Taxed Again..? They’re working on it.
A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the measure is designed to curb youth addiction to social media and digital technology. Critics say the tax is excessive, regressive, and unlikely to meaningfully address the underlying issues.
What is Happening?
Michigan legislators introduced a bill that would create a 32% tax on the sale of internet‑enabled devices intended for children. The revenue would be directed toward programs addressing youth mental health, digital addiction, and technology‑related harms.
They will probably also sue the tech companies for billions and blame it all on the lack of parenting (the root cause).
Where will the money really go?
Who knows.
Who Is Involved?
- Michigan House lawmakers sponsoring the bill (names not yet widely reported in early coverage)
- Parents and youth‑advocacy groups concerned about social‑media addiction
- Retailers and tech manufacturers, who would be responsible for collecting the tax
- Civil‑liberties and consumer‑rights groups, raising concerns about overreach and affordability
When was this introduced?
The bill was introduced in early February 2026 and is currently awaiting committee consideration.
Where will they enforce it?
The legislation applies statewide across Michigan, affecting all retailers selling internet‑connected devices to consumers.
Why Lawmakers Say It’s Needed
Supporters argue:
-
Children are increasingly exposed to addictive digital platforms.
-
Social‑media use is linked to anxiety, depression, and attention issues.
-
Parents need more tools to limit access.
-
Tax revenue could fund mental‑health programs and digital‑literacy initiatives.
Some lawmakers have compared the proposal to “sin taxes” on alcohol or tobacco — a financial deterrent intended to reduce harmful behavior.
How the Taxes Would Work
A 32% excise tax would be added to the sale of:
- Smartphones
- Tablets
- Laptops
- Gaming consoles
- Smartwatches
- Any device capable of connecting to the internet
Thescam applies only when the device is marketed for or primarily used by minors. Don’t feel left out. Adults will be next. Retailers would be responsible for determining applicability and collecting the tax.
Funds would be earmarked for:
- Youth mental‑health services
- Anti‑addiction programs
- Research on technology’s impact on children
Of course – for the children
Some Questions
Would you go to jail like a drug dealer or Al Capone for tax evasion if you bought it and then gave it to your kid?
How will they know a kid is using it without digital surveillance?
Reactions & Opinions
Supporters
-
Say the tax is a necessary intervention to slow the rise of digital addiction.
-
Argue that tech companies have failed to self‑regulate.
-
Believe the revenue could meaningfully expand mental‑health resources.
Opponents
-
Call the tax punitive and unrealistic, noting that nearly all modern devices connect to the internet.
-
Warn it will disproportionately affect low‑income families.
-
Question whether a tax will actually reduce screen time.
-
Raise concerns about enforcement and retailer liability.
-
Suggest the bill may face constitutional challenges related to commerce and parental rights.
What’s at Stake besides the further grabbing of your hard earned money and the economy?
-
Affordability: A 32% surcharge could add hundreds of dollars to the cost of a single device.
-
Digital equity: Low‑income families may be priced out of essential technology.
-
Youth mental health: Supporters argue the bill could fund critical services.
-
Precedent: Michigan could become the first state to impose a device‑specific tax targeting youth technology use.
-
Legal challenges: The bill may face scrutiny over vagueness, enforcement, and potential conflicts with federal commerce rules.
Here it is
House Bill Taxation: excise taxes; excise tax on the purchase of wireless communications devices; require for purchases of devices primarily for the use of individuals under 18 years of age. Creates new act.
- PDF LINK as Introduced
- Page Link HB 5496 of 2026
Sponsors
Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. Call our office when you are ready to hire an attorney experienced and seasoned fighting the system of “Justice” 248-357-2550.
More
Coalition Forms to Support Voter Approved MRTMA
New Coalition Forms To Support Voter Approved Cannabis ActMichigan’s adult‑use cannabis framework was not created by accident. It was built through a deliberate, voter‑driven process culminating in the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA). The Act...
Michigan Court of Appeals Orders City of Taylor to Release Police Misconduct Records
Case Summary The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that the City of Taylor must comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by the ACLU of Michigan seeking police misconduct records dating back to 2021. The request covers documents involving...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Home Invasion
Case Summary In People v Berry, the defendant co‑owned a home with his former partner. After moving out and negotiating a buyout, he re‑entered the home with another individual before the agreement was finalized. Both were charged with first‑degree home invasion. The...
Cannabis Regulators Association-Briefing on Marijuana Schedule Change
Overview of the President’s December 18th Executive Order and the Implications When Marijuana is Rescheduled to Schedule III under the U.S. Controlled Substances ActTOP-LINE SUMMARY The President signed an Executive Order on December 18, 2025, ordering his...
Trump’s Marijuana Reclassification 2025
Donald Trump’s Actions On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This marks the most significant federal...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Felon in Possession
Case Summary In People v Hughes, the defendant challenged Michigan’s felon‑in‑possession statute on Second Amendment grounds. He argued the law was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to nonviolent offenders. The Court of Appeals rejected both...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Controlled Substances
Case Summary In People v Soto (COA) the defendant faced a felony charge after an 85‑pound shipment of marijuana was delivered to her home. She argued that the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) shielded her from felony prosecution because the...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Confessions
Case Summary Michigan courts issued several important decisions clarifying when confessions are admissible, how Miranda applies in nontraditional settings, and what constitutes a valid invocation of counsel. In Lafey, a spontaneous statement made during a pat‑down was...
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — A Quick Summary
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — Quick Summary The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, limiting when and how the government may intrude on privacy. These protections apply only when police conduct qualifies as a search...
Marijuana Under Fire in Michigan
Marijuana in Michigan is facing renewed challenges as lawmakers push for higher taxes and regulatory changes that critics argue undermine the voter-approved legalization of 2018. Court battles, legislative maneuvers, and industry pushback highlight the tension between...


















