New Michigan marijuana proposal: What would change if it passes

New Michigan marijuana proposal: What would change if it passes

Amid concerns about minority businesses being left out and general frustration with the pace at which Michigan is moving on both the medical and recreational marijuana fronts, a group of organizations with marijuana business interests is preparing legislation they hope will make significant changes in how the market will operate.

Their sweeping proposal —  which will face a tough climb in the Legislature because some changes would require a super-majority vote — would make the “gifting” of marijuana illegal; fundamentally change the caregiver system that has been in place since 2008 when voters legalized marijuana for medical use; reimpose the 3 percent excise tax on medical marijuana that ended on March 6; allow medical marijuana dispensaries to begin immediately selling marijuana for adult recreational use; require people who grow their own marijuana to register any heavy equipment they use with their local community, and allow unlicensed dispensaries to continue to operate through the end of the year.

“We’re not trying to circumvent how recreational will operate,” said Eric Foster, a consultant with Banks & Company in Southfield, which has a number of marijuana business clients. “We’re just trying to accelerate the market and address some of the concerns from local government.”

Besides Banks & Company, the groups involved in developing the bills are the Florida-based Minorities for Medical Marijuana; Cannas Capital, a Muskegon insurance and investment agency that specializes in cannabis businesses; Michigan Economic Stimulus Fund, a Kalamazoo-based cannabis consulting firm and the Lake Newaygo County chapter of the NAACP.

Applicants for marijuana business licenses have been frustrated by the pace and inconsistency in action taken by the state Medical Marijuana Licensing Board. Since the state started awarding licenses last summer, only 121 licenses have been approved. Of those license approvals, 105 — 31 growers, 11 processors, 54 dispensaries, four testing labs and 5 transporters — have paid their state regulatory assessments and actually been awarded licenses. The state has denied 41 license applications, as well as 125 applications seeking preliminary approval.

Minority groups have especially been worried that they’ll be left out of the lucrative market. The state doesn’t keep statistics on the demographics of people who have been granted or denied licenses, but many Detroit-based marijuana businesses have been denied licenses.

The organizations have one potential sponsor in the legislature and is looking for others.

Rep. Ronnie Peterson, D-Ypsilanti, has met with the group and is interested in sponsoring some aspects of the proposal, but said there are other areas that need to be addressed too that aren’t included in the initial plan.

“How do the communities benefit from these businesses beyond the taxes? And we still have no legislation dealing with banking and community reinvestment programs,” he said, referring to the fact that the marijuana business is almost all done in cash, because the federal government still considers marijuana an illegal substance and banks don’t want to risk their license by accepting proceeds from pot sales.

Sen. Jeff Irwin, D-Ann Arbor, was involved in developing and campaigning for the November ballot proposal that voters approved, legalizing marijuana for adult recreational use. He doesn’t think the legislation has much of a chance in the Legislature. First, several aspects would need super-majority votes from ¾ of both the House and Senate because the bills would change voter-approved proposals, including getting rid of the current caregiver system from the 2008 medical marijuana ballot proposal and eliminating the “gifting” services that have popped up since the legal weed proposal passed last year.

And second, he said, such sweeping changes are premature.

“The citizens just overwhelming passed Proposal 1,” Irwin said. “I think we have an obligation to the citizens to let it work and see how it works before we start talking about changing it.”

He also questions the motives of those pushing the legislation.

“There is a certain group of deep-pocketed people and people from out of state who are already invested in the cannabis industry who want the Legislature to build a little walled garden so that they can make a lot of money off of Michigan consumers,” he said. “Anytime you have the Legislature trying to rope off an industry for a small group of people, I find that very dangerous.”

Some lawmakers tried to change the marijuana legalization law after the election, by outlawing home-grown marijuana, but the measure never came close to having enough support and never got a vote.

Medical marijuana caregivers would go away

The biggest change would be scrapping the caregiver system, which was created after the 2008 vote to legalize medical marijuana and allows each registered caregiver to grow up to 72 plant for six medical marijuana cardholders. The proposal would get rid of that category in favor of less expensive transitional licenses for smaller marijuana grow operations, and potentially open the market up to more minority business owners.

