Obstruction Laws in Michigan

Obstruction Laws in Michigan

In Michigan, obstruction is a crime that involves interfering with law enforcement or other officials when they are trying to carry out their duties.

Obstruction can cover a wide range of actions, including lying to the police, physically interfering with an officer’s job, or helping someone else avoid arrest. Michigan law takes obstruction seriously, and it can lead to felony charges with significant penalties.

What Is Obstruction?

Under Michigan Compiled Law (MCL) 750.81d, obstruction is defined as any action that resists, opposes, or interferes with a police officer, firefighter, paramedic, or other emergency responder while they are performing their duties. This can include:

  • Physically stopping an officer from making an arrest
  • Giving false information to the police
  • Refusing to follow lawful commands
  • Tampering with evidence or hiding it from the police

The key part of the law is that obstruction makes it harder for officials to do their jobs safely and effectively. Even if you don’t touch the officer, simply not following orders or making their job more difficult can still be considered obstruction.

750.81d Assaulting, battering, resisting, obstructing, opposing person performing duty; felony; penalty; other violations; consecutive terms; definitions.

Sec. 81d.

    (1) Except as provided in subsections (2), (3), and (4), an individual who assaults, batters, wounds, resists, obstructs, opposes, or endangers a person who the individual knows or has reason to know is performing his or her duties is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $2,000.00, or both.
    (2) An individual who assaults, batters, wounds, resists, obstructs, opposes, or endangers a person who the individual knows or has reason to know is performing his or her duties causing a bodily injury requiring medical attention or medical care to that person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 4 years or a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both.
    (3) An individual who assaults, batters, wounds, resists, obstructs, opposes, or endangers a person who the individual knows or has reason to know is performing his or her duties causing a serious impairment of a body function of that person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 years or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both.
    (4) An individual who assaults, batters, wounds, resists, obstructs, opposes, or endangers a person who the individual knows or has reason to know is performing his or her duties causing the death of that person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both.
    (5) This section does not prohibit an individual from being charged with, convicted of, or punished for any other violation of law that is committed by that individual while violating this section.
    (6) A term of imprisonment imposed for a violation of this section may run consecutively to any term of imprisonment imposed for another violation arising from the same transaction.
    (7) As used in this section:
    (a) “Obstruct” includes the use or threatened use of physical interference or force or a knowing failure to comply with a lawful command.
    (b) “Person” means any of the following:
    (i) A police officer of this state or of a political subdivision of this state including, but not limited to, a motor carrier officer or capitol security officer of the department of state police.
    (ii) A police officer of a junior college, college, or university who is authorized by the governing board of that junior college, college, or university to enforce state law and the rules and ordinances of that junior college, college, or university.
    (iii) A conservation officer of the department of natural resources or the department of environmental quality.
    (iv) A conservation officer of the United States department of the interior.
    (v) A sheriff or deputy sheriff.
    (vi) A constable.
    (vii) A peace officer of a duly authorized police agency of the United States, including, but not limited to, an agent of the secret service or department of justice.
    (viii) A firefighter.
    (ix) Any emergency medical service personnel described in section 20950 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.20950.
    (x) An individual engaged in a search and rescue operation as that term is defined in section 50c.

    (c) “Serious impairment of a body function” means that term as defined in section 58c of the Michigan vehicle code, 1949 PA 300, MCL 257.58c.

Link to MCL 750.81d

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Resisting and Obstructing Officers

Michigan law, specifically Michigan Compiled Law (MCL) 750.81d, makes it a crime to obstruct, resist, or assault a police officer while they are carrying out their duties.

This law applies not only to police officers but also to firefighters, emergency medical personnel, and other authorized officials.

Resisting involves refusing to comply with lawful orders, such as resisting an arrest.

Obstruction, on the other hand, refers to actions that make it difficult or impossible for an officer to perform their duties, like lying to police, refusing to move when asked, or hiding evidence.

If you are found guilty of resisting or obstructing, you can face a felony charge. The penalties for this crime depend on the circumstances:

 

  • Basic offense: If there is no injury to the officer, the crime is punishable by up to 2 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $2,000.
  • Injury to an officer: If the officer is injured during the act of resisting or obstructing, the penalty increases to a maximum of 4 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $5,000.
  • Serious injury to an officer: If the officer suffers a serious bodily injury, the punishment increases to 15 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000.
  • Death of an officer: If the officer dies as a result of the obstruction or resistance, the offender can face up to 20 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $20,000.

Passive vs. Active Resistance

There is a distinction between passive resistance and active resistance. Passive resistance is often seen in peaceful protests, where someone might sit or stand in a location without fighting back. While still illegal, passive resistance typically results in lower penalties than active resistance, which involves physical struggle or fleeing from an officer.

