No Second Amendment Rights For You
If you are charged with a crime you’re part of the State of Michigan family now. Call us – Because you don’t want to be a part of that family.
Komorn Law (248) 357-2550
A federal judge in Michigan has ruled that a man with a prior misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence remains prohibited from possessing firearms under federal law, even though a Michigan state court had previously set aside that conviction.
Jeramy Wilburn, the plaintiff in the case, began acquiring firearms after his domestic violence conviction was set aside by the state court, believing he was once again eligible to do so. However, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) confiscated his weapons, asserting that he was still federally prohibited from owning them.
Wilburn subsequently sued the ATF and its Director, alleging violations of his Second Amendment rights and seeking a preliminary injunction to have his firearms returned.
U.S. District Judge Susan K. DeClercq sided with the government, granting their motion to dismiss Wilburn’s lawsuit and denying his request for a preliminary injunction. Judge DeClercq explained that under federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(33)(B)(ii), a prior domestic violence conviction only ceases to be a bar to firearm ownership if the state procedure used to set aside the conviction “completely remove[s] all effects of the conviction.”
Citing the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Wyoming ex rel. Crank v. United States, Judge DeClercq noted that the terms “expunged” and “set aside” in federal law are intended to be equivalent and require the complete removal of all consequences of the conviction.
The court found that Michigan’s law regarding setting aside convictions does not meet this federal standard. Judge DeClercq pointed out that Michigan law explicitly states that a conviction may still have various legal ramifications even after it has been set aside.
Therefore, Judge DeClercq concluded that “as a matter of statutory construction, the relief Wilburn received under Michigan’s set-aside procedure did not expunge or set aside his conviction for purposes of federal law.”
The 21-page ruling is titled Wilburn, et al. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, et al.; MiLW No. 02-109059.
Link to the full text of the opinion
Recent
Criminal Law FAQs – Theft Crimes
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Theft CrimesAccording to Michigan State Law (Michigan Compiled Laws - MCL), Theft Crimes generally involve the unlawful taking of someone else's property with the intent to deprive them of it, either permanently or for a significant period....
Criminal Law FAQs – Domestic Violence
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Domestic ViolenceAccording to Michigan State Law, Domestic Violence is not a standalone criminal offense but rather a designation applied to certain crimes when the victim is a "spouse or former spouse, an individual with whom the person...
More
What Are Your Rights Before And After Arrest?
What are your rights before and after arrest?Generally, police require a search warrant to lawfully enter any private premises or to search electronic devices such as your phone or computer. If the police do not possess a search warrant, you are under no obligation to...
MI Court of Appeals – MRTMA defense denied dismissal
Does the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act protect you in all Marijuana scenarios?The Conflict The central issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), MCL 333.27951 et seq., prevents a...
The “Automobile Exception” in Michigan law
The "automobile exception" in Michigan law allows police to search a vehicle without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime.This exception is grounded in the idea that vehicles are inherently mobile, meaning evidence could be...
The search being challenged was triggered by the odor of cannabis
The case People of Michigan v. Freddie Wilkins III (No. 367209) revolves around a legal challenge regarding the search of a vehicle without a warrant.Police conducted a warrantless search under the "automobile exception."The case People of Michigan v. Freddie Wilkins...
Carrying a Concealed Weapon in Michigan
Carrying a concealed weapon (CCW) in Michigan without proper authorization is a crime.Carrying a concealed weapon (CCW) in Michigan without proper authorization can lead to serious criminal charges. Michigan law has strict regulations regarding firearms, and violating...
MI Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records Dispute
Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Public Records DisputeTeachers Union and School District at Odds Over Data AccessThe Michigan Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case regarding whether public school teachers' class materials are subject to the...
