Note: This is what they are supposed to do. Whether they give a damn about you and the outcome is up to the individual attorney
What it is supposed to be
In Michigan, public defenders play a vital role in the criminal justice system by providing legal representation to people who cannot afford private attorneys.
They help ensure that everyone, regardless of income, receives a fair trial as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Public defenders handle cases ranging from misdemeanors to serious felonies and work at different levels based on experience and qualifications.
What Public Defenders Do
Public defenders represent clients in criminal cases at all stages of the legal process, including:
- Arraignments – Advising clients on their rights and entering pleas.
- Pretrial Hearings – Filing motions to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, or seek reduced bail.
- Trials – Presenting evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and making arguments in court.
- Plea Bargaining – Negotiating with prosecutors to reduce charges or sentencing.
- Sentencing – Advocating for fair punishments or alternatives like probation or rehabilitation programs.
- Appeals – Challenging wrongful convictions or excessive sentences in higher courts.
Because public defenders handle many cases at once, they must work quickly and efficiently while giving each client strong representation.
Levels of Public Defenders and Their Qualifications
Public defenders in Michigan progress through different levels based on education, experience, and case complexity.
1. Entry-Level Public Defender (Assistant Public Defender I)
- Education: Must have a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from an accredited law school.
- License: Must pass the Michigan Bar Exam and be licensed to practice law in Michigan.
- Experience: No prior courtroom experience required, though internships or clerkships in criminal law are helpful.
- Duties: Handles misdemeanor cases and low-level felonies under supervision.
2. Mid-Level Public Defender (Assistant Public Defender II & III)
- Education: J.D. degree and active Michigan law license.
- Experience: At least 2-5 years of criminal defense or prosecutorial experience.
- Duties: Takes on more serious felony cases, may argue motions in higher courts, and supervises newer attorneys.
3. Senior Public Defender (Assistant Public Defender IV)
- Education: Same as lower levels but with extensive trial experience.
- Experience: 7+ years in criminal defense, often handling serious felonies like murder or sexual assault cases.
- Duties: Represents high-profile clients, trains junior attorneys, and may work on appeals.
4. Chief Public Defender
- Education: J.D. degree and Michigan law license.
- Experience: 10+ years in criminal defense, with leadership and administrative experience.
- Duties: Manages the public defender’s office, oversees budgets, and sets legal strategies for the department.
If you need a defender to fight to the better end you either get lucky and get assigned a public defender that really cares or you hire a private attorney who primary goal is your rights, freedom, family and future.
Are Your Constitutional Rights Threatened?
1 A – 2 A – 4 A or any right
Call Our Office
Komorn Law (248) 357-2550
Other Posts
Sometimes our posts provide a general overview of things with opinionated sarcasm and dry humor by the writer to lighten the same old same old of other law sites. It does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a criminal offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance. BTW. True Fact: When Michael Komorn fights the justice system there is only one focus. You and your rights.
Recent
What does Nolle Prosequi mean?
What does Nolle Prosequi mean? Fatal Flaw In criminal cases, nolle prosequi may be employed when there is a significant weakness in the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor acknowledges an inability to prove the charges, or even when the prosecutor has lost...
People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)
Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against his fourteen‑year‑old daughter. The Court held that although one evidentiary error occurred, it was...
More
People v. Lukity, 460 Mich 484 (1999)
Case Summary The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and reinstated the defendant’s conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct against his fourteen‑year‑old daughter. The Court held that although one evidentiary error occurred, it was...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Threat of Terrorism
Case Summary In People v Kvasnicka, the defendant sent a message to a young girl stating she “would not be laughing” when he came to her school to “shoot it up or blow it up like Columbine.” Charged under Michigan’s threat‑of‑terrorism statute, he argued the law was...
Michigan House Bill Proposes 32% Tax on Internet Devices for Kids
Taxed Again..? They're working on it.A newly introduced Michigan House bill would impose a 32% excise tax on smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, and other internet‑connected devices marketed to or primarily used by minors. Lawmakers backing the proposal argue the...
Shadow cash is corrupting Michigan courtrooms
The Shadow Cash Threat: Protecting the Integrity of Michigan Courtrooms In recent months, a spotlight has been cast on a hidden influence within the Michigan legal system: "shadow cash." This term refers to third-party litigation funding (TPLF), where outside...
Michigan judge charged in stealing from incapacitated adults
No Good Headline to Lead with HereSummary Federal prosecutors have charged a 36th District Court judge and three associates with orchestrating a long‑running financial scheme that diverted funds from incapacitated adults under court‑appointed guardianship. The...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Prisoner in Possession
Prisoner in Possession of a Controlled SubstanceCase Summary In People v Tadgerson, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed a critical question: does the crime of a prisoner possessing a controlled substance under MCL 800.281(4) require proof of intent, or is it a...
