Komorn Law Case Victories

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Just some of our victories

Attorney Michael Komorn

Attorney Michael Komorn

State / Federal Legal Defense

With extensive experience in criminal legal defense since 1993 from pre-arrest, District, Circuit, Appeals, Supreme and the Federal court systems.

KOMORN LAW (248) 357-2550

Komorn Law-In the News-Fox17

Komorn Law-In the News-Fox17

Komorn Law | In the News | Fox 17 News | Links   Medical marijuana battle: Father fights for custody of son OTTAWA COUNTY, Mich. – Medical...

read more

More…

6-30-18 United States v Neece – Federal Case Dismissed

MM cardholder Neece was charged with possession of a controlled substance, 36 CFR 261.53(e) for possessing three joints in his kayak.

The feds alleged his possession in a national forest in violation of the MMMA because someone was seen smoking a joint.

Defendant moved to dismiss under the rider to the Consolidated Appropriations Act (f/k/a Rohrabacher-Farr or Rohrabacher-Blumenauer).

The court dismissed the case, citing McIntosh.   The court held that strict compliance must be established to be dismissed.   Had the officers seen Neece smoking in public, in violation of the MMMA 333.26427(b)(3), the court would not have dismissed the case.

A big hearty congratulations to Michael Komorn and the Komorn Law team for this victory.   To the best of my knowledge, this is the first Michigan MM case to dismissed in federal court for violating the rider.

 

6-3-14 People vs V – Section 8 Dismissal

Client was charged with improper transport of marijuana in a vehicle. 750.474 but his medical marijuana card expired and and he needed a section 8 defense to remove this conviction from his record. Defendant would be immune from prosecution if he can prove prima facie evidence and a preponderance of evidence of medical use.

The court heard arguments and dismissed the charge of improperly transporting usable marijuana.  Court ruled that defendant was immune based on Section 8

Charges were dropped on 6-3-14

 

08-12-2013 People vs D

Marijuana Criminal Defense

Client charged with marijuana possession in Montrose MI. Client was assigned a court appointed lawyer and encouraged to plead guilty and accept 3 months of probation. Client hired Michael Komorn for representation and withdrew the plea.

The charge was dismissed.

 

2-24-2013 People vs N

Medical Marijuana patient charged with 3 counts of Delivery / Manufacture of Marijuana.

Prove defendant was immune from prosecution because of a medical marijuana defense.  333.7401(2)(d)(3) and MCL 333.26424, 333.26428.

Defendant hired Michael Komorn

The defendant was immune from prosecution and that the charges shall be dismissed without prejudice. The prosecutor and court dismissed all three charges on 2-24-2013

Legal Counsel and Your Rights

When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.

An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.

Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.

Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.

Research us and then call us.

More Rights You Should Know

4th Amendment Violation

4th Amendment Violation

The court granted our motion to Suppress and Dismiss all evidence “ The manner by which the evidence was seized violated the accused 4th Amendment Rights, and therefore that evidence is suppressed and all charges shall be dismissed. “ Just leaving Gaylord, where they...

read more
SCOTUS – Justices uphold laws targeting homelessness

SCOTUS – Justices uphold laws targeting homelessness

Does not amount to “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth Amendment The Supreme Court has affirmed the validity of ordinances in a southwest Oregon city that restrict individuals experiencing homelessness from utilizing blankets, pillows, or cardboard boxes...

read more

Other Articles

Compounding Charges Laws in Michigan

Compounding Charges Laws in Michigan

Understanding Compounding Charges Laws in Michigan Compounding charges refer to the illegal act of accepting or agreeing to accept a benefit in exchange for not prosecuting a crime. In Michigan, this is considered a serious offense, and the law specifically prohibits...

read more
What is the Difference Between a Magistrate and a Judge

What is the Difference Between a Magistrate and a Judge

What's the difference between a Magistrate and a Judge in Michigan?In Michigan’s court system, both magistrates and judges play important roles, but they have different responsibilities and authority. Understanding the differences between the two can help you know...

read more
MI Court of Appeals – MRTMA defense denied dismissal

MI Court of Appeals – MRTMA defense denied dismissal

Does the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act protect you in all Marijuana scenarios?The Conflict The central issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), MCL 333.27951 et seq., prevents a...

read more
The “Automobile Exception” in Michigan law

The “Automobile Exception” in Michigan law

The "automobile exception" in Michigan law allows police to search a vehicle without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime.This exception is grounded in the idea that vehicles are inherently mobile, meaning evidence could be...

read more
Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Other Topics

Driving Under the Influence

Michigan

Your Rights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Law Firm VIctories

Share This