Oakland County Judge Faces Judicial Tenure Complaint After Removal from Felony Cases
An Oakland County District Court judge, Kristen Hartig of Troy’s 52-4 District Court, is now facing a formal complaint from the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) following her recent removal from all felony cases. The complaint, announced on Wednesday, June 4, 2025, details multiple allegations of misconduct, including a refusal to provide a personal psychological evaluation report to the commission during an investigation into her behavior.
The JTC’s complaint asserts that a previous investigation into Hartig’s conduct indicated mental health was an issue, leading to the order for a psychological evaluation. Her alleged refusal to promptly provide the report, despite repeated requests, is a central part of the current complaint. Furthermore, the commission accuses Judge Hartig of making false statements to the JTC, mistreating court employees, obstructing the administration of her court, and improperly dismissing criminal cases.
These allegations paint a picture of a judge who created a “climate of fear” among court personnel and acted beyond her authority. Prior to the formal complaint, Chief Judge Travis Reeds had already removed Judge Hartig from presiding over felony cases in May, reassigning her to civil, landlord/tenant, and small claims matters.
Following the JTC’s formal complaint, Judge Reeds stated that Hartig would be temporarily removed from her entire docket, emphasizing the importance of accountability to preserve public trust in the judiciary. Judge Hartig, through her spokesperson, has stated her respect for the JTC’s role and commitment to fully participating in the process, while also suggesting the complaint is based on “disputed claims and a flawed process.”
The next step in the process involves Hartig’s response to the complaint and a potential public hearing before a special master appointed by the Michigan Supreme Court, which will ultimately decide on any disciplinary action, ranging from censure to removal from the bench.
In Michigan, judicial immunity generally protects judges from civil liability for actions taken within their judicial capacity. This immunity is designed to allow judges to make decisions without fear of being personally sued, thereby preserving the independence of the judiciary.
However, this immunity does not shield judges from accountability for misconduct.
The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) serves as the primary mechanism for judicial accountability in the state. It investigates allegations of judicial misconduct and, if warranted, can file formal complaints and recommend sanctions to the Michigan Supreme Court, which holds the ultimate authority to discipline or remove judges from office for reasons such as misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform duties, or conduct clearly prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Read the 2025-06-04_FC 109 Complaint
Read More about Michigan Judges – Here at Abusive Discretion
People v Soto (MRTMA Defense Denied)
An Analysis of People of MI v. Julia Kathleen Soto: Application of Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act to Felony ChargesMichigan has made headlines for legalizing recreational marijuana, but this doesn't mean all marijuana-related activities are now legal. The case...
Michigan’s Cannabis Regulator Urges Industry to Act – Lobby Lawmakers
Michigan's cannabis industry is facing significant headwinds, from oversupply and falling prices to persistent illicit market activity. In a recent public meeting, Brian Hanna, the executive director of the Michigan Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA), made a clear and...
Breaking and Entering and Home Invasion in Michigan
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Breaking and Entering / Home InvasionBeing accused of breaking and entering or home invasion in Michigan can be a very serious matter. These charges carry severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines, impacting an...
When individuals find themselves facing criminal charges in State or Federal courtrooms, securing a robust defense is life changing. Attorney Michael Komorn of Komorn Law PLLC is known for providing an aggressive defense, leveraging extensive experience in both state and federal court systems. With a deep understanding of trial and appellate processes, Komorn is dedicated to advocating for clients’ rights and freedom.
Komorn Law
Charged with a Crime? – Better Call Komorn
Coalition Forms to Support Voter Approved MRTMA
New Coalition Forms To Support Voter Approved Cannabis ActMichigan’s adult‑use cannabis framework was not created by accident. It was...
Michigan Court of Appeals Orders City of Taylor to Release Police Misconduct Records
Case Summary The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that the City of Taylor must comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Home Invasion
Case Summary In People v Berry, the defendant co‑owned a home with his former partner. After moving out and negotiating a buyout, he...
Michigan House Bill 5450 of 2024
Step by StepMichigan House Bill 5450 of 2024 is a bill that was introduced by Representative Sharon MacDonell on February 14, 2024. The...
Search and Seizure – Consent or Plain view
The Fourth Amendment was established to protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, yet there are exceptions.In Michigan,...
A drunk driving investigation, a car wreck and a blood draw
A Case Summary: People v. Blake Anthony-William BartonOn October 11, 2024, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case...













