Federal defense attorneys play a crucial role in the criminal justice system, specializing in representing individuals facing federal charges. With a deep understanding of federal laws and regulations, these legal professionals navigate the complexities of the federal court system to ensure their clients receive fair and just treatment.
From building a strong defense strategy to advocating for their clients’ rights, federal defense attorneys provide essential legal counsel and representation throughout the entire legal process. In this article, we will explore the responsibilities, challenges, and importance of federal defense attorneys in safeguarding the rights of individuals facing federal criminal charges.
Importance of Federal Defense Attorneys
Federal defense attorneys play a critical role in ensuring that defendants receive fair and just treatment in federal court. They are responsible for protecting the rights of their clients and advocating for their best interests throughout the legal process.
Without skilled federal defense attorneys, individuals facing federal charges would be at a significant disadvantage and vulnerable to potential injustices within the system.
Role and Responsibilities of a Federal Defense Attorney
Legal Counsel and Advocate
One of the primary roles of a federal defense attorney is to provide legal counsel and act as an advocate for their clients. They thoroughly analyze the case, advise defendants on their legal options, and develop strategies to effectively navigate the complexities of federal court proceedings. Their goal is to ensure their clients understand their rights and make informed decisions throughout the legal process.
Protecting Defendant’s Rights
Federal defense attorneys are staunch defenders of their clients’ constitutional rights. They carefully scrutinize the evidence presented by the prosecution, challenge any violations of their clients’ rights, and ensure that all legal procedures are followed correctly. They serve as a safeguard against any potential abuses of power, helping to level the playing field and ensure a fair and just trial.
Understanding the Federal Court System
Key Differences between Federal and State Courts
While state courts handle cases that violate state laws,federal courts handle cases involving federal offenses, such as interstate crimes, fraud, drug trafficking, and violations of federal laws.
One key difference is that federal laws apply uniformly throughout the country, whereas state laws can vary from one state to another.
Jurisdiction and Structure of Federal Courts
Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal laws, constitutional matters, and disputes between states. They are structured hierarchically, with district courts as the trial courts, followed by circuit courts of appeals, and ultimately the Supreme Court as the highest federal court.
Each level of the federal court system has its own rules and procedures that federal defense attorneys must navigate.
Preparing a Strong Defense Strategy
Initial Case Assessment and Legal Research
To develop a strong defense strategy, federal defense attorneys conduct a thorough assessment of the case. They analyze the evidence, interview witnesses, and review applicable laws and precedents.
This careful examination helps them identify any weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and build a solid defense.
Developing a Defense Theory
Based on their assessment and research, federal defense attorneys formulate a defense theory. This theory serves as the foundation for their client’s defense strategy and guides their actions throughout the trial.
They aim to present a compelling argument that challenges the prosecution’s case, introduces reasonable doubt, or establishes a defense based on legal principles or factual evidence.
With the expertise and dedication of federal defense attorneys, individuals facing federal charges can have a fighting chance in the courtroom.
Their role in providing legal counsel, protecting their clients’ rights, understanding the federal court system, and developing a strong defense strategy is essential for ensuring a fair and just legal process.
Investigating the Case and Gathering Evidence
As a federal defense attorney, one of the crucial roles you play is investigating the case and gathering evidence.
You get to dive deep into the details, interview witnesses, and conduct investigations to uncover all the facts.
Interviewing Witnesses and Conducting Investigations
Grilling witnesses, digging into their stories, and trying to find any inconsistencies or hidden truths. The goal is to uncover evidence that supports your client’s innocence or weakens the prosecution’s case.
Collecting and Analyzing Forensic Evidence
Besides getting up close and personal with witnesses, you’ll also be getting into collecting and analyzing forensic evidence is a crucial part of building a solid defense.
Whether it’s analyzing DNA samples, examining fingerprints, or scrutinizing digital evidence, you’ll be using your Sherlock-level deductions to challenge the prosecution’s case.
Navigating Plea Bargains and Negotiations
Ah, the art of negotiation. As a federal defense attorney, you’ll find yourself in the thick of plea bargains and negotiations. This is where your silver tongue and quick-thinking skills come into play.
Exploring Plea Bargain Options
Plea bargains can be a lifeline for both the defendant and the prosecution. As a federal defense attorney, you’ll explore potential plea deals that could benefit your client. This involves analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the case, understanding the potential consequences of going to trial, and negotiating a deal that satisfies both parties (or at least gets your client the best possible outcome).
Negotiating with Prosecution
Negotiating with the prosecution is like a legal dance-off. You’ll be juggling arguments, counteroffers, and legal tactics to try to reach a favorable agreement. Your job is to protect your client’s interests and make sure they get a fair deal. It’s all about finding that sweet spot where both sides can leave the dance floor feeling satisfied (and not too bruised).
