In Michigan, our court system is designed as a “One Court of Justice,” meaning that while there are different levels of courts, they work together as an integrated unit. Sometimes, a higher court needs to step in to ensure a lower court is properly administering justice. This powerful action is called “superintending control.”

Why Would a Higher Court “Superintend” a Lower Court?

Superintending control is an extraordinary power, not just a way to appeal a decision you don’t like. It’s used when a lower court fails to perform a clear legal duty and there isn’t another adequate legal way to fix the problem. Think of it as a referee stepping in when a game isn’t being played according to the rules, especially when the issues affect how the court generally operates rather than just one specific case error.

Reasons a higher court might exercise superintending control include:

• Failure to perform a clear legal duty: The lower court is not doing something that the law or court rules clearly require it to do.

• Abuse of discretion or exceeding jurisdiction: The lower court acts beyond its authority or makes decisions that are so wrong they indicate a fundamental problem with how it’s operating.

• Addressing general practices: Instead of correcting a single error in one case, superintending control can be used to fix widespread issues or policies within a lower court that are causing systemic problems.

Michigan Court Rules (MCR) and Laws (MCL)

• Michigan Constitution, Article VI, Section 4: Grants the Supreme Court general superintending control over all courts.
• MCL 600.219: States that the Michigan Supreme Court has general superintending control over all inferior courts and can issue any necessary writs or directives to ensure proper administration of justice.
• MCL 600.615: Grants the Circuit Court general superintending control over all inferior courts and tribunals, subject to Supreme Court rules.

The specific procedures for seeking superintending control are found in the Michigan Court Rules (MCR):

• MCR 3.302: This is the primary rule governing superintending control actions. It emphasizes that this action can only be taken if no other adequate remedy (like a standard appeal) is available.

• MCR 7.304(A): Allows a complaint for superintending control to be filed directly in the Supreme Court in situations where a regular appeal cannot be filed.

• MCR 7.203(C)(1): Gives the Michigan Court of Appeals the power of superintending control over courts immediately below it, especially if the lower court’s action would eventually lead to an appealable order in the Court of Appeals.

Procedures an Attorney Would Take

An attorney seeking superintending control would:

Determine if it’s the right remedy: First, the attorney must confirm that there is no other adequate legal remedy available, such as a direct appeal. Superintending control is a last resort for systemic issues or clear legal duty failures.

File a Complaint for Superintending Control: This is an original civil action, meaning it starts a new case in the higher court, unlike an appeal which continues an existing case.

Prepare a brief: A detailed brief supporting the complaint must be filed, explaining the legal duty the lower court failed to perform, why other remedies are inadequate, and the specific relief sought.

Pay a filing fee or seek a waiver: As with most court actions, a fee is required unless the attorney requests and qualifies for a fee waiver.

Case Examples

Here are three Michigan cases where superintending control was used:

People v Curtis, 389 Mich 698 (1973): In this case, a circuit court issued an order of superintending control to a district court concerning the district court’s authority regarding certain criminal proceedings. This highlights how higher courts ensure lower courts act within their proper jurisdiction.

Cahill v Fifteenth District Judge, 393 Mich 137 (1974): The Michigan Supreme Court found superintending control appropriate to address general practices of a district court regarding how it handled bond posting and the availability of jury trials. This case is a prime example of using superintending control to address systemic, rather than individual, errors in a lower court’s practices.

Grievance Adm v Atty Discipline Bd, 447 Mich 411 (1994): The Michigan Supreme Court used its superintending control power over the Attorney Discipline Board. This demonstrates the Supreme Court’s broad authority to oversee various tribunals to ensure they are performing their duties correctly.

Komorn Law

Komorn Law, established in 1993, has the experience and expertise to fight your case in a court of law, from the district to federal court systems.

Our dedicated team understands the complexities of Michigan’s legal landscape, including the intricacies of court procedures and the strategic application of legal remedies like superintending control.

We are committed to meticulously preparing every case, advocating fiercely for our clients’ rights, and pursuing every avenue to achieve a favorable outcome.

When you’re ready to hire a lawyer who hates to lose, call our office at (248) 357-2550call Komorn Law at (248) 357-2550.

