$700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson – What’s Your Cut?

$700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson – What’s Your Cut?

Attorney General Nessel Reaches $700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson

Your mom and your dad have been covering you with Johnson and Johnson powder since you were a baby. There was always a cloud of powder in the air as they slapped it on you.

It got all over your face and hands and you both carried it throughout the house.  You could taste it because it got in your mouth from breathing it in.  You’ve been using it all your life, you still have some in your closet. You still use it today.

What’s your cut of the $700 Million and why didn’t they ban it from use long ago? 

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Here is the news release from the government.

Attorney General Nessel Reaches $700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson

June 11, 2024

LANSING – Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and 42 other attorneys general reached a $700 million nationwide settlement to resolve allegations related to the marketing of Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder and body powder products that contained talc.

The consent judgment (PDF) filed in this lawsuit addresses allegations that Johnson & Johnson deceptively promoted and misled consumers in advertisements related to the safety and purity of some of its talc powder products. As part of the lawsuit, Johnson & Johnson has agreed to stop the manufacture and sale of its baby powder and body powder products that contain talc in the United States.

“Product safety should be a top priority for every company in every sector, but especially an historic, trusted brand selling baby care products,” said Nessel. “Misleading Michigan consumers will not be tolerated, no matter how large or well-known the corporate perpetrator. We will stand up for consumer safety in our state, and I’m appreciative for our many bipartisan partners on this litigation throughout the country.”

Johnson & Johnson sold such products for more than 100 years. After the coalition of states began investigating, the company stopped distributing and selling these products in the United States and more recently ended global sales. While this lawsuit targeted the deceptive marketing of these products, numerous other lawsuits filed by private plaintiffs in class actions raised allegations that talc causes serious health issues including mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.

Under the consent judgment, Johnson & Johnson:

  • Has ceased and not resumed the manufacturing, marketing, promotion, sale, and distribution of all baby and body powder products and cosmetic powder products that contain talcum powder, including, but not limited to, Johnson’s Baby Powder and Johnson & Johnson’s Shower to Shower (“Covered Products”) in the United States.
  • Shall permanently stop the manufacture of any Covered Products in the United States either directly, or indirectly through any third party.
  • Shall permanently stop the marketing and promotion of any Covered Products in the United States either directly, or indirectly through any third party.
  • Shall permanently stop the sale or distribution of any Covered Products in the United States either directly, or indirectly through any third party.

As part of the settlement, Michigan will receive $20,615,040.58. This settlement is pending judicial approval.

Michigan is joined on the multistate settlement by the attorneys general of Texas, Florida, and North Carolina, as well as Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

Some laws in effect in 2025 "Enacted by the People of Michigan" Here we go...Minimum wage Improved Workforce Opportunity Wage Act - Michigan's minimum wage will increase twice during 2025, per a 2018 Supreme Court ruling. Starting Jan. 1, 2025, the standard minimum...

read more
The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

Everything you have and say will be evidence used against you. The Police took your cellphone - Now what?After your arrest, you arrive at the police station where you go through the booking process, and your cellphone is taken from you. Once you are released, your...

read more

Read it Consent Judgement PDF

  • Where does the money go?
  • Are you eligible for some of that government windfall?
  • How do you prove that you used the powder and the link to your disease?
  • Got a lifetime of receipts?
  • Got pictures of you using it daily?

Here are some possible answers at Forbes.com

The answer is millions of consumers will pay more for products and J&J will make it up in a year and probably another robbery just occured.

Other Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

I got a DUI while driving my dad’s boat – Will they take it?

I got a DUI while driving my dad’s boat – Will they take it?

I was out driving my dad’s boat on the lake and I got caught drinking. Can they take the boat away from my dad who was not with me?

Happy Father’s Day – Dad

No, in most cases, they likely won’t take your dad’s boat away for you getting a DUI while driving it.

They Could Tow it and impound it if there is no one sober there and that will cost you a bundle.

However, there could be some consequences for your dad depending on the specifics:

  • Repossession for fines: If the fines associated with your DUI are very high, the court could potentially order the boat to be sold to pay them off, but this is uncommon.
  • Insurance issues: A DUI could raise your dad’s boat insurance rates, or the company might even cancel the policy altogether. Without insurance, the boat couldn’t be legally operated.

The bigger issue here is you and the DUI. Boating under the influence (BUİ) is a serious offense in Michigan, similar to a DUI on land.

Here are some resources you might find helpful:

  • Information on Michigan BUIs: [Michigan boating under the influence ON Michigan.gov (.gov) michigan.gov]
  • Help and resources for DUIs: [National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (.gov) nhtsa.gov]

But here is the real resource you will need.
The phone number to my office.

Komorn Law 248-357-2550

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

Some laws in effect in 2025 "Enacted by the People of Michigan" Here we go...Minimum wage Improved Workforce Opportunity Wage Act - Michigan's minimum wage will increase twice during 2025, per a 2018 Supreme Court ruling. Starting Jan. 1, 2025, the standard minimum...

read more
The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

Everything you have and say will be evidence used against you. The Police took your cellphone - Now what?After your arrest, you arrive at the police station where you go through the booking process, and your cellphone is taken from you. Once you are released, your...

read more

Other Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Seattle settles case involving – the rights of nature

Seattle settles case involving – the rights of nature

The Rights of Nature

Seattle settled a lawsuit brought by the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe on behalf of salmon harmed by dams on the Skagit River. This is one of the first “rights of nature” cases in the US, and the tribe argued that the lack of fish passage measures violated the salmon’s rights. Seattle agreed to include fish passage facilities in its application to renew its license to operate the dams.

