Oregon governor signs a bill recriminalizing drug possession into law
On April 1, 2024, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed House Bill 4002 into law, effectively recriminalizing the possession of small amounts of certain controlled substances. This legislation marks a significant shift in Oregon’s drug policy, reversing a key provision of Ballot Measure 110 passed by voters in 2020. Measure 110 decriminalized possession of illicit drugs like heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine, making them civil violations punishable by a fine only.
In a signing letter, Kotek said the law’s success will depend on “deep coordination” between courts, police, prosecutors, defense attorneys and local mental health providers, describing them as “necessary partners to achieve the vision for this legislation.”
House Bill 4002: Key Provisions
- Recriminalization: Possession of controlled substances in usable quantities for personal consumption becomes a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine of up to $3,600, or both.
- Treatment Emphasis: The bill allocates new funding for substance abuse treatment programs. Law enforcement agencies are encouraged to create deflection programs that divert individuals caught with drugs towards treatment options instead of prosecution.
- Implementation Timeline: The recriminalization provisions take effect on September 1, 2024.
Background: The Decriminalization Experiment
Measure 110, approved with over 58% of the vote, aimed to address the state’s addiction crisis by shifting focus from punishment to treatment. However, implementation issues arose. Limited treatment resources hampered the program’s effectiveness, and concerns emerged regarding increased public drug use and public safety.
Arguments for Recriminalization
Proponents of House Bill 4002 argue that decriminalization failed to deliver on its promises. They cite:
- Inadequate Treatment Infrastructure: The lack of readily available treatment options rendered the decriminalization policy ineffective in addressing addiction.
- Public Safety Concerns: Increased reports of public drug use and associated criminal activity fueled arguments for stricter enforcement.
- Unintended Consequences: Critics argued decriminalization normalized drug use and discouraged individuals from seeking help.
Arguments Against Recriminalization
Opponents of the bill express concerns that it represents a step backward in drug policy reform. They argue:
- The Criminal Justice System is Ineffective: They believe criminalization disproportionately impacts low-income communities and people of color, hindering access to treatment.
- Focus on Treatment, Not Incarceration: Opponents advocate for increased investment in treatment programs over incarceration, which they view as counterproductive.
- Limited Bill Impact: Critics argue the bill’s treatment funding is insufficient and may not effectively address the root causes of addiction.
The Road Ahead
House Bill 4002 represents a compromise approach, attempting to balance public safety concerns with treatment availability. The success of this legislation hinges on several factors, including:
- Effective Implementation: Establishing accessible, well-funded treatment programs is crucial to diverting individuals from the criminal justice system.
- Police Discretion: Law enforcement agencies will need clear guidelines on implementing the deflection programs and how to interact with individuals struggling with addiction.
- Data Collection and Analysis: Monitoring the program’s impact on public safety, treatment utilization, and recidivism rates will be essential for evaluating its effectiveness.
Oregon’s policy shift reflects the ongoing national debate on drug policy reform. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether House Bill 4002 offers a viable solution to the state’s addiction crisis.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I think I found a bag with some Fentynal in my yard??
Answer: Get far away and call the police. Even though we battle the police in a court of law there is still a need for them. Unless you want to pick it up and find out.
In 2023 the overdose death rate topped 112,000 in a 12 month period for the first time, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dec 28, 2023 (Still left out 3 days)
Related Articles
CRA Executive Director Hanna Applauds Whitmer’s FY25 Budget
No Evidence of Widespread Discriminatory Policing PracticesNever Ending Quest February 15, 2024 LANSING, MI – Today, Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) Executive Director Brian Hanna applauded Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Executive Budget...
Cannabis Tax Payments Being Distributed in Michigan
Adult-Use Marijuana Tax Payments Being Distributed In MichiganHere's what they say...Treasury: Adult-Use Marijuana Payments Being Distributed to Michigan Municipalities and Counties; More Than $59.5 Million Going to 224 Municipalities and Counties. Sales of "legal"...
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of Claims judge on Jan. 2 dismissed two lawsuits linked to Michigan’s enormous 64,000-pound, $229 million 2021 marijuana recall that impacted an estimated 60% of all...
Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional
COA 352569 PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE Opinion People v Poole (Docket No. 352569) decided January 18, 2024 The State Appellate Defender Office celebrates today’s outcome for our client John Antonio Poole. As an 18-year-old child, Mr. Poole was sentenced to life...
More Posts
Michigan Supreme Court – Forfeiture of 2006 Saturn ION
FORFEITURE OF 2006 SATURN IONMichigan Supreme Court Ruling - July 25, 2025 The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that Detroit police can no longer seize cars through...
The MSP is Concerned About Your Privacy (Vehicle Information)
Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your Driver License and Motor Vehicle Information privacy?Here's what they say on their websiteThe Michigan State...
The MSP is Concerned About Your Privacy (Biometric Information)
Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your DNA / biometric privacy?Here's what they say on their websiteThe Michigan State Police (MSP) is committed to...
The MSP and Your Privacy (Criminal History)
Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your criminal history privacy?Here's what they say on their websiteThe Michigan State Police (MSP) is committed to...
Michigan DNA Collection – The Law
Chapter 750Act 328 of 1931328-1931-LXXVI THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT)Act 328 of 1931Here's the website info750.520m DNA identification profiling; chemical testing;...
The 6th Amendment – Do You Know What It Is?
The 6th Amendment: is it still a thing?The 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial pillar of the Bill of Rights, designed to ensure fair and just...
The US Supreme Court and Federal Gun Law Cases
The US Supreme Court and Federal Gun Law CasesChallenges to Federal Gun Laws the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed Updated July 8, 2024...
Do Passengers in a Vehicle have 4th Amendment Rights?
Do Passengers have 4th Amendment Rights?Michigan Supreme Court Limits Police Ability to Search Passenger Property in CarsBackground Mead was a passenger in a car and...
Michigan Appeals Court Decision on Cannabis Use and Probation
Michigan Court of Appeals - Recreational Cannabis Use and ProbationRecently, another pivotal case, People v. Lopez-Hernandez, was decided by the Michigan Court of...
Do Students Have 4th Amendment Rights in Schools
Students and 4th Amendment RightsStudents are entitled to a right to be safe from unreasonable searches and seizures even within school premises, as ruled by the...