To establish that property seized from a person because it may be associated with a suspected drug crime is not subject to forfeiture unless the individual is actually convicted. The bill would also prohibit officials from requiring a person to negotiate for return of their property.
However, the conviction requirement would only apply to forfeitures of less than $50,000 (meaning police and prosecutors could still take and keep those assets using a lower burden of proof).
Introduced by Rep. Peter Lucido (R) on February 2, 2017
Passed 83 to 26 in the House on May 8, 2018.
See Who Voted – Yes / No – below to establish that property seized from a person because it may be associated with a suspected drug crime is not subject to forfeiture unless an individual is actually convicted.
|Brinks (D)||Byrd (D)||Camilleri (D)||Chang (D)||Clemente (D)|
|Durhal (D)||Ellison (D)||Garrett (D)||Gay-Dagnogo (D)||Geiss (D)|
|Greig (D)||Hammoud (D)||Hertel (D)||Hoadley (D)||Jones (D)|
|LaGrand (D)||Lasinski (D)||Liberati (D)||Moss (D)||Pagan (D)|
|Peterson (D)||Phelps (D)||Rabhi (D)||Robinson (D)||Scott (D)|
|Singh (D)||Sneller (D)||Sowerby (D)||Wittenberg (D)||Zemke (D)|
|Afendoulis (R)||Albert (R)||Alexander (R)||Allor (R)||Barrett (R)|
|Bellino (R)||Bizon (R)||Brann (R)||Calley (R)||Canfield (R)|
|Chatfield (R)||Cole (R)||Farrington (R)||Frederick (R)||Glenn (R)|
|Griffin (R)||Hauck (R)||Hernandez (R)||Hoitenga (R)||Hornberger (R)|
|Howell (R)||Howrylak (R)||Hughes (R)||Iden (R)||Inman (R)|
|Johnson (R)||Kahle (R)||Kelly (R)||LaFave (R)||Lauwers (R)|
|Leonard (R)||Leutheuser (R)||Lilly (R)||Lower (R)||Lucido (R)|
|Marino (R)||McCready (R)||Noble (R)||Pagel (R)||Reilly (R)|
|Rendon (R)||Roberts (R)||Runestad (R)||Sheppard (R)||Tedder (R)|
|Theis (R)||VanderWall (R)||VanSingel (R)||Vaupel (R)||Verheulen (R)|
|Wentworth (R)||Whiteford (R)||Yaroch (R)|
|Cambensy (D)||Chirkun (D)||Cochran (D)||Dianda (D)||Elder (D)|
|Faris (D)||Green (D)||Greimel (D)||Guerra (D)||Kosowski (D)|
|Love (D)||Neeley (D)||Sabo (D)||Santana (D)||Yancey (D)|
|Cox (R)||Crawford (R)||Garcia (R)||Graves (R)||Kesto (R)|
|LaSata (R)||Maturen (R)||Miller (R)||Victory (R)||Webber (R)|
See the Michigan House Judiciary Committee hearing on Asset Forfeiture legislation on HOUSE TELEVISION
Komorn Law has represented numerous clients through the legal chaos of starting up a business in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Industry.
If you or someone you know is facing charges as a result of Medical Marijuana, DUI, Drugs, Forfeiture, Criminal Enterprise, etc. Please contact our office and ensure you’re defended by an experienced lawyer in the evolving laws.
Lead attorney Michael Komorn is recognized as an expert on the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. He is the President of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Association (MMMA), a nonprofit patient advocacy group which advocates for the rights of medical marijuana patients and their caregivers.
Contact us for a free no-obligation case evaluation