Taxed Again..? They’re working on it.
A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the measure is designed to curb youth addiction to social media and digital technology. Critics say the tax is excessive, regressive, and unlikely to meaningfully address the underlying issues.
What is Happening?
Michigan legislators introduced a bill that would create a 32% tax on the sale of internet‑enabled devices intended for children. The revenue would be directed toward programs addressing youth mental health, digital addiction, and technology‑related harms.
They will probably also sue the tech companies for billions and blame it all on the lack of parenting (the root cause).
Where will the money really go?
Who knows.
Who Is Involved?
- Michigan House lawmakers sponsoring the bill (names not yet widely reported in early coverage)
- Parents and youth‑advocacy groups concerned about social‑media addiction
- Retailers and tech manufacturers, who would be responsible for collecting the tax
- Civil‑liberties and consumer‑rights groups, raising concerns about overreach and affordability
When was this introduced?
The bill was introduced in early February 2026 and is currently awaiting committee consideration.
Where will they enforce it?
The legislation applies statewide across Michigan, affecting all retailers selling internet‑connected devices to consumers.
Why Lawmakers Say It’s Needed
Supporters argue:
-
Children are increasingly exposed to addictive digital platforms.
-
Social‑media use is linked to anxiety, depression, and attention issues.
-
Parents need more tools to limit access.
-
Tax revenue could fund mental‑health programs and digital‑literacy initiatives.
Some lawmakers have compared the proposal to “sin taxes” on alcohol or tobacco — a financial deterrent intended to reduce harmful behavior.
How the Taxes Would Work
A 32% excise tax would be added to the sale of:
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- Gaming consoles
- Smartwatches
- Any device capable of connecting to the internet
Thescam applies only when the device is marketed for or primarily used by minors. Don’t feel left out. Adults will be next. Retailers would be responsible for determining applicability and collecting the tax.
Funds would be earmarked for:
- Youth mental‑health services
- Anti‑addiction programs
- Research on technology’s impact on children
Of course – for the children
Some Questions
Would you go to jail like a drug dealer or Al Capone for tax evasion if you bought it and then gave it to your kid?
How will they know a kid is using it without digital surveillance?
Reactions & Opinions
Supporters
-
Say the tax is a necessary intervention to slow the rise of digital addiction.
-
Argue that tech companies have failed to self‑regulate.
-
Believe the revenue could meaningfully expand mental‑health resources.
Opponents
-
Call the tax punitive and unrealistic, noting that nearly all modern devices connect to the internet.
-
Warn it will disproportionately affect low‑income families.
-
Question whether a tax will actually reduce screen time.
-
Raise concerns about enforcement and retailer liability.
-
Suggest the bill may face constitutional challenges related to commerce and parental rights.
What’s at Stake besides the further grabbing of your hard earned money and the economy?
-
Affordability: A 32% surcharge could add hundreds of dollars to the cost of a single device.
-
Digital equity: Low‑income families may be priced out of essential technology.
-
Youth mental health: Supporters argue the bill could fund critical services.
-
Precedent: Michigan could become the first state to impose a device‑specific tax targeting youth technology use.
-
Legal challenges: The bill may face scrutiny over vagueness, enforcement, and potential conflicts with federal commerce rules.
Here it is
House Bill Taxation: excise taxes; excise tax on the purchase of wireless communications devices; require for purchases of devices primarily for the use of individuals under 18 years of age. Creates new act.
- PDF LINK as Introduced
- Page Link HB 5496 of 2026
Sponsors
Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. Call our office when you are ready to hire an attorney experienced and seasoned fighting the system of “Justice” 248-357-2550.
More
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Election Interference
Case Summary In People v Burkman, defendants created a robocall targeting African American voters during the 2020 election. The call falsely warned that mail‑in voting would expose voters to law‑enforcement tracking, debt collection, and forced vaccinations....
Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising
Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...
Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?
A deadlocked jury is often called a hung jury—A deadlocked jury—often called a hung jury—occurs when jurors cannot reach the unanimous (or legally required) agreement needed to deliver a verdict. In criminal cases, most jurisdictions require unanimity. When the jury...
Social Security Scams – What to Know
The Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) have issued several warnings about ongoing Social Security scams and continue to advise caution to the public. Here are some of the popular Social Security scams to watch out for in...
Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax
Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest
People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...
Michigan Drivers Face Higher Gas Tax in 2026
Keep Pushing.Summary Michigan’s fuel‑tax structure will undergo a major statutory shift on January 1, 2026, raising the state gas tax from 31 cents to approximately 52.4 cents per gallon. The change eliminates the 6% sales tax on fuel and replaces it with a higher,...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter
Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an agitated customer and three patrons inside the store, after which the customer shot the patrons. In People v Sherrill, the defendant...
Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws
Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with cannabis tax changes, wage increases, consumer protections, and transparency laws.Michigan begins 2026 with a slate of new laws...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...
















