What is corruption? U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments

What is corruption? U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments

Apr 13, 2024 | Blog, Michigan Crime, Michigan News

What is corruption? U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments that could impact bribery cases in Illinois

The high court is reviewing a law that’s popular among federal prosecutors — including those pursuing former Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan.

A cash-strapped mayor in northwest Indiana goes to a trucking company after engineering city contracts in its favor, and he tells its owners he needs money.

They pay him $13,000 for consulting. But there’s no evidence he did any work.

The feds call that corruption. But next week, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether the mayor even committed a crime under a law that’s popular among federal prosecutors — including those pursuing former Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan.

Read more here at the Chicago Sun Times

Komorn Law Established 1993

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: There is so much corruption in my case I need a lawyer!

Answer: Do you have irrefutable evidence?

 

Related Articles

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the...

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...

More Posts

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a...

read more
What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from...

read more
MSP Flint post commander rigging promotion exams says lawsuit

MSP Flint post commander rigging promotion exams says lawsuit

Apr 12, 2024 | Blog, Michigan Crime, Michigan News

Ex-Flint Michigan State Police post commander sued by trooper following internal probe

The former commander of the Michigan State Police post in Flint is alleged to have been providing answers to promotion exam questions to favored officers, while also engaging in retaliatory actions against others, as stated in a federal lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Flint, sheds additional light on an ongoing MSP internal affairs investigation that originated at the Flint post. This investigation has resulted in several personnel actions, including firings, forced retirements, a demotion, and a resignation. Furthermore, it has had an impact on the MSP post in West Branch, located in Ogemaw County.

First Lt. Yvonne Brantley, who was the post commander in Flint, retired in lieu of being fired. Sgt. Jared Chiros, who worked at the Flint post, had resigned.

Brantley is the sole defendant named in the lawsuit filed by Trooper Evan Neilson, although Chiros also holds a substantial involvement in the legal proceedings.

The internal affairs investigation determined that Brantley would favor or target certain individuals for promotion or non-promotion and for those who she wanted promoted, she would feed them answers to test questions and provide the test questions to prepare for taking the examination the lawsuit alleges.

DUI for Alcohol or Marijuana or Prescription Drugs - Fight it

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: I need to sue the police for civil rights violations. Do you do that?

Answer: We are sorry. We are a legal defense firm and will fight for your rights and freedom in the “justice system” but we do not do lawsuits at this time. Maybe in the near future.

 

Related Articles

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the...

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...

More Posts

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a...

read more
What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from...

read more
Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Is a Verbal Agreement Legal?

Apr 2, 2024 | Blog, Michigan Crime, Michigan Laws, Your Rights

Is Oral Legal?

Verbal agreements, also called oral contracts, can be legal and enforceable in Michigan, but with some limitations.

Here’s a breakdown:

Generally Enforceable: Michigan law recognizes verbal contracts as valid if they meet the standard elements of a contract: offer, acceptance, and consideration (exchange of something of value).

Statute of Frauds: However, there’s a law called the Statute of Frauds that requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed to be enforceable.

These include:

  • Agreements that won’t be performed within one year of making the agreement.
  • Promises to answer for the debt of another person.
  • Selling real estate.
  • Selling goods for over $1,000.

Difficulties in Court: Even if your verbal agreement isn’t subject to the Statute of Frauds, it can be difficult to enforce in court. This is because there’s no written record of the agreement, so it becomes a “he-said, she-said” situation.

To Sum it Up: Verbal agreements can be legal in Michigan, but it’s always better to have a written contract, especially for important agreements. A written contract provides clear evidence of the terms and reduces the risk of misunderstandings or someone backing out of the agreement.

If you’re unsure whether your verbal agreement needs to be in writing or you need help enforcing a verbal agreement, it’s best to consult with an attorney.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

What’s the law?

