DISCLAIMER In a legal environment that continues to evolve, it is essential to stay informed and seek guidance from knowledgeable professionals. Before acting on any information you find on the internet, this website, any linked website, any referring website or any verbal or written information consult a licensed attorney. Contact Komorn Law today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in navigating the complexities of Michigan’s laws. Consult an Attorney – Remember you’re on the internet.
Federal defense attorneys play a crucial role in the criminal justice system, specializing in representing individuals facing federal charges. With a deep understanding of federal laws and regulations, these legal professionals navigate the complexities of the federal court system to ensure their clients receive fair and just treatment.
From building a strong defense strategy to advocating for their clients’ rights, federal defense attorneys provide essential legal counsel and representation throughout the entire legal process. In this article, we will explore the responsibilities, challenges, and importance of federal defense attorneys in safeguarding the rights of individuals facing federal criminal charges.
Importance of Federal Defense Attorneys
Federal defense attorneys play a critical role in ensuring that defendants receive fair and just treatment in federal court. They are responsible for protecting the rights of their clients and advocating for their best interests throughout the legal process.
Without skilled federal defense attorneys, individuals facing federal charges would be at a significant disadvantage and vulnerable to potential injustices within the system.
Role and Responsibilities of a Federal Defense Attorney
Legal Counsel and Advocate
One of the primary roles of a federal defense attorney is to provide legal counsel and act as an advocate for their clients. They thoroughly analyze the case, advise defendants on their legal options, and develop strategies to effectively navigate the complexities of federal court proceedings. Their goal is to ensure their clients understand their rights and make informed decisions throughout the legal process.
Protecting Defendant’s Rights
Federal defense attorneys are staunch defenders of their clients’ constitutional rights. They carefully scrutinize the evidence presented by the prosecution, challenge any violations of their clients’ rights, and ensure that all legal procedures are followed correctly. They serve as a safeguard against any potential abuses of power, helping to level the playing field and ensure a fair and just trial.
Understanding the Federal Court System
Key Differences between Federal and State Courts
While state courts handle cases that violate state laws,federal courts handle cases involving federal offenses, such as interstate crimes, fraud, drug trafficking, and violations of federal laws.
One key difference is that federal laws apply uniformly throughout the country, whereas state laws can vary from one state to another.
Jurisdiction and Structure of Federal Courts
Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal laws, constitutional matters, and disputes between states. They are structured hierarchically, with district courts as the trial courts, followed by circuit courts of appeals, and ultimately the Supreme Court as the highest federal court.
Each level of the federal court system has its own rules and procedures that federal defense attorneys must navigate.
Preparing a Strong Defense Strategy
Initial Case Assessment and Legal Research
To develop a strong defense strategy, federal defense attorneys conduct a thorough assessment of the case. They analyze the evidence, interview witnesses, and review applicable laws and precedents.
This careful examination helps them identify any weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and build a solid defense.
Developing a Defense Theory
Based on their assessment and research, federal defense attorneys formulate a defense theory. This theory serves as the foundation for their client’s defense strategy and guides their actions throughout the trial.
They aim to present a compelling argument that challenges the prosecution’s case, introduces reasonable doubt, or establishes a defense based on legal principles or factual evidence.
With the expertise and dedication of federal defense attorneys, individuals facing federal charges can have a fighting chance in the courtroom.
Their role in providing legal counsel, protecting their clients’ rights, understanding the federal court system, and developing a strong defense strategy is essential for ensuring a fair and just legal process.
Investigating the Case and Gathering Evidence
As a federal defense attorney, one of the crucial roles you play is investigating the case and gathering evidence.
You get to dive deep into the details, interview witnesses, and conduct investigations to uncover all the facts.
Interviewing Witnesses and Conducting Investigations
Grilling witnesses, digging into their stories, and trying to find any inconsistencies or hidden truths. The goal is to uncover evidence that supports your client’s innocence or weakens the prosecution’s case.
Collecting and Analyzing Forensic Evidence
Besides getting up close and personal with witnesses, you’ll also be getting into collecting and analyzing forensic evidence is a crucial part of building a solid defense.
Whether it’s analyzing DNA samples, examining fingerprints, or scrutinizing digital evidence, you’ll be using your Sherlock-level deductions to challenge the prosecution’s case.
Navigating Plea Bargains and Negotiations
Ah, the art of negotiation. As a federal defense attorney, you’ll find yourself in the thick of plea bargains and negotiations. This is where your silver tongue and quick-thinking skills come into play.
Exploring Plea Bargain Options
Plea bargains can be a lifeline for both the defendant and the prosecution. As a federal defense attorney, you’ll explore potential plea deals that could benefit your client. This involves analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the case, understanding the potential consequences of going to trial, and negotiating a deal that satisfies both parties (or at least gets your client the best possible outcome).
Negotiating with Prosecution
Negotiating with the prosecution is like a legal dance-off. You’ll be juggling arguments, counteroffers, and legal tactics to try to reach a favorable agreement. Your job is to protect your client’s interests and make sure they get a fair deal. It’s all about finding that sweet spot where both sides can leave the dance floor feeling satisfied (and not too bruised).
Representing Clients in Federal Court Trials
Lights, camera, courtroom drama! As a federal defense attorney, you’ll have the honor of representing your client in federal court trials. It’s your chance to shine, or more accurately, your chance to present a compelling defense strategy.
Building a Strong Defense Strategy for Trial
Preparing for trial is like preparing for a Broadway performance. You’ll analyze the prosecution’s case, research legal precedents, and develop a solid defense strategy. It’s about crafting a narrative that showcases your client’s innocence or raises reasonable doubts in the minds of the jury. You’ll assemble a team of expert witnesses, create killer opening and closing statements, and do everything in your power to secure a not guilty verdict.
