Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint After Removal from Felony Cases
An Oakland County District Court judge, Kristen Hartig of Troy’s 52-4 District Court, is now facing a formal complaint from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) following her recent removal from all felony cases. The complaint, announced on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, details multiple allegations of misconduct, including a refusal to provide a personal psychological evaluation report to the commission during an investigation into her behavior.
The JTC’s complaint asserts that a previous investigation into Hartig’s conduct indicated mental health was an issue, leading to the order for a psychological evaluation. Her alleged refusal to promptly provide the report, despite repeated requests, is a central part of the current complaint. Furthermore, the commission accuses Judge Hartig of making false statements to the JTC, mistreating court employees, obstructing the administration of her court, and improperly dismissing criminal cases.
These allegations paint a picture of a judge who created a “climate of fear” among court personnel and acted beyond her authority. Prior to the formal complaint, Chief Judge Travis Reeds had already removed Judge Hartig from presiding over felony cases in May, reassigning her to civil, landlord/tenant, and small claims matters.
Following the JTC’s formal complaint, Judge Reeds stated that Hartig would be temporarily removed from her entire docket, emphasizing the importance of accountability to preserve public trust in the judiciary. Judge Hartig, through her spokesperson, has stated her respect for the JTC’s role and commitment to fully participating in the process, while also suggesting the complaint is based on “disputed claims and a flawed process.”
The next step in the process involves Hartig’s response to the complaint and a potential public hearing before a special master appointed by the Michigan Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide on any disciplinary action, ranging from censure to removal from the bench.
In Michigan, judicial immunity generally protects judges from civil liability for actions taken within their judicial capacity. This immunity is designed to allow judges to make decisions without fear of being personally sued, thereby preserving the independence of the judiciary.
However, this immunity does not shield judges from accountability for misconduct.
The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) serves as the primary mechanism for judicial accountability in the state. It investigates allegations of judicial misconduct and, if warranted, can file formal complaints and recommend sanctions to the Michigan Supreme Court, which holds the ultimate authority to discipline or remove judges from office for reasons such as misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform duties, or conduct clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Read the 2025-06-04_FC 109 Complaint
Read More about Michigan Judges – Here at Abusive Discretion
Breaking and Entering and Home Invasion in Michigan
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Breaking and Entering / Home InvasionBeing accused of breaking and entering or home invasion in Michigan can be a very serious matter. These charges carry severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines, impacting an...
JDC employee charged with supplying minors with cannabis gummies
The recent arrest and felony charges against a juvenile detention center employee for allegedly supplying marijuana gummies to minors serve as a stark reminder that despite Michigan's progressive cannabis laws, serious penalties still exist for drug-related offenses....
Police Interrogation Rights – Protecting Yourself During Questioning
Police Interrogation Rights in Michigan: Protecting Yourself During QuestioningIf you are arrested and question here's what may happen You will be lied to You will be promised things they can't deliver You will be threatened You will be manipulated You will be...
When individuals find themselves facing criminal charges in State or Federal courtrooms, securing a robust defense is life changing. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC is known for providing an aggressive defense, leveraging extensive experience in both state and federal court systems. With a deep understanding of trial and appellate processes, Komorn is dedicated to advocating for clients’ rights and freedom.
Komorn Law
Charged with a Crime? – Better Call Komorn
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Controlled Substances
Case Summary In People v Soto (COA) the defendant faced a felony charge after an 85‑pound shipment of marijuana was delivered to her home....
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Confessions
Case Summary Michigan courts issued several important decisions clarifying when confessions are admissible, how Miranda applies in...
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — A Quick Summary
Fourth Amendment Search & Seizure — Quick Summary The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures,...
Nuclear waste headed to southeast Michigan landfill
What happened to the nuclear waste from the Manhattan Project? It's coming to Michigan so New York can be a cleaner place.August 2024, the...
Michigan Appeals Court Decision on Cannabis Use and Probation
Michigan Court of Appeals - Recreational Cannabis Use and ProbationRecently, another pivotal case, People v. Lopez-Hernandez, was decided...
Facial Recognition and Wrongful Arrests
Facial RecognitionHow Technology Can Lead to Mistaken-Identity Arrests Facial recognition technology has become increasingly prevalent in...












