A visit with a kick

A visit with a kick

POW – Right in the Kisser. Businesses watch out for the law

A Pennsylvania-based convenience store chain was hit with a lawsuit by the Biden administration at the same time the president stopped by one of their locations on the campaign trail.

Sheetz is being accused of racial discrimination by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). THE EEOC claims that the company’s hiring practices discriminated against minority applicants.

The lawsuit was filed the same day Biden cheerfully stopped by a Pittsburgh location on Wednesday for food.

Specifically, the EEOC contends that Sheetz’s criminal background checks were discriminatory due to their method of excluding applicants suspected of failing the checks.

The EEOC claims that this disproportionately impacted Native American, Black and multiracial jobseekers.

https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-sues-sheetz-inc-racially-discriminatory-hiring-practice

More Posts

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

Woman tried to board flight with 56 pounds of marijuana

Woman tried to board flight with 56 pounds of marijuana

Woman allowed airport police to check her luggage, had name tag on bags, according to reports

Before a 21-year-old Memphis woman could board an United Airlines flight, Memphis International Airport Police found 56 pounds of marijuana in her luggage, according to multiple reports.

The woman was charged with possession of a controlled substance with the intention to manufacture, deliver or sell, Shelby County jail records show. This charge is a felony offense that carries harsh penalties.

The woman is now free after posting a $5,000 bond, according to Shelby County jail records.

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

You’re too stupid to store a gun properly

You’re too stupid to store a gun properly

The Biden administration once again defends a ban in federal court, arguing that people who use marijuana should be prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms.

They claim that this restriction is supported by historical precedent and that individuals who consume cannabis while owning guns pose a unique threat to society.

One of the reasons behind this argument is that such individuals are viewed as unlikely to store their weapons properly before using marijuana.

Attorneys for the Justice Department responded to a series of prompts from the judges, asserting that the firearm ban for marijuana consumers is justified based on historical analogues to restrictions on the mentally ill and habitually drunk that were imposed during the time of the Second Amendment’s ratification in 1791.

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

What is corruption? U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments

What is corruption? U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments

What is corruption? U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments that could impact bribery cases in Illinois

The high court is reviewing a law that’s popular among federal prosecutors — including those pursuing former Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan.

A cash-strapped mayor in northwest Indiana goes to a trucking company after engineering city contracts in its favor, and he tells its owners he needs money.

They pay him $13,000 for consulting. But there’s no evidence he did any work.

The feds call that corruption. But next week, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether the mayor even committed a crime under a law that’s popular among federal prosecutors — including those pursuing former Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan.

Read more here at the Chicago Sun Times

Komorn Law Established 1993

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: There is so much corruption in my case I need a lawyer!

Answer: Do you have irrefutable evidence?

 

Related Articles

CRA Executive Director Hanna Applauds Whitmer’s FY25 Budget

CRA Executive Director Hanna Applauds Whitmer’s FY25 Budget

No Evidence of Widespread Discriminatory Policing PracticesNever Ending Quest February 15, 2024 LANSING, MI – Today, Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) Executive Director Brian Hanna applauded Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Executive Budget...

Cannabis Tax Payments Being Distributed in Michigan

Cannabis Tax Payments Being Distributed in Michigan

Adult-Use Marijuana Tax Payments Being Distributed In MichiganHere's what they say...Treasury: Adult-Use Marijuana Payments Being Distributed to Michigan Municipalities and Counties; More Than $59.5 Million Going to 224 Municipalities and Counties. Sales of "legal"...

Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall

Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall

Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of Claims judge on Jan. 2 dismissed two lawsuits linked to Michigan’s enormous 64,000-pound, $229 million 2021 marijuana recall that impacted an estimated 60% of all...

Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional

Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional

COA 352569 PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE Opinion People v Poole (Docket No. 352569) decided January 18, 2024 The State Appellate Defender Office celebrates today’s outcome for our client John Antonio Poole. As an 18-year-old child, Mr. Poole was sentenced to life...

More Posts

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is Oral Legal?Verbal agreements, also called oral contracts, can be legal and enforceable in Michigan, but with some limitations. Here's a breakdown: Generally...

read more
MSP Flint post commander rigging promotion exams says lawsuit

MSP Flint post commander rigging promotion exams says lawsuit

The former commander of the Michigan State Police post in Flint is alleged to have been providing answers to promotion exam questions to favored officers, while also engaging in retaliatory actions against others, as stated in a federal lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Flint, sheds additional light on an ongoing MSP internal affairs investigation that originated at the Flint post. This investigation has resulted in several personnel actions, including firings, forced retirements, a demotion, and a resignation. Furthermore, it has had an impact on the MSP post in West Branch, located in Ogemaw County.

