House Bill 5107 – The MRTMA Shuffle

House Bill 5107 – The MRTMA Shuffle

Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations.

Michigan’s Cannabis Regulation Challenges

Since Michigan legalized recreational marijuana in 2018 under the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), the state has faced ongoing challenges with illegal grow operations and unlicensed distribution. The Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has struggled to enforce limits on personal possession and cultivation, especially when large-scale operations disguise themselves as personal use.

To address these concerns, lawmakers introduced House Bill 5107 on October 22, 2025, sponsored by Rep. Mike Hoadley and co-sponsored by several others. The bill aims to amend Sections 5 and 15 of MRTMA (MCL 333.27955 and MCL 333.27965) to redefine the allowable amounts of marijuana for personal use and possession

What HB 5107 Proposes

HB 5107 modifies the legal thresholds for marijuana possession and cultivation. The bill proposes reducing the number of plants and the amount of usable marijuana individuals can possess without triggering criminal penalties. It also clarifies the distinction between personal use and commercial-scale activity.

The bill is tie-barred to HB 5105, meaning both must be passed together. HB 5105 updates the penalties for marijuana-related offenses, while HB 5107 sets the legal possession limits. This ensures that enforcement is consistent and that penalties are applied fairly based on updated thresholds.

Don’t worry the bill is tie-barred to House Bill 5105

How HB 5105 and HB 5107 Work Together

  • HB 5105 amends the Michigan Public Health Code (MCL 333.7401) to redefine criminal penalties for marijuana-related offenses. It introduces tiered penalties based on the amount of marijuana or concentrate possessed or manufactured.
  • HB 5107 amends the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MCL 333.27955 and MCL 333.27965) to modify the allowable amounts of marijuana for personal use and possession.

Because HB 5105 sets penalties and HB 5107 sets the legal possession limits, the two bills are interdependent. For example, if HB 5107 changes the legal threshold for personal possession, HB 5105 must reflect those changes in its penalty structure. The tie-bar ensures that enforcement and legal standards remain aligned.

Read the HB5105 article HERE (But finish this article first)

You can read the full bill texts here:

What Does “Tie-Barred” Mean?

In Michigan legislative terms, a tie-bar means that one bill is legally connected to another. If two bills are tie-barred, they must both be passed for either to take effect. This ensures that related legal changes are implemented together, maintaining consistency across statutes.

Key Details of HB 5107

  • Introduced: October 22, 2025

  • Sponsors: Rep. Mike Hoadley (R-99), Joseph Aragona, Ken Borton, Parker Fairbairn, Douglas Wozniak, Jerry Neyer

  • Committee: House Regulatory Reform

  • Purpose: Modify allowable marijuana possession and cultivation limits

  • Tie-Barred: Must be passed alongside HB 5105

Proposed Possession Limits

  • Usable Marijuana:

    • Reduced personal possession limits for flower and concentrate

    • Clarifies what constitutes “personal use” vs. trafficking

  • Cultivation:

    • Limits the number of plants individuals can grow at home

    • Sets thresholds that trigger misdemeanor or felony charges under HB 5105

You can read the full bill texts here:

View the relevant law at [MCL 333.7401]

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

FAQs About HB 5107

Q1: What does “tie-barred” mean in HB 5107? A1: It means HB 5107 cannot become law unless HB 5105 is also passed. They are legally linked.

Q2: Does HB 5107 affect medical marijuana users? A2: HB 5107 targets recreational possession limits. Registered medical users following state guidelines are not directly affected.

Q3: Is HB 5107 currently law? A3: No. As of November 2025, HB 5107 is still under review by the House Regulatory Reform Committee.

Legal Defense: Komorn Law PLLC

If you or someone you know is facing marijuana-related charges under from the cannabis enforcement teams or federal drug laws, Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC offers aggressive and strategic defense. With decades of experience in cannabis law and federal litigation, Komorn Law understands the nuances of Michigan’s evolving marijuana regulations and how to challenge overreach or misapplication in court.

