Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.

This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a refusal to participate in this testing as a criminal offense, similar to the penalties imposed for declining an alcohol-related preliminary breath test.

  • Crimes: intoxication or impairment
  • Criminal procedure: evidence
  • Traffic control: traffic regulation Crimes: intoxication or impairment; methods of testing intoxication or impairment in the Michigan vehicle code; expand to include other bodily fluid.

Amends secs. 625a, 625c & 625g of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.625a et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4390’25

Below is the text to the introduced bill.
If you are from the future you can see updates here.

Komorn Law

TIP: When you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs don’t drive.
But if you do and you get tangled up in the web of justice – Call Us

A bill to amend 1949 PA 300, entitled

“Michigan vehicle code,”

by amending sections 625a, 625c, and 625g (MCL 257.625a, 257.625c, and 257.625g), sections 625a and 625g as amended by 2021 PA 85 and section 625c as amended by 2014 PA 315.

THE “PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN” ENACT:

Sec. 625a. (1) A peace officer may arrest a person without a warrant under either of the following circumstances:

(a) The peace officer has reasonable cause to believe the person was, at the time of an accident in this state, the operator of a vehicle involved in the accident and was operating the vehicle in violation of section 625 or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to section 625.

(b) The person is found in the driver’s seat of a vehicle parked or stopped on a highway or street within this state if any part of the vehicle intrudes into the roadway and the peace officer has reasonable cause to believe the person was operating the vehicle in violation of section 625 or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to section 625.

(2) A peace officer who has reasonable cause to believe that a person was operating a vehicle upon a public highway or other place open to the public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state and that the person by the consumption of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance or a combination of them may have affected his or her the person’s ability to operate a vehicle, or reasonable cause to believe that a person was operating a commercial motor vehicle within the state while the person’s blood, breath, or urine, or other bodily fluid contained any measurable amount of alcohol, a controlled substance, or any other intoxicating substance or while the person had any detectable presence of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance or any other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, or reasonable cause to believe that a person who is less than 21 years of age was operating a vehicle upon a public highway or other place open to the public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state while the person had any bodily alcohol content as that term is defined in section 625(6), may require the person to submit to a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis.

The following provisions apply to a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis administered under this subsection:

(a) A peace officer may arrest a person based in whole or in part upon the results of a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis.

(b) The results of a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis are admissible in a criminal prosecution for a crime enumerated in section 625c(1) or in an administrative hearing for 1 or more of the following purposes:

(i) To assist the court or hearing officer in determining a challenge to the validity of an arrest. This subparagraph does not limit the introduction of other competent evidence offered to establish the validity of an arrest.

(ii) As evidence of the defendant’s breath alcohol content, if offered by the defendant to rebut testimony elicited on cross-examination of a defense witness that the defendant’s breath alcohol content was higher at the time of the charged offense than when a chemical test was administered under subsection (6).

(iii) As evidence of the defendant’s breath alcohol content, if offered by the prosecution to rebut testimony elicited on cross-examination of a prosecution witness that the defendant’s breath alcohol content was lower at the time of the charged offense than when a chemical test was administered under subsection (6).

(iv) As evidence of the presence or nonpresence of a controlled substance in the defendant’s oral fluid, if offered by the defendant to rebut testimony elicited on cross-examination of a defense witness that a preliminary oral fluid analysis of the defendant’s oral fluid showed the presence of a controlled substance that was not found to be present when a chemical test of the defendant’s blood, urine, or other bodily fluid was administered under subsection (6).

(v) As evidence of the presence or nonpresence of a controlled substance in the defendant’s oral fluid, if offered by the prosecution to rebut testimony elicited on cross-examination of a prosecution witness that a preliminary oral fluid analysis of the defendant’s oral fluid showed no presence of a controlled substance that was found to be present when a chemical test of the defendant’s blood, urine, or other bodily fluid was administered under subsection (6).

