Motion in Limine vs Motion to Suppress

Defininition and Explaination – Motion in Limine

Overview

Although both a motion in limine and a motion to suppress deal with evidence, they serve very different purposes in Michigan criminal cases. Understanding the distinction is critical because each motion affects the trial in its own way and relies on different legal standards. Komorn Law regularly litigates both types of motions to protect clients’ constitutional rights and prevent improper evidence from reaching the jury.

What Is a Motion to Suppress?

A motion to suppress asks the court to exclude evidence because it was obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights. These motions typically involve:

• Fourth Amendment illegal searches or seizures
• Fifth Amendment violations (e.g., Miranda issues)
• Sixth Amendment right‑to‑counsel violations
• Unlawful traffic stops
• Invalid warrants
• Coerced statements If the court grants a motion to suppress, the evidence is completely barred from trial because it was unlawfully obtained. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) (exclusionary rule).

What Is a Motion in Limine?

A motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to decide whether certain evidence should be excluded or allowed before the jury hears it. Unlike a motion to suppress, it does not depend on constitutional violations. Instead, it focuses on the Michigan Rules of Evidence, such as:

• MRE 401–403 (relevance and prejudice)

• MRE 404(b) (other‑acts evidence)

• MRE 702 (expert testimony) A motion in limine is about trial fairness, not police misconduct.

Key Differences Between the Two Motions

Although both motions can keep evidence out of trial, they differ in purpose, timing, and legal basis:

A motion to suppress challenges how evidence was obtained. A motion in limine challenges whether the jury should hear it.

Why Both Motions Matter in Criminal Defense

Strategic use of both motions can dramatically change the outcome of a case. A successful motion to suppress may eliminate key evidence, forcing the prosecution to reduce or dismiss charges. A motion in limine can prevent the jury from hearing damaging, irrelevant, or inflammatory information. Together, they help ensure a fair trial and protect constitutional rights.

Since 1993, Komorn Law, PLLC has aggressively defended clients in Michigan courts, litigating motions to suppress, motions in limine, and complex constitutional issues. If you are facing criminal charges or need strategic pretrial advocacy, contact us at 248‑357‑2550 or visit > KomornLaw.com

FAQs

Q: Can a motion in limine exclude evidence that was illegally obtained?
A: No. That requires a motion to suppress based on constitutional grounds.

Q: Can both motions be filed in the same case?
A: Yes. Many cases involve both constitutional issues and evidentiary concerns.

Q: When is a motion to suppress usually filed?
A: Early in the case, often before the preliminary exam or shortly after discovery.

Q: Does a motion in limine apply only to the prosecution’s evidence?
A: No. Either side may file one to control what the jury hears.

Q: What happens if the prosecutor violates a granted motion in limine?
A: The judge may issue sanctions, strike testimony, or declare a mistrial.