Cannabis cash transactions aren’t suspicious says IRS

Following The Money

Large cash transactions by marijuana businesses should not be automatically flagged as suspicious, as per the latest IRS guidance.

The tax agency’s guidance aims to provide clarity on the federal Bank Secrecy Act, which mandates businesses, including banks, to submit Form 8300 within 15 days if they receive $10,000 or more in cash.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Those forms enable the filer to categorize a transaction as “suspicious,” providing vital information for investigation by the IRS and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) into potential criminal activity.

But classifying a cash transaction from a legitimate cannabis enterprise as suspicious in a defensive manner is a misuse of that designation,” cautioned IRS Special Counsel Charles Hall in a memorandum dated January 22nd.

Links to the IRS Releases

Related Articles

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids

Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the...

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms

The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults

No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising

Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...

More Posts

What is Inference Stacking?

What is Inference Stacking?

What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from...

read more
The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp

The New Federal Definition of Hemp: Legal and Regulatory ImplicationsCongress has enacted a sweeping revision to the federal definition of hemp through the Continuing...

read more
Miranda v Arizona

Miranda v Arizona

Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent,...

read more
Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a...

read more
Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Disclaimer: Please remember that the information provided in these legal tips and articles is for educational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or an agreement for legal services. Laws are subject to change, and interpretations can vary. While we strive for accuracy, legal information can be complex and may not apply to your specific situation. Reading this information does not establish an attorney-client relationship. It is crucial to consult with a qualified attorney to discuss the specific facts of your case before taking any action or making any decisions.

Other Topics

Driving Under the Influence

Michigan Laws FAQs

Your Rights

Michigan Supreme Court

Michigan Court of Appeals

Law Firm VIctories

Share This