LARA-MMFLA-Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c)

KOMORN LAW

STATE and FEDERAL
Aggressive Legal Defense
All Criminal Allegations / DUI / Drugs
Since 1993

Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c)?

 

Rule 24(2)(c) of the Emergency Administrative Rules filed on December 4, 2017 pertains to operation at a same location commonly referred to as co-location. For background purposes, pursuant to section 205 of the MMFLA a municipality has the authority to adopt an ordinance to limit the type or number of marihuana facilities within their boundaries. For clarification purposes, the intent behind Rule 24(2)(c) is that the applicant cannot circumvent the municipal ordinance or zoning regulation, which may limit the type or number of marihuana facilities under section 205 of the act, simply by operating at a same location.


Komorn Law has represented numerous clients through the legal chaos of starting up a business in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Industry.

Contact Us For More Information.

800-656-3557

Michael Komorn-Criminal Defense Attorney

About Your Attorney

Attorney Michael Komorn

Categories

Other Topics

Driving Under the Influence

Michigan

Your Rights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Law Firm VIctories

Share This