(c) A person who submits to a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis remains subject to the requirements of sections 625c, 625d, 625e, and 625f for purposes of chemical tests described in those sections.

(d) Except as provided in subsection (5), a person who refuses to submit to a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis upon a lawful request by a peace officer is responsible for a civil infraction.

(3) A peace officer shall use the results of a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis conducted under this section to determine whether to order a person out-of-service under section 319d. A peace officer shall order out-of-service as required under section 319d a person who was operating a commercial motor vehicle and who refuses to submit to a preliminary chemical breath analysis as provided in this section. This section does not limit use of other competent evidence by the peace officer to determine whether to order a person out-of-service under section 319d.

(4) A person who was operating a commercial motor vehicle and who is requested to submit to a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis under this section must be advised that refusing a peace officer’s request to take a test described in this section is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than $100.00, or both, and will result in the issuance of a 24-hour out-of-service order.

(5) A person who was operating a commercial motor vehicle and who refuses to submit to a preliminary chemical breath analysis or a preliminary oral fluid analysis upon a peace officer’s lawful request is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than $100.00, or both.

(6) The following provisions apply to chemical tests and analysis of a person’s blood, breath, urine, or breath, other bodily fluid other than a preliminary chemical breath analysis:

(a) The amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance in a driver’s blood, or urine, or other bodily fluid or the amount of alcohol in a person’s breath at the time alleged as shown by chemical analysis of the person’s blood, breath, urine, or breath other bodily fluid is admissible into evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding and is presumed to be the same as at the time the person operated the vehicle.

(b) A person arrested for a crime described in section 625c(1) must be advised of all of the following:

(i) If he or she the person takes a chemical test of his or her the person’s blood, breath, urine, or breath other bodily fluid administered at the request of a peace officer, he or she the person has the right to demand that a person of his or her the person’s own choosing administer 1 of the chemical tests.

(ii) The results of the test are admissible in a judicial proceeding as provided under this act and will be considered with other admissible evidence in determining the defendant’s innocence or guilt.

(iiiHe or she The person is responsible for obtaining a chemical analysis of a test sample obtained at his or her the person’s own request.

(iv) If he or she the person refuses the request of a peace officer to take a test described in subparagraph (i), a test must not be given without a court order, but the peace officer may seek to obtain a court order.

(v) Refusing a peace officer’s request to take a test described in subparagraph (i) will result in the suspension of his or her the person’s operator’s or chauffeur’s license and vehicle group designation or operating privilege and in the addition of 6 points to his or her the person’s driver record.

(c) A sample or specimen of breath, urine, or breath other bodily fluid must be taken and collected in a reasonable manner. Only a licensed physician, or an individual operating under the delegation of a licensed physician under section 16215 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.16215, qualified to withdraw blood and acting in a medical environment, may withdraw blood at a peace officer’s request to determine the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance in the person’s blood, as provided in this subsection. Liability for a crime or civil damages predicated on the act of withdrawing or analyzing blood and related procedures does not attach to a licensed physician or individual operating under the delegation of a licensed physician who withdraws or analyzes blood or assists in the withdrawal or analysis in accordance with this act unless the withdrawal or analysis is performed in a negligent manner.

(d) A chemical test described in this subsection must be administered at the request of a peace officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person has committed a crime described in section 625c(1). A person who takes a chemical test administered at a peace officer’s request as provided in this section must be given a reasonable opportunity to have a person of his or her the person’s own choosing administer 1 of the chemical tests described in this subsection within a reasonable time after his or her the person’s detention. The test results are admissible and must be considered with other admissible evidence in determining the defendant’s innocence or guilt. If the person charged is administered a chemical test by a person of his or her the person’s own choosing, the person charged is responsible for obtaining a chemical analysis of the test sample.