Representing Clients in Federal Court Trials
Lights, camera, courtroom drama! As a federal defense attorney, you’ll have the honor of representing your client in federal court trials. It’s your chance to shine, or more accurately, your chance to present a compelling defense strategy.
Building a Strong Defense Strategy for Trial
Preparing for trial is like preparing for a Broadway performance. You’ll analyze the prosecution’s case, research legal precedents, and develop a solid defense strategy. It’s about crafting a narrative that showcases your client’s innocence or raises reasonable doubts in the minds of the jury. You’ll assemble a team of expert witnesses, create killer opening and closing statements, and do everything in your power to secure a not guilty verdict.
Cross-Examination of Witnesses
Cross-examining witnesses is like being a legal bulldog with a bone. You’ll dissect the prosecution’s witnesses, challenging their credibility, poking holes in their testimonies, and exposing inconsistencies. It’s your opportunity to shine a spotlight on the weaknesses in the prosecution’s case while advocating for your client’s innocence. Just remember, no actual bulldogs allowed in the courtroom.
Post-trial Proceedings and Appeals
The show isn’t over when the jury delivers their verdict. As a federal defense attorney, there are still important tasks to tackle after the trial concludes.
Sentencing and Mitigation
After a guilty verdict (let’s hope that’s not the case), it’s time to navigate the choppy waters of sentencing and mitigation. You’ll present arguments and evidence to convince the judge to hand down the most lenient sentence possible. It’s all about advocating for your client and emphasizing any mitigating factors that could sway the judge’s decision.
Filing Appeals and Reviewing Decisions
When the verdict doesn’t go your way (cue dramatic music), you may have to take the case to the next level. Filing appeals and reviewing decisions is like playing a legal chess game. You’ll analyze the trial proceedings, search for errors or misconduct, and present your case to a higher court. It’s all about fighting for justice and making sure your client’s rights are upheld.In conclusion, federal defense attorneys are instrumental in protecting the rights and interests of individuals facing federal criminal charges. Their expertise in federal law, strategic defense planning, and courtroom advocacy ensures a fair legal process and potential favorable outcomes for their clients. By understanding the role and responsibilities of federal defense attorneys, as well as the intricacies of the federal court system, individuals can make informed decisions when seeking legal representation. With their dedication and commitment to justice, federal defense attorneys play a vital role in preserving the fundamental principles of fairness and equality within the criminal justice system.
Anything you say will be used against you! Call our office before you say anything. Komorn Law 248-357-2550
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the difference between a federal defense attorney and a state defense attorney?
Federal defense attorneys specialize in representing individuals facing federal charges, which typically involve violations of federal laws or crimes that occur across state lines. State defense attorneys, on the other hand, focus on representing individuals charged with crimes that fall under state jurisdiction. The laws, procedures, and court systems involved in federal and state cases differ significantly, necessitating specialized knowledge and experience for effective representation.
2. How do federal defense attorneys build a strong defense strategy?
Federal defense attorneys meticulously analyze the details of the case, conduct investigations, interview witnesses, and gather evidence to build a robust defense strategy. They scrutinize every aspect of the prosecution’s case, identify weaknesses, and explore potential legal defenses. Additionally, they may consult with experts, such as forensic analysts or investigators, to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and present a compelling defense on behalf of their clients.
3. Can federal defense attorneys negotiate plea bargains?
Yes, federal defense attorneys can negotiate plea bargains on behalf of their clients. Plea bargains involve reaching an agreement with the prosecution, wherein the defendant agrees to plead guilty to certain charges in exchange for a reduced sentence or lesser charges. Federal defense attorneys leverage their knowledge of federal laws, sentencing guidelines, and their clients’ individual circumstances to negotiate favorable plea deals that best serve their clients’ interests.
4. What happens if a federal case goes to trial?
If a federal case goes to trial, federal defense attorneys play a critical role in representing their clients in court. They thoroughly prepare for trial by crafting a compelling defense strategy, selecting jurors, cross-examining witnesses, presenting evidence, and making persuasive arguments on behalf of their clients. During the trial, federal defense attorneys strive to challenge the prosecution’s case and establish reasonable doubt, aiming for an acquittal or a favorable outcome for their clients.
DISCLAIMER In a legal environment that continues to evolve, it is essential to stay informed and seek guidance from knowledgeable professionals. Before acting on any information you find on the internet, this website, any linked website, any referring website or any verbal or written information consult a licensed attorney. Contact Komorn Law today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in navigating the complexities of Michigan’s laws. Consult an Attorney – Remember you’re on the internet.
Some Michigan government job applicants will no longer be overlooked because of their marijuana use.
The Michigan Civil Service Commission voted unanimously Wednesday, July 12, to partially lift a longstanding ban on hiring state employees who fail pre-employment drug screens for marijuana.
A five-year high of 151 applicants who applied for state jobs failed for the presence of marijuana in 2022, according to data provided by the Office of the State Employer (OSE).