There isn’t a specific MCL dedicated solely to verbal agreements in Michigan. However, the relevant statute that applies to the enforceability of certain contracts based on form is the Statute of Frauds. This is found in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) under Article 2 on Sales:

This MCL outlines the types of contracts that must be in writing and signed to be enforceable in court. These include:

  • Agreements that can’t be performed within one year (MCL 566.132(1)(a))
  • Promises to guarantee another’s debt (MCL 566.132(1)(b))

Michigan’s UCC also has a separate provision under Article 2 for the sale of goods:

This MCL requires any contract for the sale of goods for more than $1,000 to be in writing to be enforceable.

So, while there’s no single MCL for verbal agreements, these two provisions (MCL 566.132 and MCL 440.2201) are the key ones to consider when determining if a verbal agreement needs to be written down in Michigan.

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: I made a verbal agreement and shook hands with my friend for a $20 bet that he couldn’t eat a spoonful of cinnamon. He did. Am I legally obligated to pay him?

Answer: Some questions don’t need legal advice. Pay him the $20 and don’t bet anymore.

Related Articles

What is a Preliminary Exam?

What is a Preliminary Exam?

Michigan Preliminary Examinations The Strategic Gatekeeper in Felony Defense The Preliminary Examination as the First Line of Defense In Michigan felony cases, the preliminary examination (PE) is the first—and often most decisive—opportunity to challenge the...

What does Nolle Prosequi mean?

What does Nolle Prosequi mean?

What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a significant weakness in the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor acknowledges an inability to prove the charges, or even when the prosecutor has lost...

More Posts

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a...

read more
What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from...

read more

Squatters and the Law in Michigan

Squatters and the Law in Michigan

Apr 1, 2024 | Blog, Michigan Crime, Michigan Laws, Your Rights

Squatters and You

Squatting, in one definition is the act of occupying a property without legal permission, can be a headache for both property owners and squatters themselves. Sorry to cause you a such a headache squatter.

Michigan has specific laws addressing squatting, offering some protection to owners while outlining potential consequences for squatters.

Here’s One…

MCL 750.553: Criminal Trespass

Michigan criminalizes squatting in single-family dwellings and one or both units in a two-family dwelling through MCL 750.553. This law defines “occupies” as physically living within the structure.

Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

  • No Consent: The squatter must have never had the owner’s consent to occupy the property.
  • Penalty: A first offense is considered a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 per dwelling unit occupied, imprisonment for not more than 180 days, or both. Subsequent offenses are felonies with steeper penalties.
  • Exceptions: The law doesn’t apply to guests or family members of the owner or a tenant.

This statute empowers property owners to pursue legal action against squatters, potentially leading to their removal and facing criminal charges. While they destroy your property and cost you legal fees, house and utility payments. 

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Self-Help Eviction

Michigan offers a unique remedy for property owners: self-help eviction.

Unlike most states, Michigan allows owners to take specific actions to encourage squatters to leave without involving law enforcement.

However, crucial limitations exist:

  • Limited Scope: Self-help measures are only applicable to situations covered by MCL 750.553 (single-family and two-family dwellings).
  • Actions: These measures can involve changing locks, shutting off utilities deemed non-essential for safety and health (like electricity or heat), or removing the squatter’s belongings after they’ve been properly evicted (typically through a legal notice).

Important Cautions:

  • Legality: Any self-help actions must strictly adhere to legal boundaries. Improper actions can lead to lawsuits from the squatter. Consulting a lawyer before taking any steps is highly recommended.
  • Tenant vs. Squatter: These measures cannot be used against tenants with a valid lease agreement. Evicting tenants requires following formal eviction procedures.

MCL Adverse Possession vs. Squatting

It’s important to distinguish squatting from adverse possession, another legal concept related to occupying land. MCL 600.5801 [MCL 600.5801] outlines adverse possession, where someone can potentially gain ownership of a property through extended, uninterrupted, and hostile possession that meets specific criteria. Squatting, however, is generally temporary and lacks the “hostile” element required for adverse possession.