Komorn Law can:

  • Challenge unlawful search and seizure
  • Dispute quantity assessments and intent
  • Navigate federal vs. state law conflicts
  • Advocate for reduced or dismissed charges
Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

More Articles

More

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws: Steady As She Goes Michigan's adult-use marijuana legislation, established in 2018 through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), remains stable. While there haven't been any major changes to the core tenets...

read more
Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, calling them rushed, recently vetoed 11 bills including three medical cannabis bills, with others related to retirement and tax. The governor did however sign into law six other bills approved by the Legislature.  Two bills that were...

read more
House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle

House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle

Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations.

Michigan’s Cannabis Laws

Since Michigan legalized recreational marijuana in 2018, the state has worked to balance personal freedom with public safety. However, large-scale illegal grow operations and unregulated cannabis distribution continue to challenge law enforcement and the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA). In response, lawmakers introduced a series of bills in October 2025 to tighten regulations and redefine penalties.

One of the most prominent proposals is House Bill 5105, introduced on October 22, 2025, by Rep. Pauline Wendzel and others. The bill aims to amend Section 7401 of the Michigan Public Health Code (MCL 333.7401) to update criminal penalties for marijuana-related offenses based on quantity and intent

What HB 5105 Proposes

HB 5105 seeks to distinguish between personal use and large-scale illegal operations by setting clear thresholds for marijuana possession and manufacturing. The bill introduces tiered penalties based on weight, plant count, and concentrate volume.

For example, possessing 10 to 25 kilograms of marijuana or 50 to 100 plants would result in a misdemeanor, while quantities exceeding 250 kilograms or 1,000 plants could lead to felony charges with up to 10 years in prison.

The bill also addresses marijuana concentrates, which have grown in popularity. Possession of 1 to 2.5 kilograms of concentrate would be treated as a misdemeanor, while more than 10 kilograms could trigger felony charges. These changes aim to give law enforcement clearer guidelines and help the CRA target large-scale illicit operations more effectively

Don’t worry the bill is tie-barred to House Bill 5107

How HB 5105 and HB 5107 Work Together

  • HB 5105 amends the Michigan Public Health Code (MCL 333.7401) to redefine criminal penalties for marijuana-related offenses. It introduces tiered penalties based on the amount of marijuana or concentrate possessed or manufactured.
  • HB 5107 amends the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MCL 333.27955 and MCL 333.27965) to modify the allowable amounts of marijuana for personal use and possession.

Because HB 5105 sets penalties and HB 5107 sets the legal possession limits, the two bills are interdependent. For example, if HB 5107 changes the legal threshold for personal possession, HB 5105 must reflect those changes in its penalty structure. The tie-bar ensures that enforcement and legal standards remain aligned.

You can read the full bill texts here:

What Does “Tie-Barred” Mean?

In Michigan legislative terms, a tie-bar means that one bill is legally connected to another. If two bills are tie-barred, they must both be passed for either to take effect. This ensures that related legal changes are implemented together, maintaining consistency across statutes.

Key Details of HB 5105

  • Introduced: October 22, 2025

  • Sponsors: Reps. Wendzel, Aragona, Borton, Fairbairn, Wozniak, Neyer

  • Committee: Regulatory Reform

  • Purpose: Amend penalties under MCL 333.7401 for marijuana-related crimes

  • Focus Areas:

    • Unlicensed manufacturing

    • Possession thresholds for flower and concentrate

    • Differentiation between personal and commercial-scale offenses

Penalty Breakdown

  • Misdemeanor Offenses:

    • 10–25 kg of marijuana

    • 50–100 plants

    • 1–2.5 kg of concentrate

  • Felony Offenses:

    • Over 250 kg of marijuana

    • Over 1,000 plants

    • Over 10 kg of concentrate

    • Up to 10 years imprisonment for highest tier offenses

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is Michigan House Bill 5105?

Answer: House Bill 5105 is a proposed amendment to Michigan’s Public Health Code (MCL 333.7401) that redefines criminal penalties for marijuana-related offenses. It introduces tiered punishments based on the amount of marijuana or concentrate possessed or manufactured, aiming to target large-scale illegal cannabis operations while distinguishing them from personal use.

Who introduced HB 5105 and why?

Answer: HB 5105 was introduced on October 22, 2025, by Rep. Pauline Wendzel and co-sponsored by several other lawmakers. The bill was created in response to growing concerns about unlicensed marijuana grow operations and trafficking, which pose risks to public safety and undermine Michigan’s regulated cannabis market.

What are the proposed penalties under HB 5105?

