Squatters and You
Squatting, in one definition is the act of occupying a property without legal permission, can be a headache for both property owners and squatters themselves. Sorry to cause you a such a headache squatter.
Michigan has specific laws addressing squatting, offering some protection to owners while outlining potential consequences for squatters.
Here’s One…
MCL 750.553: Criminal Trespass
Michigan criminalizes squatting in single-family dwellings and one or both units in a two-family dwelling through MCL 750.553. This law defines “occupies” as physically living within the structure.
Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
- No Consent: The squatter must have never had the owner’s consent to occupy the property.
- Penalty: A first offense is considered a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 per dwelling unit occupied, imprisonment for not more than 180 days, or both. Subsequent offenses are felonies with steeper penalties.
- Exceptions: The law doesn’t apply to guests or family members of the owner or a tenant.
This statute empowers property owners to pursue legal action against squatters, potentially leading to their removal and facing criminal charges. While they destroy your property and cost you legal fees, house and utility payments.
Self-Help Eviction
Michigan offers a unique remedy for property owners: self-help eviction.
Unlike most states, Michigan allows owners to take specific actions to encourage squatters to leave without involving law enforcement.
However, crucial limitations exist:
- Limited Scope: Self-help measures are only applicable to situations covered by MCL 750.553 (single-family and two-family dwellings).
- Actions: These measures can involve changing locks, shutting off utilities deemed non-essential for safety and health (like electricity or heat), or removing the squatter’s belongings after they’ve been properly evicted (typically through a legal notice).
Important Cautions:
- Legality: Any self-help actions must strictly adhere to legal boundaries. Improper actions can lead to lawsuits from the squatter. Consulting a lawyer before taking any steps is highly recommended.
- Tenant vs. Squatter: These measures cannot be used against tenants with a valid lease agreement. Evicting tenants requires following formal eviction procedures.
MCL Adverse Possession vs. Squatting
It’s important to distinguish squatting from adverse possession, another legal concept related to occupying land. MCL 600.5801 [MCL 600.5801] outlines adverse possession, where someone can potentially gain ownership of a property through extended, uninterrupted, and hostile possession that meets specific criteria. Squatting, however, is generally temporary and lacks the “hostile” element required for adverse possession.
Adverse Possession in Michigan – Can Someone Claim Your Property?
Taking Action – Since You Can’t Call in the A Team
If you suspect someone is squatting in your property, here are some steps to consider:
- Contact Law Enforcement: For situations covered by MCL 750.553, involving the police can initiate the process of removing the squatter and potentially pressing charges.
- Seek Legal Counsel: An attorney can guide you through the legal options available, including navigating self-help measures or pursuing formal eviction procedures.
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Neglect of Duty
Case Summary In People v Harper, a Wayne County Sheriff’s deputy was charged with neglect of duty after witnessing an inmate escape during his smoke break and taking no action to stop or pursue the prisoner. The prosecution relied on the Sheriff’s Department policy...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Metallic Knuckles
Case Summary In People v Dummer, the defendant challenged Michigan’s metallic‑knuckles statute, arguing that simply possessing the weapon was protected by the Second Amendment. The Michigan Court of Appeals acknowledged that possession of metallic knuckles is...
The Law
750.553 Occupancy of building without consent; violation; penalty; exception.
Sec. 553.
Real Questions from Real Calls
Question: I am squatting in a house in Michigan and was threatened by the owner. What can I do?
In Michigan, squatting is illegal and the owner has the right to take action to get you out. Here’s what you should know:
Your Legal Situation:
- Squatting is a Crime: Michigan’s MCL 750.553 criminalizes squatting in single-family homes and one or both units in a two-family dwelling [MCL 750.553]. Since you’re squatting, the owner has legal grounds to pursue your removal.
- Threats vs. Legal Action: While the owner may have threatened you, they can’t physically remove you themselves. However, they can involve the police or initiate legal eviction proceedings.
What You Can Do:
- Leave Immediately: This is the safest and most advisable option. There’s a high chance you’ll be evicted if the owner pursues legal channels, and you could face criminal charges.
- Seek Shelter Assistance: Contact local homeless shelters or social service agencies for temporary housing or resources to help you find permanent housing.
- Legal Aid: Consider seeking legal aid from organizations specializing in tenant rights. They can offer advice on your options and potential defenses (if any) based on the specifics of your situation.
Important Notes:
- Self-Help Eviction: Michigan allows self-help eviction for some situations, but it’s a complex process with legal risks. It’s best to avoid this and let the legal system handle the eviction.
- False Claims of Tenancy: Don’t attempt to falsely claim you have a lease agreement. This is a crime and could worsen your situation.
Here are some resources that can help:
- Michigan Legal Services Helpline: 1-888-773-8255
Related Articles
Michigan begins 2026 with New Laws
Michigan’s 2026 legal landscape includes major tax reforms—most notably the gas‑tax increase from 31¢ to 52.4¢ per gallon—along with cannabis tax changes, wage increases, consumer protections, and transparency laws.Michigan begins 2026 with a slate of new laws...
Michigan Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Cases – Appeal
Michigan appellate courts issued several significant decisions refining how convictions are reviewed, when relief from judgment is appropriate, and how procedural errors must be preserved. These cases collectively clarify retroactivity, evidentiary‑weight standards,...
Coalition Forms to Support Voter Approved MRTMA
New Coalition Forms To Support Voter Approved Cannabis ActMichigan’s adult‑use cannabis framework was not created by accident. It was built through a deliberate, voter‑driven process culminating in the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA). The Act...
Michigan Court of Appeals Orders City of Taylor to Release Police Misconduct Records
Case Summary The Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that the City of Taylor must comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by the ACLU of Michigan seeking police misconduct records dating back to 2021. The request covers documents involving...
More Posts
Should courts allow prosecutors to refer to complainants as victims
Labeling before adjudication. Kedero Treasvant was convicted of multiple firearm-related offenses in Michigan, and his appeal raises a key issue about courtroom...
Improper Transport of a Firearm in Michigan
Improper Firearms Transport, Storage Laws and Penalties Michigan law makes improper gun transport a misdemeanor crime under MCL 750.227d. Firearms can be confiscated...
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Gun Rights and Marijuana Use
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Gun Rights and Marijuana Use The Supreme Court has agreed to hear U.S. v. Hemani, a case challenging the federal ban on gun ownership by...
House Bill 5107 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations. Michigan’s Cannabis Regulation Challenges Since...
House Bill 5105 – The MRTMA Shuffle
Michigan House Bill 5105 proposes new marijuana penalties and possession limits to combat illicit cannabis operations. Michigan’s Cannabis Laws Since Michigan legalized...
Miranda v Arizona
Case Summary Miranda v. Arizona established that before police conduct custodial interrogation, they must advise suspects of their rights: the right to remain silent,...
Michigan Cannabis Tax Bill HB4951- Passed
In case you did not know...In September 2025, the Michigan Legislature passed House Bill 4951, known as the Comprehensive Road Funding Tax Act. This legislation...
Don’t worry – There’s always a workaround
In case you did not know...The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of marijuana alone is no longer sufficient probable cause for police to conduct a...
Seven News Story Summaries – September 2025 (Part 1)
Seven Summaries of Seven News StoriesGovernor Issues Executive Directive on AI Use in State Agencies Between September 1–15, 2025, the Governor of Michigan issued an...
Viridis Labs Barred from Michigan’s Cannabis Industry
The Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) has announced a landmark settlement, permanently banning three former law enforcement officials from participating in Michigan's...