(e) If, after an accident, the driver of a vehicle involved in the accident is transported to a medical facility and a sample of the driver’s blood or other bodily fluid is withdrawn at that time for medical treatment, the results of a chemical analysis of that sample are admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding to show the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance in the person’s blood at the time alleged, regardless of whether the person had been offered or had refused a chemical test. The medical facility or person performing the chemical analysis shall disclose the results of the analysis to a prosecuting attorney who requests the results for use in a criminal prosecution as provided in this subdivision. A medical facility or person disclosing information in compliance with this subsection is not civilly or criminally liable for making the disclosure.

(f) If, after an accident, the driver of a vehicle involved in the accident is deceased, a sample of the decedent’s blood or other bodily fluid must be withdrawn in a manner directed by the medical examiner to determine the amount of alcohol or the presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, in the decedent’s blood. The medical examiner shall give the results of the chemical analysis of the sample to the law enforcement agency investigating the accident and that agency shall forward the results to the department of state police.

(g) The department of state police shall promulgate uniform rules in compliance with the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, for the administration of chemical tests for the purposes of this section. An instrument used for a preliminary chemical breath analysis or preliminary oral fluid analysis may be used for a chemical test described in this subsection if approved under rules promulgated by the department of state police.

(7) The provisions of subsection (6) relating to chemical testing do not limit the introduction of any other admissible evidence bearing upon any of the following questions:

(a) Whether the person was impaired by, or under the influence of, alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

(b) Whether the person had an alcohol content of 0.08 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning 5 years after the state treasurer publishes a certification under section 625(28), the person had an alcohol content of 0.10 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

(c) If the person is less than 21 years of age, whether the person had any bodily alcohol content within his or her the person’s body. As used in this subdivision, “any bodily alcohol content” means either of the following:

(i) An alcohol content of 0.02 grams or more but less than 0.08 grams per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning 5 years after the state treasurer publishes a certification under section 625(28), the person had an alcohol content of 0.02 grams or more but less than 0.10 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

(ii) Any presence of alcohol within a person’s body resulting from the consumption of alcoholic liquor, other than the consumption of alcoholic liquor as a part of a generally recognized religious service or ceremony.

(8) If a chemical test described in subsection (6) is administered, the test results must be made available to the person charged or the person’s attorney upon written request to the prosecution, with a copy of the request filed with the court. The prosecution shall furnish the results at least 2 days before the day of the trial. The prosecution shall offer the test results as evidence in that trial. Failure to fully comply with the request bars the admission of the results into evidence by the prosecution.

(9) A person’s refusal to submit to a chemical test as provided in subsection (6) is admissible in a criminal prosecution for a crime described in section 625c(1) only to show that a test was offered to the defendant, but not as evidence in determining the defendant’s innocence or guilt. The jury must be instructed accordingly.

(10) As used in this section:

(a) “Controlled substance” means that term as defined in section 7104 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7104.

(b) “Intoxicating substance” means that term as defined in section 625.

Sec. 625c. (1) A person who operates a vehicle upon a public highway or other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles, within this state is considered to have given consent to chemical tests of his or her the person’s blood, breath, or urine, or other bodily fluid for the purpose of determining the amount of alcohol or presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, in his or her the person’s blood, or urine, or other bodily fluid or the amount of alcohol in his or her the person’s breath in all of the following circumstances:

(a) If the person is arrested for a violation of section 625(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), or (8), section 625a(5), or section 625m or a local ordinance substantially corresponding to section 625(1), (3), (6), or (8), section 625a(5), or section 625m.

(b) If the person is arrested for a violation of section 601d, section 626(3) or (4), or manslaughter, or murder resulting from the operation of a motor vehicle, and the peace officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating the vehicle in violation of section 625.

(2) A person who is afflicted with hemophilia, diabetes, or a condition requiring the use of an anticoagulant under the direction of a physician is not considered to have given consent to the withdrawal of blood.

(3) The tests shall must be administered as provided in section 625a(6).