Lake Erie Bill of Rights adopted by Toledo, Ohio, in 2019 was intended to protect the lake from pollution. The law gave Lake Erie legal standing and gave Toledo, Ohio, and its residents the right to sue on the lake’s behalf.

Here are some relevant articles:

  • Press Release: City of Seattle Settles “Rights of Nature” Case Filed by the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe – Agrees to Create Fish Passage Through Skagit River Dams Center for Democratic and Environmental Rights
  • Seattle settles case involving ‘rights of nature,‘ a theory gaining steam in other countries ABA Journal
Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

Some laws in effect in 2025 "Enacted by the People of Michigan" Here we go...Minimum wage Improved Workforce Opportunity Wage Act - Michigan's minimum wage will increase twice during 2025, per a 2018 Supreme Court ruling. Starting Jan. 1, 2025, the standard minimum...

read more
The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

Everything you have and say will be evidence used against you. The Police took your cellphone - Now what?After your arrest, you arrive at the police station where you go through the booking process, and your cellphone is taken from you. Once you are released, your...

read more

Other Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

It’s their corner now

“This punishment should serve as a clear warning for all unlicensed cannabis stores in the state: we will enforce the law and shut down your operations,” state Attorney General Letitia James said

The owner of seven unlicensed cannabis shops in New York, known for hosting an Easter egg hunt as part of their promotions, has been fined over $15 million by state officials for repeatedly disregarding orders to cease operations without proper approval.

A state Supreme Court justice in Lyons, New York, levied a fine against David Tulley on Wednesday. Acting Justice Richard Healy ordered Tulley to pay 90% of his gross sales from February 2022 to May 2023, along with $10,000 for each day he operated without licenses.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Other Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

IRS 280E and Cannabis Businesses

What is IRS Section 280E?

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code restricts businesses from deducting typical business expenses from their gross income related to the distribution of Schedule I or II substances per the Controlled Substances Act.

But you still have to pay taxes on it.

Komorn Law PLLC: Your Partner in Strategic Growth

At Komorn Law PLLC, we understand the importance of aligning business strategies with the latest regulatory and tax developments. Our expertise in cannabis law enables us to provide tailored advice that anticipates shifts in the regulatory landscape and leverages them for our clients’ benefit. We encourage cannabis businesses to consult with our team to navigate these changes effectively, ensuring they are positioned to capitalize on new opportunities in a more favorable legal environment.

Strategic Tax Planning for Cannabis Businesses in the New Regulatory Era

As legal professionals at Komorn Law PLLC deeply engaged with the evolving landscape of cannabis law, we are at the forefront of advising and representing businesses navigating these changes.

The recent recommendation by Attorney General Merrick Garland to reclassify cannabis from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance marks a pivotal shift, promising significant legal and financial implications for the industry.

Decoding the Reclassification Benefits

Cannabis, currently grouped with substances like heroin under Schedule I, has faced disproportionately stringent regulations. This reclassification to Schedule III, which includes less stringently controlled substances such as ketamine and testosterone, rectifies a longstanding regulatory misalignment. It acknowledges cannabis’s lower risk compared to many Schedule II drugs that have contributed to widespread public health issues.

For cannabis businesses, the most immediate benefit of this shift is the potential alleviation from the severe limitations imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 280E. Currently, businesses involved with Schedule I substances are denied the ability to deduct typical business expenses, drastically increasing their tax burden. The reclassification promises to normalize tax treatments, significantly reducing effective tax rates and enhancing overall business profitability.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Navigating Beyond IRC 280E

While overcoming IRC 280E is a significant victory, it is just one piece of the tax puzzle for cannabis businesses. Many such businesses operate as C corporations, subjecting them to a flat 21% federal income tax rate on profits, with an additional tax on dividends paid to shareholders. This double taxation framework can lead to an effective tax rate nearing 44.8% at the federal level alone, not including potential state and local taxes.

Given the inherent tax challenges in the C corporation structure, especially regarding asset sales, Komorn Law PLLC advises a strategic reassessment of business structures. The sale of assets by a C corporation incurs federal, state, and local taxes on gains, followed by further taxation of the distributed dividends, compounding the financial burden.

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

New Laws in Effect for Michigan in 2025

Some laws in effect in 2025 "Enacted by the People of Michigan" Here we go...Minimum wage Improved Workforce Opportunity Wage Act - Michigan's minimum wage will increase twice during 2025, per a 2018 Supreme Court ruling. Starting Jan. 1, 2025, the standard minimum...

read more
The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

The Police Took Your Cellphone – Now What?

Everything you have and say will be evidence used against you. The Police took your cellphone - Now what?After your arrest, you arrive at the police station where you go through the booking process, and your cellphone is taken from you. Once you are released, your...

read more

Advising on Strategic Business Realignments

With the regulatory changes on the horizon, it’s critical for cannabis businesses to reevaluate their entity structure. Transitioning from a C corporation to an S corporation or a partnership offers several advantages, primarily the elimination of double taxation on distributions. This can be significantly more tax-efficient, particularly when considering the sale or transfer of business assets.

For businesses anticipating an increase in value following the reclassification, it is crucial to implement these structural changes before this appreciation occurs. Such proactive adjustments can optimize tax efficiencies and enhance the business’s long-term financial health.

Contact Komorn Law for More Insight

At Komorn Law we specialize in cannabis law, providing strategic advice that anticipates regulatory shifts and leverages them for our clients’ advantage.

Consult with our team to navigate changes effectively and position yourself to capitalize on new opportunities in a more favorable legal environment.

Other Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.