Cross-Examination of Witnesses
Cross-examining witnesses is like being a legal bulldog with a bone. You’ll dissect the prosecution’s witnesses, challenging their credibility, poking holes in their testimonies, and exposing inconsistencies. It’s your opportunity to shine a spotlight on the weaknesses in the prosecution’s case while advocating for your client’s innocence. Just remember, no actual bulldogs allowed in the courtroom.
Post-trial Proceedings and Appeals
The show isn’t over when the jury delivers their verdict. As a federal defense attorney, there are still important tasks to tackle after the trial concludes.
Sentencing and Mitigation
After a guilty verdict (let’s hope that’s not the case), it’s time to navigate the choppy waters of sentencing and mitigation. You’ll present arguments and evidence to convince the judge to hand down the most lenient sentence possible. It’s all about advocating for your client and emphasizing any mitigating factors that could sway the judge’s decision.
Filing Appeals and Reviewing Decisions
When the verdict doesn’t go your way (cue dramatic music), you may have to take the case to the next level. Filing appeals and reviewing decisions is like playing a legal chess game. You’ll analyze the trial proceedings, search for errors or misconduct, and present your case to a higher court. It’s all about fighting for justice and making sure your client’s rights are upheld.In conclusion, federal defense attorneys are instrumental in protecting the rights and interests of individuals facing federal criminal charges. Their expertise in federal law, strategic defense planning, and courtroom advocacy ensures a fair legal process and potential favorable outcomes for their clients. By understanding the role and responsibilities of federal defense attorneys, as well as the intricacies of the federal court system, individuals can make informed decisions when seeking legal representation. With their dedication and commitment to justice, federal defense attorneys play a vital role in preserving the fundamental principles of fairness and equality within the criminal justice system.
Anything you say will be used against you! Call our office before you say anything. Komorn Law 248-357-2550
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the difference between a federal defense attorney and a state defense attorney?
Federal defense attorneys specialize in representing individuals facing federal charges, which typically involve violations of federal laws or crimes that occur across state lines. State defense attorneys, on the other hand, focus on representing individuals charged with crimes that fall under state jurisdiction. The laws, procedures, and court systems involved in federal and state cases differ significantly, necessitating specialized knowledge and experience for effective representation.
2. How do federal defense attorneys build a strong defense strategy?
Federal defense attorneys meticulously analyze the details of the case, conduct investigations, interview witnesses, and gather evidence to build a robust defense strategy. They scrutinize every aspect of the prosecution’s case, identify weaknesses, and explore potential legal defenses. Additionally, they may consult with experts, such as forensic analysts or investigators, to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and present a compelling defense on behalf of their clients.
3. Can federal defense attorneys negotiate plea bargains?
Yes, federal defense attorneys can negotiate plea bargains on behalf of their clients. Plea bargains involve reaching an agreement with the prosecution, wherein the defendant agrees to plead guilty to certain charges in exchange for a reduced sentence or lesser charges. Federal defense attorneys leverage their knowledge of federal laws, sentencing guidelines, and their clients’ individual circumstances to negotiate favorable plea deals that best serve their clients’ interests.
4. What happens if a federal case goes to trial?
If a federal case goes to trial, federal defense attorneys play a critical role in representing their clients in court. They thoroughly prepare for trial by crafting a compelling defense strategy, selecting jurors, cross-examining witnesses, presenting evidence, and making persuasive arguments on behalf of their clients. During the trial, federal defense attorneys strive to challenge the prosecution’s case and establish reasonable doubt, aiming for an acquittal or a favorable outcome for their clients.
DISCLAIMER In a legal environment that continues to evolve, it is essential to stay informed and seek guidance from knowledgeable professionals. Before acting on any information you find on the internet, this website, any linked website, any referring website or any verbal or written information consult a licensed attorney. Contact Komorn Law today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in navigating the complexities of Michigan’s laws. Consult an Attorney – Remember you’re on the internet.
A federal judge in Detroit heard arguments Thursday in a legal battle that has halted the processing of applications for recreational marijuana businesses in the city.
U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman last month ordered Detroit to temporarily stop processing applications amid a lawsuit that argues a provision of a new ordinance regulating recreational pot operations gives unfair preference to longtime residents deemed legacy Detroiters.
Friedman granted the preliminary injunction in favor of Crystal Lowe, a resident and prospective marijuana business operator, who sued the city over the ordinance on claims the law is “discriminatory” and limits her chances.
Lowe’s attorney Kevin Blair argued to the judge Thursday that the ordinance is a penalty for people, like Lowe, who temporarily moved out of the city and it does nothing to help “folks who have been disproportionally affected by the war on drugs.”
CRIMINAL DEFENSE Komorn Law has the experience and history of providing results-focused legal defense to clients in marijuana, drugged driving, DUI, criminal charges, as well as many other case types. From the first encounter with law enforcement to districts courts all the way to the supreme court.
CANNABIS BUSINESS LICENSING AND LEGAL COUNSEL If you are starting or have an established Cannabis Business in Michigan. Komorn Law has the legal team you will need. With a 100% success rate in licensing our firm offers legal counsel services with connections and assets in the world’s leading and most refined cannabis industry network.
Call our Office 248-357-2550
“The city has stated they’re purposely restricting to allow ‘naïve and unsophisticated’ legacy applicants to get ahead,” Blair told Friedman.
Emily Palacios, an Ann Arbor-based attorney representing the city, countered Blair has failed to demonstrate how the ordinance provisions violate Lowe’s equal protection rights under the Michigan Constitution.