Adverse Possession in Michigan – Can Someone Claim Your Property?

Taking Action – Since You Can’t Call in the A Team

If you suspect someone is squatting in your property, here are some steps to consider:

  • Contact Law Enforcement: For situations covered by MCL 750.553, involving the police can initiate the process of removing the squatter and potentially pressing charges.
  • Seek Legal Counsel: An attorney can guide you through the legal options available, including navigating self-help measures or pursuing formal eviction procedures.

The Law

750.553 Occupancy of building without consent; violation; penalty; exception.

Sec. 553.

    (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), an individual who occupies a building that is a single-family dwelling or 1 or both units in a building that is a 2-family dwelling and has not, at any time during that period of occupancy, occupied the property with the owner’s consent for an agreed-upon consideration is guilty of a crime as follows:
    (a) For a first offense, a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000.00 per dwelling unit occupied or imprisonment for not more than 180 days, or both.
    (b) For a second or subsequent offense, a felony punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000.00 per dwelling unit occupied or imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both.
    (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a guest or a family member of the owner of the dwelling or of a tenant.

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: I am squatting in a house in Michigan and was threatened by the owner. What can I do?

In Michigan, squatting is illegal and the owner has the right to take action to get you out. Here’s what you should know:

Your Legal Situation:

  • Squatting is a Crime: Michigan’s MCL 750.553 criminalizes squatting in single-family homes and one or both units in a two-family dwelling [MCL 750.553]. Since you’re squatting, the owner has legal grounds to pursue your removal.
  • Threats vs. Legal Action: While the owner may have threatened you, they can’t physically remove you themselves. However, they can involve the police or initiate legal eviction proceedings.

What You Can Do:

  • Leave Immediately: This is the safest and most advisable option. There’s a high chance you’ll be evicted if the owner pursues legal channels, and you could face criminal charges.
  • Seek Shelter Assistance: Contact local homeless shelters or social service agencies for temporary housing or resources to help you find permanent housing.
  • Legal Aid: Consider seeking legal aid from organizations specializing in tenant rights. They can offer advice on your options and potential defenses (if any) based on the specifics of your situation.

Important Notes:

  • Self-Help Eviction: Michigan allows self-help eviction for some situations, but it’s a complex process with legal risks. It’s best to avoid this and let the legal system handle the eviction.
  • False Claims of Tenancy: Don’t attempt to falsely claim you have a lease agreement. This is a crime and could worsen your situation.

Here are some resources that can help:

  • Michigan Legal Services Helpline: 1-888-773-8255

Related Articles

What is a Preliminary Exam?

What is a Preliminary Exam?

Michigan Preliminary Examinations The Strategic Gatekeeper in Felony Defense The Preliminary Examination as the First Line of Defense In Michigan felony cases, the preliminary examination (PE) is the first—and often most decisive—opportunity to challenge the...

What does Nolle Prosequi mean?

What does Nolle Prosequi mean?

What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a significant weakness in the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor acknowledges an inability to prove the charges, or even when the prosecutor has lost...

More Posts

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Franks Hearing?

What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a...

read more
What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from...

read more
Adverse Possession in Michigan – Can Someone Claim Your Property?

Adverse Possession in Michigan – Can Someone Claim Your Property?

Mar 29, 2024 | Blog, Michigan Crime, Michigan Laws, Your Rights

Understanding Adverse Possession in Michigan

Michigan recognizes adverse possession, a legal doctrine allowing someone to acquire ownership of real property they’ve occupied for a specific period, even without a formal title.

The Statute: MCL 600.5801

The relevant statute governing adverse possession is MCL 600.5801 [MCL 600.5801], titled “Limitations of actions – real property.” It establishes time limits for filing legal actions regarding land ownership.

Subsection (4) is crucial, stating a 15-year limitation period “in all other cases under this section.” This implies that to gain title through adverse possession, one must continuously possess the land for fifteen years.