Answer: The bill proposes penalties based on possession thresholds:

  • Misdemeanor: 10–25 kg of marijuana, 50–100 plants, or 1–2.5 kg of concentrate.
  • Felony: Over 250 kg of marijuana, over 1,000 plants, or over 10 kg of concentrate, with up to 10 years imprisonment.

These penalties are designed to differentiate between personal use and commercial-scale illegal activity.

Does HB 5105 affect medical marijuana patients?

Answer: No, HB 5105 does not directly target registered medical marijuana patients who comply with Michigan’s medical cannabis laws. The bill focuses on unlicensed manufacturing and possession beyond legal limits, particularly in cases involving trafficking or large-scale cultivation.

Is HB 5105 currently law?

Answer: As of November 2025, HB 5105 is still under review by the House Regulatory Reform Committee. It has not yet been passed into law. You can track its progress and read the full bill text on the Michigan Legislature Website.

Legal Defense: Komorn Law PLLC

If you or someone you know is facing marijuana-related charges under from the cannabis enforcement teams or federal drug laws, Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC offers aggressive and strategic defense. With decades of experience in cannabis law and federal litigation, Komorn Law understands the nuances of Michigan’s evolving marijuana regulations and how to challenge overreach or misapplication in court.

Komorn Law can:

  • Challenge unlawful search and seizure
  • Dispute quantity assessments and intent
  • Navigate federal vs. state law conflicts
  • Advocate for reduced or dismissed charges
Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

More Articles

More

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws: Steady As She Goes Michigan's adult-use marijuana legislation, established in 2018 through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), remains stable. While there haven't been any major changes to the core tenets...

read more
Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, calling them rushed, recently vetoed 11 bills including three medical cannabis bills, with others related to retirement and tax. The governor did however sign into law six other bills approved by the Legislature.  Two bills that were...

read more

Supreme Court Rejects Gun Rights Cases Leaving Weapons Ban Unresolved

Supreme Court Rejects Gun Rights Cases Leaving Weapons Ban Unresolved

Supreme Court Rejects Gun Rights Cases, Leaving Assault Weapons Ban Unresolved

In a surprising move, the U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to hear two major gun rights cases, leaving unresolved questions about the constitutionality of assault weapons bans and high-capacity magazine restrictions. While the Court gave no explanation for its decision, several conservative justices voiced concern, signaling that the issue may return to the docket soon.

The cases involved challenges to state laws banning popular firearms like the AR-15 and limiting magazine capacity. These laws were contested under the precedent set by District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which affirmed an individual’s right to possess firearms for self-defense. The Court’s refusal to hear the cases means lower court rulings upholding these bans remain in effect—for now.

  • Assault Weapons Ban Challenges

    Plaintiffs argued that AR-15-style rifles are in “common use” and thus protected under Heller. Lower courts disagreed, citing public safety concerns.

  • High-Capacity Magazine Restrictions

    States like California and New York limit magazines to 10 rounds. These laws were upheld despite arguments that they infringe on Second Amendment rights.

  • Justice Statements

    Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissented from the denial, suggesting the Court should clarify its stance on modern firearm regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

 

Q: Why did the Supreme Court reject the cases? A: The Court did not provide a reason, but some justices indicated the issue may be revisited soon.

Q: Are assault weapons banned nationwide? A: No. Bans vary by state. The Court’s decision leaves state laws intact.

Q: What is the AR-15 and why is it controversial? A: It’s a semi-automatic rifle often used in mass shootings, prompting calls for regulation.

Q: What does “common use” mean in gun law? A: It refers to weapons widely owned by law-abiding citizens, which may be protected under the Second Amendment.

Q: Can states still pass new gun laws? A: Yes. States retain the power to regulate firearms unless a law is struck down by the courts.

Legal Defense: Komorn Law PLLC

When your rights are on the line, hire Komorn Law, established in 1993, to fight for you from district court to the federal level. Call our office at 248-357-2550.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

More Articles

More

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws: Steady As She Goes Michigan's adult-use marijuana legislation, established in 2018 through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), remains stable. While there haven't been any major changes to the core tenets...

read more
Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, calling them rushed, recently vetoed 11 bills including three medical cannabis bills, with others related to retirement and tax. The governor did however sign into law six other bills approved by the Legislature.  Two bills that were...

read more
Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws Steady As She Goes

Michigan Adult-Use Marijuana Laws: Steady As She Goes

Michigan’s adult-use marijuana legislation, established in 2018 through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), remains stable. While there haven’t been any major changes to the core tenets of the law recently, it’s important to remember it’s an evolving landscape.