Sources

• Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL) 600.219
• Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL) 600.615
• Michigan Court Rules, Chapter 7 (Appellate Rules) (This link provides access to Chapter 7, which contains MCR 7.304 and 7.203. MCR 3.302 is typically found in Chapter 3 of the Michigan Court Rules.)
• Komorn Law
• Komorn Law Phone Number: (248) 357-2550

We fight for our clients throughout the State of Michigan and Northern Ohio.

Here are some court contacts we frequently handle cases.

Oakland County

If you are facing any legal charges in Oakland County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (248) 858-0344
• Address: 1200 N Telegraph Rd, Department 404, Pontiac, MI 48341-0404
• Website: Oakland County 6th Judicial Circuit Court

Macomb County

If you are facing any legal charges in Macomb County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (586) 469-5150
• Address: 40 N. Main Street, Mt. Clemens, MI 48043
• Website: Macomb County 16th Judicial Circuit Court

Wayne County

If you are facing any legal charges in Wayne County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the Third Circuit Court (Wayne County):

• Telephone Number (Civil/Family): (313) 224-5510
• Telephone Number (Criminal): (313) 224-5261 or (313) 224-2503
• Address (Civil/Family): 2 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226
• Address (Criminal): 1441 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48226
• Website: https://www.3rdcc.org/

Kent County

If you are facing any legal charges in Kent County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (616) 632-5220
• Address: 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
• Website: Kent County

Traverse County

If you are facing any legal charges in Traverse County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the 13th Circuit Court (which includes Traverse County):

• Telephone Number: (231) 922-4701
• Address: 328 Washington Street, Suite 300, Traverse City, MI 49684
• Website: Traverse City 13h Circuit Court

Monroe County

If you are facing any legal charges in Monroe County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (734) 240-7020
• Address: 106 E First Street, Monroe, MI 48161
• Website: Monroe County 38th Circuit Court

The Michigan Court of Appeals recently reversed an earlier decision, ruling on July 22, 2025, that the state’s anti-terrorism threat statute, MCL 750.543m, is indeed constitutional. This decision comes after the Michigan Supreme Court sent the case back for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding the “recklessness” standard in such threat cases.

The ruling means that prosecutors can continue to use this law as a vital tool in holding individuals accountable for making threats of terrorism, provided they can demonstrate the defendant acted recklessly in communicating the threat.

Background on Michigan’s Terrorist Threat Law

Michigan’s anti-terrorism threat law, codified as MCL 750.543m, was enacted in 2002. This law makes it a felony to threaten to commit an act of terrorism or to knowingly make a false report of terrorism. The statute does not require that the person making the threat actually intended to carry out the act or had the capability to do so. This law has been crucial for prosecutors in addressing a range of serious threats, including those made in schools or through social media.

The constitutionality of this law came under scrutiny in the case of People v. Kvasnicka. In an earlier ruling in February 2025, the Michigan Court of Appeals had found the statute unconstitutional. Their reasoning was that the law did not explicitly require proof that the defendant subjectively understood the threatening nature of their statements or acted recklessly. This earlier decision effectively dismissed charges against a man accused of threatening a school via social media.

The Michigan Supreme Court, in March 2025, vacated that earlier ruling and sent the case back to the Court of Appeals for further review. The Supreme Court’s directive was to ensure the law aligns with constitutional standards, particularly in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Counterman v. Colorado, which established a “recklessness” standard for true threat cases.

Counterman v. Colorado

In Counterman v. Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that for a statement to be classified as a “true threat” and thus unprotected by the First Amendment, the prosecution must prove the defendant acted at least recklessly in making the statement. This means the defendant must have been aware of a substantial risk that their communication would be perceived as threatening violence, but disregarded that risk. The Court rejected Colorado’s use of an objective “reasonable person” standard, which only considered how a reasonable person would interpret the statement. 

Key aspects of the ruling:

Recklessness Standard:
The Court established that the prosecution must prove the defendant acted recklessly, meaning they consciously disregarded a substantial risk that their statement would be viewed as threatening violence.

Subjective Understanding:
The ruling emphasizes the need for some level of subjective understanding by the defendant regarding the threatening nature of their speech.