The number more than doubled from 2021 and the state recorded 351 pre-employment failures for marijuana since it was legalized for recreational use in 2018. Of 83 failed pre-employment drug tests this year, 81 were for marijuana.
Marijuana testing will remain in place for a large swath of government employees, including health workers, state police and Michigan Department of Corrections officers. But effective Oct. 1 eliminates the requirement for office staff and those applying for positions that don’t require driving, operation of heavy machinery or handling of hazardous materials.
The change also eliminates current rules that ban applicants who previously failed a drug test for marijuana from applying for another state job for three years.
STATE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION SPDOC No. 23-06
TO: ALL APPOINTING AUTHORITIES, HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICERS, AND RECOGNIZED EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS FROM: JOHN GNODTKE, STATE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR
DATE: MAY 12, 2023 SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULE 2-7, DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING, AND REGULATIONS 2.07, DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING, AND 2.10, DRUG TESTING COMPLAINTS BY NON-EMPLOYEES
In the 1980s, the commission adopted a testing policy outside its rules to provide guidelines on drug and alcohol testing of classified employees. In 1998, the commission amended its rules to specifically (1) require preemployment drug-testing of newly hired classified employees, (2) allow reasonable-suspicion and follow-up testing of classified employees, and (3) allow random-selection and post-accident testing of classified employees in test-designated positions. The rules define these test-designated positions as those (1) requiring a commercial driver’s license or operating certain vehicles, equipment, and machinery, (2) with law enforcement powers or allowed to carry a firearm on duty, (3) providing healthcare services, (4) working with prisoners, probationers, or parolees, (5) with unsupervised access to controlled substances, or (6) handling hazardous or explosive materials. Also in the late 1990s, collective bargaining agreements added provisions allowing similar reasonable-suspicion, follow-up, randomselection, and post-accident drug-testing of exclusively represented employees. Federal law also requires preemployment and employee testing of some test-designated positions operating certain vehicles.
The 1998 rules directed the state personnel director to establish prohibited levels of drugs in regulations. Those regulations—and collective bargaining agreements—called for testing under procedures established under federal law. While the regulations technically allow agencies to request approval to test for any drug in schedule 1 or 2 of the state’s public health code, the default testing protocol used by the state since 1998 has tested for five classes of drugs: marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, and phencyclidine. Recent years have seen changes across the country in state laws regulating controlled substances. Michigan voters legalized marijuana’s medicinal use in 2008 and recreational
use by adults in 2018. In light of these changes, commissioners have requested circulation for public comment of potential regulation amendments to end the preemployment-testing requirement for marijuana for classified employees hired into nontest-designated positions. Ending this pre-employment testing for marijuana would not affect the availability of reasonable-suspicion or follow-up testing for marijuana of classified employees, including candidates who become employees. Because of ongoing testing requirements under federal law and safety considerations related to test-designated positions, the proposed amendments would preserve the status quo for pre-employment, random-selection, post-accident, follow-up, and reasonablesuspicion testing for those positions.
The potential change to regulation 2.07, § 4.B.1.b for which public comment is sought is: b. Drugs included. Rule 9‐1 defines drugs as those included in schedule 1 or 2 of controlled substances at MCL 333.7201, et seq. Hundreds of drugs are covered under schedules 1 and 2, but it is not feasible to test routinely for all of them. When a drug test is required, an appointing authority shall require testing for marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, and phencyclidine, except that an appointing authority shall not require testing for marijuana for a pre‐ employment drug test of a new hire to a position that is not test‐designated. Before If an agency requires testing for other drugs, it must first obtain written approval from the director. A request must include the agency’s proposed initial test methods, testing levels, and performance test program. When conducting reasonable‐suspicion or post‐accident testing, an agency may require testing for any drug listed in schedule 1 or 2.
Staff has identified a related issue determined by rule that would require commission action to modify. Since Proposal 1 took effect in December 2018, approximately 350 applicants for classified positions have tested positive for marijuana in preemployment testing. Rule 2-7.4(b)(1) requires rescission of the conditional employment offer and a three-year sanction from appointment to other state positions in such a situation. While many of these sanctions have since lapsed, a few hundred remain in effect. The commission could adopt rule language allowing amnesty through rescission of continuing sanctions based on a preemployment drug test for a non-test designated position with a positive result for marijuana. Such action would not result in employment for these candidates but would allow them to apply for classified positions rather than waiting three years after being sanctioned.
The potential new rule 2-7.4(c) for which public comment is requested is: (c) Rescission of marijuana sanctions. A person with an active three‐year sanction based on a positive result for marijuana from a pre‐employment drug test for a non‐test‐designated position may request the sanction’s prospective rescission as provided in the regulations.
