Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint After Removal from Felony Cases

An Oakland County District Court judge, Kristen Hartig of Troy’s 52-4 District Court, is now facing a formal complaint from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) following her recent removal from all felony cases. The complaint, announced on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, details multiple allegations of misconduct, including a refusal to provide a personal psychological evaluation report to the commission during an investigation into her behavior.

The JTC’s complaint asserts that a previous investigation into Hartig’s conduct indicated mental health was an issue, leading to the order for a psychological evaluation. Her alleged refusal to promptly provide the report, despite repeated requests, is a central part of the current complaint. Furthermore, the commission accuses Judge Hartig of making false statements to the JTC, mistreating court employees, obstructing the administration of her court, and improperly dismissing criminal cases.

These allegations paint a picture of a judge who created a “climate of fear” among court personnel and acted beyond her authority. Prior to the formal complaint, Chief Judge Travis Reeds had already removed Judge Hartig from presiding over felony cases in May, reassigning her to civil, landlord/tenant, and small claims matters.

Following the JTC’s formal complaint, Judge Reeds stated that Hartig would be temporarily removed from her entire docket, emphasizing the importance of accountability to preserve public trust in the judiciary. Judge Hartig, through her spokesperson, has stated her respect for the JTC’s role and commitment to fully participating in the process, while also suggesting the complaint is based on “disputed claims and a flawed process.”

The next step in the process involves Hartig’s response to the complaint and a potential public hearing before a special master appointed by the Michigan Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide on any disciplinary action, ranging from censure to removal from the bench.

In Michigan, judicial immunity generally protects judges from civil liability for actions taken within their judicial capacity. This immunity is designed to allow judges to make decisions without fear of being personally sued, thereby preserving the independence of the judiciary.

However, this immunity does not shield judges from accountability for misconduct.

The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) serves as the primary mechanism for judicial accountability in the state. It investigates allegations of judicial misconduct and, if warranted, can file formal complaints and recommend sanctions to the Michigan Supreme Court, which holds the ultimate authority to discipline or remove judges from office for reasons such as misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform duties, or conduct clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Read the 2025-06-04_FC 109 Complaint

Read More about Michigan Judges – Here at Abusive Discretion

When individuals find themselves facing criminal charges in State or Federal courtrooms, securing a robust defense is life changing. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC is known for providing an aggressive defense, leveraging extensive experience in both state and federal court systems. With a deep understanding of trial and appellate processes, Komorn is dedicated to advocating for clients’ rights and freedom.

Maintaining public trust in the judiciary is paramount to a functioning legal system. In Michigan, several mechanisms exist to ensure judicial accountability, holding judges responsible for their conduct both on and off the bench.

These safeguards are primarily governed by these guidelines below.

• Michigan Constitution
• Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL)
• Rules of the Michigan Supreme Court

The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC):

The cornerstone of judicial accountability in Michigan is the Judicial Tenure Commission, established by the Michigan Constitution (Article VI, Section 30). The JTC is an independent body tasked with investigating allegations of judicial misconduct and disability. Its powers and procedures are further defined by Michigan Court Rule 9.200 et seq. The JTC can investigate complaints filed by the public, attorneys, or initiate inquiries on its own motion.

Grounds for disciplinary action by the JTC include:

Misconduct in Office: This encompasses actions that violate the Code of Judicial Conduct or the rules governing judicial ethics.

Persistent Failure to Perform the Duties of Office: Neglecting judicial responsibilities, such as timely rulings or regular court attendance, falls under this category.

Conduct Clearly Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice: This broad category covers behavior that undermines public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

Physical or Mental Disability Seriously Interfering with the Performance of Judicial Duties: When a judge's health significantly impairs their ability to fulfill their responsibilities.

Conviction of a Felony: A criminal conviction can lead to disciplinary action.

Upon investigating a complaint, the JTC may dismiss it, issue a private admonishment, or file a formal complaint with the Michigan Supreme Court if it finds sufficient evidence of misconduct.

If a formal complaint is filed, the Supreme Court appoints a master to conduct a public hearing. The master then submits findings and recommendations to the JTC, which, in turn, makes its own recommendation to the Supreme Court.

The Michigan Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to discipline judges, with sanctions ranging from censure and reprimand to suspension and removal from office (MCL 600.225 outlines the Supreme Court's general superintending control over all state courts).

Other Avenues for Accountability:

While the JTC is the primary body for addressing judicial misconduct, other avenues exist:

• Impeachment: The Michigan Constitution (Article XI, Section 7) grants the House of Representatives the power to impeach civil officers, including judges, for corrupt conduct in office or for crimes or misdemeanors. The Senate then conducts the trial, and a two-thirds vote is required for conviction and removal.
• Recall: Elected judges are subject to recall by the voters under specific conditions outlined in the Michigan Constitution (Article II, Section 9) and the Recall Act (MCL 168.951 et seq.).
• Electoral Process: Voters have the opportunity to hold judges accountable at the ballot box during elections.

Code of Judicial Conduct:

The Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court, provides specific ethical guidelines for judges. It covers areas such as impartiality, diligence, avoidance of impropriety, and the proper discharge of judicial responsibilities. Violations of this Code can form the basis of a complaint to the JTC.

When facing legal challenges, particularly those involving potential judicial overreach or misconduct, it is crucial to have experienced and dedicated legal representation. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC provides an aggressive defense in courtrooms across Michigan. With a comprehensive understanding of the law and a commitment to protecting his clients' rights, Michael Komorn is prepared to vigorously advocate on your behalf in both State and Federal courts. His experience and dedication can be invaluable in navigating complex legal situations.

FAQs about Judicial Accountability in Michigan:

Q: Who can file a complaint against a judge in Michigan?

A: Any individual, including members of the public, attorneys, or court staff, can file a complaint with the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission if they believe a judge has engaged in misconduct. The JTC can also initiate investigations on its own.

Q: What happens after a complaint is filed with the JTC?

A: The JTC reviews the complaint to determine if it alleges conduct that, if true, would constitute judicial misconduct or disability. If so, the JTC may conduct an investigation, which can involve interviewing witnesses, reviewing court records, and requesting information from the judge.

Q: What are the possible sanctions a judge can face in Michigan for misconduct?

A: The Michigan Supreme Court, based on recommendations from the JTC, can impose various sanctions, including private admonishment, public censure or reprimand, suspension with or without pay, and removal from office.

In the news about Judges

• Oakland County judge removed from felony cases now faces a judicial tenure complaint
• Troy District Court judge was ‘unsafe to practice’

Komorn Law
Areas of Service

We fight for our clients throughout the State of Michigan and Northern Ohio.

Here are some court contacts we frequently handle cases.

Komorn Law, PLLC, led by Attorney Michael Komorn, serves clients throughout Michigan. While our office is located in Farmington Hills, Michigan (Oakland County), our extensive experience in criminal defense spans various court systems across the state, including:

• District Courts
• Circuit Courts
• Michigan Court of Appeals
• Michigan Supreme Court
• Federal Court System