Just some of our victories
Making A Federal Case Out Of Marijuana
Posted by Michael Komorn , 12 April 2017 · 792 views Our client, a medical marijuana patient registered with the State of Michigan, was out for a...
Judge hears arguments in class action marijuana lawsuit
DETROIT, Mich. — A judge on Wednesday heard arguments in a federal class action lawsuit filed by medical marijuana patients and caregivers against...
Komorn Law-In the News-Fox17
Komorn Law | In the News | Fox 17 News | Links Medical marijuana battle: Father fights for custody of son OTTAWA COUNTY, Mich. – Medical...
Charges dismissed after marijuana evidence destroyed
A Michigan State Police lieutenant’s decision to destroy more than 500 marijuana plants without a judge’s order has led to dismissal of felony...
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More…
6-30-18 United States v Neece – Federal Case Dismissed
MM cardholder Neece was charged with possession of a controlled substance, 36 CFR 261.53(e) for possessing three joints in his kayak.
The feds alleged his possession in a national forest in violation of the MMMA because someone was seen smoking a joint.
Defendant moved to dismiss under the rider to the Consolidated Appropriations Act (f/k/a Rohrabacher-Farr or Rohrabacher-Blumenauer).
The court dismissed the case, citing McIntosh. The court held that strict compliance must be established to be dismissed. Had the officers seen Neece smoking in public, in violation of the MMMA 333.26427(b)(3), the court would not have dismissed the case.
A big hearty congratulations to Michael Komorn and the Komorn Law team for this victory. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first Michigan MM case to dismissed in federal court for violating the rider.
6-3-14 People vs V – Section 8 Dismissal
Client was charged with improper transport of marijuana in a vehicle. 750.474 but his medical marijuana card expired and and he needed a section 8 defense to remove this conviction from his record. Defendant would be immune from prosecution if he can prove prima facie evidence and a preponderance of evidence of medical use.
The court heard arguments and dismissed the charge of improperly transporting usable marijuana. Court ruled that defendant was immune based on Section 8
Charges were dropped on 6-3-14
08-12-2013 People vs D
Marijuana Criminal Defense
Client charged with marijuana possession in Montrose MI. Client was assigned a court appointed lawyer and encouraged to plead guilty and accept 3 months of probation. Client hired Michael Komorn for representation and withdrew the plea.
The charge was dismissed.
2-24-2013 People vs N
Medical Marijuana patient charged with 3 counts of Delivery / Manufacture of Marijuana.
Prove defendant was immune from prosecution because of a medical marijuana defense. 333.7401(2)(d)(3) and MCL 333.26424, 333.26428.
Defendant hired Michael Komorn
The defendant was immune from prosecution and that the charges shall be dismissed without prejudice. The prosecutor and court dismissed all three charges on 2-24-2013
Legal Counsel and Your Rights
When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.
An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.
Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.
Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.
Research us and then call us.
More Rights You Should Know
Marijuana retailer drops lawsuit against City of Ypsilanti
YPSILANTI, MI - Less than four months after a company sued Ypsilanti over the city’s marijuana business licensing process, the company has dropped the legal claims. AMA Operations, LLC — a company that sought one of 10 local marijuana retailer permits — alleged...
Do Passengers in a Vehicle have 4th Amendment Rights?
Do Passengers have 4th Amendment Rights?Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Ability to Search Passenger Property in CarsBackground Mead was a passenger in a car and had just met the driver, who offered him a ride. When the police stopped the vehicle and ordered both...
Other Articles
Obstruction Laws in Michigan
Move along or you'll be arrested for Obstruction of "Justice".In Michigan, obstruction is a crime that involves interfering with law enforcement or other officials when they are trying to carry out their duties. Obstruction can cover a wide range of actions, including...
Defending against false accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct
Defending against false accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in MichiganDefending against a false accusation of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan is a serious matter and requires a well-prepared legal strategy. Here are several steps you should take to...
Can I sue for being falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct
If you are innocent and falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan can you sue?Yes, if you have been falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan and can prove that the accusations were malicious or knowingly false, you may be able to...
Resisting Arrest in Michigan
Stop resisting! Stop resisting!In Michigan, resisting arrest is a serious crime. Under Michigan Compiled Law (MCL) 750.81d, it is illegal to resist or obstruct a police officer or any other law enforcement official when they are performing their duties. This law...
Probable Cause v Reasonable Suspicion
What's the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion?Definition of Probable Cause Probable cause refers to the belief held by a reasonable person that a crime is currently being committed, has already been committed, or is likely to be committed in...
False accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan
False accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) are a serious.False accusations of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) are a serious issue and can have devastating consequences for the accused. While it’s important to recognize that sexual assault is a significant...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Consent in Michigan
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Consent in Michigan: Definitions, Penalties, and Legal References.Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) consent refers to the voluntary, informed, and freely given agreement by an individual to engage in sexual activity. Consent plays a critical...
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Fourth Degree
Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: Fourth DegreeCriminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) is a set of laws in Michigan that define and penalize various forms of sexual offenses. These laws are categorized into four degrees, with each degree reflecting the severity of the...