First Lt. Yvonne Brantley, who was the post commander in Flint, retired in lieu of being fired. Sgt. Jared Chiros, who worked at the Flint post, had resigned.

Brantley is the sole defendant named in the lawsuit filed by Trooper Evan Neilson, although Chiros also holds a substantial involvement in the legal proceedings.

The internal affairs investigation determined that Brantley would favor or target certain individuals for promotion or non-promotion and for those who she wanted promoted, she would feed them answers to test questions and provide the test questions to prepare for taking the examination the lawsuit alleges.

DUI for Alcohol or Marijuana or Prescription Drugs - Fight it

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: I need to sue the police for civil rights violations. Do you do that?

Answer: We are sorry. We are a legal defense firm and will fight for your rights and freedom in the “justice system” but we do not do lawsuits at this time. Maybe in the near future.

 

Related Articles

CRA Executive Director Hanna Applauds Whitmer’s FY25 Budget

CRA Executive Director Hanna Applauds Whitmer’s FY25 Budget

No Evidence of Widespread Discriminatory Policing PracticesNever Ending Quest February 15, 2024 LANSING, MI – Today, Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) Executive Director Brian Hanna applauded Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Executive Budget...

Cannabis Tax Payments Being Distributed in Michigan

Cannabis Tax Payments Being Distributed in Michigan

Adult-Use Marijuana Tax Payments Being Distributed In MichiganHere's what they say...Treasury: Adult-Use Marijuana Payments Being Distributed to Michigan Municipalities and Counties; More Than $59.5 Million Going to 224 Municipalities and Counties. Sales of "legal"...

Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall

Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall

Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of Claims judge on Jan. 2 dismissed two lawsuits linked to Michigan’s enormous 64,000-pound, $229 million 2021 marijuana recall that impacted an estimated 60% of all...

Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional

Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional

COA 352569 PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE Opinion People v Poole (Docket No. 352569) decided January 18, 2024 The State Appellate Defender Office celebrates today’s outcome for our client John Antonio Poole. As an 18-year-old child, Mr. Poole was sentenced to life...

More Posts

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is Oral Legal?Verbal agreements, also called oral contracts, can be legal and enforceable in Michigan, but with some limitations. Here's a breakdown: Generally...

read more
Michigan Expungement Law Reaches the 3 Year Mark

Michigan Expungement Law Reaches the 3 Year Mark

April 2024 – Michigan Expungement Law 3 year Anniversary

Three years after the implementation of the “Clean Slate” law, advocates are hailing its significant impact on expanding expungement opportunities in Michigan.

On October 13, 2020, Public Act 193 of 2020 was signed into law with an effective date of April 11, 2021. This act included a group of bills collectively known as the “Clean Slate” package. These bills have impacted the rules and procedures an individual may use to have prior convictions set aside. 

To make those changes, the legislation provided for a two-year development process, making the effective date April 11, 2023.

The legislation, enacted in two phases, aimed to address barriers to a fresh start for individuals with past criminal convictions.

The first phase, effective in 2021, broadened eligibility for court-ordered expungements. It allows individuals to petition for the expungement of up to three felonies and an unlimited number of misdemeanors.

The second phase, implemented one year ago, established a system for automatic expungement. Under this provision, the Michigan State Police developed a computerized system to automatically clear certain records after designated waiting periods. This includes up to two felonies after ten years and four misdemeanor offenses with sentences exceeding 93 days.

Additionally, the law mandated local courts to automatically seal records of misdemeanors carrying sentences of 92 days or less.

Legislature of Michigan – MCL 750.621g.  Details the types of offenses and waiting periods for automatic record clearance.

Question: How much does it cost for an attorney to handle and expungement?

Answer: If eligible costs for an expungement start at $1500.00

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: If expungement is automatic why do I need an Attorney?

Answer: The only thing the govenment does somewhat right automatically is find ways to take your money and spend it. The reason you need a lawyer is you may have to fight for it in some situations and you may still have to appear before a Judge and Prosecutor to be finalized.

 

Related Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

More Posts

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is Oral Legal?Verbal agreements, also called oral contracts, can be legal and enforceable in Michigan, but with some limitations. Here's a breakdown: Generally...

read more