(4) As used in this section:

(a) “Controlled substance” means that term as defined in section 7104 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7104.

(b) “Intoxicating substance” means that term as defined in section 625.

Sec. 625g. (1) If a person refuses a chemical test offered under section 625a(6), the peace officer who requested the person to submit to the chemical test shall comply with subdivisions (a) and (b). If a person submits to the chemical test or a chemical test is performed under a court order and the test reveals an unlawful alcohol content, or the presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, the peace officer who requested the person to submit to the test shall do all of the following, other than subdivision (b)(i):

(a) On behalf of the secretary of state, immediately confiscate the person’s license or permit to operate a motor vehicle and, if the person is otherwise eligible for a license or permit, issue a temporary license or permit to the person. The temporary license or permit must be on a form provided by the secretary of state.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (2), immediately do all of the following:

(i) Forward a copy of the written report of the person’s refusal to submit to a chemical test required under section 625d to the secretary of state.

(ii) Notify the secretary of state by means of the law enforcement information network that a temporary license or permit was issued to the person.

(iii) Destroy the person’s driver license or permit.

(2) If a person submits to a chemical test offered under section 625a(6) that requires an analysis of blood, or urine, or other bodily fluid and a report of the results of that chemical test is not immediately available, the peace officer who requested the person to submit to the test shall comply with subsection (1)(a) and (b)(ii) and indicate in the notice under subsection (1)(b)(ii) that a subsequent chemical test is pending. If the report reveals an unlawful alcohol content, or the presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, the peace officer who requested the person to submit to the test shall immediately comply with subsection (1)(b)(iii). If the report does not reveal an unlawful alcohol content, or the presence of a controlled substance or other intoxicating substance, or any combination of them, the peace officer who requested the person to submit to the test shall immediately notify the person of the test results and immediately return the person’s license or permit by first-class mail to the address provided at the time of arrest.

(3) A temporary license or permit issued under this section is valid for 1 of the following time periods:

(a) If the case is not prosecuted, for the earlier of 90 days after issuance or until the person’s license or permit is suspended under section 625f. The prosecuting attorney shall notify the secretary of state if a case referred to the prosecuting attorney is not prosecuted. The arresting law enforcement agency shall notify the secretary of state if a case is not referred to the prosecuting attorney for prosecution.

(b) If the case is prosecuted, until the criminal charges against the person are dismissed, the person is acquitted of those charges, or the person’s license or permit is suspended, restricted, or revoked.

(4) As used in this section:

(a) “Controlled substance” means that term as defined in section 7104 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.7104.

(b) “Intoxicating substance” means that term as defined in section 625.

(c) “Unlawful alcohol content” means any of the following, as applicable:

(i) If the person tested is less than 21 years of age, 0.02 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

(ii) If the person tested was operating a commercial motor vehicle within this state, 0.04 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

(iii) If the person tested is not a person described in subparagraph (i) or (ii), 0.08 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning 5 years after the state treasurer publishes a certification under section 625(28), 0.10 grams or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

Enacting section 1. This amendatory act takes effect 90 days after the date it is enacted into law.

Enacting section 2. This amendatory act does not take effect unless House Bill No. 4390 (request no. H00111’25) of the 103rd Legislature is enacted into law.

April 24, 2025, Introduced by Reps. Rogers, BeGole, Prestin, Rigas, Borton, Woolford, Harris, Mueller, St. Germaine, DeBoyer, Schmaltz, Meerman, Outman, Mentzer, Longjohn, Wortz, Markkanen, Wozniak, McFall, Robinson, Fairbairn, Bruck, Scott, Greene, T. Carter, Linting, Miller, VanderWall, Aragona and Kunse and referred to Committee on Government Operations.

Kommorn Law – Areas of Service

We fight for our clients throughout the State of Michigan and Northern Ohio.

Here are some court contacts we frequently handle cases.

