The Michigan Rules of Evidence are the rules adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court to govern evidentiary processes throughout Michigan’s judicial system.
Occasionally, the Rules of Evidence require amendments or changes. You can access proposed and recently-adopted orders affecting the Rules of Evidence from this page. There are also more links below at the end of this article.
Have your rights been violated?
Have your driving priviledges been revoked?
Has your professional license been suspended?
Second Amendment rights taken away?
Have you been charged with a crime?
Call our office to see if we can help
Komorn Law 248-357-2550
Proposed Amendments of MRE 702 and 804 2022-30 –
Proposed Amendments of MRE 702 and 804
Regarding expert witness’s testimony and statements against interest that expose a declarant to criminal liability.
- Issued: 10/25/2023
- Comment Period Expiration: 02/01/2024
Proposed Amendment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence 2021-10 –
Proposed Amendment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence
Would restyle the MREs in an effort to remain as consistent as possible with the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
- Issued: 03/22/2023
- Comment Period Expiration: 07/01/2023
- Public Hearing: 09/20/2023
Proposed Amendments of Rule 410 of the Michigan Rules of Evidence 2020-29 –
2020-29 Proposed Amendments of Rule 410 of the Michigan Rules of Evidence
Would add vacated pleas to the list of guilty pleas that may not be used against defendant and would add a cross-reference to MCR 6.310 regarding withdrawal of a plea to the current reference to statements made under MCR 6.302 in entering a plea.
- Issued: 06/09/2021
- Comment Period Expiration: 10/01/2021
- Public Hearing: 03/16/2022
- Effective: 10/01/2021
Access Other Proposed & Recently-Adopted Orders
Michigan Court Rules: Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 | Chapter 4 | Chapter 5 | Chapter 6 | Chapter 7 | Chapter 8 | Chapter 9
Michigan Rules of Evidence | Administrative Orders | Local Court Rules | Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct | Rules Concerning the State Bar | Rules for the Board of Law Examiners | Code of Judicial Conduct | Michigan Continuing Judicial Education Rules
Important:
This article provides a simplified overview of the Michigan Rules of Evidence for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice. When facing legal matters, always consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance.
The Michigan Rules of Evidence are subject to change over time. Always consult the latest official version for accurate information.
Here is the link to the Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook. Check the footer for the latest update.
Here is the link to proposed changes Michigan Court Website
Related Articles
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
Biden Issues More Cannabis Pardons but…
Joe Biden has extended pardons for individuals charged with simple cannabis possession and use, yet disappointingly, he has refrained from granting clemency to those currently incarcerated for cannabis-related offenses.In an extension of the previous year's extensive...
Working With and Not Against, IRS Revenue Code 280E
Cannabis operators face IRS Revenue Code 280E restrictions, but smart tax planning and strategies allow entrepreneurs to mitigate its impact on their business.Komorn Law is Michigan's top cannabis law firms when it comes to licensing, consulting and legal defense....
Department of Attorney General Prepares for MLEAC Accreditation
LANSING – The Michigan Department of Attorney General (DAG) recently welcomed a team of assessors from the Michigan Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission (MLEAC). The assessors came to examine all aspects of the Department’s compliance with the MLEAC standards in...
Oklahoma’s wild marijuana market is about to shrivel
The world's weed market, once booming with nearly 14,000 licensed medical marijuana businesses at its peak, has experienced a steady decline since Oklahoma voters overwhelmingly rejected a recreational legalization referendum in March. Heightened enforcement by state...
400K settlement after being arrested for a DUI, even though he passed breath and blood tests
A Colorado man is poised to receive a $400,000 settlement from city authorities after being wrongfully arrested for a DUI, even though he had passed both a breath and blood test.According to the complaint, Elias was driving southbound on College Avenue in Fort Collins...
When Being Questioned by the Police: Can They Lie to You?
When Being Questioned by the Police: Can They Lie to You? Introduction In the United States, police officers are generally allowed to lie to suspects during interrogations. This is a controversial practice, but it has been upheld by the Supreme Court. There are some...
Ohio Bill Introduced to Allow Each City to Ban Marijuana
With just over a week until Ohio’s voter-approved marijuana legalization law takes effect, a lawmaker has introduced a bill that would allow individual municipalities to locally ban the use and home cultivation of cannabis in their jurisdictions. The legislation aims...
Appeals Court – Detroit’s Asset Forfeiture Violates Due Process
A federal circuit judge writes that Detroit's vehicle seizure scheme "is simply a money-making venture—one most often used to extort money from those who can least afford it." A panel of federal appellate judges ruled that Detroit's practice of seizing people's cars...
NEWS RELEASE: USSC Adopts 2023 Amendments
WASHINGTON, D.C. ― Equipped with a quorum of Commissioners for the first time since 2018, the bipartisan United States Sentencing Commission voted today to promulgate amendments to the federal sentencing guidelines. “The Sentencing Commission is back in business,”...
Bad Ranking For Transparency in the Michigan Justice System
by Wes Smith, president, MPA Board of DirectorsPublisher View Newspaper Group When there was a change in leadership in Michigan’s legislature earlier this year, hope rose again in the hearts of citizens who want a more transparent state government. Maybe, it was...