First Amendment Protection:
The ruling aims to protect free speech by ensuring that individuals are not punished for speech that they did not intend to be threatening, or of which they were not aware could be interpreted as threatening.

Case Background:
Billy Counterman sent hundreds of threatening messages to musician Coles Whalen over a period of two years. The messages caused Whalen to fear for her safety and change her behavior.

Colorado’s Argument:
Colorado argued that its “reasonable person” standard was sufficient for determining whether a statement constituted a true threat.

Supreme Court’s Decision:
The Supreme Court disagreed and reversed the Colorado court’s decision, finding that the state must prove at least recklessness on the part of the defendant.

The Counterman decision clarifies the standard for what constitutes a “true threat” and its implications for free speech protections under the First Amendment. The ruling has significant implications for how states prosecute cases involving threatening speech.

The Recent Court of Appeals Decision

On July 22, 2025, a panel of the Michigan Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, reversed its prior holding in People v. Kvasnicka. The court affirmed the constitutionality of MCL 750.543m, clarifying the evidentiary standard required for conviction. This means that to secure a conviction under the statute, prosecutors must now prove that the defendant acted with “recklessness” when communicating the threat.

This “recklessness” standard requires prosecutors to show that the defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk that their communication would be viewed as a threat of violence or terrorism. This adds an important layer of protection for free speech, as it requires more than just the effect of a statement; it demands proof that the speaker was aware of the risk that their words could be perceived as a real threat. Attorney General Dana Nessel praised the ruling, calling it a “critical victory for public safety,” underscoring the law’s importance in holding accountable those who spread fear through terror threats.

Key details of the ruling:

• Date of Decision: July 22, 2025.
• Case Name: People v. Kvasnicka.
• Court: Michigan Court of Appeals.
• Outcome: Reversed prior ruling, affirming the constitutionality of MCL 750.543m.
• Key Standard: Prosecutors must prove the defendant acted with “recklessness,” meaning they consciously disregarded a substantial risk that their communication would be viewed as a threat of violence or terrorism.
• Impact: Ensures continued enforcement of the anti-terrorism threat law.
• Relevant Law: Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL) 750.543m: https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=MCL-750-543M

Aggressive Defense in the Federal Courtroom

For anyone facing charges related to terrorist threats or similar serious allegations, understanding the evolving legal landscape is critical. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC brings extensive experience in criminal defense, including in federal court. 

Suggestions/Links to Similar Articles:

• Michigan Legislature – MCL 750.543m: https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=MCL-750-543M

• Michigan Courts – Court of Appeals Published Opinions (look for People of MI v. Michael Joseph Kvasnicka for July 21, 2025): https://law.justia.com/cases/michigan/court-of-appeals-published/2025/

• KomornLaw.com – Making Terrorist Threat Charges Defense Attorney: https://www.notafraidtowin.com/making-terrorist-threat-charges/

We represent clients throughout the

State of Michigan and Northern Ohio.

Here are some court contacts we frequently handle cases.

Oakland County

If you are facing any legal charges in Oakland County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (248) 858-0344
• Address: 1200 N Telegraph Rd, Department 404, Pontiac, MI 48341-0404
• Website: Oakland County 6th Judicial Circuit Court

Macomb County

If you are facing any legal charges in Macomb County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (586) 469-5150
• Address: 40 N. Main Street, Mt. Clemens, MI 48043
• Website: Macomb County 16th Judicial Circuit Court

Wayne County

If you are facing any legal charges in Wayne County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the Third Circuit Court (Wayne County):

• Telephone Number (Civil/Family): (313) 224-5510
• Telephone Number (Criminal): (313) 224-5261 or (313) 224-2503
• Address (Civil/Family): 2 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226
• Address (Criminal): 1441 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48226
• Website: https://www.3rdcc.org/

Kent County

If you are facing any legal charges in Kent County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (616) 632-5220
• Address: 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
• Website: Kent County

Traverse County

If you are facing any legal charges in Traverse County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the 13th Circuit Court (which includes Traverse County):

• Telephone Number: (231) 922-4701
• Address: 328 Washington Street, Suite 300, Traverse City, MI 49684
• Website: Traverse City 13h Circuit Court

Monroe County

If you are facing any legal charges in Monroe County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (734) 240-7020
• Address: 106 E First Street, Monroe, MI 48161
• Website: Monroe County 38th Circuit Court

Financial exploitation of elders and vulnerable adults is a growing and particularly insidious crime in Michigan, preying on individuals who, due to age, disability, or mental incapacity, are unable to protect themselves.

