Evidence in Michigan Courts: Proposed Amendments of MRE

The Michigan Rules of Evidence are the rules adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court to govern evidentiary processes throughout Michigan’s judicial system.

Occasionally, the Rules of Evidence require amendments or changes. You can access proposed and recently-adopted orders affecting the Rules of Evidence from this page. There are also more links below at the end of this article.

Have your rights been violated?
Have your driving priviledges been revoked?
Has your professional license been suspended?
Second Amendment rights taken away?
Have you been charged with a crime?

Call our office to see if we can help
Komorn Law 248-357-2550

Proposed Amendments of MRE 702 and 804 2022-30 –

Proposed Amendments of MRE 702 and 804

Regarding expert witness’s testimony and statements against interest that expose a declarant to criminal liability.

Issued: 10/25/2023
Comment Period Expiration: 02/01/2024

Proposed Amendment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence 2021-10 –

Proposed Amendment of the Michigan Rules of Evidence

Would restyle the MREs in an effort to remain as consistent as possible with the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Issued: 03/22/2023
Comment Period Expiration: 07/01/2023
Public Hearing: 09/20/2023

Actions:

Amendments of the Michigan Rules of Evidence
- Issued: 09/20/2023
- Effective: 01/01/2024
ORDER

Proposed Amendments of Rule 410 of the Michigan Rules of Evidence 2020-29 –

2020-29 Proposed Amendments of Rule 410 of the Michigan Rules of Evidence

Would add vacated pleas to the list of guilty pleas that may not be used against defendant and would add a cross-reference to MCR 6.310 regarding withdrawal of a plea to the current reference to statements made under MCR 6.302 in entering a plea.

Issued: 06/09/2021
Comment Period Expiration: 10/01/2021
Public Hearing: 03/16/2022
Effective: 10/01/2021

Amendment of MRE 410
- Issued: 03/22/2023
- Effective: 05/01/2023
  
  ORDER

Access Other Proposed & Recently-Adopted Orders

Important:

This article provides a simplified overview of the Michigan Rules of Evidence for informational purposes only. It should not be interpreted as legal advice. When facing legal matters, always consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance.

The Michigan Rules of Evidence are subject to change over time. Always consult the latest official version for accurate information.

Here is the link to the Michigan Rules of Evidence Handbook. Check the footer for the latest update.

Here is the link to proposed changes Michigan Court Website

Related Articles

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Forfeiture Law: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark Rulings

Forfeiture Law in Focus: SCOTUS and Sixth Circuit Issue Landmark RulingsThe landscape of forfeiture law has been significantly shaped by recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. These rulings, in the cases of United States v...

Facial Recognition and Wrongful Arrests

Facial RecognitionHow Technology Can Lead to Mistaken-Identity Arrests Facial recognition technology has become increasingly prevalent in law enforcement, but its use raises critical questions about civil liberties and accuracy. One landmark case sheds light on the...

People v. Chandler Case: Protecting Fourth Amendment Rights

Court of Appeals of Michigan PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javarian CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 368736 Decided: June 27, 2024Before: Borrello, P.J., and Swartzle and Young, JJ. Introduction In the People v. Chandler case, the Michigan...

MI Lawyer Weekly – Michigan’s Go To Lawyers for Cannabis Law

Please join us in congratulating our inaugural Michigan’s Go To Lawyer for cannabis law. Michael Komorn, Komorn Law, Farmington HillsMichigan Lawyers Weekly is pleased to announce the inaugural “Go To Lawyers” for cannabis law. Now in its fifth year, the “Go To...

Chinese-funded marijuana farms springing up across the U.S.

Inside the Chinese-funded and staffed marijuana farms springing up across the U.S.During a farm inspection, New Mexico state special agents discovered an excessive number of cannabis plants in violation of state laws. Subsequent visits revealed dozens of underfed and...

AGs – Ex DEA Leaders for Push Public Hearing On Marijuana Rescheduling

State AGs And Former DEA Leaders Push Agency To Hold Public Hearing On Marijuana Rescheduling ProposalIn a filing with the federal government ahead of a key deadline this week, a group of former Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) leaders is asking the agency to...

I got a DUI while driving my dad’s boat – Will they take it?

I was out driving my dad's boat on the lake and I got caught drinking. Can they take the boat away from my dad who was not with me?Happy Father's Day - DadNo, in most cases, they likely won't take your dad's boat away for you getting a DUI while driving it. They Could...

Seattle settles case involving – the rights of nature

The Rights of NatureSeattle settled a lawsuit brought by the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe on behalf of salmon harmed by dams on the Skagit River. This is one of the first "rights of nature" cases in the US, and the tribe argued that the lack of fish passage measures violated...

NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

It's their corner now“This punishment should serve as a clear warning for all unlicensed cannabis stores in the state: we will enforce the law and shut down your operations,” state Attorney General Letitia James saidThe owner of seven unlicensed cannabis shops in New...

When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

IRS 280E and Cannabis BusinessesWhat is IRS Section 280E? Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code restricts businesses from deducting typical business expenses from their gross income related to the distribution of Schedule I or II substances per the Controlled...