If such an amendment were adopted, updates could be made to rule references in regulations 2.07 and 2.10 and the following new § 3.E could be added to regulation 2.10: E. Marijuana sanctions. A person with an active three‐year sanction based on a positive result for marijuana from a pre‐employment drug test for a non‐test‐ designated position under rule 2‐7.4(b)(1) can have the sanction prospectively rescinded by email request to MCSC‐OCSC@mi.gov. The request should identify the person’s full name and, if available, the date that the sanction was imposed. Civil service staff shall provide written confirmation of the sanction’s rescission.
Comments on the proposed amendments may be emailed to MCSC-OGC@mi.gov or sent to Office of the General Counsel, Michigan Civil Service Commission, P.O. Box 30002, Lansing, Michigan, 48909. Comments must be received by June 23, 2023. Attachments
If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime or DUI. Call Komorn Law and turn the odds in your favor. Call Now 248-357-2550
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
When it rains down in legal problems it’s probably going to pour. So you better have an umbrella fund off to the side somewhere safe…hidden…out of reach…stashed.
If you don’t have the funds, you won’t get good representation…and then you’re easy prey for the prosecutors and law enforcement.
As the marijuana industry continues to grow and evolve in Michigan, it’s crucial for marijuana cultivators to understand the importance of having legal defense funds readily available.
Despite the legalization of marijuana in the state, there are still potential legal challenges and risks that growers may face.
Having legal funds at the ready applies to everyone from
state licensed entities
caregivers and patients
recreational growers and consumers
hemp cultivators.
Understanding the legal landscape for marijuana cultivation in Michigan
An overview of marijuana laws in Michigan
In recent years, Michigan has seen significant changes in its marijuana laws. In 2008, the state passed the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act, which allowed the use of medical marijuana for qualifying patients. Then, in 2018, Michigan voters approved the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act, which legalized the recreational use of marijuana for adults.
Under these laws, individuals aged 21 and older can possess and cultivate marijuana in certain quantities. However, it’s important to understand the specific regulations and limitations that apply.
Recent developments and changes in marijuana legislation
The legislative landscape surrounding marijuana cultivation in Michigan is constantly evolving. It’s crucial for cultivators to stay informed about any new developments or changes in the law.
For example, in 2020, the Michigan Marijuana Regulatory Agency (MRA) issued emergency rules that introduced licensing requirements for commercial marijuana establishments, including cultivation facilities. These rules outline specific procedures and standards that growers must adhere to.
By keeping up with the latest legislation and regulations, marijuana cultivators can ensure they are operating within the bounds of the law and avoid potential legal complications.
Potential legal challenges faced by marijuana growers in Michigan
State and federal conflicts in marijuana regulations
One of the major challenges faced by marijuana growers in Michigan is the conflict between state and federal regulations. While marijuana cultivation may be legal under state law, it remains illegal at the federal level.
This discrepancy creates uncertainty and can expose growers to potential legal risks. Federal law enforcement agencies, such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), can still enforce federal marijuana laws, although they typically focus on larger operations and violations that involve other criminal activities.
Nevertheless, it’s important for marijuana cultivators to understand the potential consequences and navigate this legal gray area cautiously.
Risks associated with non-compliance in cultivation practices
Even within the framework of state laws, there are numerous regulations and requirements that marijuana cultivators must adhere to. Failure to comply with these rules can result in legal consequences, including fines, license revocation, and even criminal charges.
Common compliance issues include exceeding plant limits, improper labeling, inadequate security measures, and failure to follow proper cultivation and testing procedures. It’s crucial for cultivators to stay informed and ensure they are operating in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
The Importance of having legal defense funds for marijuana cultivators
The financial burden of legal defense in marijuana cultivation cases
Legal challenges can be financially draining, and marijuana cultivators are no exception. Defending oneself in a legal case can involve expensive legal fees, court costs, and potential fines or penalties. These financial burdens can quickly accumulate and become overwhelming.
Having legal defense funds set aside can help alleviate the strain and ensure that cultivators can afford proper legal representation when needed. It’s a proactive measure that cultivators should consider to protect themselves from unexpected legal challenges.
The benefits of proactive legal preparation
In the ever-changing world of marijuana legislation, being prepared is key. By setting aside legal defense funds, cultivators can take a proactive approach to potential legal challenges. This preparation allows cultivators to act swiftly when needed, securing legal representation and taking necessary steps to protect their interests.
Having legal defense funds in place also provides peace of mind. It allows cultivators to focus on their operations without constantly worrying about potential legal troubles, knowing they have the resources to defend themselves if the need arises.
Navigating the complexities of marijuana laws in Michigan
Understanding licensing and permitting requirements
Obtaining the necessary licenses and permits is crucial for marijuana cultivators in Michigan. The state has established a comprehensive licensing system to regulate commercial marijuana operations.
Understanding the specific requirements, application processes, and deadlines associated with licenses is essential. It’s advisable to seek legal counsel to ensure compliance with all licensing and permitting obligations.
Comprehending zoning restrictions and land use regulations
Zoning restrictions and land use regulations add another layer of complexity to marijuana cultivation in Michigan. Local municipalities have the authority to regulate the location and operation of marijuana establishments within their jurisdictions.