Oakland County

If you are facing any legal charges in Oakland County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

Macomb County

If you are facing any legal charges in Macomb County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

Wayne County

If you are facing any legal charges in Wayne County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the Third Circuit Court (Wayne County):

  • Telephone Number (Civil/Family): (313) 224-5510
  • Telephone Number (Criminal): (313) 224-5261 or (313) 224-2503
  • Address (Civil/Family): 2 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226
  • Address (Criminal): 1441 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48226
  • Website: https://www.3rdcc.org/

Kent County

If you are facing any legal charges in Kent County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

  • Telephone Number: (616) 632-5220
  • Address: 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503
  • Website: Kent County

Traverse County

If you are facing any legal charges in Traverse County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information for the 13th Circuit Court (which includes Traverse County):

Monroe County

If you are facing any legal charges in Monroe County and need to hire an attorney, call our Office (248) 357-2550. If you need to contact the court, here is the information:

Evaluation of Field Sobriety Tests for Identifying Drivers Under the Influence of Cannabis

Evaluation of Field Sobriety Tests for Identifying Drivers Under the Influence of Cannabis

This randomized clinical trial investigates the accuracy of field sobriety tests administered by law enforcement officers to assess functional impairment and driving performance among individuals who have smoked cannabis.

Question

How accurate are field sobriety tests (FSTs) in identifying acute Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairment?

Findings

In this randomized clinical trial of 184 cannabis users randomized to THC or placebo, law enforcement officers classified 81.0% and 49.2%, respectively, as FST impaired, and officers suspected that 99.2% of FST-impaired participants received THC. Driving simulator performance was associated with select FSTs.

Meaning

In this study, FSTs differentiated between THC- and placebo-exposed participants; however, the substantial overlap of FST impairment between groups and the high frequency at which FST impairment was suspected to be due to THC suggest that absent other indicators, FSTs alone may be insufficient to identify THC-specific driving impairment.

If you are interested in learning more detail about this evaluation go here to the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Meanwhile… until they figure it out, if you get a DUI for being under the influence of cannabis, although legal, you will need an experienced attorney to fight for you in the court system. If you want to fight call our office. If you don’t, well then settle for what they dish out and accept that you can’t go back and change the outcome. 

Have you been arrested or charged with DUI?

Charged with a Crime?
Lost Your License?
Conspiracy or CCE?
Thought Crimes?

Call Our Office for a Free Case Evaluation

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

THC Associated with Increase of Survival Time in Palliative Cancer

THC Associated with Increase of Survival Time in Palliative Cancer

Summary from the official government website (Link Below)The Use of Tetrahydrocannabinol Is Associated with an Increase in Survival Time in Palliative Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort StudyThe study, conducted by researchers in Germany, analyzed...

Scientists Discover The Reason Cannabis Causes The Munchies

Scientists Discover The Reason Cannabis Causes The Munchies

For the first time, scientists have uncovered the precise neurological impacts of cannabis use that give rise to the phenomenon famously referred to as the "munchies," as revealed by an innovative study backed by federal funds. Researchers at Washington State...

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

THC Detection in Blood: A Comprehensive Review

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive compound in marijuana, can remain detectable in the blood for several days or even weeks after use. This is due to the fact that THC is highly fat-soluble, meaning that it dissolves easily in fat cells. Once THC is absorbed into the bloodstream, it is distributed throughout the body, including the fat cells. When THC reaches the brain, it binds to cannabinoid receptors, producing the intoxicating effects associated with marijuana use.

As the intoxicating effects of THC wear off, it is released from the brain and redistributed to other tissues, including the fat cells. THC can be stored in fat cells for weeks or even months, and it is released slowly back into the bloodstream over time. This means that a blood test for THC can detect past marijuana use, even if the individual is no longer under the influence.

Have you been charged with driving while high?