Here’s a quick refresher on Michigan’s recreational marijuana laws:

  • Possession: Adults 21+ can possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana at a time. There’s a separate 15-gram limit for marijuana concentrate. At home, residents can possess up to 10 ounces and any marijuana grown on their property (within legal plant limits).
  • Consumption: Public consumption remains illegal. Cities and townships can set their own regulations regarding consumption on private property.
  • Cultivation: Residents can cultivate up to 12 marijuana plants for personal use within a private residence.
  • Sales: Recreational marijuana is sold at licensed provisioning centers. These centers are subject to state taxation (10% excise tax on top of the 6% sales tax).

What to watch for:

  • Local Regulations: Municipalities can still enact restrictions on marijuana businesses within their jurisdictions. Stay informed about your local ordinances.
  • Expungement: There have been ongoing efforts to expand expungement for marijuana-related offenses.

Looking for more information? Check out the Michigan Marijuana Regulatory Agency (MRA) for official resources and updates: Michigan Marijuana Regulatory Agency website: https://www.michigan.gov/cra

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Michigan Legislature Related to Cannabis

Document Type Description
SB 0179 of 2023
(PA 165 of 2023)
Senate Bill Marihuana: taxation; marihuana tax revenue; allocate to Indian tribes under certain circumstances. Amends sec. 14 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27964). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0180’23
SB 0180 of 2023
(PA 166 of 2023)
Senate Bill Marihuana: other; tribal marihuana businesses; allow cannabis regulatory agency to contract with Indian tribes regarding the operation of. Amends secs. 3, 7, 8, 10 & 13 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27953 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0179’23
SB 0189 of 2023 Senate Bill Appropriations: general government; appropriations for fiscal year 2023-2024; provide for. Creates appropriation act.
SB 0195 of 2023 Senate Bill Appropriations: department of licensing and regulatory affairs; appropriations for fiscal year 2023-2024; provide for. Creates appropriation act.
SB 0557 of 2023 Senate Bill State management: other; requirements for state agencies when issuing a permit; provide for. Creates new act.
HB 4049 of 2023 House Bill Marihuana: administration; spouses of applicants for licensure who hold certain positions in certain governmental bodies; prohibit the cannabis regulatory agency from denying an application based on. Amends sec. 7 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27957).
HB 4280 of 2023 House Bill Appropriations: department of licensing and regulatory affairs; appropriations for fiscal year 2023-2024; provide for. Creates appropriation act.
HB 4322 of 2023 House Bill Marihuana: other; individuals who are 19 years of age or older; allow to be employed by or volunteer for marihuana establishments. Amends title & secs. 3, 4, 5, 8, 10 & 11 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27953 et seq.).
HB 4430 of 2023 House Bill Marihuana: other; safety information provided to consumers; modify. Amends secs. 3 & 8 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27953 & 333.27958).
HB 4437 of 2023
(PA 119 of 2023)
House Bill Appropriations: omnibus; appropriations for multiple departments and branches for fiscal year 2023-2024; provide for, and make supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2022-2023. Creates appropriation act.
HB 4600 of 2023 House Bill Marihuana: administration; spouses of applicants for licensure who hold certain positions in certain governmental bodies; prohibit the cannabis regulatory agency from denying an application based on. Amends sec. 7 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27957).
HB 4601 of 2023 House Bill Medical marihuana: administration; transfer of medical marihuana from 1 facility to another; allow under certain circumstances, and prohibit a background check of an applicant’s spouse under certain circumstances. Amends secs. 102, 402, 501, 502 & 504 of 2016 PA 281 (MCL 333.27102 et seq.).
HB 5094 of 2023 House Bill State management: other; requirements for state agencies when issuing a permit; provide for. Creates new act.
HB 5529 of 2024 House Bill Marihuana: other; cannabis regulatory agency; allow to operate a marihuana reference laboratory and to collect, transport, possess, test, and perform research with marihuana. Amends sec. 7 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27957).

