$700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson – What’s Your Cut?

Attorney General Nessel Reaches $700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson

Your mom and your dad have been covering you with Johnson and Johnson powder since you were a baby. There was always a cloud of powder in the air as they slapped it on you.

It got all over your face and hands and you both carried it throughout the house.  You could taste it because it got in your mouth from breathing it in.  You’ve been using it all your life, you still have some in your closet. You still use it today.

What’s your cut of the $700 Million and why didn’t they ban it from use long ago? 

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Here is the news release from the government.

Attorney General Nessel Reaches $700 Million Settlement Against Johnson and Johnson

June 11, 2024

LANSING – Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and 42 other attorneys general reached a $700 million nationwide settlement to resolve allegations related to the marketing of Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder and body powder products that contained talc.

The consent judgment (PDF) filed in this lawsuit addresses allegations that Johnson & Johnson deceptively promoted and misled consumers in advertisements related to the safety and purity of some of its talc powder products. As part of the lawsuit, Johnson & Johnson has agreed to stop the manufacture and sale of its baby powder and body powder products that contain talc in the United States.

“Product safety should be a top priority for every company in every sector, but especially an historic, trusted brand selling baby care products,” said Nessel. “Misleading Michigan consumers will not be tolerated, no matter how large or well-known the corporate perpetrator. We will stand up for consumer safety in our state, and I’m appreciative for our many bipartisan partners on this litigation throughout the country.”

Johnson & Johnson sold such products for more than 100 years. After the coalition of states began investigating, the company stopped distributing and selling these products in the United States and more recently ended global sales. While this lawsuit targeted the deceptive marketing of these products, numerous other lawsuits filed by private plaintiffs in class actions raised allegations that talc causes serious health issues including mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.

Under the consent judgment, Johnson & Johnson:

  • Has ceased and not resumed the manufacturing, marketing, promotion, sale, and distribution of all baby and body powder products and cosmetic powder products that contain talcum powder, including, but not limited to, Johnson’s Baby Powder and Johnson & Johnson’s Shower to Shower (“Covered Products”) in the United States.
  • Shall permanently stop the manufacture of any Covered Products in the United States either directly, or indirectly through any third party.
  • Shall permanently stop the marketing and promotion of any Covered Products in the United States either directly, or indirectly through any third party.
  • Shall permanently stop the sale or distribution of any Covered Products in the United States either directly, or indirectly through any third party.

As part of the settlement, Michigan will receive $20,615,040.58. This settlement is pending judicial approval.

Michigan is joined on the multistate settlement by the attorneys general of Texas, Florida, and North Carolina, as well as Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million

"Data show these programs strengthen communities by reducing crime, boosting employment"LANSING, MI, October 24, 2024 (Substance Abuse Prevention Month) – The Michigan Supreme Court announces that the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) has awarded $18,823,910...

read more

Read it Consent Judgement PDF

  • Where does the money go?
  • Are you eligible for some of that government windfall?
  • How do you prove that you used the powder and the link to your disease?
  • Got a lifetime of receipts?
  • Got pictures of you using it daily?

Here are some possible answers at Forbes.com

The answer is millions of consumers will pay more for products and J&J will make it up in a year and probably another robbery just occured.

Other Articles

Forfeiture Law: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark Rulings

Forfeiture Law: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark Rulings

Forfeiture Law in Focus: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark RulingsThe landscape of forfeiture law has been significantly shaped by recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. These rulings, in the cases of United States v...

When Can Your Silence Be Used Against You in a Legal Situation? 

When Can Your Silence Be Used Against You in a Legal Situation? 

US Supreme Court - Salinas v. TexasWhen Can Silence Be Used Against You?  In the realm of criminal law, the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution grants individuals critical protections, including the right to remain silent and the right against...

Supreme Court 8-1 Gun Possession Decision Changes Second Amendment

Supreme Court 8-1 Gun Possession Decision Changes Second Amendment

Supreme Court 8-1 Gun Possession Decision Changes Second Amendment Landscape Forever!Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), the federal statute that prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if he has been convicted of “a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term...

Facial Recognition and Wrongful Arrests

Facial Recognition and Wrongful Arrests

Facial RecognitionHow Technology Can Lead to Mistaken-Identity Arrests Facial recognition technology has become increasingly prevalent in law enforcement, but its use raises critical questions about civil liberties and accuracy. One landmark case sheds light on the...

Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Disclaimer: Please remember that the information provided in these legal tips is for educational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Laws are subject to change, and interpretations can vary. While we strive for accuracy, legal information can be complex and may not apply to your specific situation. Reading this information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. It is crucial to consult with a qualified attorney to discuss the specific facts of your case before taking any action or making any decisions.

Other Topics

Driving Under the Influence

Michigan

Your Rights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Law Firm VIctories

Share This