600.5801 Limitation on actions; time periods; defendant claiming title under deed, court-ordered sale, tax deed, or will; other cases.

Sec. 5801.

     No person may bring or maintain any action for the recovery or possession of any lands or make any entry upon any lands unless, after the claim or right to make the entry first accrued to himself or to someone through whom he claims, he commences the action or makes the entry within the periods of time prescribed by this section.
    (1) When the defendant claims title to the land in question by or through some deed made upon the sale of the premises by an executor, administrator, guardian, or testamentary trustee; or by a sheriff or other proper ministerial officer under the order, judgment, process, or decree of a court or legal tribunal of competent jurisdiction within this state, or by a sheriff upon a mortgage foreclosure sale the period of limitation is 5 years.
    (2) When the defendant claims title under some deed made by an officer of this state or of the United States who is authorized to make deeds upon the sale of lands for taxes assessed and levied within this state the period of limitation is 10 years.
    (3) When the defendant claims title through a devise in any will, the period of limitation is 15 years after the probate of the will in this state.
    (4) In all other cases under this section, the period of limitation is 15 years.
Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Elements of Adverse Possession

To successfully claim adverse possession in Michigan, the claimant (squatter) must demonstrate they possessed the property in a way that meets the following criteria:

  • Actual Possession: This implies actively utilizing the land and regarding it as one’s possession. Infrequent or irregular use would not meet the criteria.
  • Visible and Open: The possession should be evident to anyone observing the property. Fences, landscaping, or structures built demonstrate this.
  • Notorious: The possession should be known or readily discoverable by the rightful owner. This doesn’t require the owner’s actual knowledge, but the use should be such that the owner could have discovered it with reasonable diligence.
  • Exclusive: The possession should prevent others, including the rightful owner, from using the land.
  • Continuous and Uninterrupted: Possession must be ongoing for the entire 15-year period. Gaps or breaks in possession could weaken the claim.
  • Hostile: This doesn’t imply animosity towards the true owner. It simply means the possession is adverse to the owner’s rights, suggesting a claim of ownership independent of the owner’s permission.

We’ll Take That From You.

MCL 600.5821 addresses limitations for government entities [MCL 600.5821]. Government entities like municipalities and road commissions are generally not subject to adverse possession claims.

Additionally, the “hostile” element can be tricky. Permission from the true owner, even verbal, can disrupt the claim.

Consulting an attorney is highly recommended to assess the specific facts of a potential adverse possession case.

Potential Issues

Successfully establishing adverse possession allows the claimant to gain legal title to the property.

However, there are potential drawbacks. The process can be lengthy and require significant evidence. Additionally, if the true owner contests the claim, litigation can be costly.

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: I have been living in a tent for 15 years in a Michigan State Park. Can I claim that property as my own under the adverse possession laws?

Unfortunately, you cannot claim ownership of the land in the Michigan State Park through adverse possession for a few reasons:

  • Government Immunity: MCL 600.5821 exempts government-owned land from adverse possession claims [MCL 600.5821]. State parks fall under this category, meaning no matter how long you’ve resided there, you can’t acquire ownership through adverse possession.

While you’ve met the time requirement (15 years in Michigan), the other elements likely wouldn’t hold up either.

  • Permission: Living in a state park typically requires permission, even if it’s just following camping regulations. This suggests you wouldn’t be able to establish “hostile” possession, a crucial element.

Here’s what you can do:

  • Contact Park Rangers: Explain your situation to the park rangers. They might be able to offer alternative solutions, like designated camping areas or low-cost housing programs.
  • Seek Legal Advice: An attorney specializing in property law can provide a more nuanced perspective on your situation. There might be other legal avenues to explore, depending on the specifics.

While claiming ownership through adverse possession isn’t possible in this case, there might be other options to consider.

Related Articles

The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and...

Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Can the police seize your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?Read the summary below and watch Attorney Michael Komorn in the Court of Appeals.Summary of "Ruben Delgado v. Michigan State Police": This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit...

