Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint After Removal from Felony Cases
An Oakland County District Court judge, Kristen Hartig of Troy’s 52-4 District Court, is now facing a formal complaint from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) following her recent removal from all felony cases. The complaint, announced on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, details multiple allegations of misconduct, including a refusal to provide a personal psychological evaluation report to the commission during an investigation into her behavior.
The JTC’s complaint asserts that a previous investigation into Hartig’s conduct indicated mental health was an issue, leading to the order for a psychological evaluation. Her alleged refusal to promptly provide the report, despite repeated requests, is a central part of the current complaint. Furthermore, the commission accuses Judge Hartig of making false statements to the JTC, mistreating court employees, obstructing the administration of her court, and improperly dismissing criminal cases.
These allegations paint a picture of a judge who created a “climate of fear” among court personnel and acted beyond her authority. Prior to the formal complaint, Chief Judge Travis Reeds had already removed Judge Hartig from presiding over felony cases in May, reassigning her to civil, landlord/tenant, and small claims matters.
Following the JTC’s formal complaint, Judge Reeds stated that Hartig would be temporarily removed from her entire docket, emphasizing the importance of accountability to preserve public trust in the judiciary. Judge Hartig, through her spokesperson, has stated her respect for the JTC’s role and commitment to fully participating in the process, while also suggesting the complaint is based on “disputed claims and a flawed process.”
The next step in the process involves Hartig’s response to the complaint and a potential public hearing before a special master appointed by the Michigan Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide on any disciplinary action, ranging from censure to removal from the bench.
In Michigan, judicial immunity generally protects judges from civil liability for actions taken within their judicial capacity. This immunity is designed to allow judges to make decisions without fear of being personally sued, thereby preserving the independence of the judiciary.
However, this immunity does not shield judges from accountability for misconduct.
The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) serves as the primary mechanism for judicial accountability in the state. It investigates allegations of judicial misconduct and, if warranted, can file formal complaints and recommend sanctions to the Michigan Supreme Court, which holds the ultimate authority to discipline or remove judges from office for reasons such as misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform duties, or conduct clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Read the 2025-06-04_FC 109 Complaint
Read More about Michigan Judges – Here at Abusive Discretion
Over 300 charged in $14.6 billion health care fraud
Why Healthcare Costs So Much and is Poor QualityState and federal prosecutors have charged more than 320 people and uncovered nearly $15 billion in false claims in what they described Monday as the largest coordinated takedown of health care fraud schemes in Justice...
People v Soto (MRTMA Defense Denied)
An Analysis of People of MI v. Julia Kathleen Soto: Application of Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act to Felony ChargesMichigan has made headlines for legalizing recreational marijuana, but this doesn't mean all marijuana-related activities are now legal. The case...
Michigan’s Cannabis Regulator Urges Industry to Act – Lobby Lawmakers
Michigan's cannabis industry is facing significant headwinds, from oversupply and falling prices to persistent illicit market activity. In a recent public meeting, Brian Hanna, the executive director of the Michigan Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA), made a clear and...
When individuals find themselves facing criminal charges in State or Federal courtrooms, securing a robust defense is life changing. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC is known for providing an aggressive defense, leveraging extensive experience in both state and federal court systems. With a deep understanding of trial and appellate processes, Komorn is dedicated to advocating for clients’ rights and freedom.
Komorn Law
Charged with a Crime? – Better Call Komorn
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter
Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an...
Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws
Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is...
Earned Sick Time Act – 2025 New Laws in Effect for Michigan
Some laws in effect in 2025 "Enacted by the People of Michigan" Here we go...remember these laws can change at any moment because that's...
Michigan Problem-Solving Courts Granted Nearly $19 Million
"Data show these programs strengthen communities by reducing crime, boosting employment"LANSING, MI, October 24, 2024 (Substance Abuse...
Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024
Michigan House Bill 5451 of 2024: A Step Toward "Safer Communities"Michigan House Bill 5451, introduced by Representative Sharon MacDonell...















