No Good Headline to Lead with Here
Summary
Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The indictment alleges that the group exploited gaps in Michigan’s guardianship system to siphon off more than $270,000 from individuals who lacked the capacity to manage their own affairs.
What Happened?
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the defendants used their professional positions — including judicial authority, guardianship appointments, and legal representation — to gain access to the finances of vulnerable adults. Once in control of those accounts, they allegedly transferred money into personal or business accounts and concealed the transactions through falsified filings and misleading statements.
The federal investigation culminated in a multi‑count indictment alleging wire fraud, money laundering, and false statements.
Who Is Involved
-
Judge Andrea Bradley‑Baskin, 46 Sitting judge of the 36th District Court in Detroit. Charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, multiple counts of money laundering, and lying to federal investigators.
-
Nancy Williams, 59 Operator of Guardian and Associates, a private guardianship company appointed in more than 1,000 cases involving incapacitated adults.
-
Avery Bradley, 72 Longtime attorney facing conspiracy and wire‑fraud charges.
-
Dwight Rashad, 69 Detroit resident charged with conspiracy and money laundering.
When
The indictment was announced January 30, 2026, following a multi‑year federal investigation into irregularities in guardianship‑related financial transactions.
Where
The alleged conduct occurred in Detroit and involved guardianship cases within the Eastern District of Michigan.
How the Scheme Allegedly Worked
Federal prosecutors allege the defendants:
-
Obtained control of wards’ bank accounts through guardianship appointments and legal authority.
-
Redirected funds into personal accounts or business ventures.
-
Used stolen money for private investments, including a $70,000 stake in a local bar, and for personal expenses such as a Ford Expedition lease.
-
Filed misleading or incomplete probate documents to hide missing funds.
-
Provided false information when questioned by federal agents.
The victims were adults legally determined to be unable to manage their own finances — making oversight and accountability especially critical.
Statements From Prosecutors
U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon condemned the alleged conduct, stating that individuals entrusted with protecting vulnerable adults instead “abused that high honor for personal gain.” He emphasized that the justice system depends on integrity from those who hold judicial and fiduciary authority.
Why This Case Matters
1. Breach of Judicial and Fiduciary Duty
The allegations involve a sitting judge and court‑appointed guardians — individuals expected to uphold the highest ethical standards.
2. Systemic Weaknesses in Guardianship Oversight
Michigan’s guardianship system has long faced criticism for limited monitoring and inconsistent financial reporting requirements.
3. Harm to Vulnerable Adults
Victims were individuals legally deemed unable to protect themselves, amplifying the seriousness of the alleged misconduct.
4. Public Trust in the Courts
Charges against a sitting judge raise significant concerns about internal safeguards and accountability within Michigan’s judicial system.
Potential Legal Consequences
If convicted, the defendants face:
-
Federal prison sentences for wire fraud and conspiracy
-
Additional penalties for money laundering
-
Permanent removal from judicial or legal positions
-
Restitution orders to repay misappropriated funds
-
Possible state‑level disciplinary actions
2025-2026
What a year – What a Future
- 24% tax on weed
- 52 cents per gallon tax
- fraud
- more fraud
- more fraud
- more fraud
- more fraud
- Detroit judge, 3 others charged in alleged scheme to steal thousands from vulnerable and incapacitated people
- Ex-(Who cares Red or Blue) Party treasurer charged with embezzling from vulnerable adult
- and more fraud
How about taxing us less and fighting fraud a lot more. We the people are tired of the political, citizen and NON CITIZEN grifting.
FAQs
1. How much money was allegedly taken?
Federal prosecutors estimate more than $270,000 was diverted from incapacitated adults.
2. What role did the judge play?
Judge Bradley‑Baskin is accused of participating in the conspiracy, laundering funds, and lying to investigators.
3. How did the defendants access victims’ finances?
Through court‑appointed guardianship authority, which granted them control over wards’ bank accounts and assets.
4. What were the funds allegedly used for?
Personal expenses, business investments, and other non‑authorized uses unrelated to the wards’ care.
5. What happens next?
The case will proceed through federal court, where the defendants will have the opportunity to contest the charges. Additional investigations or related charges are possible.
Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. Call our office when you are ready to hire an attorney experienced and seasoned fighting the system of “Justice” 248-357-2550.
More
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Election Interference
Case Summary In People v Burkman, defendants created a robocall targeting African American voters during the 2020 election. The call falsely warned that mail‑in voting would expose voters to law‑enforcement tracking, debt collection, and forced vaccinations....
Michigan Cannabis Tax Fraud Cases Are Rising
Hands up CaponeMichigan’s regulated cannabis industry is in a very different place than it was when medical marijuana and adult-use legalization were the primary battlegrounds. As prices compress, margins disappear, and tax burdens increase, enforcement doesn’t...
Deadlocked Jury – What does it mean?
A deadlocked jury is often called a hung jury—A deadlocked jury—often called a hung jury—occurs when jurors cannot reach the unanimous (or legally required) agreement needed to deliver a verdict. In criminal cases, most jurisdictions require unanimity. When the jury...
Social Security Scams – What to Know
The Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) have issued several warnings about ongoing Social Security scams and continue to advise caution to the public. Here are some of the popular Social Security scams to watch out for in...
Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax
Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest
People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...
Michigan Drivers Face Higher Gas Tax in 2026
Keep Pushing.Summary Michigan’s fuel‑tax structure will undergo a major statutory shift on January 1, 2026, raising the state gas tax from 31 cents to approximately 52.4 cents per gallon. The change eliminates the 6% sales tax on fuel and replaces it with a higher,...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter
Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an agitated customer and three patrons inside the store, after which the customer shot the patrons. In People v Sherrill, the defendant...
Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws
Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with cannabis tax changes, wage increases, consumer protections, and transparency laws.Michigan begins 2026 with a slate of new laws...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...
