Catch All

Michigan law also has a catch all law MCL 750.505

750.505 Punishment for indictable common law offenses.

Sec. 505.

     Any person who shall commit any indictable offense at the common law, for the punishment of which no provision is expressly made by any statute of this state, shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 5 years or by a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both in the discretion of the court.

Conclusion

Resisting arrest and obstructing officers in Michigan whether the resistance is passive or active, it is important to understand that interfering with law enforcement can lead to felony charges and significant penalties.

For more details, you can refer to the laws here:

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Recent

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

"Data show these programs strengthen communities by reducing crime, boosting employment"LANSING, MI, October 24, 2024 (Substance Abuse Prevention Month) – The Michigan Supreme Court announces that the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) has awarded $18,823,910...

read more
Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024: A Step Toward "Safer Communities"Michigan House Bill 5451, introduced by Representative Sharon MacDonell in February 2024, aims to enhance firearm safety in homes with children. The bill mandates that the Department of Health and...

read more

Other Articles

Prohibited person possessing firearm

Prohibited person possessing firearm

Thinking about going hunting? Not if you are a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm in Michigan.In Michigan, certain individuals are legally prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm. Being caught with a firearm if you fall under this category can...

Carrying a Concealed Weapon in Michigan

Carrying a Concealed Weapon in Michigan

Carrying a concealed weapon (CCW) in Michigan without proper authorization is a crime.Carrying a concealed weapon (CCW) in Michigan without proper authorization can lead to serious criminal charges. Michigan law has strict regulations regarding firearms, and violating...

MI Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records Dispute

MI Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records Dispute

Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records DisputeTeachers Union and School District at Odds Over Data AccessThe Michigan Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case regarding whether public school teachers' class materials are subject to the...

Felony Firearm Possession in Michigan

Felony Firearm Possession in Michigan

Felony Firearm Possession in Michigan.In Michigan, the laws surrounding firearms are strict, especially when it comes to felony firearm possession. If you’re charged with a felony and found to be in possession of a firearm during the crime, the penalties can be...

Defending against false accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct

Defending against false accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct

Defending against false accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan

Defending against a false accusation of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan is a serious matter and requires a well-prepared legal strategy.

Here are several steps you should take to protect yourself:

Hire an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney

The first and most important step is to immediately seek the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney.

A lawyer who specializes in CSC cases will know how to navigate the complexities of the legal system, protect your rights, and build a strong defense.

They will also help you avoid making mistakes that could hurt your case.

Use You Right To Remain Silent

If you have been accused or charged with a crime.
Say nothing to anyone. Talk to us first.
Our firm is experienced in both State and Federal courts defending clients.

CALL NOW

Do Not Contact the Accuser

It’s crucial to avoid contacting the person who accused you. Reaching out to the accuser could be interpreted as intimidation or harassment, and anything you say can be used against you. Communication should be handled exclusively through your attorney.

Gather Evidence and Witnesses

To defend yourself, you need to gather any evidence that supports your version of events. This can include:

  • Alibi Evidence: If you were not at the location where the alleged incident took place, collect evidence such as witness statements, surveillance footage, or phone records that show your location.
  • Electronic Communications: Text messages, emails, social media posts, or any other communication that proves the relationship between you and the accuser or contradicts the claims made.
  • Witness Testimonies: If anyone was with you or near the alleged incident, their testimony could help establish your innocence or prove the accusation is false.

Your attorney will help you collect and organize this evidence in a way that strengthens your defense.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Challenge the Accuser’s Credibility

One of the most common strategies in defending against false accusations is to challenge the credibility of the accuser. Your attorney may:  
  • Identify Motive: Investigate whether the accuser has a reason to lie, such as revenge, jealousy, or a personal vendetta.
  • Highlight Inconsistencies: Look for inconsistencies in the accuser’s statements or changes in their story over time.
  • Examine Mental Health History: If relevant, an attorney might explore whether the accuser has a history of mental health issues or false claims that could affect their reliability.

Use Forensic and Physical Evidence

Forensic evidence can be vital in proving your innocence. This can include:  
  • DNA Evidence: DNA analysis can show that no physical contact occurred between you and the accuser.
  • Phone and GPS Records: Records from your phone or other devices can help prove your whereabouts at the time of the alleged incident.
  • Security Footage: If there is surveillance footage from nearby locations, it can serve as proof that the alleged crime didn’t take place as described.