Want to fight that charge!
Call Our Office for a Free Case Evaluation

Factors that Affect THC Detection in Blood

A number of factors can affect how long THC remains detectable in the blood, including:

  • Frequency of use: Chronic marijuana users tend to have higher THC blood levels than occasional users.
  • Metabolism: Individuals with faster metabolisms tend to clear THC from their system more quickly.
  • Body composition: Individuals with higher body fat percentages tend to have higher THC blood levels.
  • Method of use: Different methods of marijuana use can result in different THC blood levels. For example, smoking marijuana tends to result in higher THC blood levels than eating marijuana.

Interpretation of THC Blood Test Results

It is important to note that THC blood levels do not necessarily correlate with impairment. Some individuals with high THC blood levels may not be impaired, while others with low THC blood levels may be impaired. Other factors, such as individual tolerance, route of administration, and time since use, can also play a role.

Additional Scientific Details

In addition to the information above, here are some additional scientific details about THC detection in blood:

  • THC is metabolized by the liver into a number of different metabolites, including 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC). 11-OH-THC is more potent than THC and has a longer half-life, meaning that it remains in the body longer.
  • The half-life of THC in the blood ranges from 1.3 to 13 days, depending on the individual’s metabolism and other factors.
  • THC can be detected in blood using a variety of analytical methods, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

Future Research Directions

Additional research is needed to better understand the relationship between THC blood levels and impairment. Researchers are also working to develop new methods for detecting THC in blood that are more sensitive and specific.

Did You Know

Michigan State Police Legal Updates

MSP Legal Update No. 153 (01/2023)

  • Search & Seizure: The smell of marihuana, standing alone, no longer constitutes probable cause to search for that substance
  • Vehicle Code: Violation for impeding traffic requires evidence the accused’s conduct actually affected the normal flow of traffic.

Legal Update No. 153 (01/2023)

 

MSP Legal Update No. 150 (01/2022)

  • Vehicle Code: Persons under the age of 21 may be prosecuted for operating a motor vehicle with the presence of marihuana in their system
  • Criminal Law: Ethnic intimidation based on gender includes harassing or intimidating another person because of the actual or perceived gender of that person.

Legal Update No. 150 (01/2022)

 

Legal Update No. 148 (09/2021)

Statutes: Code of Criminal Procedure amended to prohibit issuance of appearance tickets to a person arrested for an “operating while intoxicated” offense; Juvenile Law: Individuals who are 17 years of age to be treated as juveniles in criminal proceedings rather than automatically being treated as adults; Did You Know: The mere presence of an unidentified cocaine metabolite is insufficient to prove operation of a vehicle with the presence of “any amount” of cocaine in the body.

Legal Update No. 148 (09/2021)

 

Legal Update No. 147 (03/2021)

Statutes: The Code of Criminal Procedure amended to require persons arrested for certain misdemeanor and ordinance violations not exceeding 1-year in jail to be released from custody upon issuance and service of an appearance ticket; Vehicle Code: The Michigan Vehicle Code amended to eliminate the requirement to provide an audible signal when overtaking another vehicle.

Legal Update No. 147 (03/2021)

More Posts

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan

Driving under the influence of cannabis is illegal and carries serious consequences in Michigan.We have fought and won many cases from the District Courts, Circuit Courts, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court through out the State of Michigan. We have also fought...

read more
Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

Michigan House Bill NO. 4391

It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis within law enforcement procedures, designating a refusal to participate in this testing as a criminal offense, similar to the penalties imposed for...

read more
Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Legal Tip – Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan

Komorn Law - Quick Legal TipsLegal Tip: Understanding Your Rights During a DUI Stop in Michigan A DUI stop can be stressful, but knowing your rights is crucial. You have the right to remain silent. You are not obligated to answer questions beyond basic identification....

read more
How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

Don't do the crime - if you can't pay the price.Average Flat Fees. Some criminal defense attorneys charge a flat fee for certain types of cases, instead of billing by the hour. This may or may not include filing fees, motions, fees, etc. Flat fees include: DUI/DWI –...

read more
How Much Does It Cost To Hire a Criminal Defense Attorney?