In Michigan, there are more than nearly 293,000 medical marijuana cardholders and 41,440 registered caregivers. The caregivers have been selling their excess marijuana to dispensaries, but after March 31, the caregivers will only be able to sell their overages to licensed growers and processors.

Peterson said it would be beneficial to allow caregivers to more easily transition to the licensed market without having the same regulatory expenses – a $6,000 state application fee, a $10,000 regulatory assessment and the ability to show $250,000 in assets. “These small shops should be able to compete with some type of entry level license because having to show $250,000 or a half a million in assets isn’t fair.”

Irwin said, however, that the November ballot proposal already created another class of license for “micro businesses,” that don’t carry the same large expenses.

This proposal would require a ¾ vote because it changes the 2008 ballot proposal on medical marijuana.

The proposed legislation would also allow unlicensed dispensaries that are awaiting a license from the state to continue to operate through the end of 2019. But those dispensaries, which have faced a variety of deadlines to get a license or shut down, are now facing a hard March 31 deadline.

3 percent excise tax would be revived

Foster said the 3 percent excise tax on medical marijuana should be reinstated as an incentive to communities to allow legal medical weed businesses in their towns because a portion of those revenues would come back to the communities. The language to remove the tax was included in the Legislature’s 2016 laws that regulated and taxed medical marijuana and stipulated that if recreational marijuana was legalized, the excise tax on medical marijuana would disappear. Medical marijuana is still subject to the state’s 6 percent sales tax. When recreational marijuana becomes commercially available for sale early next year, it will carry a 10 percent excise tax, along with the 6 percent sales tax.

Irwin said it will be a hard sell to convince lawmakers to reimpose a tax on those using  medical marijuana.

‘Gifting’ of marijuana would be eliminated

In an attempt to tamp down the black market for marijuana, the proposed package would make “gifting” of marijuana illegal. Under the November ballot proposal, individuals can grow up to 12 plants for their personal use. They can give that product away, but not sell it. As a result, “gifting” services, which skirt the letter of the law, have cropped up across Michigan in which a person can pay $55 or more for a muffin and some juice or a T-shirt and get a gram of marijuana or a vape cartridge as a gift.

This also will need a ¾ vote in the Legislature because it changes a provision of the November ballot proposal.

Recreational marijuana sales would start immediately

The state has until December to come up with the rules and regulations that will govern the recreational marijuana market and then begin to accept applications for licenses for marijuana businesses.

But under the legislation that’s being drafted, medical marijuana dispensaries would be able to immediately begin selling recreational marijuana to people 21 and older, even before the regulations are developed by the state, Foster said.

That could pose problems for the state. In other states where recreational marijuana is legal, there are different standards and dosages for medical and recreational marijuana. Those standards haven’t been developed yet for the recreational market in Michigan.

Citing safety concerns, Peterson said he’s in favor of another provision in the proposed package that would require home growers to register any heavy equipment they use to grow marijuana with their local community.

“Particularly in urban cities, you could have five or six people growing in one block,” he said. “I’m very concerned about that.”

Foster said the bills are expected to be drafted and introduced in the next couple of weeks once sponsors have been identified.

The state Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs is taking a wait and see attitude on the proposals.

“We appreciate and evaluate input offered from all stakeholders,” said LARA spokesman David Harns. “If the proposal is introduced into the legislative system, we’ll take an in-depth look into it at that time.”

Kathleen Gray covers the marijuana industry for the Detroit Free Press. Contact her: 313-223-4430, kgray99@freepress.com or on Twitter @michpoligal.

——-

Let the circle of greed and control begin to close to completion.

Cerebral Palsy approved as Condition for Medical Marijuana Patients

Cerebral Palsy approved as Condition for Medical Marijuana Patients

March 11, 2019 – The Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) has approved adding Cerebral Palsy to the list of debilitating medical conditions set forth in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act of 2008.