Present Character Evidence

In some cases, presenting evidence of your good character and reputation can be useful. Character witnesses—people who can testify about your integrity and behavior—might help show that it is unlikely you committed the crime. However, this is more supplementary and may not be the primary defense.

Expert Witnesses

Your attorney may call in expert witnesses to challenge the prosecution’s evidence. For example:  
  • Psychological Experts: To explain why a false accusation may have been made or to challenge the mental state of the accuser.
  • Forensic Experts: To explain scientific evidence, such as the lack of physical signs of assault, that contradicts the accuser’s claims.

Cross-Examine the Accuser

If the case goes to trial, your defense lawyer will have the opportunity to cross-examine the accuser. During this process, your attorney may expose flaws, contradictions, or exaggerations in the accuser’s testimony. This can cast doubt on the prosecution’s case and may lead to an acquittal.

Prepare for Trial

Even though many cases settle before trial, you should be prepared to go to trial if necessary. Your attorney will help you prepare for:  
  • Jury Selection: Ensuring that the jury is impartial and fair.
  • Presenting Evidence: Laying out your side of the story clearly and convincingly.
  • Testifying: If you choose to testify, your lawyer will prepare you to answer questions from both the defense and prosecution.

Stay Silent and Avoid Self-Incrimination

Until your attorney advises otherwise, avoid making statements to the police, media, or anyone else about the case. Anything you say can be used against you. Politely decline to speak without a lawyer present and let your attorney handle communication.

Conclusion

Defending against a false accusation of CSC is challenging but possible with a strong legal defense strategy. The key is working closely with an experienced attorney who can help you gather evidence, challenge the accuser’s credibility, and build a case that demonstrates your innocence. Keep calm, follow your lawyer’s guidance, and protect your rights throughout the legal process.

Note: This article provides a general overview and does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a CSC offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.

Criminal Sexual Conduct Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Can I sue for being falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct

Can I sue for being falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct

If you are innocent and falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan can you sue?

Yes, if you have been falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan and can prove that the accusations were malicious or knowingly false, you may be able to sue for damages. However, successfully suing for damages depends on several factors, including the circumstances of the false accusation, the impact it had on your life, and the evidence you can provide. Here’s how you might proceed:

Defamation Lawsuit

One of the most common ways to seek damages for a false accusation is through a defamation lawsuit. Defamation involves making false statements that harm your reputation. Defamation can be broken down into two types:
  • Libel: Written false accusations (such as social media posts, letters, or news articles).
  • Slander: Spoken false accusations.
To win a defamation case, you generally need to prove:  
  • The statement was false: The accusation against you was not true.
  • The statement was made publicly: The false accusation was communicated to others, damaging your reputation.
  • Malice or negligence: In some cases, especially if you’re a private citizen, you may need to show that the accuser acted with malice or negligence in making the false claim.
  • Damages: You suffered harm as a result, such as lost income, emotional distress, or damage to your personal or professional reputation.

Malicious Prosecution

You can also file a lawsuit for malicious prosecution if you were wrongly prosecuted based on false accusations. Malicious prosecution occurs when someone intentionally and maliciously makes a false report to law enforcement, leading to your arrest or prosecution. To succeed in a malicious prosecution claim, you need to prove:  
  • The criminal case was dismissed in your favor: You were acquitted, the charges were dropped, or you were otherwise found not guilty.
  • There was no probable cause: The accusation had no legal basis, and the accuser knew it.
  • The accuser acted with malice: The accuser acted with ill intent, intending to harm you or knowing the accusation was false.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

You may also pursue a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) if the false accusation caused you significant emotional harm. To win an IIED claim, you need to prove:  
  • Extreme and outrageous conduct: The accuser’s actions were so outrageous that they go beyond what is acceptable in society.
  • Intent: The accuser intended to cause you emotional distress or acted with reckless disregard for your well-being.
  • Severe emotional distress: You suffered severe emotional or psychological harm as a result of the false accusation.

False Imprisonment

If the false accusation led to your arrest and detention, you might have a claim for false imprisonment. This legal claim involves being unlawfully detained without proper legal justification. To win this claim, you need to prove:  
  • You were detained without consent: You were held in custody against your will.
  • The detention was unlawful: The arrest or imprisonment was based on false accusations and without legal grounds.
Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Damages You Can Seek

If your lawsuit is successful, you may be able to recover a range of damages, including:  
  • Lost Wages and Income: Compensation for wages you lost due to wrongful arrest, imprisonment, or reputational damage that affected your ability to work.
  • Emotional Distress: Damages for emotional pain, suffering, anxiety, or depression caused by the false accusation.
  • Reputation Damage: Compensation for harm to your personal or professional reputation.
  • Legal Fees: Recovery of costs associated with defending yourself in court against the false accusations.
  • Punitive Damages: In some cases, if the accuser acted maliciously, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the accuser and deter similar behavior in the future.

