Defininition and Explaination – Motion in Limine
A motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow) specific evidence before the jury ever hears it. It’s one of the most important evidentiary tools in both criminal and civil litigation.
-
A motion in limine is filed before trial begins, usually at or before the final pretrial conference.
-
The phrase comes from Latin meaning “at the threshold” — because the issue is decided before the jury crosses the threshold into the courtroom.
-
Its purpose is to prevent the jury from being exposed to prejudicial, irrelevant, or inadmissible evidence that could unfairly influence the verdict.
-
The judge rules on the motion outside the presence of the jury.
Why Lawyers Use Motions in Limine
-
To exclude damaging evidence that the opposing party might try to introduce.
-
To avoid “bell that can’t be unrung” situations, where even a brief mention of improper evidence could taint the jury.
-
To streamline the trial by resolving evidentiary disputes in advance.
-
To preserve issues for appeal by creating a clear record of what was objected to and why.
What a Motion in Limine Can Address
Common targets include:
-
Prior criminal history
-
Allegations not supported by admissible evidence
-
Hearsay statements
-
Speculative or inflammatory claims
-
Irrelevant personal information
-
Improper expert testimony
-
References to plea negotiations or insurance coverage
A motion in limine can also be affirmative, asking the court to allow certain evidence that might otherwise be challenged.
How Courts Handle These Motions
-
The judge reviews the motion, any response, and applicable rules of evidence.
-
The ruling may be:
-
Granted (evidence excluded)
-
Denied (evidence allowed)
-
Reserved (judge waits to see how the evidence comes up at trial)
-
-
If granted, no one may mention the excluded evidence in front of the jury without first obtaining permission outside the jury’s presence.
Why It Matters
A motion in limine can dramatically shape the trial. Keeping prejudicial or irrelevant information away from the jury protects the defendant’s right to a fair trial and keeps the focus on legally admissible evidence.
If you want, I can turn this into a full website article with headings, FAQs, citations, SEO meta description, and schema — just say the word.
Common Issues Addressed in Motions in Limine
Attorneys use motions in limine to challenge or pre‑approve evidence such as:
-
Prior criminal history or bad acts (MRE 404(b))
-
Hearsay statements (MRE 801–803)
-
Speculative or inflammatory allegations
-
Improper expert testimony (MRE 702)
-
References to plea negotiations (MRE 410)
-
Insurance coverage or settlement discussions
-
Irrelevant personal information A motion in limine may also be affirmative, asking the court to allow evidence that may otherwise be challenged.
How Michigan Courts Decide These Motions
Judges typically hear motions in limine at the final pretrial conference or immediately before trial. The court may:
-
Grant the motion (evidence excluded)
-
Deny the motion (evidence allowed)
-
Reserve ruling until the evidence arises at trial If granted, the parties must not reference the excluded evidence in front of the jury without first obtaining permission outside the jury’s presence. Violating a granted motion in limine can result in a mistrial or sanctions.
Impact on Trial Strategy
A well‑crafted motion in limine can dramatically shape the trial. By controlling what the jury hears, attorneys can focus the case on admissible, relevant evidence and prevent the opposing party from injecting improper or prejudicial material. In criminal cases, these motions are often essential to protecting the defendant’s constitutional rights and ensuring a fair trial.
Since 1993, Komorn Law, PLLC has aggressively defended clients in Michigan courts, from district court to the federal level. Our firm has extensive experience litigating evidentiary issues, including motions in limine, suppression motions, and constitutional challenges. If you are facing criminal charges or need strategic pretrial advocacy, contact us at 248‑357‑2550 or visit > KomornLaw.com
Motion in Limine FAQs
Q: What does “motion in limine” literally mean?
A: It means “at the threshold,” referring to decisions made before the trial begins.
Q: When is a motion in limine filed?
A: Typically before trial, often at or before the final pretrial conference.
Q: Is a motion in limine the same as an objection?
A: No. An objection happens during trial; a motion in limine resolves evidentiary issues before trial.
Q: What happens if someone violates a granted motion in limine? A: The judge may issue sanctions, strike testimony, or declare a mistrial depending on the severity.
Q: Can a motion in limine be used to admit evidence?
A: Yes. Parties may file motions seeking pre‑approval of evidence likely to be challenged.
More
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Election Interference
Case Summary In People v Burkman, defendants created a robocall targeting African American voters during the 2020 election. The call falsely warned that mail‑in voting would expose voters to law‑enforcement tracking, debt collection, and forced vaccinations....
Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising
Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...
Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?
A deadlocked jury is often called a hung jury—A deadlocked jury—often called a hung jury—occurs when jurors cannot reach the unanimous (or legally required) agreement needed to deliver a verdict. In criminal cases, most jurisdictions require unanimity. When the jury...
Social Security Scams – What to Know
The Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) have issued several warnings about ongoing Social Security scams and continue to advise caution to the public. Here are some of the popular Social Security scams to watch out for in...
Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax
Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest
People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...
Michigan Drivers Face Higher Gas Tax in 2026
Keep Pushing.Summary Michigan’s fuel‑tax structure will undergo a major statutory shift on January 1, 2026, raising the state gas tax from 31 cents to approximately 52.4 cents per gallon. The change eliminates the 6% sales tax on fuel and replaces it with a higher,...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter
Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an agitated customer and three patrons inside the store, after which the customer shot the patrons. In People v Sherrill, the defendant...
Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws
Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with cannabis tax changes, wage increases, consumer protections, and transparency laws.Michigan begins 2026 with a slate of new laws...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...
















