No Good Headline to Lead with Here
Summary
Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The indictment alleges that the group exploited gaps in Michigan’s guardianship system to siphon off more than $270,000 from individuals who lacked the capacity to manage their own affairs.
What Happened?
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the defendants used their professional positions — including judicial authority, guardianship appointments, and legal representation — to gain access to the finances of vulnerable adults. Once in control of those accounts, they allegedly transferred money into personal or business accounts and concealed the transactions through falsified filings and misleading statements.
The federal investigation culminated in a multi‑count indictment alleging wire fraud, money laundering, and false statements.
Who Is Involved
-
Judge Andrea Bradley‑Baskin, 46 Sitting judge of the 36th District Court in Detroit. Charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, multiple counts of money laundering, and lying to federal investigators.
-
Nancy Williams, 59 Operator of Guardian and Associates, a private guardianship company appointed in more than 1,000 cases involving incapacitated adults.
-
Avery Bradley, 72 Longtime attorney facing conspiracy and wire‑fraud charges.
-
Dwight Rashad, 69 Detroit resident charged with conspiracy and money laundering.
When
The indictment was announced January 30, 2026, following a multi‑year federal investigation into irregularities in guardianship‑related financial transactions.
Where
The alleged conduct occurred in Detroit and involved guardianship cases within the Eastern District of Michigan.
How the Scheme Allegedly Worked
Federal prosecutors allege the defendants:
-
Obtained control of wards’ bank accounts through guardianship appointments and legal authority.
-
Redirected funds into personal accounts or business ventures.
-
Used stolen money for private investments, including a $70,000 stake in a local bar, and for personal expenses such as a Ford Expedition lease.
-
Filed misleading or incomplete probate documents to hide missing funds.
-
Provided false information when questioned by federal agents.
The victims were adults legally determined to be unable to manage their own finances — making oversight and accountability especially critical.
Statements From Prosecutors
U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon condemned the alleged conduct, stating that individuals entrusted with protecting vulnerable adults instead “abused that high honor for personal gain.” He emphasized that the justice system depends on integrity from those who hold judicial and fiduciary authority.
Why This Case Matters
1. Breach of Judicial and Fiduciary Duty
The allegations involve a sitting judge and court‑appointed guardians — individuals expected to uphold the highest ethical standards.
2. Systemic Weaknesses in Guardianship Oversight
Michigan’s guardianship system has long faced criticism for limited monitoring and inconsistent financial reporting requirements.
3. Harm to Vulnerable Adults
Victims were individuals legally deemed unable to protect themselves, amplifying the seriousness of the alleged misconduct.
4. Public Trust in the Courts
Charges against a sitting judge raise significant concerns about internal safeguards and accountability within Michigan’s judicial system.
Potential Legal Consequences
If convicted, the defendants face:
-
Federal prison sentences for wire fraud and conspiracy
-
Additional penalties for money laundering
-
Permanent removal from judicial or legal positions
-
Restitution orders to repay misappropriated funds
-
Possible state‑level disciplinary actions
2025-2026
What a year – What a Future
- 24% tax on weed
- 52 cents per gallon tax
- fraud
- more fraud
- more fraud
- more fraud
- more fraud
- Detroit judge, 3 others charged in alleged scheme to steal thousands from vulnerable and incapacitated people
- Ex-(Who cares Red or Blue) Party treasurer charged with embezzling from vulnerable adult
- and more fraud
How about taxing us less and fighting fraud a lot more. We the people are tired of the political, citizen and NON CITIZEN grifting.
FAQs
1. How much money was allegedly taken?
Federal prosecutors estimate more than $270,000 was diverted from incapacitated adults.
2. What role did the judge play?
Judge Bradley‑Baskin is accused of participating in the conspiracy, laundering funds, and lying to investigators.
3. How did the defendants access victims’ finances?
Through court‑appointed guardianship authority, which granted them control over wards’ bank accounts and assets.
4. What were the funds allegedly used for?
Personal expenses, business investments, and other non‑authorized uses unrelated to the wards’ care.
5. What happens next?
The case will proceed through federal court, where the defendants will have the opportunity to contest the charges. Additional investigations or related charges are possible.
Komorn Law, founded in 1993, brings decades of seasoned experience to Michigan’s most complex criminal and regulatory matters, including the evolving cannabis framework from the MMMA to today’s MRTMA landscape. The firm represents clients facing controlled‑substance offenses, DUI and drug‑related driving charges, firearm violations, property crimes, resisting or obstructing, and the most serious allegations such as manslaughter and homicide. With a proven record in courts across Michigan and the federal system, Komorn Law delivers relentless advocacy when the stakes are highest. Call our office when you are ready to hire an attorney experienced and seasoned fighting the system of “Justice” 248-357-2550.
More
Coalition Forms to Support Voter Approved MRTMA
New Coalition Forms To Support Voter Approved Cannabis ActMichigan’s adult‑use cannabis framework was not created by accident. It was built through a deliberate, voter‑driven process culminating in the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA). The Act...
Michigan Court of Appeals Orders City of Taylor to Release Police Misconduct Records
Case Summary The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that the City of Taylor must comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by the ACLU of Michigan seeking police misconduct records dating back to 2021. The request covers documents involving...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Home Invasion
Case Summary In People v Berry, the defendant co‑owned a home with his former partner. After moving out and negotiating a buyout, he re‑entered the home with another individual before the agreement was finalized. Both were charged with first‑degree home invasion. The...
Cannabis Regulators Association-Briefing on Marijuana Schedule Change
Overview of the President’s December 18th Executive Order and the Implications When Marijuana is Rescheduled to Schedule III under the U.S. Controlled Substances ActTOP-LINE SUMMARY The President signed an Executive Order on December 18, 2025, ordering his...
Trump’s Marijuana Reclassification 2025
Donald Trump’s Actions On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order reclassifying marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This marks the most significant federal...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Felon in Possession
Case Summary In People v Hughes, the defendant challenged Michigan’s felon‑in‑possession statute on Second Amendment grounds. He argued the law was unconstitutional both on its face and as applied to nonviolent offenders. The Court of Appeals rejected both...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Controlled Substances
Case Summary In People v Soto (COA) the defendant faced a felony charge after an 85‑pound shipment of marijuana was delivered to her home. She argued that the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) shielded her from felony prosecution because the...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Confessions
Case Summary Michigan courts issued several important decisions clarifying when confessions are admissible, how Miranda applies in nontraditional settings, and what constitutes a valid invocation of counsel. In Lafey, a spontaneous statement made during a pat‑down was...
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — A Quick Summary
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — Quick Summary The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, limiting when and how the government may intrude on privacy. These protections apply only when police conduct qualifies as a search...
Marijuana Under Fire in Michigan
Marijuana in Michigan is facing renewed challenges as lawmakers push for higher taxes and regulatory changes that critics argue undermine the voter-approved legalization of 2018. Court battles, legislative maneuvers, and industry pushback highlight the tension between...


