Cultivators must familiarize themselves with the zoning laws in their area and ensure their operations comply with the specified land use regulations. Failure to do so can result in costly legal disputes or even forced closure of the cultivation facility.
By staying informed and working within the boundaries of zoning and land use regulations, cultivators can avoid unnecessary legal complications and focus on their business objectives.
Securing legal representation: the role of a defense attorney in marijuana cultivation cases
When it comes to growing legal marijuana in Michigan, having a reliable and experienced defense attorney like Komorn Law by your side is crucial. While the state allows for the cultivation of recreational and medical marijuana, there may still be legal challenges that require professional legal assistance.
Qualifications and expertise to look for in a defense attorney
Finding the right defense attorney is essential to protect your rights and navigate the complexities of marijuana cultivation cases. Look for attorneys who specialize in cannabis law and have experience dealing with similar cases. They should have a deep understanding of the ever-changing marijuana regulations in Michigan and be familiar with the specific nuances of the industry.
The importance of attorney-client privilege and confidentiality
When discussing legal matters, confidentiality is key. Attorney-client privilege ensures that any information shared between you and your defense attorney remains confidential. This protection is crucial for open and honest communication, allowing you to provide your attorney with all relevant details without fear of it being used against you.
Costs and considerations of legal defense for marijuana growers in Michigan
While nobody likes to think about legal trouble, it’s essential to consider the potential costs associated with legal defense in the marijuana industry.
Evaluating the potential costs of legal defense
Legal defense can be expensive, and the cost will vary depending on the complexity of your case.
Factors such as the nature of the charges, the amount of evidence involved, and the length of the legal process can all impact the overall cost.
It’s wise to consult with prospective defense attorneys to get an estimate of the potential costs involved in your specific situation.
Factors to consider when budgeting for legal representation
When budgeting for legal representation, it’s crucial to assess your financial situation realistically. Consider factors such as attorney fees, court expenses, and any additional costs that may arise during the legal process. It’s wise to set aside a substantial amount or create a legal defense fund to ensure you have the necessary resources when they are needed most.
These funds should be stashed away somewhere to avoid being “confiscated” by law enforcement.
Preemptive measures: building a legal defense fund for marijuana cultivation
Being proactive and planning ahead can save you from unnecessary stress and financial strain in the event of legal disputes related to marijuana cultivation.
Strategies for setting aside funds for legal defense
One effective strategy is to establish a dedicated legal defense fund specifically for covering potential legal expenses. This fund should be separate from your regular business finances and set aside on a regular basis. By consistently contributing to this fund, you can accumulate the necessary resources over time, providing you with a safety net if legal issues arise.
Developing a comprehensive legal defense plan
Having a well-thought-out legal defense plan is essential. This includes not only financial preparations but also understanding the legal framework and regulations surrounding marijuana cultivation in Michigan. Stay abreast of any changes in the law and consult with your defense attorney to ensure you are always prepared to defend your rights.
Anything you say will be used against you! Call our office before you say anything —>
1. Is it necessary to have legal defense money if marijuana cultivation is legal in Michigan?
While marijuana cultivation may be legal in Michigan, there are still potential legal challenges and risks associated with the industry. Having legal defense funds readily available is crucial to navigate these complexities and protect your interests in case of any legal disputes or challenges that may arise.
2. How much should I budget for legal defense funds?
The amount to budget for legal defense funds may vary depending on various factors, such as the size of your operation, the level of risk involved, and the specific legal services you may require. It is recommended to consult with a legal professional to assess your unique situation and determine an appropriate budget for your legal defense funds.
3. Can I rely solely on compliance to avoid legal issues?
While compliance with marijuana laws and regulations is crucial, it is not a foolproof guarantee against legal issues. Laws and regulations can change, and misunderstandings or disputes may arise. Having legal defense funds in place ensures you are prepared to navigate any unforeseen legal challenges that may arise, even if you are operating in full compliance.
4. What steps can I take to minimize legal risks as a marijuana grower in Michigan?
To minimize legal risks as a marijuana grower in Michigan, it is important to stay informed about the latest laws, licensing requirements, and zoning regulations. Maintaining meticulous records and documentation, implementing robust compliance practices, and seeking legal counsel when needed are all proactive measures that can help mitigate legal risks associated with operating in the marijuana industry.
If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime or DUI. Call Komorn Law and turn the odds in your favor. Call Now 248-357-2550
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
A Personal Protection Order (PPO), also known as a restraining order are legal measures designed to protect individuals from various forms of harm, including domestic violence, stalking, harassment, and sexual assault.
To obtain personal protection orders, the Petitioner(the person requesting the PPO) files a Motion for the Personal Protective Order against a Respondent(the person against whom the PPO is requested)
In Michigan, PPOs play a crucial role in ensuring the safety and well-being of individuals who fear for their security or have experienced threats or acts of violence.
