Evidence in Michigan Courts: Proposed Amendments of MRE

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

The Michigan Rules of Evidence are the rules adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court to govern evidentiary processes throughout Michigan’s judicial system.

Occasionally, the Rules of Evidence require amendments or changes. You can access proposed and recently-adopted orders affecting the Rules of Evidence from this page. There are also more links below at the end of this article.

Have your rights been violated?
Have your driving priviledges been revoked?
Has your professional license been suspended?
Second Amendment rights taken away?
Have you been charged with a crime?

Call our office to see if we can help
Komorn Law  248-357-2550

Proposed Amendments of MRE 702 and 804 2022-30 –

Proposed Amendments of MRE 702 and 804

Regarding expert witness’s testimony and statements against interest that expose a declarant to criminal liability.

  • Issued: 10/25/2023
  • Comment Period Expiration: 02/01/2024

Proposed Amendment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence 2021-10 –

Proposed Amendment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence

Would restyle the MREs in an effort to remain as consistent as possible with the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

  • Issued: 03/22/2023
  • Comment Period Expiration: 07/01/2023
  • Public Hearing: 09/20/2023
Actions:
  • Amendments of the Michigan Rules of Evidence

    • Issued: 09/20/2023
    • Effective: 01/01/2024

    ORDER

Komorn Law Established 1993

Proposed Amendments of Rule 410 of the Michigan Rules of Evidence 2020-29 –

2020-29 Proposed Amendments of Rule 410 of the Michigan Rules of Evidence

Would add vacated pleas to the list of guilty pleas that may not be used against defendant and would add a cross-reference to MCR 6.310 regarding withdrawal of a plea to the current reference to statements made under MCR 6.302 in entering a plea.

  • Issued: 06/09/2021
  • Comment Period Expiration: 10/01/2021
  • Public Hearing: 03/16/2022
  • Effective: 10/01/2021
  • Amendment of MRE 410

    • Issued: 03/22/2023
    • Effective: 05/01/2023

    Important:

    This article provides a simplified overview of the Michigan Rules of Evidence for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice. When facing legal matters, always consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance.

    The Michigan Rules of Evidence are subject to change over time. Always consult the latest official version for accurate information.

    Here is the link to the Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook. Check the footer for the latest update.

    Here is the link to proposed changes Michigan Court Website

     

    Related Articles

    No Results Found

    The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

    More Posts

    People v. Chandler Case: Protecting Fourth Amendment Rights

    People v. Chandler Case: Protecting Fourth Amendment Rights

    Court of Appeals of Michigan PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javarian CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 368736 Decided: June 27, 2024Before: Borrello, P.J., and Swartzle and Young, JJ. Introduction In the People v. Chandler case, the Michigan...

    read more
    Chinese-funded marijuana farms springing up across the U.S.

    Chinese-funded marijuana farms springing up across the U.S.

    Inside the Chinese-funded and staffed marijuana farms springing up across the U.S.During a farm inspection, New Mexico state special agents discovered an excessive number of cannabis plants in violation of state laws. Subsequent visits revealed dozens of underfed and...

    read more
    Seattle settles case involving – the rights of nature

    Seattle settles case involving – the rights of nature

    The Rights of NatureSeattle settled a lawsuit brought by the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe on behalf of salmon harmed by dams on the Skagit River. This is one of the first "rights of nature" cases in the US, and the tribe argued that the lack of fish passage measures violated...

    read more
    NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

    NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

    It's their corner now“This punishment should serve as a clear warning for all unlicensed cannabis stores in the state: we will enforce the law and shut down your operations,” state Attorney General Letitia James saidThe owner of seven unlicensed cannabis shops in New...

    read more
    When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

    When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

    IRS 280E and Cannabis BusinessesWhat is IRS Section 280E? Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code restricts businesses from deducting typical business expenses from their gross income related to the distribution of Schedule I or II substances per the Controlled...

    read more
    Vehicle Forfeiture in Canada – The Process of Taking

    Vehicle Forfeiture in Canada – The Process of Taking

    Thank You... and have a nice day eh!Disclaimer: We are not Attorneys in Canada.  This is an article of information obtained from various sources and presented here. We can only assume they are accurate.  If you ever find a reason to go to Canada and need a lawyer...we...

    read more
    Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

    About Your Attorney

    Attorney Michael Komorn

    Categories

    Other Topics

    Driving Under the Influence

    No Results Found

    The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

    Michigan

    Your Rights

    Michigan Court of Appeals

    Law Firm VIctories

    Share This