The federal U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) has approved a revised amendment to sentencing guidelines, advising judges to adopt a more lenient approach towards prior marijuana possession offenses.
Members of the commission voted to approve a range of amendments to the current guidelines, incorporating a multi-part revision of criminal history.
This revised version now encompasses cannabis possession as a compelling illustration of an offense that typically necessitates contemplation for sentencing discretion.
As it currently stands, federal judges are instructed to consider previous convictions, which include cannabis offenses at the state level, as aggravating factors when determining sentencing for new cases.
But as legalization of marijuana expands to more states, advocates have been advocating for revised guidelines to prevent an individual’s marijuana-related record from contributing criminal history points that could result in harsher sentencing.
The proposal does not aim to completely eliminate marijuana convictions as a factor in criminal history. However, it suggests modifying the commentary within the guidelines to consider instances where a downward departure from the defendant’s criminal history may be appropriate, specifically mentioning sentences resulting from possession of marijuana offenses.
“While marihuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), subjecting offenders to up to one year in prison (and up to two or three years in prison for repeat offenders), many states and territories have reduced or eliminated the penalties for possessing small quantities of marihuana for personal use,” it notes.
The term ‘downward departure’ refers to situations where federal judges exercise their discretion to impose sentences that are below the recommended minimum under current guidelines.
It is crucial to recognize and explicitly acknowledge that mere possession of cannabis, without any intent to sell or distribute it to others, presents a compelling case that warrants leniency in sentencing.
By doing so, we uphold the principle of fairness and ensure that appropriate discretion is exercised in such circumstances.
USSC’s report in January exposed a disturbing reality: countless individuals faced harsher federal prison sentences as a consequence of their prior convictions on cannabis possession charges in states that have since enacted reforms to marijuana laws.
The revised guidance is on track to be presented to Congress by May 1 2023, and once accepted without opposition from lawmakers, the amendment will officially take effect on November 1.
Follow up…
More Posts
Polygraphs Proven Unreliable, Used for Police Intimidation
Polygraphs are widely recognized as unreliable yet police still use them to elicit confessions. By Michael Komorn Many states don’t allow polygraph test to be admitted in court because they are unreliable. Their lack of reliability is widely recognized by criminal...
Arrests for DUI’s on the Rise
By Michael Komorn Arrests for DUI’s have been on the rise across Michigan. This trend could drastically increase as The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has called on state authorities to reduce the legal limit to 0.05 percent. Currently, all 50 U.S. states...
US District Court Judge rules police cannot enter a car without a warrant to facilitate a drug dog sniff
Federal Judge Applies GPS Ruling To Drug Dog Traffic Stop By Michael Komorn Last week, a judge with the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia applied the precedent to the common police practice of “permeation” where a police officer enters a...
Drug Checkpoints: Unconstitutional
By Michael Komorn The Supreme Court ruled in City of Indianapolis V. Edmund that drug check points are unconstitutional. So what happens when you see one on the highway? Keep calm and carry on. Police, especially in the Mid-west, have been using drug check points as a...
Knowing When to Exercise Your Rights
Remember, even if you are doing nothing wrong, there are a number of different outcomes that can occur from a police encounter. The short list includes: 1) No action, no problems; 2) A warning or citation; 3) An arrest and/or criminal charges. Exercising your rights...
Why Police Lie Under Oath
Thousands of people plead guilty to crimes every year in the United States because they know that the odds of a jury’s believing their word over a police officer’s are slim to none. As a juror, whom are you likely to believe: the alleged criminal in an orange jumpsuit...
What Did I Just Get Charged With?
Below is a list of common drug offenses as defined by the State of Michigan. If it is your second offense, it is important you read statute 333.7413 below. 333.7413 Conviction of second or subsequent violation; penalty....