Related Articles

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Driving under the influence of cannabis is illegal and carries serious consequences in Michigan.We have fought and won many cases from the District Courts, Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court through out the State of Michigan. We have also fought...

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a refusal to participate in this testing as a criminal offense, similar to the penalties imposed for...

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Komorn Law - Quick Legal TipsLegal Tip: Understanding Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan A DUI stop can be stressful, but knowing your rights is crucial. You have the right to remain silent. You are not obligated to answer questions beyond basic identification....

How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

Don't do the crime - if you can't pay the price.Average Flat Fees. Some criminal defense attorneys charge a flat fee for certain types of cases, instead of billing by the hour. This may or may not include filing fees, motions, fees, etc. Flat fees include: DUI/DWI –...

More Posts

What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from building one inference on top of another when the first inference is not supported by direct evidence....

read more
Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?

Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?

A deadlocked jury is often called a hung jury—A deadlocked jury—often called a hung jury—occurs when jurors cannot reach the unanimous (or legally required) agreement needed to deliver a verdict. In criminal cases, most jurisdictions require unanimity. When the jury...

read more
The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and...

read more
Miranda v Arizona

Miranda v Arizona

Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent, that statements may be used against them, and the right to an attorney. These “Miranda warnings”...

read more
Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Driving under the influence of cannabis is illegal and carries serious consequences in Michigan.We have fought and won many cases from the District Courts, Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court through out the State of Michigan. We have also fought...

read more
Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a refusal to participate in this testing as a criminal offense, similar to the penalties imposed for...

read more
Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Komorn Law - Quick Legal TipsLegal Tip: Understanding Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan A DUI stop can be stressful, but knowing your rights is crucial. You have the right to remain silent. You are not obligated to answer questions beyond basic identification....

read more
Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Can the police seize your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?Read the summary below and watch Attorney Michael Komorn in the Court of Appeals.Summary of "Ruben Delgado v. Michigan State Police": This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit...

read more
23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?

23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and your data is?

As of Friday 3/28/25, the firm’s shares were worth less than a dollar.If you are charged with a crime you're part of the State of Michigan family now. Call us - Because you don't want to be a part of that family. Komorn Law (248) 357-2550Genetic testing service...

read more
Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov Vetoes Several Medical Cannabis Bills

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, calling them rushed, recently vetoed 11 bills including three medical cannabis bills, with others related to retirement and tax. The governor did however sign into law six other bills approved by the Legislature. 

Two bills that were vetoed: House Bill 5871, which would have amended state law to ease access to medical cannabis products, making them easier to be transferred from one facility to another. HB 5871 would also prohibit a background check of an applicant’s spouse under certain circumstances. 

House Bill 5965, on the other hand, would have updated some language and definitions in the state’s Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act, such as the title for the state’s Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA).

Another medical cannabis-related bill was vetoed. House Bill 5839, introduced by Rep. Pat Outman (R – Six Lakes), would have prevented the CRA from denying a person a license to sell cannabis based on their spouse’s job, including if their spouse works for the state or federal government.

Michigan Advance reports that Whitmer said in her veto letter to the Legislature on Dec. 22 that the bills “were rushed through a lame duck session and need closer examination.”

The Cost of Cannabis

The price of cannabis in the Michigan adult-use market plunged about 75%, from nearly $400 an ounce to less than $100 over the past two years. That drop in price triggered some industry officials to call for a moratorium on cultivation licenses. MLive reports that 2022 was a good year for customers, on the other hand, who are paying prices much lower than normal this year. 

If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime, DUI or Drugged Driving. Call Komorn Law and turn your defense into an offense.
Call Now 248-357-2550

More from The Executive Office

2022 Executive Orders

News

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

BMMR cannabis corruption. prosecutors dispensary Driving DUI FAQs forfeiture gun rights hemp komornlaw lara law enforcement abuse laws Legalization marijuana Medical Marijuana Michigan Michigan Court of Appeals michigan laws michigan news michigan supreme court MMFLA news police politics science usa news us supreme court Your Rights

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.

Michigan House Bill 5923 – To Amend the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act

Michigan House Bill 5923 – To Amend the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act

HOUSE BILL NO. 5923

To amend the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act

Read the Summary Analysis Here

June 25, 2020, Introduced by Reps. Chirkun and Webber and referred to the Committee on Government Operations.