These acts involve the illegal or improper use of a vulnerable adult’s funds, property, or assets for personal gain, often by those in a position of trust such as family members, caregivers, or even scam artists.

Recognizing the signs and understanding the legal protections in place is crucial to safeguarding this susceptible population from devastating financial ruin and emotional distress.

The vulnerability of elderly individuals and those with disabilities makes them prime targets for financial predators. These crimes can range from outright theft to more subtle forms of manipulation, such as convincing a vulnerable person to sign over property, change wills, or grant access to bank accounts.

The background of these specific laws in Michigan reflects a societal commitment to protect those who cannot fully protect themselves, recognizing that traditional fraud statutes may not fully capture the unique dynamics of power and trust often present in these cases. Michigan’s statutes aim to provide robust legal tools to prosecute offenders and seek justice for victims.

Here are key details and factual information regarding these offenses under Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL):

Vulnerable Adult Financial Exploitation (MCL 750.174a)

This critical statute directly addresses the financial exploitation of vulnerable adults. A “vulnerable adult” is defined as an individual 18 years of age or older who, because of age, developmental disability, mental illness, or physical disability, requires supervision or personal care or lacks the personal and social skills required to live independently.

It is illegal to obtain or use, or attempt to obtain or use, a vulnerable adult’s money or property through fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, coercion, or unjust enrichment, knowing or having reason to know the person is a vulnerable adult, for direct or indirect personal benefit.

Penalties are value-dependent and severe:

• Less than $200: Misdemeanor, up to 93 days in jail, or a fine up to $500 or three times the value (whichever is greater).
• $200 to $1,000: Misdemeanor, up to 1 year in jail, or a fine up to $2,000 or three times the value.
• $1,000 to $20,000: Felony, up to 5 years in prison, or a fine up to $10,000 or three times the value.
• $20,000 to $50,000: Felony, up to 10 years in prison, or a fine up to $15,000 or three times the value.
• $50,000 to $100,000: Felony, up to 15 years in prison, or a fine up to $25,000 or three times the value.
• More than $100,000: Felony, up to 20 years in prison, or a fine up to $50,000 or three times the value.

Penalties can be enhanced for repeat offenders. The value of money or property from separate incidents over 12 months can be aggregated for higher charges.

Source: MCL 750.174a

Vulnerable Adult Abuse (MCL 750.145n)

While primarily addressing physical or mental harm, this statute is closely related because financial exploitation often occurs alongside or leads to other forms of abuse or neglect. A “caregiver” who intentionally or recklessly causes harm to a vulnerable adult can be prosecuted.

Source: MCL 750.145n

Reporting Requirements: Michigan law mandates that certain professionals (e.g., healthcare workers, social workers, law enforcement) report suspected elder or vulnerable adult abuse, including financial exploitation, to Adult Protective Services (APS). However, anyone can and should report suspected abuse.

Source: Michigan Legal Help – What Is Elder Abuse?

Resources and Contacts by County in Michigan

Statewide Adult Protective Services Hotline (24/7):

• Phone: (855) 444-3911

Oakland County:

• Adult Protective Services (APS): Report through the statewide hotline (855-444-3911)

• Prosecutor’s Office:

  • Phone: (248) 858-0656

  • Website: Oakland County Prosecutor

Macomb County:

• Adult Protective Services (APS): Report through the statewide hotline (855-444-3911)

• Prosecutor’s Office:

  • Phone: (586) 469-5350

  • Website: Macomb County Prosecutor

Wayne County:

• Adult Protective Services (APS): Report through the statewide hotline (855-444-3911)

• Prosecutor’s Office:

  • Phone: (313) 224-5777

  • Website: Wayne County Prosecutor

Livingston County:

• Adult Protective Services (APS): Report through the statewide hotline (855-444-3911)

• Prosecutor’s Office:

  • Phone: (517) 546-1850

  • Website: Livingston County Prosecutor

Washtenaw County:

• Adult Protective Services (APS): Report through the statewide hotline (855-444-3911)

• Prosecutor’s Office:

  • Phone: (734) 222-6620

  • Website: Washtenaw County Prosecutor

Komorn Law

Facing charges related to sextortion or sexploitation requires a deep understanding of complex digital evidence and Michigan’s evolving laws. Komorn Law, established in 1993, has the experience and expertise to fight your case in a court of law, from the district to federal court systems.