Cerebral Palsy was approved by LARA after the Medical Marihuana Review Panel members unanimously recommended approval.

LARA also denied the condition of Chronic Aggressive Behavior after panel members unanimously recommended denial.

The Medical Marihuana Review Panel made their recommendations to the department after receiving citizen comments in February related to the petitions to add these conditions to the list of debilitating medical conditions identified in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MCL 333.26423). The approval or denial of the petitions by the department are considered final department actions.

Effective immediately, Cerebral Palsy is now added to the following current list of debilitating medical conditions already approved for medical marijuana in Michigan:

  • Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
  • Agitation of Alzheimer’s disease
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
  • Arthritis
  • Autism
  • Cancer
  • Chronic Pain
  • Colitis
  • Crohn’s Disease
  • Glaucoma
  • Hepatitis C
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Nail Patella
  • Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
  • Parkinson’s Disease
  • Positive status for Human Immunodeficiency Virus
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Tourette’s Syndrome
  • Ulcerative Colitis
  • A chronic or debilitating disease or medical condition or its treatment that produces one or more of the following:
    • Cachexia or Wasting Syndrome
    • Severe and Chronic Pain
    • Severe Nausea
    • Seizures, including but not limited to those characteristic of epilepsy
    • Severe and persistent muscle spasms, including but not limited to those characteristic of multiple sclerosis

MI Attorney General Drops Marijuana Charges Against Four Defendants

MI Attorney General Drops Marijuana Charges Against Four Defendants

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, Feb. 25, 2019

LANSING – Citing weak cases and changing laws, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel will this week move to dismiss all the charges against four defendants in two of the three marijuana cases pending in the office’s Criminal Division, and will offer pleas to reduced charges to most of the remaining defendants in all three cases.

“We are focusing all of our efforts and resources on the truly bad actors and those who have non-marijuana related charges,” said Nessel. “They will be held accountable and we will pursue them.”

With that said, added Nessel, “Juries don’t want to convict people on charges concerning something that is now legal,” referring to Michigan’s recent change to legalize recreational marijuana.

“The dismissals against some of the defendants in these cases also reflect that they either were not major players in these marijuana cases or that the evidence is simply insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they committed the charged crimes” said Nessel.

The Attorney General will be moving to dismiss all the charges against the following defendants in the following two cases:

People v Mark Sochacki, Terra Sochacki, James Amsdill, Debra Amsdill, Amanda Amsdill – St. Clair County Circuit Court

  • Mark Sochacki. Charged with felony delivery/manufacture of marijuana.
  • Terra Sochacki. Charged with felony delivery/manufacture of marijuana.
  • Amanda Amsdill. Charged with conducting a criminal enterprise.

People v Landon Boggs, Tyler Stanley, Ronald Earley, William Stewart, Robert Bruton, Nichole Lathers, Mark Hanna, Daniel McCready and John Lougheed – Hillsdale County Circuit Court, Jackson County Circuit Court

  • Noelle Lathers. Charged with 2 counts of felony delivery/manufacture of marijuana and 2 counts of felony conspiracy to deliver/manufacture marijuana.

In the third case, People v Darryl Berry and Johnny Cooper, Genesee County Circuit Court and Livingston County Court (Berry only), there will be no dismissals at this time, but there may be an offer to allow a plea to reduced charges.

The law enforcement agencies involved in each of the listed cases has already been contacted by the Attorney General regarding the office’s new position on the pending cases.

Case Dismissed Against Man Charged With Growing Pot

Case Dismissed Against Man Charged With Growing Pot

Case Dismissed Against Man Charged With Growing Pot

Feb 28, 2019 – Charges have been dropped against a local man accused of illegally growing large quantities of marijuana.

45-year-old Anthony Portelli of Whitmore Lake, along with two other men, was charged almost four years ago with various counts of delivering and manufacturing marijuana. The case against the men has spanned years, with motions alleging various medical marijuana defenses being held in abeyance.