The ordinance, Palacios told the judge, only gives preference in the order in which applications are certified and it gives a boost to Detroiters who would be disadvantaged.
“The city’s licensing program is not causing residents and nonresidents to face-off in direct competition,” Palacios argued to Friedman. “The city has constructed a program by which there are two sets of licenses available; 50% of the licenses are going to go to Detroit legacy applicants and 50% to non-Detroit legacy applicants. Their opportunity to compete is equal on both sides of the ledger.”
DISCLAIMER This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.
UPDATE 12-4-20: The House endorsed a landmark retreat in the nation’s decades-long war on drugs Friday, voting to remove marijuana from the federal schedule of controlled substances and provide for the regulation and taxation of legal cannabis sales. The vote was 228-to-164 and marked the first time either chamber of Congress has voted on the issue of federally decriminalizing cannabis.
The Dem controlled House of Representatives is set to vote on marijuana (cannabis) legalization at the federal level on 12/4/20. This the first time any chamber of Congress has addressed on the matter of marijuana legalization.
The bill is likely to pass the house chamber, but the Republican-controlled Senate is unlikely to take up the legislation in the last two weeks Congress is in session this year.
The measure would remove marijuana from the federal list of controlled substances and expunge some nonviolent federal marijuana convictions. It would still be up to states to pass their own regulations on the sale of marijuana.
Nixon declared a “war on drugs” in the early 1970s, calling drug abuse “public enemy number one” following the rise of recreational drugs in the 1960s. He aimed to reduce use, distribution and trade with tough enforcement and prison sentences.
Blumenaer said that unlike heroin and cocaine, both of which are also Schedule 1 drugs, cannabis is not addictive, and it has been found to have therapeutic properties for managing pain. (Research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other organizations indicates that marijuana can, indeed, be addictive.)
SUMMARY
Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act,
THE MORE ACT
Summary: H.R.3884 — 116th Congress (2019-2020)
Reported to House, Part I (11/27/2020)
Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019 or the MORE Act of 2019
This bill decriminalizes marijuana.
Specifically, it removes marijuana from the list of scheduled substances under the Controlled Substances Act and eliminates criminal penalties for an individual who manufactures, distributes, or possesses marijuana.
The bill also makes other changes, including the following:
replaces statutory references to marijuana and marihuana with cannabis,
requires the Bureau of Labor Statistics to regularly publish demographic data on cannabis business owners and employees,
establishes a trust fund to support various programs and services for individuals and businesses in communities impacted by the war on drugs,
imposes a 5% tax on cannabis products and requires revenues to be deposited into the trust fund,
makes Small Business Administration loans and services available to entities that are cannabis-related legitimate businesses or service providers,
prohibits the denial of federal public benefits to a person on the basis of certain cannabis-related conduct or convictions,
prohibits the denial of benefits and protections under immigration laws on the basis of a cannabis-related event (e.g., conduct or a conviction),
establishes a process to expunge convictions and conduct sentencing review hearings related to federal cannabis offenses, and
directs the Government Accountability Office to study the societal impact of cannabis legalization.
Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019 or the MORE Act of 2019
To decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes.
A BILL
To decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019” or the “MORE Act of 2019”.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds as follows:
(1) The communities that have been most harmed by cannabis prohibition are benefiting the least from the legal marijuana marketplace.
(2) A legacy of racial and ethnic injustices, compounded by the disproportionate collateral consequences of 80 years of cannabis prohibition enforcement, now limits participation in the industry.
(3) 33 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam have adopted laws allowing legal access to cannabis, and 11 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands have adopted laws legalizing cannabis for adult recreational use.
(4) A total of 47 States have reformed their laws pertaining to cannabis despite the Schedule I status of marijuana and its Federal criminalization.
(5) Legal cannabis sales totaled $9.5 billion in 2017 and are projected to reach $23 billion by 2022.
(6) According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), enforcing cannabis prohibition laws costs taxpayers approximately $3.6 billion a year.
(7) The continued enforcement of cannabis prohibition laws results in over 600,000 arrests annually, disproportionately impacting people of color who are almost 4 times more likely to be arrested for cannabis possession than their White counterparts, despite equal rates of use across populations.
(8) People of color have been historically targeted by discriminatory sentencing practices resulting in Black men receiving drug sentences that are 13.1 percent longer than sentences imposed for White men and Latinos being nearly 6.5 times more likely to receive a Federal sentence for cannabis possession than non-Hispanic Whites.
(9) In 2013, simple cannabis possession was the fourth most common cause of deportation for any offense and the most common cause of deportation for drug law violations.
(10) Fewer than one-fifth of cannabis business owners identify as minorities and only approximately 4 percent are black.
(11) Applicants for cannabis licenses are limited by numerous laws, regulations, and exorbitant permit applications, licensing fees, and costs in these States, which can require more than $700,000.
(12) Historically disproportionate arrest and conviction rates make it particularly difficult for people of color to enter the legal cannabis marketplace, as most States bar these individuals from participating.
(13) Federal law severely limits access to loans and capital for cannabis businesses, disproportionately impacting minority small business owners.
(14) Some States and municipalities have taken proactive steps to mitigate inequalities in the legal cannabis marketplace and ensure equal participation in the industry.
SEC. 3. DECRIMINALIZATION OF CANNABIS.
Cannabis Removed From Schedule Of Controlled Substances.—
(1) REMOVAL IN STATUTE.—Subsection (c) of schedule I of section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) is amended—
(A) by striking “(10) Marihuana.”; and
(B) by striking “(17) Tetrahydrocannabinols, except for tetrahydrocannabinols in hemp (as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946).”.
