Forfeiture without Criminal Charges

Can the police seize your belongings and hold it without charging you with a crime?

Read the summary below and watch Attorney Michael Komorn in the Court of Appeals.

Summary of “Ruben Delgado v. Michigan State Police”:

This case was filed in the Jackson County Circuit Court on July 8, 2022, by Ruben Delgado against the Michigan State Police Marihuana Tobacco Investigation Section. The case was later moved to the Court of Claims.

The central issue appears to be related to property held by the Michigan State Police from February 5, 2021, until the filing of the complaint. Delgado contended that the State Police had a legal duty to return this property as there was no legal reason for its continued possession.

The Court of Claims ultimately granted summary disposition in favor of the Michigan State Police on April 11, 2024. The court’s reasoning was that Delgado failed to file either a verified claim or a verified notice of his intention to file a claim within one year after the claim accrued, as required by the Court of Claims Act (MCL 600.6431). The court noted that neither the original complaint nor a subsequent letter serving as notice was verified. A proposed verified amended complaint was submitted after the one-year deadline, which the court deemed too late to cure the lack of verification.

Therefore, the case was dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction under the Court of Claims Act, and the court did not consider the merits of Delgado’s claim for mandamus.

It’s worth noting that this case was appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals under COA #370739, with the case status listed as “Submitted on Case Call” as of April 30, 2024.

In summary: Ruben Delgado sued the Michigan State Police for the return of property. The Michigan Court of Claims dismissed the case because Delgado failed to properly verify his claim within the statutory timeframe. The case is currently under appeal.

If You Tube above fails here is the link below. The segment starts at the 20 minute mark. The link should take you to that point in the video.

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

More Articles

More

NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

NY judge fines unlicensed cannabis shops $15 million

It's their corner now“This punishment should serve as a clear warning for all unlicensed cannabis stores in the state: we will enforce the law and shut down your operations,” state Attorney General Letitia James saidThe owner of seven unlicensed cannabis shops in New...

read more
When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

When Cannabis Businesses Are No Longer Subject to IRS 280E

IRS 280E and Cannabis BusinessesWhat is IRS Section 280E? Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code restricts businesses from deducting typical business expenses from their gross income related to the distribution of Schedule I or II substances per the Controlled...

read more
The Legal Significance of Marijuana Reclassification

The Legal Significance of Marijuana Reclassification

The Impact of Marijuana Reclassification on Legal LandscapeOn May 6, 2024, the DEA made a groundbreaking decision, accepting the US Department of Health and Human Services' recommendation to reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III controlled substance....

read more
Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Other Topics

Driving Under the Influence

Michigan

Your Rights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Law Firm VIctories

Share This