Is the cannabis industry just another sinking ship in the US? This story was picked up out in the cannabis news world. Read it for yourself.
Have the end times have begun for US weed companies as the first South American imports are approved by the DEA.
The US Federal Government Gives Approval for South American Cannabis Imports into the USA.
In an exclusive announcement from Benzinga, a breakthrough partnership between MMJ International Holdings and Global Cannabis Production (GCP) has just been announced – one that has the potential to alter how the worldwide marijuana industry operates entirely.
The two companies announced a joint partnership to get the enable the first-ever importation of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products into the United States from Uruguay. In addition, they are also inking a deal to produce cannabis-based pharmaceuticals to sell internationally. Once established, this will revolutionize patient access to cannabinoid medicines while also marking a milestone in cannabis medicine and cannabis research.
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
Property that can be forfeited: Under Michigan law, the following property can be forfeited:
Cash
Vehicles
Real estate
Boats
Aircraft
Other personal property
Crimes that can lead to forfeiture: Property can be forfeited if it is used or derived from a crime, or if it is intended to be used or derived from a crime. Some of the crimes that can lead to forfeiture include:
Drug trafficking
Money laundering
Racketeering
Human trafficking
Procedural requirements: In order to forfeit property, the government must follow certain procedural requirements. These requirements include:
Giving notice to the property owner
Holding a hearing
Proving that the property was used or derived from a crime
Rights of the property owner: The property owner has certain rights in a forfeiture proceeding. These rights include:
The right to be notified of the forfeiture proceeding
The right to a hearing
The right to present evidence
The right to challenge the government’s evidence
Did your property get stolen by “forfeiture” – Act on it now. We can fight to get it back. We have done it many times. Call Us Komorn Law 248-357-2550
In recent years, there has been some controversy surrounding civil asset forfeiture laws in Michigan. Some people argue that these laws are unfair because they allow the government to seize property without a criminal conviction. Others argue that these laws are necessary to combat crime.
In 2019, Michigan passed a law that prohibits law enforcement from forfeiting seized assets (under $50,000 in value) from crimes involving controlled substances without a conviction or plea agreement, or unless the property owner relinquishes the property.
This law was intended to address some of the concerns about civil asset forfeiture in Michigan.
If you have had property seized by the government in Michigan, you should speak to an attorney to discuss your rights.
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
The court ruled to suppress the evidence (namely an alleged handgun, suspected marihuana, suspected psilocybin mushrooms) due to the fact that the People failed to rebut the burden that the warrantless search was unconstitutional and/or failed to provide evidence that an exception to the Search Warrant requirement existed at the time of the search and seizure.
The People filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence.
A motion for reconsideration must demonstrate a “palpable error by which the court and the parties have been misled and show that a different disposition of the motion must result from correction of the error.” Charbeneau v Wayne Co Gen Hosp, 158 Mich App 730, 733; 405 NW2d 151, 153 (1987).
The People presented evidence from the transcript to again attempt to rebut the burden regarding the warrantless search being unconstitutional and/or provide evidence that an exception to the Search Warrant requirement existed.
The People sited to the testimony of Deputy Tath who stated the Defendant consented, and listed the items that were seized – “I seized suspected marijuana, suspected psilocybin mushrooms, and I believe a handgun.” The issue with this testimony being the People’s evidence does not present a timeline for when consent was given.
The People have the burden to establish Defendant’s consent to search before any evidence could lawfully be seized as an exception to the warrant requirement, the failure by the People to establish that specific timeline was fatal to the People’s argument.
Therefore, the Prosecution has not convinced the Court that the prior Order of the Court was palpable error.
If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime or DUI. Call Komorn Law and turn the odds in your favor. Call Now 248-357-2550
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
So you got pulled over and charged with DUI from Cannabis use and this ends up on the report 11-Nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-COOH-THC or THC-COOH) as part of the test results. What is it??
Here’s what they say
11-Nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-COOH-THC or THC-COOH), often referred to as 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC or THC-11-oic acid, is the main secondary metabolite of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which is formed in the body after cannabis is consumed.
11-COOH-THC is formed in the body by oxidation of the active metabolite 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC) by liver enzymes. It is then metabolized further by conjugation with glucuronide, forming a water-soluble congener which can be more easily excreted by the body.
11-COOH-THC has a long half-life in the body of up to several days (or even weeks in very heavy users), making it the main metabolite tested for blood or urine testing for cannabis use.
Fight your DUI case and move on – Call Komorn Law 248-357-2550 – For all driving cases.
Some jurisdictions where cannabis use is decriminalized or permitted under some circumstances use such tests when determining whether drivers were legally intoxicated and therefore unfit to drive, with the comparative levels of THC, 11-OH-THC and 11-COOH-THC being used to derive a “blood cannabis level” analogous to the blood alcohol level used in prosecuting impaired drivers.
While 11-COOH-THC does not have any psychoactive effects in its own right, it may still have a role in the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis, and has also been shown to moderate the effects of THC itself which may help explain the difference in subjective effects seen between occasional and regular users of cannabis.
DISCLAIMER This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.
Michigan’s largest-ever marijuana recall is at the center of a court matter that the public is forbidden from attending.
The case focuses on Cannabis Regulatory Agency accusations that Viridis Laboratories, one of the largest marijuana safety testing labs in the state, produced inaccurate test results related to potentially harmful contaminants, and inflated THC potency data. Viridis has denied the claims and filed its own lawsuit against the CRA, accusing the regulator of abusing its power and unfairly targeting the safety lab.
“Without having the proceedings being published, it’s possible a lot of things may remain hidden from public view and I don’t think that’s democracy,” said marijuana insider Rick Thompson, who is the executive director of theNational Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML)of Michigan,
Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office is representing the CRA.