(2) REMOVAL FROM SCHEDULE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall finalize a rulemaking under section 201(a)(2) removing marihuana and tetrahydrocannabinols from the schedules of controlled substances. Marihuana and tetrahydrocannabinols shall each be deemed to be a drug or other substance that does not meet the requirements for inclusion in any schedule.
A rulemaking under this paragraph shall be considered to have taken effect as of the date of enactment of this Act for purposes of any offense committed, case pending, conviction entered, and, in the case of a juvenile, any offense committed, case pending, and adjudication of juvenile delinquency entered before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) Conforming Amendments To Controlled Substances Act.—The Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 102(44) (21 U.S.C. 802(44)), by striking “marihuana,”;
(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “marijuana,”; and
(B) in paragraph (5), by striking “, such as a marihuana cigarette,”; and
(8) in section 516(d) (21 U.S.C. 886(d)), by striking “section 401(b)(6)” each place the term appears and inserting “section 401(b)(5)”.
(c) Other Conforming Amendments.—
(1) NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM DRUG CONTROL ACT OF 1986.—The National Forest System Drug Control Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 559b et seq.) is amended—
(A) in section 15002(a) (16 U.S.C. 559b(a)) by striking “marijuana and other”;
(B) in section 15003(2) (16 U.S.C. 559c(2)) by striking “marijuana and other”; and
(C) in section 15004(2) (16 U.S.C. 559d(2)) by striking “marijuana and other”.
(2) INTERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS.—Section 2516 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (1)(e), by striking “marihuana,”; and
(B) in subsection (2) by striking “marihuana”.
(d) Retroactivity.—The amendments made by this section to the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are retroactive and shall apply to any offense committed, case pending, conviction entered, and, in the case of a juvenile, any offense committed, case pending, or adjudication of juvenile delinquency entered before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 4. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA OF CANNABIS BUSINESS OWNERS AND EMPLOYEES.
(a) In General.—The Bureau of Labor Statistics shall regularly compile, maintain, and make public data on the demographics of—
(1) individuals who are business owners in the cannabis industry; and
(2) individuals who are employed in the cannabis industry.
(b) Demographic Data.—The data collected under subsection (a) shall include data regarding—
(1) age;
(2) certifications and licenses;
(3) disability status;
(4) educational attainment;
(5) family and marital status;
(6) nativity;
(7) race and Hispanic ethnicity;
(8) school enrollment;
(9) veteran status; and
(10) sex.
(c) Confidentiality.—The name, address, and other identifying information of individuals employed in the cannabis industry shall be kept confidential by the Bureau and not be made available to the public.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) CANNABIS.—The term “cannabis” means either marijuana or cannabis as defined under the State law authorizing the sale or use of cannabis in which the individual or entity is located.
(2) CANNABIS INDUSTRY.—The term “cannabis industry” means an individual or entity that is licensed or permitted under a State or local law to engage in commercial cannabis-related activity.
(3) OWNER.—The term “owner” means an individual or entity that is defined as an owner under the State or local law where the individual or business is licensed or permitted.
SEC. 5. CREATION OF OPPORTUNITY TRUST FUND AND IMPOSITION OF TAX ON CANNABIS PRODUCTS.
(a) Trust Fund.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Subchapter A of chapter 98 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 9512. OPPORTUNITY TRUST FUND.
“(a) Creation Of Trust Fund.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the ‘Opportunity Trust Fund’ (referred to in this section as the ‘Trust Fund’), consisting of such amounts as may be appropriated or credited to such fund as provided in this section or section 9602(b).
“(b) Transfers To Trust Fund.—There are hereby appropriated to the Trust Fund amounts equivalent to the net revenues received in the Treasury from the tax imposed by section 5701(h).
“(c) Expenditures.—Amounts in the Trust Fund shall be available, without further appropriation, only as follows:
“(1) 50 percent to the Attorney General to carry out section 3052(a) of part OO of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
“(2) 10 percent to the Attorney General to carry out section 3052(b) of part OO of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
“(3) 20 percent to the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to carry out section 6(b)(1) of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019.
“(4) 20 percent to the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to carry out section 6(b)(2) of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019”..”.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for subchapter A of chapter 98 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“Sec. 9512. Opportunity trust fund.”.
(b) Imposition Of Tax.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 5701 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i) and by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:
“(h) Cannabis Products.—On cannabis products, manufactured in or imported into the United States, there shall be imposed a tax equal to 5 percent of the price for which sold.”.
(2) CANNABIS PRODUCT DEFINED.—Section 5702 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(q) Cannabis Product.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the term ‘cannabis product’ means any cannabis or any article which contains cannabis or any derivative thereof.
“(2) EXCEPTION.—The term ‘cannabis product’ shall not include any medicine or drug that is a prescribed drug (as such term is defined in section 213(d)(3)).
“(3) CANNABIS.—The term ‘cannabis’—
“(A) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin; and
“(B) does not include—
“(i) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or
“(ii) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.”.
(3) CANNABIS PRODUCTS TREATED AS TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—Section 5702(c) of such Code is amended by striking “and roll-your-own tobacco” and inserting “roll-your-own tobacco, and cannabis products”.
(4) MANUFACTURER OF CANNABIS PRODUCTS TREATED AS MANUFACTURER OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—Section 5702 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(r) Manufacturer Of Cannabis Products.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Any person who plants, cultivates, harvests, produces, manufactures, compounds, converts, processes, prepares, or packages any cannabis product shall be treated as a manufacturer of cannabis products (and as manufacturing such cannabis product).