What do you do when you are pulled over for suspected DUI?

If you are pulled over for suspected drunk driving you are probably going to be arrested. The less you say - the better off you are in the long run. If you find yourself being pulled over for suspected DUI, ensure you pull over safely to the roadside, maintain a...

read more
One of Michigan’s Top DUI Attorneys

One of Michigan’s Top DUI Attorneys

We aggressively defend all aspects of traffic law, from simple civil infractions to more serious alcohol and drug-related offenses.  Don't wait till the last second to get an attorney.  That's how you lose.Why Attorney Michael Komorn is one of Michigan’s Top DUI...

read more
Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – Second Offense

Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – Second Offense

Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – Second Offense Operating Under the Influence (OUI) is a serious offense in Michigan. If someone is caught driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, they can face severe penalties. When it comes to a second offense, the...

read more
Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – First Offense

Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – First Offense

First Offense DUI in Michigan: Laws and ConsequencesFacing a first offense DUI in Michigan can be daunting as the implications are significant and the legal landscape is complex. Understanding the laws surrounding Operating While Intoxicated is essential, as these...

read more
Can I have open alcohol in a trailer that is being pulled on the road?

Can I have open alcohol in a trailer that is being pulled on the road?

Question: Can I have open alcohol in a trailer or camper that is being pulled on the road?

Answer:  In most instances transporting or possession of open intoxicants in a vehicle is not permitted.  

MCL 257.624a states in part, “a person who is an operator or occupant shall not transport or possess alcoholic liquor in a container that is open or uncapped or upon which the seal is broken within the passenger compartment of a vehicle upon a highway, or within the passenger compartment of a moving vehicle in any place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor vehicles, including an area designated for the parking of vehicles…”

There are limited exceptions in cases where the transportation of an open or uncapped alcoholic liquor in the passenger compartment of a vehicle are permitted.

They include times when the vehicle does not have a trunk or separate area from the passenger compartment, and the container is in a locked glove compartment, behind the last upright seat, or in an area not normally occupied by the operator. There are additional exceptions in the case of a chartered vehicle such as a limousine or chartered bus.

FAQ compliments of you the taxpayer and the MSP

Question: I need a lawyer for a DUI charge I got. Who should I call?

Answer: Komorn Law (248) 357-2550

If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime or DUI.
Call Komorn Law Call Now 248-357-2550

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

Blog Cannabis Science Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Komorn Driving DUI Forfeiture Health Benefits of Marijuana Hemp Know Your Rights Komorn Law Blog LARA-MMFLA Info Legalization Marijuana Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Komorn Medical Marijuana Medical Marijuana Attorney Michael Komorn Michigan Laws Michigan Medical Marhuana Regulation Michigan Medical Marijuana Act Michigan Medical Marijuana Criminal Defense Michigan Medical Marijuana Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Komorn Michigan News Michigan Supreme Court News Planet Green Trees Radio Recent Victories Supreme Court Uncategorized USA news Victories Project Your Rights

DISCLAIMER
This website and/or post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas, private stuff, work related information, non work related information and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything and everything – do your research on “Official Government and State Sites”, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain. You’re on the internet.

One of Michigan’s Top DUI Attorneys

Michigan’s DUI Laws and Penalties

Michigan’s OWI Laws and Penalties

An DUI / OUI / OWVI conviction requires proof only that the driver shows visible signs of impairment due to ingesting alcohol or drugs.

The Michigan Law

Under MCL 257.625(3), you are assumed guilty of a crime if, regardless of your blood alcohol content, your ability to operate a vehicle was “visibly impaired” by alcohol.

This is referred to as “operating while visibly impaired” or OWVI.

Michigan’s OWI and OWVI Laws

There are two main categories: operating while under the influence of drugs or alcohol (OWI) and operating while visibly impaired (OWVI) by drugs or alcohol. Some people still use the term DUI, but it’s the same thing as OWI.

