People v Williams Michigan COA – Police CPL Check

People v Williams Michigan COA – Police CPL Check

People v Williams
Michigan Court of Appeals
No 365299 (04/18/24)

MCL 28.425f permits a police officer to ask a person observed to be carrying a concealed weapon to produce their concealed pistol license (CPL) at any time and for any reason.

Makes possession of a concealed weapon a presumptive crime

Further, MCL 750.227 makes possession of a concealed weapon a presumptive crime, which can be rebutted by the suspect producing their CPL. Thus, a police officer has reasonable suspicion to  approach a person and ask for proof of a CPL after observing a bulge in the person’s clothing indicative of a hidden firearm.

The trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion to suppress is reversed.

About it

Michigan Court of Appeals Case No. 365299, People v Williams, centers on a warrantless search and subsequent arrest. The details of the case are not explicitly mentioned in the available information, but the legal reasoning behind the decision is referenced.

The case cites MCL 750.227, which prohibits carrying a concealed pistol without a license. It also references previous cases (Henderson and Williams) that established the legality of a warrantless search under the “automobile exception” when there’s reasonable suspicion of a crime.

The relevant part of People v Williams seems to focus on justifying a traffic stop. The court apparently determined that an informant’s tip about a driver possessing a handgun amounted to reasonable suspicion, warranting the stop. This aligns with the established principle that police can conduct stops based on reasonable suspicion, even if it’s a lesser standard compared to the probable cause needed for arrests or searches.

While the case itself isn’t elaborated on, it highlights the legal basis for traffic stops based on reasonable suspicion, particularly when the suspicion involves potential gun possession.

Better have a real good attorney

Underage Workers in Factories Spark Fines, Investigations, and Legislation

Underage Workers in Factories Spark Fines, Investigations, and Legislation

A New York Times report exposed widespread child labor in a Michigan factory, prompting state and federal authorities to take action. The report focused on a Hearthside Food Solutions plant in Kentwood, alleging the presence of numerous underage workers.

Michigan’s Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity (LEO) and the U.S. Department of Labor launched investigations into the facility.

Additionally, Michigan’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA) levied over $50,000 in fines against the plant for inadequate safety training and dangerous machinery.

Hearthside initially denied the allegations but has since paid some fines and is appealing others.

Federal and State Collaboration

The U.S. Department of Labor has increased oversight through an interagency task force focused on combating child labor. This initiative allows collaboration with other federal agencies, like the Department of Education, which offers training on child labor identification to school staff.

Strengthening Enforcement

State legislators are proposing bills to improve child labor enforcement and worker protection. One bill increases fines for violating child labor laws, aligning them with federal penalties. It also allows child workers to sue for damages and protects whistleblowers from retaliation.

Another bill proposes a complete overhaul of the work permit system in Michigan. Currently, teens obtain permits through schools. This bill would shift the responsibility to the LEO, creating a centralized database of legal teen workers and their employers. This system would enhance the LEO’s ability to identify potential child labor violations.

Immigrant Advocacy and Underlying Issues

Many underage workers in the exposed case were immigrants. Immigrant advocacy groups support the proposed bills, emphasizing provisions for compensating victims and protecting whistleblowers.

These measures could alleviate stress on immigrant families forced into child labor due to economic hardship.

However, these groups express concern that solely focusing on enforcement might drive children into even more dangerous and unregulated working environments.

As always addressing the (root causes) of child labor, such as poverty and lack of opportunity, is crucial for lasting solutions.

Better have a real good attorney

Understanding Domestic Violence Laws in Michigan

Understanding Domestic Violence Laws in Michigan

Understanding Domestic Violence Laws in Michigan

Domestic violence is a serious issue that can affect anyone, regardless of age, income, or background. If you are experiencing domestic violence in Michigan, it’s important to know your rights and the laws that protect you. This article will explain the key points of domestic violence laws in Michigan.

What is Domestic Violence?

Michigan law defines domestic violence as a pattern of behavior used to control an intimate partner. This can include:

  • Physical abuse: Hitting, kicking, shoving, grabbing, choking, or any other physical force used to harm.
  • Sexual abuse: Forced sexual contact, threats of sexual violence, or any sexual activity that is not consensual.
  • Emotional abuse: Yelling, threats, insults, name-calling, stalking, or any behavior that causes fear or emotional distress.
  • Financial abuse: Controlling finances, preventing access to money, or sabotaging your ability to work.

