Taxed Again..? They’re working on it.
A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the measure is designed to curb youth addiction to social media and digital technology. Critics say the tax is excessive, regressive, and unlikely to meaningfully address the underlying issues.
What is Happening?
Michigan legislators introduced a bill that would create a 32% tax on the sale of internet‑enabled devices intended for children. The revenue would be directed toward programs addressing youth mental health, digital addiction, and technology‑related harms.
They will probably also sue the tech companies for billions and blame it all on the lack of parenting (the root cause).
Where will the money really go?
Who knows.
Who Is Involved?
- Michigan House lawmakers sponsoring the bill (names not yet widely reported in early coverage)
- Parents and youth‑advocacy groups concerned about social‑media addiction
- Retailers and tech manufacturers, who would be responsible for collecting the tax
- Civil‑liberties and consumer‑rights groups, raising concerns about overreach and affordability
When was this introduced?
The bill was introduced in early February 2026 and is currently awaiting committee consideration.
Where will they enforce it?
The legislation applies statewide across Michigan, affecting all retailers selling internet‑connected devices to consumers.
Why Lawmakers Say It’s Needed
Supporters argue:
-
Children are increasingly exposed to addictive digital platforms.
-
Social‑media use is linked to anxiety, depression, and attention issues.
-
Parents need more tools to limit access.
-
Tax revenue could fund mental‑health programs and digital‑literacy initiatives.
Some lawmakers have compared the proposal to “sin taxes” on alcohol or tobacco — a financial deterrent intended to reduce harmful behavior.
How the Taxes Would Work
A 32% excise tax would be added to the sale of:
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- Gaming consoles
- Smartwatches
- Any device capable of connecting to the internet
Thescam applies only when the device is marketed for or primarily used by minors. Don’t feel left out. Adults will be next. Retailers would be responsible for determining applicability and collecting the tax.
Funds would be earmarked for:
- Youth mental‑health services
- Anti‑addiction programs
- Research on technology’s impact on children
Of course – for the children
Some Questions
Would you go to jail like a drug dealer or Al Capone for tax evasion if you bought it and then gave it to your kid?
How will they know a kid is using it without digital surveillance?
Reactions & Opinions
Supporters
-
Say the tax is a necessary intervention to slow the rise of digital addiction.
-
Argue that tech companies have failed to self‑regulate.
-
Believe the revenue could meaningfully expand mental‑health resources.
Opponents
-
Call the tax punitive and unrealistic, noting that nearly all modern devices connect to the internet.
-
Warn it will disproportionately affect low‑income families.
-
Question whether a tax will actually reduce screen time.
-
Raise concerns about enforcement and retailer liability.
-
Suggest the bill may face constitutional challenges related to commerce and parental rights.
What’s at Stake besides the further grabbing of your hard earned money and the economy?
-
Affordability: A 32% surcharge could add hundreds of dollars to the cost of a single device.
-
Digital equity: Low‑income families may be priced out of essential technology.
-
Youth mental health: Supporters argue the bill could fund critical services.
-
Precedent: Michigan could become the first state to impose a device‑specific tax targeting youth technology use.
-
Legal challenges: The bill may face scrutiny over vagueness, enforcement, and potential conflicts with federal commerce rules.
Here it is
House Bill Taxation: excise taxes; excise tax on the purchase of wireless communications devices; require for purchases of devices primarily for the use of individuals under 18 years of age. Creates new act.
- PDF LINK as Introduced
- Page Link HB 5496 of 2026
Sponsors
Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. Call our office when you are ready to hire an attorney experienced and seasoned fighting the system of “Justice” 248-357-2550.
More
A Motion in Limine – What does it Mean?
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineA motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow) specific evidence before the jury ever hears it. It’s one of the most important evidentiary tools in both criminal and civil...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Threat of Terrorism
Case Summary In People v Kvasnicka, the defendant sent a message to a young girl stating she “would not be laughing” when he came to her school to “shoot it up or blow it up like Columbine.” Charged under Michigan’s threat‑of‑terrorism statute, he argued the law was...
What is a Franks Hearing?
What is a Frank's Hearing?A Franks hearing is a critical legal tool used when a defendant claims that police lied, exaggerated, or recklessly disregarded the truth in a search warrant affidavit. When law enforcement places its hand on the Constitution, the law...
Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms
The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...
Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults
No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Prisoner in Possession
Prisoner in Possession of a Controlled SubstanceCase Summary In People v Tadgerson, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed a critical question: does the crime of a prisoner possessing a controlled substance under MCL 800.281(4) require proof of intent, or is it a...
What is Inference Stacking?
What Is Inference Stacking? A Legal ExplanationInference stacking—also called pyramiding of inferences—is a rule of evidence that prohibits courts or juries from building one inference on top of another when the first inference is not supported by direct evidence....
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Murder
Case Summary In People v Jones, the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed whether a single act of abuse can support convictions for both first‑degree child abuse and felony murder. The defendant argued that using the same conduct to support both charges violated...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Neglect of Duty
Case Summary In People v Harper, a Wayne County Sheriff’s deputy was charged with neglect of duty after witnessing an inmate escape during his smoke break and taking no action to stop or pursue the prisoner. The prosecution relied on the Sheriff’s Department policy...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Metallic Knuckles
Case Summary In People v Dummer, the defendant challenged Michigan’s metallic‑knuckles statute, arguing that simply possessing the weapon was protected by the Second Amendment. The Michigan Court of Appeals acknowledged that possession of metallic knuckles is...


