“(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any cannabis product which is for such person’s own personal consumption or use.
“(3) APPLICATION OF RULES RELATED TO MANUFACTURERS OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS.—Any reference to a manufacturer of tobacco products, or to manufacturing tobacco products, shall be treated as including a reference to a manufacturer of cannabis products, or to manufacturing cannabis products, respectively.”.
(5) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RULES FOR DETERMINING PRICE.—Section 5702(l) of such Code is amended—
(A) by striking “section 5701(a)(2)” and inserting “subsections (a)(2) and (h) of section 5701”; and
(B) by inserting “And Cannabis Products” after “Cigars” in the heading thereof.
(6) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 5702(j) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “In the case of a cannabis product, the previous sentence shall be applied by substituting ‘from a facility of a manufacturer required to file a bond under section 5711’ for ‘from the factory or from internal revenue bond under section 5704’.”.
(c) Effective Date.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the amendments made by this section shall apply to articles manufactured or imported in calendar quarters beginning more than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) TRUST FUND.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 6. OPPORTUNITY TRUST FUND PROGRAMS.
(a) Cannabis Justice Office; Community Reinvestment Grant Program.—
(1) CANNABIS JUSTICE OFFICE.—Part A of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 109 the following:
“SEC. 110. CANNABIS JUSTICE OFFICE.
“(a) Establishment.—There is established within the Office of Justice Programs a Cannabis Justice Office.
“(b) Director.—The Cannabis Justice Office shall be headed by a Director who shall be appointed by the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs. The Director shall report to the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs. The Director shall award grants and may enter into compacts, cooperative agreements, and contracts on behalf of the Cannabis Justice Office. The Director may not engage in any employment other than that of serving as the Director, nor may the Director hold any office in, or act in any capacity for, any organization, agency, or institution with which the Office makes any contract or other arrangement.
“(c) Employees.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director shall employ as many full-time employees as are needed to carry out the duties and functions of the Cannabis Justice Office under subsection (d). Such employees shall be exclusively assigned to the Cannabis Justice Office.
“(2) INITIAL HIRES.—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Director shall—
“(A) hire no less than one-third of the total number of employees of the Cannabis Justice Office; and
“(B) no more than one-half of the employees assigned to the Cannabis Justice Office by term appointment that may after 2 years be converted to career appointment.
“(3) LEGAL COUNSEL.—At least one employee hired for the Cannabis Justice Office shall serve as legal counsel to the Director and shall provide counsel to the Cannabis Justice Office.
“(d) Duties And Functions.—The Cannabis Justice Office is authorized to—
“(1) administer the Community Reinvestment Grant Program; and
“(2) perform such other functions as the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs may delegate, that are consistent with the statutory obligations of this section.”.
(2) COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT GRANT PROGRAM.—Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“PART OO—COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT GRANT PROGRAM
“SEC. 3052. AUTHORIZATION.
“(a) In General.—The Director of the Cannabis Justice Office shall establish and carry out a grant program, known as the ‘Community Reinvestment Grant Program’, to provide eligible entities with funds to administer services for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, including—
“(1) job training;
“(2) reentry services;
“(3) legal aid for civil and criminal cases, including expungement of cannabis convictions;
“(4) literacy programs;
“(5) youth recreation or mentoring programs;
“(6) health education programs; and
“(7) services to address any collateral consequences that individuals or communities face as a result of the War on Drugs.
“(b) Substance Use Treatment Services.—The Community Reinvestment Grant Program established in subsection (a) shall provide eligible entities with funds to administer substance use treatment services for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs.
“SEC. 3053. FUNDING FROM OPPORTUNITY TRUST FUND.
“The Director shall carry out the program under this part using funds made available under section 9512(c)(1) and (2) of the Internal Revenue Code.
“SEC. 3054. DEFINITIONS.
“In this part:
“(1) The term ‘cannabis conviction’ means a conviction, or adjudication of juvenile delinquency, for a cannabis offense (as such term is defined in section 13 of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019).
“(2) The term ‘substance use treatment’ means an evidence-based, professionally directed, deliberate, and planned regimen including evaluation, observation, medical monitoring, harm reduction, and rehabilitative services and interventions such as pharmacotherapy, mental health services, and individual and group counseling, on an inpatient or outpatient basis, to help patients with substance use disorder reach remission and maintain recovery.
“(3) The term ‘eligible entity’ means a nonprofit organization, as defined in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, that is representative of a community or a significant segment of a community with experience in providing relevant services to individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs in that community.
“(4) The term ‘individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs’ has the meaning given that term in section 6 of the Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019”..”.
(b) Cannabis Opportunity Program; Equitable Licensing Grant Program.—
(1) CANNABIS OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall establish and carry out a program, to be known as the “Cannabis Opportunity Program” to provide any eligible State or locality funds to make loans under section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 363(m)) to assist small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C)) that operate in the cannabis industry.
(2) EQUITABLE LICENSING GRANT PROGRAM.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall establish and carry out a grant program, to be known as the “Equitable Licensing Grant Program”, to provide any eligible State of locality funds to develop and implement equitable cannabis licensing programs that minimize barriers to cannabis licensing and employment for individuals most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, provided that each grantee includes in its cannabis licensing program at least four of the following:
(A) A waiver of cannabis license application fees for individuals who have had an income below 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Level for at least 5 of the past 10 years who are first-time applicants.
(B) A prohibition on the denial of a cannabis license based on a conviction for a cannabis offense that took place prior to State legalization of cannabis or the date of enactment of this Act, as appropriate.
