Can the police seize your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?
Read the summary below and watch Attorney Michael Komorn in the Court of Appeals.
Summary of “Ruben Delgado v. Michigan State Police”:
This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court on July 8, 2022, by Ruben Delgado against the Michigan State Police Marihuana Tobacco Investigation Section. The case was later moved to the Court of Claims.
The central issue appears to be related to property held by the Michigan State Police from February 5, 2021, until the filing of the complaint. Delgado contended that the State Police had a legal duty to return this property as there was no legal reason for its continued possession.
The Court of Claims ultimately granted summary disposition in favor of the Michigan State Police on April 11, 2024. The court’s reasoning was that Delgado failed to file either a verified claim or a verified notice of his intention to file a claim within one year after the claim accrued, as required by the Court of Claims Act (MCL 600.6431). The court noted that neither the original complaint nor a subsequent letter serving as notice was verified. A proposed verified amended complaint was submitted after the one-year deadline, which the court deemed too late to cure the lack of verification.
Therefore, the case was dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction under the Court of Claims Act, and the court did not consider the merits of Delgado’s claim for mandamus.
It’s worth noting that this case was appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals under COA #370739, with the case status listed as “Submitted on Case Call” as of April 30, 2024.
In summary: Ruben Delgado sued the Michigan State Police for the return of property. The Michigan Court of Claims dismissed the case because Delgado failed to properly verify his claim within the statutory timeframe. The case is currently under appeal.
MCOA Oral Arguments April 1, 2025 – Panel 4
If You Tube above fails here is the link below. The segment starts at the 20 minute mark. The link should take you to that point in the video.
More Articles
Criminal Law FAQs – Marijuana Offenses
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Marijuana OffensesFAQ 1: Is recreational marijuana legal in Michigan? Answer: Yes,...
Criminal Law FAQs – Operating While Intoxicated (DUI – OWI)
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Drunk Driving (Operating While Intoxicated - OWI)FAQ 1: What is the legal blood alcohol...
Legal Tip – Driving High on Cannabis in Michigan
Driving under the influence of cannabis is illegal and carries serious consequences in Michigan.We have fought and won...
Michigan House Bill NO. 4391
It may just be easier to collect and analyze tears.This legislation seeks to integrate saliva testing for cannabis...
More
Feds Clarify Doctor Prescribed Medical Cannabis Is No Excuse
The revised federal workplace drug testing guidelines, issued by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), are intended to provide clarity. These guidelines emphasize that individuals who use...
US Cannabis Industry-Just Another Sinking Ship?
Is the cannabis industry just another sinking ship in the US? This story was picked up out in the cannabis news world. Read it for yourself. Have the end times have begun for US weed companies as the first South American imports are approved by the DEA. The US Federal...
The Marijuana Industry Paid an Extra $1.8 Billion in Federal Taxes Because of the 280E Tax Code
News from the internet Why legalize cannabis when 280E is the gift that keeps on giving to the Federal government? Whitney Economics, a cannabis research firm, recently conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of federal taxes on the cannabis industry. The...
Federal Court Strikes Down Gun Ban For People Who Use Marijuana
The federal government's justification for upholding the law is "concerning," according to a federal judge, who ruled that the ban on marijuana users owning firearms is unconstitutional. A man was charged in Oklahoma in 2022 after police found marijuana and a handgun...
US court upholds ban on selling guns to marijuana card holders
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal ban on the sale of guns to medical marijuana card holders does not violate the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court said Wednesday. The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals applies to the nine Western states that fall under...
