Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint After Removal from Felony Cases
An Oakland County District Court judge, Kristen Hartig of Troy’s 52-4 District Court, is now facing a formal complaint from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) following her recent removal from all felony cases. The complaint, announced on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, details multiple allegations of misconduct, including a refusal to provide a personal psychological evaluation report to the commission during an investigation into her behavior.
The JTC’s complaint asserts that a previous investigation into Hartig’s conduct indicated mental health was an issue, leading to the order for a psychological evaluation. Her alleged refusal to promptly provide the report, despite repeated requests, is a central part of the current complaint. Furthermore, the commission accuses Judge Hartig of making false statements to the JTC, mistreating court employees, obstructing the administration of her court, and improperly dismissing criminal cases.
These allegations paint a picture of a judge who created a “climate of fear” among court personnel and acted beyond her authority. Prior to the formal complaint, Chief Judge Travis Reeds had already removed Judge Hartig from presiding over felony cases in May, reassigning her to civil, landlord/tenant, and small claims matters.
Following the JTC’s formal complaint, Judge Reeds stated that Hartig would be temporarily removed from her entire docket, emphasizing the importance of accountability to preserve public trust in the judiciary. Judge Hartig, through her spokesperson, has stated her respect for the JTC’s role and commitment to fully participating in the process, while also suggesting the complaint is based on “disputed claims and a flawed process.”
The next step in the process involves Hartig’s response to the complaint and a potential public hearing before a special master appointed by the Michigan Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide on any disciplinary action, ranging from censure to removal from the bench.
In Michigan, judicial immunity generally protects judges from civil liability for actions taken within their judicial capacity. This immunity is designed to allow judges to make decisions without fear of being personally sued, thereby preserving the independence of the judiciary.
However, this immunity does not shield judges from accountability for misconduct.
The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) serves as the primary mechanism for judicial accountability in the state. It investigates allegations of judicial misconduct and, if warranted, can file formal complaints and recommend sanctions to the Michigan Supreme Court, which holds the ultimate authority to discipline or remove judges from office for reasons such as misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform duties, or conduct clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Read the 2025-06-04_FC 109 Complaint
Read More about Michigan Judges – Here at Abusive Discretion
MI COA Upholds Constitutionality of State’s Terrorist Threat Statute
The ruling means that prosecutors can continue to use this law as a vital tool in holding individuals accountable for making threats of terrorism, provided they can demonstrate the defendant acted recklessly in communicating the threat. The statute does not require...
Elder and Vulnerable Adult Financial Exploitation in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Elder and Vulnerable Adult Financial ExploitationFinancial exploitation of elders and vulnerable adults is a growing and particularly insidious crime in Michigan, preying on individuals who, due to age, disability, or mental incapacity, are unable...
Sextortion and Sexploitation in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Sextortion and SexploitationSextortion and sexploitation are increasingly prevalent and devastating forms of digital abuse, leveraging technology to coerce, manipulate, and exploit individuals, often for sexual gratification or financial gain....
When individuals find themselves facing criminal charges in State or Federal courtrooms, securing a robust defense is life changing. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC is known for providing an aggressive defense, leveraging extensive experience in both state and federal court systems. With a deep understanding of trial and appellate processes, Komorn is dedicated to advocating for clients’ rights and freedom.
Komorn Law
Charged with a Crime? – Better Call Komorn
People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)
Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal...
Motion in Limine vs Motion to Suppress
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineOverview Although both a motion in limine and a motion to suppress deal with evidence,...
A Motion in Limine – What does it Mean?
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineA motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow)...
Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids
Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming...
Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms
The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence...
Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults
No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with...















