Defininition and Explaination – Motion in Limine
A motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow) specific evidence before the jury ever hears it. It’s one of the most important evidentiary tools in both criminal and civil litigation.
-
A motion in limine is filed before trial begins, usually at or before the final pretrial conference.
-
The phrase comes from Latin meaning “at the threshold” — because the issue is decided before the jury crosses the threshold into the courtroom.
-
Its purpose is to prevent the jury from being exposed to prejudicial, irrelevant, or inadmissible evidence that could unfairly influence the verdict.
-
The judge rules on the motion outside the presence of the jury.
Why Lawyers Use Motions in Limine
-
To exclude damaging evidence that the opposing party might try to introduce.
-
To avoid “bell that can’t be unrung” situations, where even a brief mention of improper evidence could taint the jury.
-
To streamline the trial by resolving evidentiary disputes in advance.
-
To preserve issues for appeal by creating a clear record of what was objected to and why.
What a Motion in Limine Can Address
Common targets include:
-
Prior criminal history
-
Allegations not supported by admissible evidence
-
Hearsay statements
-
Speculative or inflammatory claims
-
Irrelevant personal information
-
Improper expert testimony
-
References to plea negotiations or insurance coverage
A motion in limine can also be affirmative, asking the court to allow certain evidence that might otherwise be challenged.
How Courts Handle These Motions
-
The judge reviews the motion, any response, and applicable rules of evidence.
-
The ruling may be:
-
Granted (evidence excluded)
-
Denied (evidence allowed)
-
Reserved (judge waits to see how the evidence comes up at trial)
-
-
If granted, no one may mention the excluded evidence in front of the jury without first obtaining permission outside the jury’s presence.
Why It Matters
A motion in limine can dramatically shape the trial. Keeping prejudicial or irrelevant information away from the jury protects the defendant’s right to a fair trial and keeps the focus on legally admissible evidence.
If you want, I can turn this into a full website article with headings, FAQs, citations, SEO meta description, and schema — just say the word.
Common Issues Addressed in Motions in Limine
Attorneys use motions in limine to challenge or pre‑approve evidence such as:
-
Prior criminal history or bad acts (MRE 404(b))
-
Hearsay statements (MRE 801–803)
-
Speculative or inflammatory allegations
-
Improper expert testimony (MRE 702)
-
References to plea negotiations (MRE 410)
-
Insurance coverage or settlement discussions
-
Irrelevant personal information A motion in limine may also be affirmative, asking the court to allow evidence that may otherwise be challenged.
How Michigan Courts Decide These Motions
Judges typically hear motions in limine at the final pretrial conference or immediately before trial. The court may:
-
Grant the motion (evidence excluded)
-
Deny the motion (evidence allowed)
-
Reserve ruling until the evidence arises at trial If granted, the parties must not reference the excluded evidence in front of the jury without first obtaining permission outside the jury’s presence. Violating a granted motion in limine can result in a mistrial or sanctions.
Impact on Trial Strategy
A well‑crafted motion in limine can dramatically shape the trial. By controlling what the jury hears, attorneys can focus the case on admissible, relevant evidence and prevent the opposing party from injecting improper or prejudicial material. In criminal cases, these motions are often essential to protecting the defendant’s constitutional rights and ensuring a fair trial.
Since 1993, Komorn Law, PLLC has aggressively defended clients in Michigan courts, from district court to the federal level. Our firm has extensive experience litigating evidentiary issues, including motions in limine, suppression motions, and constitutional challenges. If you are facing criminal charges or need strategic pretrial advocacy, contact us at 248‑357‑2550 or visit > KomornLaw.com
Motion in Limine FAQs
Q: What does “motion in limine” literally mean?
A: It means “at the threshold,” referring to decisions made before the trial begins.
Q: When is a motion in limine filed?
A: Typically before trial, often at or before the final pretrial conference.
Q: Is a motion in limine the same as an objection?
A: No. An objection happens during trial; a motion in limine resolves evidentiary issues before trial.
Q: What happens if someone violates a granted motion in limine? A: The judge may issue sanctions, strike testimony, or declare a mistrial depending on the severity.
Q: Can a motion in limine be used to admit evidence?
A: Yes. Parties may file motions seeking pre‑approval of evidence likely to be challenged.
More
The New Federal Definition of Hemp
The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and...
Should courts allow prosecutors to refer to complainants as victims
Labeling before adjudication. Kedero Treasvant was convicted of multiple firearm-related offenses in Michigan, and his appeal raises a key issue about courtroom language—specifically, whether prosecutors can refer to complainants as “victims” before guilt is...
Improper Transport of a Firearm in Michigan
Improper Firearms Transport, Storage Laws and Penalties Michigan law makes improper gun transport a misdemeanor crime under MCL 750.227d. Firearms can be confiscated and sometimes not returned, but attorneys can file motions under Michigan Court Rules (MCR) to seek...
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Gun Rights and Marijuana Use
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Gun Rights and Marijuana Use The Supreme Court has agreed to hear U.S. v. Hemani, a case challenging the federal ban on gun ownership by individuals who use marijuana—even in states where it’s legal. The decision could reshape how drug...
House Bill 5107 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations. Michigan’s Cannabis Regulation Challenges Since Michigan legalized recreational marijuana in 2018 under the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of...
House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations. Michigan’s Cannabis Laws Since Michigan legalized recreational marijuana in 2018, the state has worked to balance personal freedom with public...
Miranda v Arizona
Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent, that statements may be used against them, and the right to an attorney. These “Miranda warnings”...
Michigan Cannabis Tax Bill HB4951- Passed
In case you did not know...In September 2025, the Michigan Legislature passed House Bill 4951, known as the Comprehensive Road Funding Tax Act. This legislation introduces a significant change to the taxation of marijuana in Michigan, with implications for cannabis...
Don’t worry – There’s always a workaround
In case you did not know...The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of marijuana alone is no longer sufficient probable cause for police to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle. This decision overturns a previous precedent where the odor of marijuana...
Seven News Story Summaries – September 2025 (Part 1)
Seven Summaries of Seven News StoriesGovernor Issues Executive Directive on AI Use in State Agencies Between September 1–15, 2025, the Governor of Michigan issued an executive directive regulating the use of artificial intelligence in state agencies. The directive...




