Challenges to Suing for Damages

Suing for damages after a false accusation can be difficult, especially if the accuser believed the accusation to be true or if it was a case of mistaken identity. To succeed in your claim, you must prove the accuser acted with malice or gross negligence. If the accuser cooperated with law enforcement and provided evidence in good faith, suing them may be more challenging.

Conclusion

If you were falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct and suffered damages as a result, you may be able to pursue legal action. Common claims include defamation, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. However, proving these claims requires clear evidence that the accusation was knowingly false or made with malice. Consulting with an experienced attorney is critical to evaluating your options and determining the best course of action.

Note: This article provides a general overview and does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a CSC offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.

Criminal Sexual Conduct Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Recent

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

"Data show these programs strengthen communities by reducing crime, boosting employment"LANSING, MI, October 24, 2024 (Substance Abuse Prevention Month) – The Michigan Supreme Court announces that the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) has awarded $18,823,910...

read more
Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024: A Step Toward "Safer Communities"Michigan House Bill 5451, introduced by Representative Sharon MacDonell in February 2024, aims to enhance firearm safety in homes with children. The bill mandates that the Department of Health and...

read more
Resisting Arrest in Michigan

Resisting Arrest in Michigan

In Michigan, resisting arrest is a serious crime. Under Michigan Compiled Law (MCL) 750.81d, it is illegal to resist or obstruct a police officer or any other law enforcement official when they are performing their duties. This law doesn’t only apply to police officers but also to firefighters, paramedics, and other emergency personnel.

Beside obstruction of “Justice” – This is a favorite of government officials to throw on for any reason they see fit. It may be that they are just having a bad day and you did not submit like a wet noodle.

Charged with resisting arrest?

The first and most important step is to immediately seek the help of an experienced criminal defense trial attorney. Because a trial is where you may have to take it and it won’t be cheap.

A lawyer who specializes in Resisting and Obstructing cases will know how to navigate the complexities of the legal system, protect your rights, and build a strong defense.

They will also help you avoid making mistakes that could hurt your case.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Levels of Obstruction and Resisting Arrest in Michigan

In Michigan, the law deals with obstruction and resisting arrest through a range of actions that can interfere with a law enforcement officer’s duties. These actions are illegal and are taken seriously by the courts. Michigan law outlines several levels of offenses for obstruction and resisting arrest, depending on the severity of the act and the resulting consequences.

Resisting and Obstructing Officers

Michigan law, specifically Michigan Compiled Law (MCL) 750.81d, makes it a crime to obstruct, resist, or assault a police officer while they are carrying out their duties.

This law applies not only to police officers but also to firefighters, emergency medical personnel, and other authorized officials.

Resisting involves refusing to comply with lawful orders, such as resisting an arrest.

Obstruction, on the other hand, refers to actions that make it difficult or impossible for an officer to perform their duties, like lying to police, refusing to move when asked, or hiding evidence.

If you are found guilty of resisting or obstructing, you can face a felony charge. The penalties for this crime depend on the circumstances:

 

  • Basic offense: If there is no injury to the officer, the crime is punishable by up to 2 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $2,000.
  • Injury to an officer: If the officer is injured during the act of resisting or obstructing, the penalty increases to a maximum of 4 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $5,000.
  • Serious injury to an officer: If the officer suffers a serious bodily injury, the punishment increases to 15 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $10,000.
  • Death of an officer: If the officer dies as a result of the obstruction or resistance, the offender can face up to 20 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $20,000.

Passive vs. Active Resistance

There is a distinction between passive resistance and active resistance. Passive resistance is often seen in peaceful protests, where someone might sit or stand in a location without fighting back. While still illegal, passive resistance typically results in lower penalties than active resistance, which involves physical struggle or fleeing from an officer.

Conclusion

Resisting arrest and obstructing officers in Michigan whether the resistance is passive or active, it is important to understand that interfering with law enforcement can lead to felony charges and significant penalties.

For more details, you can refer to the Michigan Compiled Laws:

Understanding these laws can help prevent situations that might lead to arrest or additional charges.

Recent

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

"Data show these programs strengthen communities by reducing crime, boosting employment"LANSING, MI, October 24, 2024 (Substance Abuse Prevention Month) – The Michigan Supreme Court announces that the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) has awarded $18,823,910...

read more
Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024: A Step Toward "Safer Communities"Michigan House Bill 5451, introduced by Representative Sharon MacDonell in February 2024, aims to enhance firearm safety in homes with children. The bill mandates that the Department of Health and...

read more

Other Articles

Prohibited person possessing firearm

Prohibited person possessing firearm

Thinking about going hunting? Not if you are a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm in Michigan.In Michigan, certain individuals are legally prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm. Being caught with a firearm if you fall under this category can...