(C) A prohibition on criminal conviction restrictions for licensing except with respect to a conviction related to owning and operating a business.
(D) A prohibition on cannabis license holders engaging in suspicionless cannabis drug testing of their prospective or current employees, except with respect to drug testing for safety-sensitive positions, as defined under the Omnibus Transportation Testing Act of 1991.
(E) The establishment of a cannabis licensing board that is reflective of the racial, ethnic, economic, and gender composition of the State or locality, to serve as an oversight body of the equitable licensing program.
(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) The term “individual most adversely impacted by the War on Drugs” means an individual—
(i) who has had an income below 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Level for at least 5 of the past 10 years; and
(ii) has been arrested for or convicted of the sale, possession, use, manufacture, or cultivation of cannabis or a controlled substance (except for a conviction involving distribution to a minor), or whose parent, sibling, spouse, or child has been arrested for or convicted of such an offense.
(B) The term “eligible State or locality” means a State or locality that has taken steps to—
(i) create an automatic process, at no cost to the individual, for the expungement, destruction, or sealing of criminal records for cannabis offenses; and
(ii) eliminate violations or other penalties for persons under parole, probation, pre-trial, or other State or local criminal supervision for a cannabis offense.
(C) The term “State” means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, and any Indian Tribe (as defined in section 201 of Public Law 90–294 (25 U.S.C. 1301) (commonly known as the “Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968”)).
SEC. 7. AVAILABILITY OF SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.
(a) Definitions Relating To Cannabis-Related Legitimate Businesses And Service Providers.—Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(ff) Cannabis-Related Legitimate Businesses And Service Providers.—In this Act:
“(1) CANNABIS.—The term ‘cannabis’—
“(A) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin; and
“(B) does not include—
“(i) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or
“(ii) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.
“(2) CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESS.—The term ‘cannabis-related legitimate business’ means a manufacturer, producer, or any person or company that is a small business concern and that—
“(A) engages in any activity described in subparagraph (B) pursuant to a law established by a State or a political subdivision of a State, as determined by such State or political sub-division; and
“(B) participates in any business or organized activity that involves handling cannabis or cannabis products, including cultivating, producing, manufacturing, selling, transporting, displaying, dispensing, distributing, or purchasing cannabis or cannabis products.
“(3) SERVICE PROVIDER.—The term ‘service provider’—
“(A) means a business, organization, or other person that—
“(i) sells goods or services to a cannabis-related legitimate business; or
“(ii) provides any business services, including the sale or lease of real or any other property, legal or other licensed services, or any other ancillary service, relating to cannabis; and
“(B) does not include a business, organization, or other person that participates in any business or organized activity that involves handling cannabis or cannabis products, including cultivating, producing, manufacturing, selling, transporting, displaying, dispensing, distributing, or purchasing cannabis or cannabis products.”.
Small Business Development Centers.—Section 21(c) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(9) SERVICES FOR CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—A small business development center may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern under this section solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
(c) Women’s Business Centers.—Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(p) Services For Cannabis-Related Legitimate Businesses And Service Providers.—A women’s business center may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern under this section solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
(d) SCORE.—Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(b)(1)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The head of the SCORE program established under this subparagraph may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
(e) Veteran Business Outreach Centers.—Section 32 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657b) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Services For Cannabis-Related Legitimate Businesses And Service Providers.—A Veteran Business Outreach Center may not decline to provide services to an otherwise eligible small business concern under this section solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
(f) 7(a) Loans.—Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(36) LOANS TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—The Administrator may not decline to provide a guarantee for a loan under this subsection to an otherwise eligible small business concern solely because such concern is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
(g) Disaster Loans.—Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (15) the following new paragraph:
“(16) ASSISTANCE TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—The Administrator may not decline to provide assistance under this subsection to an otherwise eligible borrower solely because such borrower is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
(h) Microloans.—Section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(14) ASSISTANCE TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.—An eligible intermediary may not decline to provide assistance under this subsection to an otherwise eligible borrower solely because such borrower is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider.”.
State Or Local Development Company Loans.—Title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 511. LOANS TO CANNABIS-RELATED LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND SERVICE PROVIDERS.
“The Administrator may not decline to provide a guarantee for a loan under this title to an otherwise eligible State or local development company solely because such State or local development company provides financing to an entity that is a cannabis-related legitimate business or service provider (as defined in section 3(ff) of the Small Business Act).”.
SEC. 8. NO DISCRIMINATION IN THE PROVISION OF A FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT ON THE BASIS OF CANNABIS.
(a) In General.—No person may be denied any Federal public benefit (as such term is defined in section 401(c) of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1611(c))) on the basis of any use or possession of cannabis, or on the basis of a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a cannabis offense, by that person.
(b) Security Clearances.—Federal agencies may not use past or present cannabis or marijuana use as criteria for granting, denying, or rescinding a security clearance.
SEC. 9. NO ADVERSE EFFECT FOR PURPOSES OF THE IMMIGRATION LAWS.
(a) In General.—For purposes of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act), cannabis may not be considered a controlled substance, and an alien may not be denied any benefit or protection under the immigration laws based on any event, including conduct, a finding, an admission, addiction or abuse, an arrest, a juvenile adjudication, or a conviction, relating to cannabis, regardless of whether the event occurred before, on, or after the effective date of this Act.
(b) Cannabis Defined.—The term “cannabis”—
(1) means all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin; and
(2) does not include—
(A) hemp, as defined in section 297A of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946; or
(B) the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.