A bill to amend 2016 PA 281, entitled

“Medical marihuana facilities licensing act,”

by amending section 102 (MCL 333.27102), as amended by 2019 PA 3.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

Sec. 102. As used in this act:

(a) “Advisory panel” or “panel” means the marihuana advisory panel created in section 801.marijuana regulatory agency.

(b) “Affiliate” means any person that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with; is in a partnership or joint venture relationship with; or is a co-shareholder of a corporation, a co-member of a limited liability company, or a co-partner in a limited liability partnership with a licensee or applicant.

(c) “Applicant” means a person who applies for a state operating license. Applicant includes, with respect to disclosures in an application, for purposes of ineligibility for a license under section 402, or for purposes of prior board marijuana regulatory agency approval of a transfer of interest under section 406, and only for applications submitted on or after January 1, 2019, a managerial employee of the applicant, a person holding a direct or indirect ownership interest of more than 10% in the applicant, and the following for each type of applicant:

(i) For an individual or sole proprietorship: the proprietor and spouse.

(ii) For a partnership and limited liability partnership: all partners and their spouses. For a limited partnership and limited liability limited partnership: all general and limited partners, not including a limited partner holding a direct or indirect ownership interest of 10% or less and who does not exercise control over or participate in the management of the partnership, and their spouses. For a limited liability company: all members and managers, not including a member holding a direct or indirect ownership interest of 10% or less and who does not exercise control over or participate in the management of the company, and their spouses.

(iii) For a privately held corporation: all corporate officers or persons with equivalent titles and their spouses, all directors and their spouses, and all stockholders, not including those holding a direct or indirect ownership interest of 10% or less, and their spouses.

(iv) For a publicly held corporation: all corporate officers or persons with equivalent titles and their spouses, all directors and their spouses, and all stockholders, not including those holding a direct or indirect ownership interest of 10% or less, and their spouses.

(v) For a multilevel ownership enterprise: any entity or person that receives or has the right to receive more than 10% of the gross or net profit from the enterprise during any full or partial calendar or fiscal year.

(vi) For a nonprofit corporation: all individuals and entities with membership or shareholder rights in accordance with the articles of incorporation or the bylaws and their spouses.

(d) “Board” means the medical marihuana licensing board created in section 301.marijuana regulatory agency.

(e) “Cutting” means a section of a lead stem or root stock that is used for vegetative asexual propagation.

(f) “Department” means the department of licensing and regulatory affairs.

(g) “Grower” means a licensee that is a commercial entity located in this state that cultivates, dries, trims, or cures and packages marihuana for sale to a processor, provisioning center, or another grower.

(h) “Industrial hemp” means that term as defined in section 7106 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7106.

(i) “Industrial hemp research and development act” means the industrial hemp research and development act, 2014 PA 547, MCL 286.841 to 286.859.

(j) “Licensee” means a person holding a state operating license.

(k) “Marihuana” means that term as defined in section 7106 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7106.

(l) “Marihuana facility” means a location at which a licensee is licensed to operate under this act.

(m) “Marihuana plant” means any plant of the species Cannabis sativa L. Marihuana plant does not include industrial hemp.

(n) “Marihuana-infused product” means a topical formulation, tincture, beverage, edible substance, or similar product containing any usable marihuana that is intended for human consumption in a manner other than smoke inhalation. Marihuana-infused product is not considered a food for purposes of the food law, 2000 PA 92, MCL 289.1101 to 289.8111.

(o) “Marihuana tracking act” means the marihuana tracking act, 2016 PA 282, MCL 333.27901 to 333.27904.

(p) “Marijuana regulatory agency” means the marijuana regulatory agency created under Executive Reorganization Order No. 2019-2, MCL 333.27001.

(q) (p) “Michigan medical marihuana act” Medical Marihuana Act” means the Michigan medical marihuana act, Medical Marihuana Act, 2008 IL 1, MCL 333.26421 to 333.26430.

(r) (q) “Municipality” means a city, township, or village.

(s) (r) “Paraphernalia” means any equipment, product, or material of any kind that is designed for or used in growing, cultivating, producing, manufacturing, compounding, converting, storing, processing, preparing, transporting, injecting, smoking, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body, marihuana.