Carrying a Concealed Weapon in Michigan

Carrying a Concealed Weapon in Michigan

Carrying a concealed weapon (CCW) in Michigan without proper authorization is a crime.Carrying a concealed weapon (CCW) in Michigan without proper authorization can lead to serious criminal charges. Michigan law has strict regulations regarding firearms, and violating...

MI Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records Dispute

MI Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records Dispute

Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records DisputeTeachers Union and School District at Odds Over Data AccessThe Michigan Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case regarding whether public school teachers' class materials are subject to the...

Felony Firearm Possession in Michigan

Felony Firearm Possession in Michigan

Felony Firearm Possession in Michigan.In Michigan, the laws surrounding firearms are strict, especially when it comes to felony firearm possession. If you’re charged with a felony and found to be in possession of a firearm during the crime, the penalties can be...

Probable Cause v Reasonable Suspicion

Probable Cause v Reasonable Suspicion

What’s the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion?

Definition of Probable Cause

Probable cause refers to the belief held by a reasonable person that a crime is currently being committed, has already been committed, or is likely to be committed in the near future.

Legal Repercussions of Probable Cause – Probable cause serves as the necessary foundation for obtaining a search or arrest warrant and empowers a police officer to make an arrest if a crime is witnessed in progress.

Definition of Reasonable Suspicion

Reasonable suspicion has been defined by the United States Supreme Court as “the sort of common-sense conclusion about human behavior upon which practical people . . . are entitled to rely.”

Further, it has defined reasonable suspicion as requiring only something more than an “unarticulated hunch.” It requires facts or circumstances that give rise to more than a bare, imaginary, or purely conjectural suspicion.

Reasonable suspicion means that any reasonable person would suspect that a crime was in the process of being committed, had been committed or was going to be committed very soon.

Legal Repercussions of Reasonable Suspicion – When an officer has reasonable suspicion in a given situation, they are permitted to briefly detain or frisk the suspect.

However, reasonable suspicion alone does not authorize a full search of a person or their vehicle unless the individual is on school property.

It is important to note that reasonable suspicion does not provide sufficient grounds for an arrest or for obtaining a search warrant.

The Difference Between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion

It is common for individuals to confuse the terms probable cause and reasonable suspicion, yet each has distinct implications that affect a person’s rights, the appropriate law enforcement procedures, and the overall outcome of an encounter with police.

Reasonable suspicion serves as a preliminary step prior to establishing probable cause; it indicates that there is a belief a crime may have occurred. This situation transitions into probable cause when the evidence suggests that a crime has most likely taken place.

Stop and Frisk

In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the court recognized that a limited stop and frisk of an individual could be conducted without a warrant based on less than probable cause.

The stop must be based on a reasonable, individualized suspicion based on articulable facts, and the frisk is limited to a pat-down for weapons.

An anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun is not, by itself, sufficient to justify a stop and frisk. Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000).

Florida v. Bostick 501 U.S. 429, 437 (1991) – A person’s refusal to cooperate is not sufficient for reasonable suspicion.

Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124-25 (2000). – A person’s flight in a high crime area after seeing police was sufficient for reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

The same requirement of founded suspicion for a “person” stop applies to stops of individual vehicles.

United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002). The scope of the “frisk” for weapons during a vehicle stop may include areas of the vehicle in which a weapon may be placed or hidden.

Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983). The police may order passengers and the driver out of or into the vehicle pending completion of the stop.

Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997). The passengers may not be detained longer than it takes the driver to receive his citation. Once the driver is ready to leave, the passengers must be permitted to go as well.

During a stop for traffic violations, the officers need not independently have reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot to justify frisking passengers, but they must have reason to believe the passengers are armed and dangerous. Arizona v. Johnson, 129 S Court. 781, 784 (2009).

Legal Counsel and Your Rights

When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.

An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.

Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.

Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.

Research us and then call us.

Recent

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

"Data show these programs strengthen communities by reducing crime, boosting employment"LANSING, MI, October 24, 2024 (Substance Abuse Prevention Month) – The Michigan Supreme Court announces that the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) has awarded $18,823,910...

read more
Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024

Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024: A Step Toward "Safer Communities"Michigan House Bill 5451, introduced by Representative Sharon MacDonell in February 2024, aims to enhance firearm safety in homes with children. The bill mandates that the Department of Health and...

read more

Other Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.