(c) Conforming Amendments To Immigration And Nationality Act.—The Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 212(h), by striking “and subparagraph (A)(i)(II) of such subsection insofar as it relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana”;
(2) in section 237(a)(2)(B)(i), by striking “other than a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana”;
(3) in section 101(f)(3), by striking “(except as such paragraph relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana)”;
(4) in section 244(c)(2)(A)(iii)(II) by striking “except for so much of such paragraph as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana”;
(5) in section 245(h)(2)(B) by striking “(except for so much of such paragraph as related to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana)”;
(6) in section 210(c)(2)(B)(ii)(III) by striking “, except for so much of such paragraph as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana”; and
(7) in section 245A(d)(2)(B)(ii)(II) by striking “, except for so much of such paragraph as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana”.
SEC. 10. RESENTENCING AND EXPUNGEMENT.
(a) Expungement Of Federal Cannabis Offense Convictions For Individuals Not Under A Criminal Justice Sentence.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Federal district shall conduct a comprehensive review and issue an order expunging each conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a Federal cannabis offense entered by each Federal court in the district before the date of enactment of this Act and on or after May 1, 1971. Each Federal court shall also issue an order expunging any arrests associated with each expunged conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency.
(2) NOTIFICATION.—To the extent practicable, each Federal district shall notify each individual whose arrest, conviction, or adjudication of delinquency has been expunged pursuant to this subsection that their arrest, conviction, or adjudication of juvenile delinquency has been expunged, and the effect of such expungement.
(3) RIGHT TO PETITION COURT FOR EXPUNGEMENT.—At any point after the date of enactment of this Act, any individual with a prior conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a Federal cannabis offense, who is not under a criminal justice sentence, may file a motion for expungement. If the expungement of such a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency is required pursuant to this Act, the court shall expunge the conviction or adjudication, and any associated arrests. If the individual is indigent, counsel shall be appointed to represent the individual in any proceedings under this subsection.
(4) SEALED RECORD.—The court shall seal all records related to a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency that has been expunged under this subsection. Such records may only be made available by further order of the court.
(b) Sentencing Review For Individuals Under A Criminal Justice Sentence.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—For any individual who is under a criminal justice sentence for a Federal cannabis offense, the court that imposed the sentence shall, on motion of the individual, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, the attorney for the Government, or the court, conduct a sentencing review hearing. If the individual is indigent, counsel shall be appointed to represent the individual in any sentencing review proceedings under this subsection.
(2) POTENTIAL REDUCED RESENTENCING.—After a sentencing hearing under paragraph (1), a court shall—
(A) expunge each conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency for a Federal cannabis offense entered by the court before the date of enactment of this Act, and any associated arrest;
(B) vacate the existing sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency and, if applicable, impose any remaining sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency on the individual as if this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, were in effect at the time the offense was committed; and
(C) order that all records related to a conviction or adjudication of juvenile delinquency that has been expunged or a sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency that has been vacated under this Act be sealed and only be made available by further order of the court.
(c) Effect Of Expungement.—An individual who has had an arrest, a conviction, or juvenile delinquency adjudication expunged under this section—
(1) may treat the arrest, conviction, or adjudication as if it never occurred; and
(2) shall be immune from any civil or criminal penalties related to perjury, false swearing, or false statements, for a failure to disclose such arrest, conviction, or adjudication.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Federal cannabis offense” means an offense that is no longer punishable pursuant to this Act or the amendments made under this Act.
(2) The term “expunge” means, with respect to an arrest, a conviction, or a juvenile delinquency adjudication, the removal of the record of such arrest, conviction, or adjudication from each official index or public record.
(3) The term “under a criminal justice sentence” means, with respect to an individual, that the individual is serving a term of probation, parole, supervised release, imprisonment, official detention, pre-release custody, or work release, pursuant to a sentence or disposition of juvenile delinquency imposed on or after the effective date of the Controlled Substances Act (May 1, 1971).
(e) Study.—The Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with the National Institute on Drug Abuse, shall conduct a demographic study of individuals convicted of a Federal cannabis offense. Such study shall include information about the age, race, ethnicity, sex, and gender identity of those individuals, the type of community such users dwell in, and such other demographic information as the Comptroller General determines should be included.
(f) Report.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to Congress the results of the study conducted under subsection (e).
SEC. 11. REFERENCES IN EXISTING LAW TO MARIJUANA OR MARIHUANA.
Wherever, in the statutes of the United States or in the rulings, regulations, or interpretations of various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States—
(1) there appears or may appear the term “marihuana” or “marijuana”, that term shall be struck and the term “cannabis” shall be inserted; and
(2) there appears or may appear the term “Marihuana” or “Marijuana”, that term shall be struck and the term “Cannabis” shall be inserted.
SEC. 12. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act or an amendment made by this Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of this Act and the amendments made by this Act to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.
SEC. 13. CANNABIS OFFENSE DEFINED.
For purposes of this Act, the term “cannabis offense” means a criminal offense related to cannabis—
(1) that, under Federal law, is no longer punishable pursuant to this Act or the amendments made under this Act; or
(2) that, under State law, is no longer an offense or that was designated a lesser offense or for which the penalty was reduced under State law pursuant to or following the adoption of a State law authorizing the sale or use of cannabis.
SEC. 14. RULEMAKING.
Unless otherwise provided in this Act, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Small Business Administration shall issue or amend any rules, standard operating procedures, and other legal or policy guidance necessary to carry out implementation of this Act. After the 1-year period, any publicly issued sub-regulatory guidance, including any compliance guides, manuals, advisories and notices, may not be issued without 60-day notice to appropriate congressional committees. Notice shall include a description and justification for additional guidance.