At a status conference Thursday, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the case against Portelli and a motion to do so was granted by a Livingston County Circuit Court judge. In an email to WHMI Prosecutor Bill Vailliencourt stated, “In light of the legalization of recreational marijuana in Michigan, we determined that it was no longer an appropriate use of resources to proceed.”

The charges against Portelli, Jeffrey Mote of South Lyon and Richard Lee Riley of Brighton were filed in 2015, following a police raid in 2013 at an alleged marijuana dispensary in Brighton Township and two other homes. Authorities had claimed that Portelli managed the dispensary, Riley grew the marijuana plants and Mote owned the homes where they were being grown.

The case against Mote was dismissed in 2016 due to insufficient evidence, while Riley was sentenced that same year to six months of probation after pleading guilty to maintaining a drug house in exchange for the original charges being dismissed. (DK)

Nessel signals shift in policy with dismissal of marijuana charges

Nessel signals shift in policy with dismissal of marijuana charges

Four people charged with marijuana crimes by Republican former Attorney General Bill Schuette will have their charges dismissed by Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel.

“Weak cases and changing laws” were cited as some of the reasons for the dismissals in two of the three marijuana cases pending in Nessel’s criminal division, according to a statement from her office. Those who had their charges dismissed were not “major players” in the cases or lacked sufficient evidence to prove their involvement, her office said.

Even remaining defendants in the three cases may be offered pleas to reduced charges so that Nessel’s office can focus on “truly bad actors,” Nessel said in a statement.

“Juries don’t want to convict people on charges concerning something that is now legal,” she said.

Nessel was a vocal advocate for marijuana legalization while on the campaign trail and received support from the cannabis community. After the November voter-approved legalization of marijuana, Nessel encouraged county prosecutors to stop pursuing misdemeanor possession cases. 

After the election, then Gov.-elect Gretchen Whitmer said she would pursue executive action or legislation to free inmates and expunge criminal records for those convicted of marijuana crimes. 

Among the charges dismissed were those against Mark and Terra Sochacki and Amanda Amsdill related to dispensaries James and Debra Amsdill ran in 2011 in St. Clair, Tuscola and Sanilac counties. The Sochackis were employees of the Amsdills.

The Sochackis had been charged with felony deliver/manufacture of marijuana, while Amanda Amsdill had been charged with conducting a criminal enterprise.

The charges against James and Debra Amsdill were not dismissed, but could be reduced in the future.

After eight years, two circuit court dismissals and two Court of Appeals dismissals, Amanda Amsdill was happy to hear charges against her were dropped but disappointed her parents weren’t also cleared, Amsdill’s lawyer Paul Tylenda said.  

“This is certainly a step in the right direction for Michigan and for the Attorney General’s office in Michigan,” Tylenda said. “I don’t think there was any dispute that the previous attorney general loved to overcharge marijuana issues.”

The Sochackis also were relieved by the decision, but are in some ways “broken” by the long legal process, said the couple’s lawyer Michael Komorn. 

“Its been devastating to them,” Komorn said. “They’ve gone through a lot.”

Mark Sochacki currently is serving a prison sentence for 2017 assault and robbery charges in St. Clair County, according to online Michigan Department of Corrections records.

Noelle Lathers, who had been charged with delivery/manufacture of marijuana, also had her charges dismissed from circuit courts in Hillsdale and Jackson counties.

Defendants in a third case involving charges in circuit courts in Genesee and Livingston counties may be offered a plea deal to reduced charges.

eleblanc@detroitnews.com

(517) 371-3661

Michigan State Police to expand roadside drug testing pilot

Michigan State Police to expand roadside drug testing pilot

Last November the Michigan State Police wrapped up a year long pilot program in five Michigan counties to test the accuracy of a roadside drug test.

In December lawmakers agreed to fund an expansion of the program based on its success.

A fatal crash in the Upper Peninsula city of Gladstone in 2013 was the catalyst behind the drug testing pilot. A semi-truck driver was convicted on six-felony charges in connection with the crash, including two counts of operating a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance causing death.

According to MSP the number of drug-impaired fatal crashes has increased over the ten year period between 2007 and 2017 by 151%, up from 98 to 246.

