Note: This is what they are supposed to do. Whether they give a damn about you and the outcome is up to the individual attorney
What it is supposed to be
In Michigan, public defenders play a vital role in the criminal justice system by providing legal representation to people who cannot afford private attorneys.
They help ensure that everyone, regardless of income, receives a fair trial as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Public defenders handle cases ranging from misdemeanors to serious felonies and work at different levels based on experience and qualifications.
What Public Defenders Do
Public defenders represent clients in criminal cases at all stages of the legal process, including:
- Arraignments – Advising clients on their rights and entering pleas.
- Pretrial Hearings – Filing motions to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, or seek reduced bail.
- Trials – Presenting evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and making arguments in court.
- Plea Bargaining – Negotiating with prosecutors to reduce charges or sentencing.
- Sentencing – Advocating for fair punishments or alternatives like probation or rehabilitation programs.
- Appeals – Challenging wrongful convictions or excessive sentences in higher courts.
Because public defenders handle many cases at once, they must work quickly and efficiently while giving each client strong representation.
Levels of Public Defenders and Their Qualifications
Public defenders in Michigan progress through different levels based on education, experience, and case complexity.
1. Entry-Level Public Defender (Assistant Public Defender I)
- Education: Must have a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from an accredited law school.
- License: Must pass the Michigan Bar Exam and be licensed to practice law in Michigan.
- Experience: No prior courtroom experience required, though internships or clerkships in criminal law are helpful.
- Duties: Handles misdemeanor cases and low-level felonies under supervision.
2. Mid-Level Public Defender (Assistant Public Defender II & III)
- Education: J.D. degree and active Michigan law license.
- Experience: At least 2-5 years of criminal defense or prosecutorial experience.
- Duties: Takes on more serious felony cases, may argue motions in higher courts, and supervises newer attorneys.
3. Senior Public Defender (Assistant Public Defender IV)
- Education: Same as lower levels but with extensive trial experience.
- Experience: 7+ years in criminal defense, often handling serious felonies like murder or sexual assault cases.
- Duties: Represents high-profile clients, trains junior attorneys, and may work on appeals.
4. Chief Public Defender
- Education: J.D. degree and Michigan law license.
- Experience: 10+ years in criminal defense, with leadership and administrative experience.
- Duties: Manages the public defender’s office, oversees budgets, and sets legal strategies for the department.
If you need a defender to fight to the better end you either get lucky and get assigned a public defender that really cares or you hire a private attorney who primary goal is your rights, freedom, family and future.
Are Your Constitutional Rights Threatened?
1 A – 2 A – 4 A or any right
Call Our Office
Komorn Law (248) 357-2550
Other Posts
Sometimes our posts provide a general overview of things with opinionated sarcasm and dry humor by the writer to lighten the same old same old of other law sites. It does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a criminal offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance. BTW. True Fact: When Michael Komorn fights the justice system there is only one focus. You and your rights.
Recent
Motion in Limine vs Motion to Suppress
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineOverview Although both a motion in limine and a motion to suppress deal with evidence, they serve very different purposes in Michigan criminal cases. Understanding the distinction is critical because each motion affects...
A Motion in Limine – What does it Mean?
Defininition and Explaination - Motion in LimineA motion in limine is a pretrial request asking the judge to exclude (or sometimes allow) specific evidence before the jury ever hears it. It’s one of the most important evidentiary tools in both criminal and civil...
More
Court to Allow Challenge to Michigan’s New 24% Cannabis Tax
Summary A Michigan Court of Claims judge has ruled that the lawsuit challenging the state’s newly enacted 24% wholesale marijuana excise tax may proceed. The ruling, issued January 5, 2026, keeps alive a significant constitutional challenge brought by industry groups...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Arrest
People v Lyons, No 370840, ___ Mich App ___, ___ NW3d ___ (May 13, 2025)Case Summary In People v Lyons, the defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police. Before the vehicle fully stopped, he exited and began walking away. Officers ordered him to return, he...
Michigan Drivers Face Higher Gas Tax in 2026
Keep Pushing.Summary Michigan’s fuel‑tax structure will undergo a major statutory shift on January 1, 2026, raising the state gas tax from 31 cents to approximately 52.4 cents per gallon. The change eliminates the 6% sales tax on fuel and replaces it with a higher,...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Manslaughter
Case Summary These two cases examine the boundaries of involuntary manslaughter. In People v Aiyash, a gas‑station clerk locked an agitated customer and three patrons inside the store, after which the customer shot the patrons. In People v Sherrill, the defendant...
Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws
Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with cannabis tax changes, wage increases, consumer protections, and transparency laws.Michigan begins 2026 with a slate of new laws...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...