Attorney Michael Komorn and his team are known for their aggressive approach and mature understanding of the trial and appeals process, ensuring clients receive a robust defense. When you’re ready to hire a lawyer who hates to lose, call Komorn Law at (248) 357-2550.

We fight for our clients throughout the State of Michigan and Northern Ohio.

Here are some court contacts we frequently handle cases.

Oakland County

If you are facing any legal charges in Oakland County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (248) 858-0344
• Address: 1200 N Telegraph Rd, Department 404, Pontiac, MI 48341-0404
• Website: Oakland County 6th Judicial Circuit Court

Macomb County

If you are facing any legal charges in Macomb County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (586) 469-5150
• Address: 40 N. Main Street, Mt. Clemens, MI 48043
• Website: Macomb County 16th Judicial Circuit Court

Wayne County

If you are facing any legal charges in Wayne County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the Third Circuit Court (Wayne County):

• Telephone Number (Civil/Family): (313) 224-5510
• Telephone Number (Criminal): (313) 224-5261 or (313) 224-2503
• Address (Civil/Family): 2 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226
• Address (Criminal): 1441 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48226
• Website: https://www.3rdcc.org/

Kent County

If you are facing any legal charges in Kent County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (616) 632-5220
• Address: 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
• Website: Kent County

Traverse County

If you are facing any legal charges in Traverse County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the 13th Circuit Court (which includes Traverse County):

• Telephone Number: (231) 922-4701
• Address: 328 Washington Street, Suite 300, Traverse City, MI 49684
• Website: Traverse City 13h Circuit Court

Monroe County

If you are facing any legal charges in Monroe County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (734) 240-7020
• Address: 106 E First Street, Monroe, MI 48161
• Website: Monroe County 38th Circuit Court

Sextortion and sexploitation are increasingly prevalent and devastating forms of digital abuse, leveraging technology to coerce, manipulate, and exploit individuals, often for sexual gratification or financial gain.

These crimes involve a severe breach of trust and privacy, with victims facing immense emotional and psychological harm, public humiliation, and financial ruin. In Michigan, these malicious acts are met with serious legal penalties, reflecting the profound societal impact of such offenses and the urgent need to protect vulnerable individuals in the digital sphere.

The rise of the internet and social media has unfortunately provided new platforms for perpetrators to engage in these heinous acts. Sextortion involves threatening to distribute intimate or sexually explicit images or videos of someone unless they comply with demands, often for more explicit material, money, or sexual acts.

Sexploitation, particularly when referring to child sexual exploitation, involves the abuse of individuals, especially minors, for sexual purposes through various means, including the creation, distribution, or possession of child sexually abusive material. Michigan’s laws have evolved to specifically address these modern forms of sexual abuse, recognizing the unique harm they inflict and the digital pathways through which they are perpetrated.

Here are key details and factual information regarding these offenses under Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL):

Sexual Extortion (MCL 750.213b)

This is a relatively new and critical addition to Michigan law, specifically targeting threats to release, exhibit, create, or distribute “sexually explicit visual material” of another individual. The intent of the threat is to compel or attempt to compel the victim to do or refrain from doing any act against their will.

“Sexually explicit visual material” is broadly defined to include photographs or videos depicting nudity, erotic fondling, sexual intercourse, or sadomasochistic abuse.

Penalties are severe and escalate:

• First offense: Felony, up to 5 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $5,000, or both.
• Second offense: Felony, up to 10 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
• Third or subsequent offense: Felony, up to 20 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $20,000, or both.
• Aggravated Sexual Extortion: If the victim is under 18 or a vulnerable adult and the offender is over 18, or if the victim suffers serious physical harm, serious mental harm, or death, the crime becomes a felony punishable by up to 25 years imprisonment.