An OWI is the more serious offense. It means you were driving while:

  • under the influence of alcohol or drugs
  • had a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .08% or greater
  • had any amount of illegal drugs in your body

Once again –> an OWVI conviction only requires proof that you only showed visible signs of impairment due to alcohol or drugs.

 

This is why you need to retain a lawyer.  Even if your going to take a plea.

 

Michigan’s OWI and OWVI Penalties

If you’re convicted of OWI or OWVI, you’ll face penalties according to Michigan law. For most convictions, you’ll lose your license, pay fines, and possibly go to jail.

How Long an OWI or OWVI Stays on Your Record in Michigan

OWIs and OWVIs stay on your record for seven years in Michigan. This means that if you get another conviction within seven years, it will count as a prior conviction and you’ll face harsher penalties.

 

Michigan DUI Penalties

1st Offense

If you are caught driving under the influence (DUI) in Michigan for the first time, you may face up to 93 days in jail (up to 180 days if your blood alcohol content (BAC) was .17% or greater). You may also be fined $100 to $500 ($200 to $700 if your BAC was .17% or greater) and ordered to complete up to 360 hours of community service.

2nd Offense

If you are caught DUI for the second time, you may face 5 days to one year in jail, a fine of $200 to $1,000, and 30 to 90 days of community service. Your vehicle may also be immobilized for 90 to 180 days (if not forfeited).

3rd Offense

If you are caught DUI for the third time, you may face one to five years in jail (30 days to one year if community service is ordered), a fine of $500 to $5,000, and 60 to 180 days of community service. Your vehicle may also be immobilized for one to three years (if not forfeited).

Jail

If you are caught DUI in Michigan, you may face jail time depending on the offense. The length of jail time increases with each subsequent offense.

 

Vehicle Immobilization for OWI and OWVI Convictions in Michigan

If you are convicted of operating while intoxicated (OWI) or operating while visibly impaired (OWVI) in Michigan, the judge may order the immobilization or forfeiture of your vehicle. For a first offense, immobilization or forfeiture is optional, but for any subsequent offense, it is mandatory. The length of immobilization increases with each subsequent offense.

  • 1st offense. Possibly forfeiture or immobilization for up to 180 days.
  • 2nd offense. Immobilization for 90 to 180 days is mandatory (if not forfeited).
  • 3rd offense. Immobilization for one to three years is mandatory (if not forfeited).

 

Michigan’s OWI Enhancements for Passengers Under 16 Years Old

If you are caught DUI with a passenger under 16 years old in Michigan, you may face additional penalties. For a first offense, you may be fined $200 to $1,000 and either serve five days to one year in jail or complete 30 to 90 days of community service. For a subsequent offense with a passenger under 16, you may be fined $500 to $5,000 and either serve one to five years in jail or probation (which must include five days to one year in jail and 30 to 90 days of community service).

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Can you get a DUI removed from your record in Michigan?

The waiting period to have a first-time operating while intoxicated offense expunged from your record is 5 years.

As of February 19th, 2022, first time operating while intoxicated convictions are now eligible to be set-aside (expunged) under certain circumstances.

 

Waiting Time

  • When seeking to expunge one or more serious misdemeanor convictions or one felony conviction, at least 5 years from the latest of the following events: date of the sentencing, completion of a term of probation, discharge from parole, or completion of any term of imprisonment.
  • When seeking to expunge more than one felony conviction, at least 7 years from the latest of the following events: date of the sentencing, completion of a term of probation, discharge from parole, or completion of any term of imprisonment.
  • When seeking to expunge one or more misdemeanor convictions (other than serious misdemeanors and any misdemeanor conviction for an assaultive crime), at least 3 years from the latest of the following events: date of the sentencing, completion of a term of probation, or completion of any term of imprisonment.

Law Firm VIctories

Your Rights

DUI