Emergency Personal Protective Orders
An individual that believes they are in immediate danger can request an ex parte personal protection order. These orders take effect immediately upon the judge’s signature, without a hearing or notice to the Respondent.
To have an emergency ex parte PPO granted, the Petitioner must present specific facts that show that the Petitioner is in danger of immediate and irreparable injury, harm, or damage that cannot be repaired by a court order after the injury occurs.
Non-Emergency Personal Protective Orders
For non-emergency situations, the Petitioner must request a hearing before a circuit judge to have a PPO issued. The judge will hear testimony from witnesses regarding the circumstances that the Petitioner believes require that a PPO be granted.
When the Petitioner files for a PPO, a copy of the motion for a PPO will be given to the Respondent.
If a PPO is granted, it will take effect as soon as it is signed by the judge. But is only enforceable once it has been served upon the Respondent.
When the PPO has been served on the respondent, the Respondent has up to 14 days to contest the order.
Honest Liars?
Are all PPOs issued with good evidence? Is it he said – she said or she said – she said? Are accusations embellished. Is the dog caught up in the middle? bank accounts? personal belongings? Is the issuing judge going on the word of one person? Yes and No to all that and more.
Most PPOs are are issued with good reason and evidence. But of course there are those who have been issued a PPO through false accusations and just simply for vengeance or revenge. If you feel that you are a victim of a PPO for untruthful and dishonest reasons you should fight it. It’s not a good thing to have on your record. The Komorn Law firm has defended and had PPOs removed under these circumstances for clients who wish to take a stand and fight it. Contact our office for a free case evaluation 248-357-2550.
The State of Michigan website provides the following information
A PPO is a court order to protect a person from someone who has sexually assaulted you, or someone who has made you afraid of being assaulted.
The court can order that person not to:
Have contact with you.
Follow or approach you.
Enter a place where you live.
Threaten to sexually assault, kill, or physically injure you or another person.
Purchase or possess a firearm.
Interfere with you at your place of employment or education.
Contact you by phone, email or social media.
Do anything that interferes with your personal freedom or that causes you a reasonable fear of harm.
For more information about PPOs and how to file for a PPO, visit Michigan Legal Help.
You can also get help in filing for a PPO by contacting your local sexual assault or domestic violence services program or by hiring your own attorney.
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961 (EXCERPT) Act 236 of 1961
600.2950 Personal protection order; restraining or enjoining spouse, former spouse, individual with child in common, individual in dating relationship, or person residing or having resided in same household from certain conduct; respondent required to carry concealed weapon; omitting address of residence from documents; issuance, contents, effectiveness, duration, and service of personal protection order; entering order into law enforcement information network; notice; failure to comply with order; false statement to court; enforcement; respondent less than 18 years of age; ownership interest in animal; definitions.
Charged with drug possession, driving under the influence of marijuana or alcohol? Contact Komorn Law Immediately to ensure your rights are recognized 248-357-2550.
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
A Personal Protection Order (PPO), also known as a restraining order are legal measures designed to protect individuals from various forms of harm, including domestic violence, stalking, harassment, and sexual assault.
To obtain personal protection orders, the Petitioner (the person requesting the PPO) files a Motion for the Personal Protective Order against a Respondent (the person against whom the PPO is requested)
In Michigan, PPOs play a crucial role in ensuring the safety and well-being of individuals who fear for their security or have experienced threats or acts of violence.
A PPO is a court order to protect a person from someone who has sexually assaulted you, or someone who has made you afraid of being assaulted.
The court can order that person not to:
Have contact with you.
Follow or approach you.
Enter a place where you live.
Threaten to sexually assault, kill, or physically injure you or another person.
Purchase or possess a firearm.
Interfere with you at your place of employment or education.
Contact you by phone, email or social media.
Do anything that interferes with your personal freedom or that causes you a reasonable fear of harm.
Emergency Personal Protective Orders
An individual that believes they are in immediate danger can request an ex parte personal protection order. These orders take effect immediately upon the judge’s signature, without a hearing or notice to the Respondent.
To have an emergency ex parte PPO granted, the Petitioner must present specific facts that show that the Petitioner is in danger of immediate and irreparable injury, harm, or damage that cannot be repaired by a court order after the injury occurs.
Non-Emergency Personal Protective Orders
For non-emergency situations, the Petitioner must request a hearing before a circuit judge to have a PPO issued. The judge will hear testimony from witnesses regarding the circumstances that the Petitioner believes require that a PPO be granted.
When the Petitioner files for a PPO, a copy of the motion for a PPO will be given to the Respondent.
If a PPO is granted, it will take effect as soon as it is signed by the judge. But is only enforceable once it has been served upon the Respondent.
When the PPO has been served on the respondent, the Respondent has up to 14 days to contest the order.
In early May, the Michigan House and Senate passed House Bills 4250, 4251, and 4252 to amend parts of the Michigan Vehicle Code in an effort to reduce distracted-driving crashes and fatalities.