SEC. 15. SOCIETAL IMPACT OF MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION STUDY.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall, not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, provide to Congress a study that addresses the societal impact of the legalization of recreational cannabis by States, including—
(1) sick days reported to employers;
(2) workers compensations claims;
(3) tax revenue remitted to States resulting from legal marijuana sales;
(4) changes in government spending related to enforcement actions and court proceedings;
(5) Federal welfare assistance applications;
(6) rate of arrests related to methamphetamine possession;
(7) hospitalization rates related to methamphetamine and narcotics use;
(8) uses of marijuana and its byproducts for medical purposes;
(9) arrest rates of individuals driving under the influence or driving while intoxicated by marijuana;
(10) traffic-related deaths and injuries where the driver is impaired by marijuana;
(11) arrest of minors for marijuana-related charges;
(12) violent crime rates;
(13) school suspensions, expulsions, and law enforcement referrals that are marijuana-related;
(14) high school dropout rates;
(15) changes in district-wide and State-wide standardized test scores;
(16) marijuana-related hospital admissions and poison control calls;
(17) marijuana-related juvenile admittances into substance rehabilitation facilities and mental health clinics;
(18) diversion of marijuana into neighboring States and drug seizures in neighboring States;
(19) marijuana plants grown on public lands in contravention to Federal and State laws; and
(20) court filings under a State’s organized crime statutes.
Union Calendar No. 497
116th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 3884
[Report No. 116–604, Part I]
A BILL
To decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes.
November 27, 2020
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendment
RELATED BILLS
Related Bills: H.R.3884 — 116th Congress (2019-2020)
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3884) to decriminalize and deschedule cannabis, to provide for reinvestment in certain persons adversely impacted by the War on Drugs, to provide for expungement of certain cannabis offenses, and for other purposes.
Procedurally-related: H.Res.1244 is a House rule related to H.R.3884
House
12/03/2020 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
House – 04/08/2019 Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. (All Actions)
Short Titles as Introduced
Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2019
All Actions (5)
04/08/2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. Action By: Committee on the Judiciary
03/08/2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health. Action By: Committee on Energy and Commerce
03/07/2019
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Action By: House of Representatives
03/07/2019
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. Action By: House of Representatives
03/07/2019
Introduced in House Action By: House of Representatives
Related Bills (0)
As of 12/04/2020 no related bill information has been received for H.R.1588 – Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2019
The House of Representatives approved a measure to prevent the DOJ from interfering with individual state marijuana laws, including those allowing recreational use, cultivation and sales.
The amendment, would also shield cannabis laws in Washington, D.C. and U.S. territories, is attached to a large-scale appropriations bill to fund parts of the federal government for Fiscal Year 2020.
The inclusion of adult-use programs represents a significant expansion of an existing policy that protects only local medical cannabis laws from federal intervention which was first enacted in 2014.
The expansive attachment was approved in a floor vote of 267 to 165. The tally is considered by legalization supporters to be an signal of the depth of support there is in Congress for a more comprehensive change to federal marijuana policies.
“This is the most significant vote on marijuana reform policy that the House of Representatives has ever taken,” said NORML Political Director Justin Strekal. “Today’s action by Congress highlights the growing power of the marijuana law reform movement and the increasing awareness by political leaders that the policy of prohibition and criminalization has failed.”
“The historic nature of this vote cannot be overstated,” he said. “For the first time, a chamber of Congress has declared that the federal government should defer to state cannabis laws.”
The measure, sponsored by Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) and Tom McClintock (R-CA), would bar the Department of Justice from spending money to prevent states and territories from implementing their own laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of marijuana.
“We’re watching the growth of this industry, a multibillion-dollar industry. We’re watching state after state move forward,” Blumenauer said in a floor debate on the state protection amendment on Wednesday evening. “Every one of us on the floor of the House who are here now represent areas that have taken action. We have had embedded in our legislation protections for medical marijuana. And this would simply extend that same protection to prevent the Department of Justice interfering with adult use. I strongly, strongly urge that we build on the legacy that we’ve had in the past, that we move this forward to allow the federal government to start catching up to where the rest of the states are.”
House Democratic leadership urged their conference to support the measure in a whip email on Thursday, and only eight members of the party voted against it.
Lobbying For The Whole Pie
The passage of the state protection amendment comes despite congressional offices receiving an 11th-hour email saying Greenwich Biosciences, maker of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CBD-based medication Epidiolex, wanted lawmakers to defeat it.
Earlier on Thursday, the House approved an amendment from Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-CA) that directs the Food and Drug Administration to establish a process for regulating CBD in foods and dietary supplements.
Yes/No
Another measure passed in a voice vote, from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), shifts $5 million away from the Drug Enforcement Administration toward an opioid treatment program.
Another Ocasio-Cortez amendment aimed at removing barriers to research on psychedelic drugs such as psilocybin and MDMA (ecstasy) was soundly defeated on the House floor last week.
The House is set to consider another amendment on the spending legislation in the coming days that would allow military veterans to receive medical marijuana recommendations from Department of Veterans Affairs doctors.
Make Laws-Make Money
Another bill maneuvering through the House contains language to protect banks working with state-legal cannabis businesses and removes a longstanding rider that has prevented Washington, D.C. from spending its own local tax dollars to legalize and regulate marijuana sales.
A safe marijuana banking bill was cleared by the Financial Services Committee and is expected to receive a floor vote.
The Veterans’ Affairs Committee held a hearing on four separate pieces of legislation concerning cannabis and military veterans on Thursday. And the Small Business Committee hosted a Wednesday hearing on issues facing cannabis firms, with the panel’s chairwoman announcing she would soon file a bill on the issue.