Who is Protected by Domestic Violence Laws?

Michigan’s domestic violence laws protect a variety of relationships, not just spouses. You can seek protection under these laws if you have been in an intimate relationship with the abuser, even if you never lived together or were not married. This includes:

  • Spouses or former spouses
  • Dating partners or former dating partners
  • People who have a child together, even if they were never romantically involved

What are the Different Types of Domestic Violence Charges?

The severity of the domestic violence crime will determine the charges filed. Here’s a breakdown of some common charges:

  • Domestic Assault: This is the most common charge for domestic violence. It can include causing physical harm, fear of harm, or offensive physical contact. A first offense is typically a misdemeanor punishable by up to 93 days in jail and a fine of $500.
  • Aggravated Domestic Assault: This is a more serious charge that applies when the abuser causes serious injuries (requiring medical attention) or uses a weapon. A first offense can be either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the severity of the abuse. Penalties can range from one year in jail and a $1,000 fine to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine.
  • Stalking: Repeatedly following, harassing, or threatening someone can be considered stalking. This is a criminal offense, and penalties can vary depending on the circumstances.

Protection Orders

A personal protection order (PPO) is a court order that prohibits the abuser from contacting you or coming near you. It can also order the abuser to leave your home and give you temporary custody of your children.

There are two main types of PPOs in Michigan:

  • Emergency PPO: A law enforcement officer can issue this temporary order if they believe you are in immediate danger. It lasts for up to 72 hours.
  • Regular PPO: You can petition the court for a longer-term PPO. A hearing will be held where you will have the opportunity to present evidence of the abuse. The judge will then decide whether to grant the PPO and for how long.

How to Get Help

If you are experiencing domestic violence, there are resources available to help you. Here are some steps you can take:

  • Call 911: If you are in immediate danger, call 911.
  • Go to a safe place: If you can safely leave your home, do so and go to a friend’s house, family member’s house, or a domestic violence shelter.
  • Contact a domestic violence hotline: There are 24/7 hotlines available that can provide support and information about your options.
  • Talk to an attorney: An attorney can advise you of your legal rights and help you obtain a personal protection order.
Marijuana grow busted as feds investigations trend in more states

Marijuana grow busted as feds investigations trend in more states

The DEA is investigating international criminal organizations that are operating illegal marijuana grows in about 20 states, including Maine.

The significant electricity usage in a residence, its windows concealed with cardboard, and the scent of marijuana caught the attention of law enforcement, leading them to discover an illegal cultivation operation hidden away in a remote area.

The recent discovery of a home equipped with a concealed grow operation and the subsequent seizure of approximately 40 pounds of processed marijuana serves as a prime example of a troubling trend that law enforcement authorities have been highlighting for years.

This trend involves foreign nationals taking advantage of the legalization of cannabis for recreational or medical purposes in certain U.S. states, using it as an opportunity to produce marijuana for the illicit markets within the country.

The incident symbolizes the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in combatting the illegal production and distribution of marijuana across the United States.

The Drug Enforcement Administration is actively investigating international criminal organizations that are operating illegal marijuana grows in approximately 20 states, including Maine. This information was shared by Attorney Garland Merrick Garland during his testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee last week, in response to a question raised by Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine.

Law enforcement officials are diligently pursuing their investigations into the individuals responsible for directing the operations, as well as the destination of the profits.

Oregon governor signs a bill recriminalizing drug possession

Oregon governor signs a bill recriminalizing drug possession

Oregon governor signs a bill recriminalizing drug possession into law

On April 1, 2024, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed House Bill 4002 into law, effectively recriminalizing the possession of small amounts of certain controlled substances. This legislation marks a significant shift in Oregon’s drug policy, reversing a key provision of Ballot Measure 110 passed by voters in 2020. Measure 110 decriminalized possession of illicit drugs like heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine, making them civil violations punishable by a fine only.

In a signing letter, Kotek said the law’s success will depend on “deep coordination” between courts, police, prosecutors, defense attorneys and local mental health providers, describing them as “necessary partners to achieve the vision for this legislation.”