(t) (s) “Person” means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability limited partnership, trust, or other legal entity.

(u) (t) “Plant” means any living organism that produces its own food through photosynthesis and has observable root formation or is in growth material.

(v) (u) “Processor” means a licensee that is a commercial entity located in this state that purchases marihuana from a grower and that extracts resin from the marihuana or creates a marihuana-infused product for sale and transfer in packaged form to a provisioning center or another processor.

(w) (v) “Provisioning center” means a licensee that is a commercial entity located in this state that purchases marihuana from a grower or processor and sells, supplies, or provides marihuana to registered qualifying patients, directly or through the patients’ registered primary caregivers. Provisioning center includes any commercial property where marihuana is sold at retail to registered qualifying patients or registered primary caregivers. A noncommercial location used by a registered primary caregiver to assist a qualifying patient connected to the caregiver through the department’s marihuana registration process in accordance with the Michigan medical marihuana act Medical Marihuana Act is not a provisioning center for purposes of this act.

(x) (w) “Registered primary caregiver” means a primary caregiver who has been issued a current registry identification card under the Michigan medical marihuana act.Medical Marihuana Act.

(y) (x) “Registered qualifying patient” means a qualifying patient who has been issued a current registry identification card under the Michigan medical marihuana act or a visiting qualifying patient as that term is defined in section 3 of the Michigan medical marihuana act, Medical Marihuana Act, MCL 333.26423.

(z) (y) “Registry identification card” means that term as defined in section 3 of the Michigan medical marihuana act, Medical Marihuana Act, MCL 333.26423.

(aa) (z) “Rules” means rules promulgated under the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, by the department in consultation with the board marijuana regulatory agency to implement this act.

(bb) (aa) “Safety compliance facility” means a licensee that is a commercial entity that takes marihuana from a marihuana facility or receives marihuana from a registered primary caregiver, tests the marihuana for contaminants and for tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids, returns the test results, and may return the marihuana to the marihuana facility.

(cc) (bb) “Secure transporter” means a licensee that is a commercial entity located in this state that stores marihuana and transports marihuana between marihuana facilities for a fee.

(dd) (cc) “Seed” means the fertilized, ungerminated, matured ovule, containing an embryo or rudimentary plant, of a marihuana plant that is flowering.

(ee) (dd) “Seedling” means a marihuana plant that has germinated and has not flowered and is not harvestable.

(ff) (ee) “State operating license” or, unless the context requires a different meaning, “license” means a license that is issued under this act that allows the licensee to operate as 1 of the following, specified in the license:

(i) A grower.

(ii) A processor.

(iii) A secure transporter.

(iv) A provisioning center.

(v) A safety compliance facility.

(gg) (ff) “Statewide monitoring system” or, unless the context requires a different meaning, “system” means an internet-based, statewide database established, implemented, and maintained by the department under the marihuana tracking act, that is available to licensees, law enforcement agencies, and authorized state departments and agencies on a 24-hour basis for all of the following:

(i) Verifying registry identification cards.

(ii) Tracking marihuana transfer and transportation by licensees, including transferee, date, quantity, and price.

(iii) Verifying in commercially reasonable time that a transfer will not exceed the limit that the patient or caregiver is authorized to receive under section 4 of the Michigan medical marihuana act, Medical Marihuana Act, MCL 333.26424.

(hh) (gg) “Tissue culture” means a marihuana plant cell, cutting, tissue, or organ, that is kept under a sterile condition on a nutrient culture medium of known composition and that does not have visible root formation. A tissue culture is not a marihuana plant for purposes of a grower.

(ii) (hh) “Usable marihuana” means the dried leaves, flowers, plant resin, or extract of the marihuana plant, but does not include the seeds, stalks, and roots of the plant.

Enacting section 1. This amendatory act does not take effect unless Senate Bill No.____ or House Bill No. 5922 (request no. 03758’19) of the 100th Legislature is enacted into law.

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

BMMR cannabis corruption. prosecutors dispensary Driving DUI FAQs forfeiture gun rights hemp komornlaw lara law enforcement abuse laws Legalization marijuana Medical Marijuana Michigan Michigan Court of Appeals michigan laws michigan news michigan supreme court MMFLA news police politics science usa news us supreme court Your Rights

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.