About Komorn Law

"The best defense is a better offense"

Choosing the right legal defense team may be one of the most important decisions you’ll ever make.

Michael A. Komorn, Esq.

Lead Trial Attorney

Komorn Law, PLLC
30903 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 240
Farmington Hills, MI 48334
(248) 357-2550

Komorn Law PLLC

Established 1993

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, district, circuit, supreme and the federal court systems. Attorney Michael Komorn has a mature understanding of the inner workings of the trial and the appeals process.

Komorn has successfully represented Michigan clients in cases involving DUI, OUI homicide, child custody, gun restoration, professional license restoration, criminal charges, criminal enterprise, medical marihuana patients and caregivers, doctors, driving while high, drug charges, maintaining a drug house, etc.

Komorn is recognized as the leading consultant and defense attorney with a relentless pursuit for the rights of individuals regarding the laws enacted by the people of Michigan regarding the Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA) and Michigan Marijuana Facilities Act (MMFL).

He is a member of the American Bar Association (ABA), NACDL, Recorders Court Bar Association and winner of the 2016 CDAM award. He also provides mentoring for juvenile clients who have had involvement with the criminal justice system.

Komorn has represented clients in numerous jury trials and his appellate work includes several published cases.

With dozens of victories and expert litigator in criminal law defense, Michael and his team take an aggressive approach toward all issues on every case, giving our clients an edge through the legal system.

Do your research – Just Google Michael Komorn to learn more. Then call our firm confidently knowing that we will fight to the end for you.

Call Our Office For A Free Case Evaluation 248-357-2550

The Mission

The mission is to provide the highest standards of legal advice and expertise with an emphasis on the client’s future.

Komorn Law has a well-earned reputation among Prosecutors, Law Enforcement Agencies and fellow Attorneys for defending our clients with the most innovative and dynamic defense strategies to ensure their rights are fully protected and favorable outcomes are achieved.

We understand that this may be one of the most difficult moments in your life. That’s why choosing the right criminal defense team may be one of the most important decisions you’ll ever make for you, your future and your family.

Attorney Michael Komorn is a member of:

State Appellate Defenders Office
Wayne County Bar Association
Oakland County Bar Association
Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan – Award 2016
State Bar of Michigan
American Bar Association
Recorders Court Bar Association
NACDL
NORML

Posts

What does Nolle Prosequi mean?

What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a significant weakness in the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor acknowledges an inability to prove the charges, or even when the prosecutor has lost...

People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)

Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against his fourteen‑year‑old daughter. The Court held that although one evidentiary error occurred, it was...

Motion in Limine vs Motion to Suppress

Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineOverview Although both a motion in limine and a motion to suppress deal with evidence, they serve very different purposes in Michigan criminal cases. Understanding the distinction is critical because each motion affects...

A Motion in Limine – What does it Mean?

Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineA motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow) specific evidence before the jury ever hears it. It’s one of the most important evidentiary tools in both criminal and civil...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Threat of Terrorism

Case Summary In People v Kvasnicka, the defendant sent a message to a young girl stating she “would not be laughing” when he came to her school to “shoot it up or blow it up like Columbine.” Charged under Michigan’s threat‑of‑terrorism statute, he argued the law was...

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a search warrant affidavit. When law enforcement places its hand on the Constitution, the law...

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the...

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Prisoner in Possession

Prisoner in Possession of a Controlled SubstanceCase Summary In People v Tadgerson, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed a critical question: does the crime of a prisoner possessing a controlled substance under MCL 800.281(4) require proof of intent, or is it a...

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from building one inference on top of another when the first inference is not supported by direct evidence....

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Murder

Case Summary In People v Jones, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed whether a single act of abuse can support convictions for both first‑degree child abuse and felony murder. The defendant argued that using the same conduct to support both charges violated...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Neglect of Duty

Case Summary In People v Harper, a Wayne County Sheriff’s deputy was charged with neglect of duty after witnessing an inmate escape during his smoke break and taking no action to stop or pursue the prisoner. The prosecution relied on the Sheriff’s Department policy...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Metallic Knuckles

Case Summary In People v Dummer, the defendant challenged Michigan’s metallic‑knuckles statute, arguing that simply possessing the weapon was protected by the Second Amendment. The Michigan Court of Appeals acknowledged that possession of metallic knuckles is...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Election Interference

Case Summary In People v Burkman, defendants created a robocall targeting African American voters during the 2020 election. The call falsely warned that mail‑in voting would expose voters to law‑enforcement tracking, debt collection, and forced vaccinations....

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...

Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?

A deadlocked jury is often called a hung jury—A deadlocked jury—often called a hung jury—occurs when jurors cannot reach the unanimous (or legally required) agreement needed to deliver a verdict. In criminal cases, most jurisdictions require unanimity. When the jury...

Social Security Scams – What to Know

The Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) have issued several warnings about ongoing Social Security scams and continue to advise caution to the public. Here are some of the popular Social Security scams to watch out for in...

Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax

Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest

People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...

Michigan Drivers Face Higher Gas Tax in 2026

Keep Pushing.Summary Michigan’s fuel‑tax structure will undergo a major statutory shift on January 1, 2026, raising the state gas tax from 31 cents to approximately 52.4 cents per gallon. The change eliminates the 6% sales tax on fuel and replaces it with a higher,...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter

Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an agitated customer and three patrons inside the store, after which the customer shot the patrons. In People v Sherrill, the defendant...

Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws

Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with cannabis tax changes, wage increases, consumer protections, and transparency laws.Michigan begins 2026 with a slate of new laws...

Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal

Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...

Coalition Forms to Support Voter Approved MRTMA

New Coalition Forms To Support Voter Approved Cannabis ActMichigan’s adult‑use cannabis framework was not created by accident. It was built through a deliberate, voter‑driven process culminating in the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA). The Act...