Minors committing sextortion may face misdemeanor charges.

Source: MCL 750.213b (Effective April 2, 2025).

Child Sexploitation / Child Sexually Abusive Material (CSAM) (MCL 750.145c)

Michigan law rigorously prohibits various acts related to child sexual exploitation, broadly referred to as “child sexually abusive material” (CSAM). This encompasses the production, distribution, and possession of such material.

Types of Prohibited Conduct:

Possession of CSAM: Felony, punishable by up to 4 years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine. This includes viewing pornographic material of a child.

Distribution or Promotion of CSAM: Felony, punishable by up to 7 years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine.

Production of CSAM (including enticing or coercing a child): Felony, punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment and a $100,000 fine.

A conviction often leads to mandatory lifetime registration on the Michigan Sex Offender Registry.

Source: MCL 750.145c (governs child pornography crimes, including possession, reproduction, distribution, and soliciting a child).

Disseminating Sexually Explicit Matter to a Minor (MCL 722.675)

This law makes it a felony to knowingly disseminate to a minor (under 18) sexually explicit visual or verbal material that is harmful to minors, or knowingly exhibit to a minor a sexually explicit performance that is harmful to minors.

Penalties: Felony, punishable by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.

Source: MCL 722.675

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) (MCL 750.520b et seq.)

While broader, some forms of sexual exploitation, particularly involving direct sexual penetration or contact with a minor, fall under Michigan’s extensive Criminal Sexual Conduct statutes, with first-degree CSC being among the most serious felonies.

Source: MCL 750.520b

Macomb County, Livingston County, Washtenaw County and Oakland County:

Law enforcement in Macomb County, Livingston County, Washtenaw County and Oakland County, rigorously investigates allegations of extortion and racketeering.

These complex cases often involve extensive investigations, sometimes collaborating with state police or federal agencies like the FBI, especially when racketeering crosses jurisdictional lines.

The Police Department, often working in conjunction with the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office and the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office’s Special Victims Unit, actively investigates and prosecutes sextortion and sexploitation cases. These investigations often involve digital forensics and coordination with state and federal agencies due to the online nature of these crimes.

Source: Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office – Special Victims Unit

Komorn Law

Facing charges related to sextortion or sexploitation requires a deep understanding of complex digital evidence and Michigan’s evolving laws. Komorn Law, established in 1993, has the experience and expertise to fight your case in a court of law, from the district to federal court systems.

Attorney Michael Komorn and his team are known for their aggressive approach and mature understanding of the trial and appeals process, ensuring clients receive a robust defense. When you’re ready to hire a lawyer who hates to lose, call Komorn Law at (248) 357-2550.

We fight for our clients throughout the State of Michigan and Northern Ohio.

Here are some court contacts we frequently handle cases.

Oakland County

If you are facing any legal charges in Oakland County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (248) 858-0344
• Address: 1200 N Telegraph Rd, Department 404, Pontiac, MI 48341-0404
• Website: Oakland County 6th Judicial Circuit Court

Macomb County

If you are facing any legal charges in Macomb County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (586) 469-5150
• Address: 40 N. Main Street, Mt. Clemens, MI 48043
• Website: Macomb County 16th Judicial Circuit Court

Wayne County

If you are facing any legal charges in Wayne County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the Third Circuit Court (Wayne County):

• Telephone Number (Civil/Family): (313) 224-5510
• Telephone Number (Criminal): (313) 224-5261 or (313) 224-2503
• Address (Civil/Family): 2 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226
• Address (Criminal): 1441 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48226
• Website: https://www.3rdcc.org/

Kent County

If you are facing any legal charges in Kent County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (616) 632-5220
• Address: 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
• Website: Kent County

Traverse County

If you are facing any legal charges in Traverse County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the 13th Circuit Court (which includes Traverse County):

• Telephone Number: (231) 922-4701
• Address: 328 Washington Street, Suite 300, Traverse City, MI 49684
• Website: Traverse City 13h Circuit Court

Monroe County

If you are facing any legal charges in Monroe County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

• Telephone Number: (734) 240-7020
• Address: 106 E First Street, Monroe, MI 48161
• Website: Monroe County 38th Circuit Court