When his parents were killed in 2016, the couple’s son contacted his legislator who got the ball rolling on legislation to curb drugged driving.

Senator Thomas Casperson introduced a pair of bills to combat the problem and come up with a solution to roadside testing. Public Act 242 and 243 of 2016 became known as the Barbara J. and Thomas J. Swift Law, and police started looking at test instruments.

Members of MSP, prosecuting attorneys, toxicologists and forensic experts got together, forming the Oral Fluid Roadside Analysis Pilot Program Committee.

Their report was recently released along with the recommendation to expand the pilot state-wide for at least a year.

The oral fluid roadside test is the Alere DDS2, which detects six different drugs, including a component of cannabis known as Delta 9 THC. It also tests for the presence of amphetamine, cocaine, methamphetamine, opiates and benzodiazepines.

Program director, F/Lt. Jim Flegel said an independent laboratory as well as the MSP Forensic Lab tested the results, and across the board they proved accurate.

In all 92 people were tested and 89 were arrested. According to the report 83 people tested positive for substances; and over 80% of those who tested positive for cannabis.

As a result of the five-county pilot, MSP plans to continue working on the accuracy of the equipment, which it hopes will support permanent changes to the Motor Vehicle Code.

MSP is also training more officers across the state as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) who can spot impaired drivers and test them at the roadside.

A date to start the yearlong pilot program has not been set, but is expected to be sometime within 2019.

Media + Blog 

Planet Green Trees Podcast

Komorn Law In The News

Media

Evidence in Michigan Courts: A Guide to Rules 101-106

Evidence in Michigan Courts: A Guide to Rules 101-106

Navigating the legal system can be daunting, especially when it comes to understanding the rules governing evidence. This article sheds light on the first six articles of the Michigan Rules of Evidence (MRE), providing a helpful summary for legal professionals,...

Maker of CBD products asks court to decide

Maker of CBD products asks court to decide

The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. Organized crime, from the mafia to small-time money laundering schemes, often evades criminal...

Examining Michigan’s Act 247 and the Publication of Notices

Examining Michigan’s Act 247 and the Publication of Notices

Are Newspapers Still the Town Crier in a Digital Age? Examining Michigan's Act 247 and the Publication of Notices In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, the role of traditional media like newspapers is constantly under scrutiny. Yet, in Michigan, a 1963 law,...

Second Amendment Restrictions and Restoration in Michigan

Second Amendment Restrictions and Restoration in Michigan

Michigan cherishes the Second Amendment, but it's important to remember that this right isn't absolute. Certain actions or circumstances can lead to its temporary or permanent loss. Understanding these situations and potential avenues for restoration is crucial for...

Can employers test for weed in 2024?

Can employers test for weed in 2024?

A bill enacted into California law in 2024 prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals based on their off-duty and off-site use of cannabis, as it relates to their employment. The bill provides an extra level of safeguard for marijuana users in...

Understanding the Process and Rules of Impeachment in Michigan

Understanding the Process and Rules of Impeachment in Michigan

Understanding the Process and Rules of Impeachment in MichiganMichigan's history with impeachment is relatively short, with the first and only instance occurring in 1975 against Governor William Milliken. However, the process outlined in the state's constitution and...

Understanding Michigan’s Riot Laws and Penalties

Understanding Michigan’s Riot Laws and Penalties

Understanding Michigan's Riot Laws and PenaltiesIn any society, maintaining peace and order is paramount. Michigan, like other states, has specific laws in place to address situations of public unrest and violence. To understand the legal framework and potential...

MI COURT OF APPEALS – Over 1000 Cannabis Plants Just a Misdemeanor

MI COURT OF APPEALS – Over 1000 Cannabis Plants Just a Misdemeanor

Court rules, Illegal marijuana grow of any size only a misdemeanor in Michigan.Past defendants may have grounds to fight their prior convictions.Since the act's passage in 2018, the outdated 1978 law has led to the charging and conviction of over 3,500 individuals, as...