How will you obey?
Texting while driving is already illegal in Michigan, but that law was instituted years ago, when cell phones and their capabilities were much different.
The new law now makes all non hands free cell phone usage illegal while driving.
Send or receive a telephone call.
Send, receive, or read a text message.
View, record, or transmit a video.
Access, read, or post to a social networking site.
The law makes holding or using a cell phone while driving a primary offense — meaning an officer could pull someone over and ticket them for this offense.
The new legislation specifically states, however, that police would not be allowed to search a driver solely because of this violation. But we all know that’s not reality.
The legislation defines holding a cell phone or electronic device as physically supporting it with “any part of the hands, arms or shoulders.”
Drivers caught violating the rules would face fines and/or be required to perform community service.
Potential fines
If a person is caught holding or using a cell phone, or mobile electronic device, while driving a regular motor vehicle, they would face the following fines:
First violation: $100 fine or 16 hours of community service, or both.
Second or subsequent violation: $250 fine or 24 hours of community service, or both.
If 3 violations occur within a 3-year period: The driver would be ordered by the court to complete a drive-improvement course.
If a person driving a commercial vehicle or a school bus is caught holding or using a cell phone, they would face the following fines:
First violation: $200 fine or 32 hours of community service, or both.
Second or subsequent violation: $500 fine or 48 hours of community service, or both.
Under the legislation, if a crash were to occur and the at-fault driver was holding or using a cell phone while driving, any civil fines would be doubled.
There are a few exceptions to the rules.
Law enforcement, first responders, and other emergency workers would not be prohibited from using a cell phone while performing official duties.
The same exception goes for anyone calling or texting 911 to report an emergency or seek help.
Drivers will still be allowed to use their GPS, but only if it’s hands-free. Phones could be used as navigation systems so long as it is in a hands-free fashion, such as mounting it to the dashboard or using voice commands to control it.
Generally, using voice commands or hands-free modes to use mobile electronic devices is allowed.
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
Act No. 41 Public Acts of 2023
Approved by the Governor June 7, 2023
Filed with the Secretary of State June 7, 2023
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 30, 2023
STATE OF MICHIGAN
102ND LEGISLATURE
REGULAR SESSION OF 2023
Introduced by Reps. Koleszar, Morse, Weiss, Rheingans, Scott, Brenda Carter, Steckloff, Brabec and Whitsett
ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 4250
AN ACT to amend 1949 PA 300, entitled “An act to provide for the registration, titling, sale, transfer, and regulation of certain vehicles operated upon the public highways of this state or any other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles and distressed vehicles; to provide for the licensing of dealers; to provide for the examination, licensing, and control of operators and chauffeurs; to provide for the giving of proof of financial responsibility and security by owners and operators of vehicles; to provide for the imposition, levy, and collection of specific taxes on vehicles, and the levy and collection of sales and use taxes, license fees, and permit fees; to provide for the regulation and use of streets and highways; to create certain funds; to provide penalties and sanctions for a violation of this act; to provide for civil liability of manufacturers, the manufacturers of certain devices, the manufacturers of automated technology, upfitters, owners, and operators of vehicles and service of process on residents and nonresidents; to regulate the introduction and use of certain evidence; to regulate and certify the manufacturers of certain devices; to provide for approval and certification of installers and servicers of certain devices; to provide for the levy of certain assessments; to provide for the enforcement of this act; to provide for the creation of and to prescribe the powers and duties of certain state and local agencies; to impose liability upon the state or local agencies; to provide appropriations for certain purposes; to repeal all other acts or parts of acts inconsistent with this act or contrary to this act; and to repeal certain parts of this act on a specific date,” by amending section 602b (MCL 257.602b), as amended by 2016 PA 332.
The People of the State of Michigan enact: (Did we?)
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, an individual shall not hold or use a mobile electronic device while operating a commercial motor vehicle or a school bus. As used in this subsection, “use a mobile electronic device” means 1 or more of the following:
(a) Using a mobile electronic device to do any task, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(i) Send or receive a telephone call.
(ii) Send, receive, or read a text message.
(iii) View, record, or transmit a video.
(iv) Access, read, or post to a social networking site.
(b) Reaching for a mobile electronic device in a manner that requires a driver to maneuver so that the driver is no longer in a seated driving position, restrained by a seat belt that is installed as required by 49 CFR 393.93 and adjusted in accordance with the vehicle manufacturer’s instructions.
(3) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to any of the following situations:
(a) The use of a mobile electronic device by a law enforcement officer, firefighter, emergency medical technician, paramedic, operator of an authorized emergency vehicle, or similarly engaged paid or volunteer public safety first responder during the performance of that individual’s official duties, or a public utility employee or contractor acting within the scope of that individual’s employment when responding to a public utility emergency.