House Bill 4002: Key Provisions

  • Recriminalization: Possession of controlled substances in usable quantities for personal consumption becomes a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine of up to $3,600, or both.
  • Treatment Emphasis: The bill allocates new funding for substance abuse treatment programs. Law enforcement agencies are encouraged to create deflection programs that divert individuals caught with drugs towards treatment options instead of prosecution.
  • Implementation Timeline: The recriminalization provisions take effect on September 1, 2024.

Background: The Decriminalization Experiment

Measure 110, approved with over 58% of the vote, aimed to address the state’s addiction crisis by shifting focus from punishment to treatment. However, implementation issues arose. Limited treatment resources hampered the program’s effectiveness, and concerns emerged regarding increased public drug use and public safety.

Arguments for Recriminalization

Proponents of House Bill 4002 argue that decriminalization failed to deliver on its promises. They cite:

  • Inadequate Treatment Infrastructure: The lack of readily available treatment options rendered the decriminalization policy ineffective in addressing addiction.
  • Public Safety Concerns: Increased reports of public drug use and associated criminal activity fueled arguments for stricter enforcement.
  • Unintended Consequences: Critics argued decriminalization normalized drug use and discouraged individuals from seeking help.

Arguments Against Recriminalization

Opponents of the bill express concerns that it represents a step backward in drug policy reform. They argue:

  • The Criminal Justice System is Ineffective: They believe criminalization disproportionately impacts low-income communities and people of color, hindering access to treatment.
  • Focus on Treatment, Not Incarceration: Opponents advocate for increased investment in treatment programs over incarceration, which they view as counterproductive.
  • Limited Bill Impact: Critics argue the bill’s treatment funding is insufficient and may not effectively address the root causes of addiction.

The Road Ahead

House Bill 4002 represents a compromise approach, attempting to balance public safety concerns with treatment availability. The success of this legislation hinges on several factors, including:

  • Effective Implementation: Establishing accessible, well-funded treatment programs is crucial to diverting individuals from the criminal justice system.
  • Police Discretion: Law enforcement agencies will need clear guidelines on implementing the deflection programs and how to interact with individuals struggling with addiction.
  • Data Collection and Analysis: Monitoring the program’s impact on public safety, treatment utilization, and recidivism rates will be essential for evaluating its effectiveness.

Oregon’s policy shift reflects the ongoing national debate on drug policy reform. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether House Bill 4002 offers a viable solution to the state’s addiction crisis.

Real Questions from Real Calls

Question: I think I found a bag with some Fentynal in my yard??

Answer: Get far away and call the police. Even though we battle the police in a court of law there is still a need for them. Unless you want to pick it up and find out.

What is Fentanyl?

In 2023 the overdose death rate topped 112,000 in a 12 month period for the first time, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dec 28, 2023 (Still left out 3 days)

 

 

Related Articles

Woman high on cannabis panics and jumps from rideshare on I-96

Woman high on cannabis panics and jumps from rideshare on I-96

Not a good ideaA woman, who was allegedly under the influence of cannabis, experienced a moment of panic while riding in a rideshare vehicle. In a concerning turn of events, she chose to abruptly exit the moving vehicle on I-96 near I-94, according to reports from...

Senate considers bill making governor, lawmakers eligible for FOIA

Senate considers bill making governor, lawmakers eligible for FOIA

Why this was not a thing and passed decades ago would be a good question.The Senate oversight committee will review a bill that aims to extend Michigan's Freedom of Information Act to cover lawmakers and the governor's office. Senate Bills 669 and 670 aim to expand...

Whitmer supports opt-out system for state park passes

Whitmer supports opt-out system for state park passes

Whitmer expressed her support in her 2025 budget recommendations for legislation that would automatically charge vehicle owners a fee for entry to state parks. Another fine piece of legislation introduced House Bill 5428, which would automatically take from vehicle...

More Posts

Michigan Crime Victim Compensation

Michigan Crime Victim Compensation

Michigan has a crime victim compensation fund. You can contact them using the various links on this page. This post is just to provide you with information. We do not...

read more
Komorn Law Case Victories

Komorn Law Case Victories

Just some of our victoriesState / Federal Legal Defense With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals,...

read more