23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?

23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?

As of Friday 3/28/25, the firm’s shares were worth less than a dollar.If you are charged with a crime you're part of the State of Michigan family now. Call us - Because you don't want to be a part of that family. Komorn Law (248) 357-2550Genetic testing service...

Drones – What Drones? Update

Drones – What Drones? Update

Drone story update January 28, 2025 NJ drones 'were authorized to be flown by FAA for research,' Donald Trump says The mysterious drones that captivated New Jersey late last year were not enemy craft, but instead were authorized by the FAA, President Donald Trump said...

More Posts

What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from...

read more
The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing...

read more
Miranda v Arizona

Miranda v Arizona

Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent,...

read more
Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a...

read more
Police investigate crash-and-grab burglary at Hazel Park pot shop

Police investigate crash-and-grab burglary at Hazel Park pot shop

Mar 12, 2024 | Blog, Michigan Crime, News

Hazel Park police are seeking assistance from the public as they work to uncover the identities of about six individuals involved in a burglary at a cannabis retail store.

Burglars used a stolen SUV to smash through the rear of the Jars Cannabis store on Dequindre near Eight Mile Road.

Hazel Park Police Chief Brian Buchholz said “We got a call at 4:27 a.m. Friday from a witness who heard a loud bang,”

Investigators were able to get surveillance video that showed much of what happened, Buchholz said.

“When we looked at the (surveillance video) we saw six Black males all wearing dark clothing,” he said.

One of the individuals took on the role of a lookout while the remaining five were observed carrying large garbage bags out of the establishment. Once the burglary was completed, all six of them promptly entered a waiting dark blue Chrysler 300., Buchholz said.

 

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Related Articles

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Driving under the influence of cannabis is illegal and carries serious consequences in Michigan.We have fought and won many cases from the District Courts, Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court through out the State of Michigan. We have also fought...

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a refusal to participate in this testing as a criminal offense, similar to the penalties imposed for...

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Komorn Law - Quick Legal TipsLegal Tip: Understanding Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan A DUI stop can be stressful, but knowing your rights is crucial. You have the right to remain silent. You are not obligated to answer questions beyond basic identification....

How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

Don't do the crime - if you can't pay the price.Average Flat Fees. Some criminal defense attorneys charge a flat fee for certain types of cases, instead of billing by the hour. This may or may not include filing fees, motions, fees, etc. Flat fees include: DUI/DWI –...

More Posts

What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from building one inference on top of another when the first inference is not supported by direct evidence....

read more
Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?

Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?

A deadlocked jury is often called a hung jury—A deadlocked jury—often called a hung jury—occurs when jurors cannot reach the unanimous (or legally required) agreement needed to deliver a verdict. In criminal cases, most jurisdictions require unanimity. When the jury...

read more
The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and...

read more
Miranda v Arizona

Miranda v Arizona

Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent, that statements may be used against them, and the right to an attorney. These “Miranda warnings”...

read more
Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Driving under the influence of cannabis is illegal and carries serious consequences in Michigan.We have fought and won many cases from the District Courts, Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court through out the State of Michigan. We have also fought...

read more
Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a refusal to participate in this testing as a criminal offense, similar to the penalties imposed for...

read more
Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Komorn Law - Quick Legal TipsLegal Tip: Understanding Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan A DUI stop can be stressful, but knowing your rights is crucial. You have the right to remain silent. You are not obligated to answer questions beyond basic identification....

read more
Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Can the police seize your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?Read the summary below and watch Attorney Michael Komorn in the Court of Appeals.Summary of "Ruben Delgado v. Michigan State Police": This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit...

read more
23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?

23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?

As of Friday 3/28/25, the firm’s shares were worth less than a dollar.If you are charged with a crime you're part of the State of Michigan family now. Call us - Because you don't want to be a part of that family. Komorn Law (248) 357-2550Genetic testing service...

read more