(b) The use of a mobile electronic device for emergency purposes, including calling or texting a 9-1-1 system, or making an emergency call to a law enforcement agency, health care provider, fire department, or other emergency services agency or entity to report to appropriate authorities any of the following:
(i) A fire, traffic accident, serious road hazard, or medical or hazardous materials emergency.
(ii) An operator of another motor vehicle who is driving in a reckless or otherwise unsafe manner or who appears to be driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
(iii) A crime being committed.
(c) The use of a global positioning or navigation feature of a mobile electronic device if information is not entered by hand into the global positioning or navigation system feature of the mobile electronic device.
(d) The use of a mobile electronic device in a voice-operated or hands-free mode if the operator of the motor vehicle does not use the operator’s hands to operate the device, except for either of the following:
(i) Using a single button press, tap, or swipe to activate or deactivate a feature or function of the mobile electronic device or to select a telephone number or name.
(ii) Using a mobile electronic device that is integrated into a motor vehicle and utilizes the user interfaces that are permanently installed into the motor vehicle.
(e) The use of a mobile electronic device used for the sole purpose of continuously recording or broadcasting video inside or outside of a motor vehicle.
(f) The use of a mobile electronic device that is placed in a mount and used in any manner as described in subdivisions (a) to (e).
(4) Except as provided in subsection (6), an individual who violates subsection (1) is responsible for a civil infraction and must be ordered to do the following:
(a) For a first violation, pay a $100.00 civil fine or perform 16 hours of community service, or both.
(b) For a second or subsequent violation, pay a $250.00 civil fine or perform 24 hours of community service, or both.
(5) Except as provided in subsection (6), an individual who violates subsection (2) is responsible for a civil infraction and must be ordered to do the following:
(a) For a first violation, pay a $200.00 civil fine or perform 32 hours of community service, or both.
(b) For a second or subsequent violation, pay a $500.00 civil fine or perform 48 hours of community service, or both.
(6) If an individual is involved in an accident for which the individual is at fault when the individual violates this section, any civil fine ordered must be double the amount that would otherwise be ordered under subsection (4) or (5), as applicable.
(7) This section supersedes all local ordinances regulating the use of a mobile electronic device while operating a motor vehicle in motion on a highway or street, except that a unit of local government may adopt an ordinance or enforce an existing ordinance substantially corresponding to this section.
(8) If an individual is responsible for 3 or more civil infractions for violations of subsection (1) within a 3-year period, a court shall order the individual to complete a basic driver improvement course within a reasonable time as determined by the court. This subsection does not apply to a violation of subsection (2).
(9) A police officer enforcing this section may treat a violation of this section as the primary or sole reason for issuing a citation to a driver. A police officer shall not search a motor vehicle or the driver or passenger in the motor vehicle solely because of a violation of this section.
(10) This section does not apply to any of the following:
(a) A level 3, 4, or 5 automated driving system, as described in “J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles”, April 2021 edition, published by SAE International, or an automated vehicle equipped with an automated driving system as described in this subdivision, during testing or operation with the automated driving system engaged.
(b) Viewing or using in a hands-free manner a device mounted in a vehicle for displaying information related to testing or operating an automated driving system or automated technology.
(c) Operating, or programming the operation of, an automated motor vehicle while testing or operating the automated motor vehicle without a human operator while the automated driving system is engaged.
(11) This section does not apply beginning 5 years after the effective date of the amendatory act that added subsection (12).
(12) As used in this section:
(a) “Hold” means to physically support with any part of the hands, arms, or shoulders.
(b) “Mobile electronic device” means an electronic device that is not permanently installed in a motor vehicle, including, but not limited to, a device capable of text messaging, voice communication, entertainment, navigation, accessing the internet, or producing email. Mobile electronic device does not include either of the following:
(i) A radio designed for the Citizens Band Service or the Amateur Radio Service of the Federal Communications Commission or a commercial 2-way radio communications device or equipment permanently installed in a motor vehicle.
(ii) A medical device that is designed to be worn, including, but not limited to, an insulin pump.
(c) “Operate” means to drive or assume physical control of a motor vehicle on a public way, street, road, or highway, including operation while temporarily stationary because of traffic, road conditions, a traffic light, or a stop sign. Operate does not include a motor vehicle that is lawfully parked.
(d) “Social networking site” means any web-based service that allows individuals to construct a profile within a founded system and communicate with other users of the site for social or amusement purposes.
(13) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2), as used in this section, “use a mobile electronic device” means using a mobile electronic device to do any task, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(i) Send or receive a telephone call.
(ii) Send, receive, or read a text message.
(iii) View, record, or transmit a video.
(iv) Access, read, or post to a social networking site.
Enacting section 1. This amendatory act does not take effect unless all of the following bills of the 102nd Legislature are enacted into law:
(a) House Bill No. 4251.
(b) House Bill No. 4252.
Enacting section 2. This amendatory act takes effect June 30, 2023.
This act is ordered to take immediate effect.