The Michigan Supreme Court Wednesday shot down the state attorney general’s high-profile effort to criminally prosecute seven former public officials for their role in the Flint water crisis.
In a series of orders, the court left in place lower court dismissals of the charges, which were thrown out after an earlier Supreme Court ruling found that a prosecution team appointed by Attorney General Dana Nessel had improperly relied on a one-person grand jury to bring charges in 2021.
Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy, appointed by Nessel as co-lead of the state’s prosecution team along with Solicitor General Fadwa Hammoud, had used the unusual tactic, in which prosecutors presented evidence in secret to a single judge to secure charges against multiple former public officials.
Flint Water Crisis Summary
The Flint Water Crisis was a public health crisis that started in 2014 after the drinking water for the city of Flint, Michigan was contaminated with lead and possibly Legionella bacteria. In April 2014, during a financial crisis, state-appointed emergency manager Darnell Earley changed Flint’s water source from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (sourced from Lake Huron and the Detroit River) to the Flint River. Residents complained about the taste, smell, and appearance of the water, and many raised concerns about its safety.
However, state and local officials repeatedly assured residents that the water was safe to drink. It was not until 2015, after months of protests and pressure from activists and public health experts, that the state finally admitted that the water was contaminated with lead.
The Flint Water Crisis had a devastating impact on the city’s residents, particularly children. Lead poisoning is especially harmful to children, and can cause a range of health problems, including learning disabilities, behavioral problems, and reduced IQ. An estimated 6,000 to 12,000 children were exposed to lead-contaminated water during the crisis.
The Flint Water Crisis is a story of government negligence and environmental injustice. The city’s decision to switch to the Flint River was made in an effort to save money, but it came at a great cost to the city’s residents. The crisis also exposed the deep racial and economic inequality in Flint, as the city’s predominantly Black and low-income residents were disproportionately affected by the contamination.
Flint Water Crisis FAQs
What caused the Flint Water Crisis?
The Flint Water Crisis was caused by a combination of factors, including:
- The city’s decision to switch to the Flint River as its water source. The Flint River is more corrosive than the Detroit water system, and this caused the city’s lead pipes to corrode and leach lead into the water.
- The state’s failure to properly treat the Flint River water. The Flint River water is more acidic than the Detroit water system, and this required the state to add corrosion inhibitors to the water to prevent lead from leaching into the pipes. However, the state failed to add enough corrosion inhibitors, which allowed the lead to leach into the water.
- The state’s failure to listen to residents’ concerns about the water quality. Residents complained about the taste, smell, and appearance of the water from the beginning, but the state repeatedly assured them that the water was safe to drink.
Who was affected by the Flint Water Crisis?
The Flint Water Crisis affected all residents of Flint, but it was particularly harmful to children. Lead poisoning is especially harmful to children, and can cause a range of health problems, including learning disabilities, behavioral problems, and reduced IQ. An estimated 6,000 to 12,000 children were exposed to lead-contaminated water during the crisis.
- What has been done to address the Flint Water Crisis?
- The state has taken a number of steps to address the Flint Water Crisis, including:
- Switching Flint back to the Detroit water system.
- Replacing lead pipes in Flint homes.
- Providing bottled water and water filters to residents.
- Providing medical care and educational support to children who were exposed to lead-contaminated water.
More Posts
House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations. Michigan’s Cannabis Laws Since Michigan legalized recreational marijuana in 2018, the state has worked to balance personal freedom with public...
Miranda v Arizona
Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent, that statements may be used against them, and the right to an attorney. These “Miranda warnings”...
Michigan Cannabis Tax Bill HB4951- Passed
In case you did not know...In September 2025, the Michigan Legislature passed House Bill 4951, known as the Comprehensive Road Funding Tax Act. This legislation introduces a significant change to the taxation of marijuana in Michigan, with implications for cannabis...
Don’t worry – There’s always a workaround
In case you did not know...The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of marijuana alone is no longer sufficient probable cause for police to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle. This decision overturns a previous precedent where the odor of marijuana...
Seven News Story Summaries – September 2025 (Part 1)
Seven Summaries of Seven News StoriesGovernor Issues Executive Directive on AI Use in State Agencies Between September 1–15, 2025, the Governor of Michigan issued an executive directive regulating the use of artificial intelligence in state agencies. The directive...
Viridis Labs Barred from Michigan’s Cannabis Industry
The Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has announced a landmark settlement, permanently banning three former law enforcement officials from participating in Michigan's cannabis market. The agreement mandates the immediate closure of Viridis Laboratories and its sister...
Appeals Court Reaffirms Strict One-Year Deadline for Suing the State of Michigan
Michigan Court of Appeals reiterated that there are no exceptions to the one-year deadline for filing lawsuits against the state of Michigan. Summary In a decision issued on July 30, 2025, the Michigan Court of Appeals reiterated that there are no exceptions to the...
Supreme Court Precedent Ignored by Lower Courts in Union Payment Cases
Should public employees retain the right to stop supporting a union, regardless of a prior written membership agreement, as guaranteed by the U.S. Supreme Court?In a concerning trend for individual worker rights, lower courts are reportedly ignoring a key U.S. Supreme...
Understanding Superintending Control in Michigan Courts
Sometimes, a higher court needs to step in to ensure a lower court is properly administering justice. This powerful action is called "superintending control."In Michigan, our court system is designed as a "One Court of Justice," meaning that while there are different...
MI COA Upholds Constitutionality of State’s Terrorist Threat Statute
The ruling means that prosecutors can continue to use this law as a vital tool in holding individuals accountable for making threats of terrorism, provided they can demonstrate the defendant acted recklessly in communicating the threat. The statute does not require...










