Squatters
Squatting, in one definition is the unauthorized occupation of a property, can be a frustrating ordeal for property owners in Michigan. Understanding the relevant laws and procedures is crucial for regaining possession of your property.
Squatting vs. Adverse Possession: Key Differences
Michigan law differentiates between squatting and adverse possession. Squatting refers to the unlawful occupation of a property without the owner’s consent. In contrast, adverse possession allows someone who isn’t the legal owner to gain ownership rights under specific circumstances, as outlined in MCL § 600.5801. To establish adverse possession, an occupant must demonstrate:
- Continuous occupancy: Occupying the property for at least 15 consecutive years (MCL § 600.5801(1)).
- Color of title: Possessing a document, though potentially flawed, that suggests ownership (MCL § 600.5801(2)). However, simply paying rent or utilities doesn’t constitute color of title.
- Payment of property taxes: Paying property taxes for at least ten consecutive years (MCL § 600.5801(2)).
Open, notorious, and hostile possession: Occupying the property openly, demonstrably, and claiming it as their own, even if mistakenly (MCL § 600.5801(3, 4)).
The burden of proof lies with the squatter to establish adverse possession. Notably, Michigan courts have interpreted these requirements strictly, making it difficult for squatters to gain ownership rights.
News Articles and Information
MML-Michigan Communities and Squatting: What You Need to Know (PDF)
Here’s how homeowners can fight against squatter insanity
And now for something completely different…
Self-Help Eviction: A Unique Feature in Michigan
Michigan offers a unique remedy for property owners facing squatters: self-help eviction. Unlike most states, Michigan law allows owners to take specific steps to make the property unappealing for squatters, encouraging them to leave voluntarily.
Important Caveats: It’s crucial to note that self-help eviction has limitations:
No removal of belongings: Owners cannot remove the squatter’s belongings or physically force them out.
Tenant vs. squatter: This method only applies to squatters, not tenants with a valid lease agreement. Evicting tenants requires a formal eviction process through the court system.
Potential legal repercussions: Improper use of self-help measures could result in legal action from the squatter. Consulting an attorney before taking any steps is highly recommended.
Getting Rid of Squatters
If you discover that someone unauthorized is occupying your property, contact the police. However, be aware that the police may consider it a civil issue and advise you to pursue eviction through the courts. It is important to note that squatting is considered a misdemeanor in Michigan, even if law enforcement may not be fully aware of this fact.
Instead of waiting on or dealing with the police, property owners in Michigan can take action to remove illegal occupants within the limits of the law:
- Kindly request the squatter to vacate the premises within a specified timeframe.
- Notify the squatter that legal measures will be pursued if they fail to comply promptly.
- While the squatter is away from the property, consider changing the locks, securing entry points, boarding up windows, and implementing additional barriers like fences to prevent re-entry.
The Expanding List of Crimes that Restrict Gun Ownership
The Expanding List of Crimes that Restrict Gun Ownership in MichiganHere are the LawsDomestic Violence The legislature passed a package of bills that add subsets to certain misdemeanor offenses (identified below) for offenses involving domestic relationships. See 2023...
Forensic Science Division – DNA Profiling System
The Michigan State Police Forensic Science Division (FSD) DNA Profiling System is a comprehensive program that uses DNA analysis to support criminal investigations throughout the state. The system is housed within the Biometrics and Identification Division (BID),...
Criminal Trespass: Legal Ramifications of Squatting
Squatting in Michigan is considered criminal trespass under MCL 750.553. This statute classifies trespassing as a misdemeanor for first offenses, punishable by fines up to $5,000 or imprisonment for up to 180 days, or both. Subsequent offenses become felonies with steeper penalties.
There are additional trespassing classifications based on the property type:
- Residential property: Trespassing on a single-family or two-family dwelling is typically a misdemeanor.
- Commercial property: Trespassing on commercial buildings, industrial sites, construction zones, or utility property can be charged as a felony.
Property owners who suspect squatting should contact law enforcement. Officers can remove squatters if they lack a legal right to be on the property.
The Law
750.553 Occupancy of building without consent; violation; penalty; exception.
Sec. 553.
Other Articles
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
More Posts
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rules 901-903 Authenticating Evidence
Michigan Rules 901-903 - Evidence Authentication Ever wondered how that document or recording made its way into a Michigan courtroom? The answer lies in Michigan Rules...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 801-807 Hearsay Evidence
Michigan Rules of Evidence 801-807 Hearsay: In the courtroom, truth-finding is paramount. Yet, not every statement offered as evidence directly reveals the truth. Enter...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 701-707 Opinions
Opinions - Everyone's got one or two or three: A Look at Michigan Rules of Evidence 701-707 Lay Versus Expert Opinions (Rules 701 & 702) Before delving into...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 601-615 Witnesses
Navigating the Witness Box: A Look at Michigan Rules of Evidence 601-615 In the courtroom, witness testimony plays a crucial role in unveiling the truth and determining...
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall
Judge tosses lawsuits stemming from Michigan’s marijuana recall LANSING, MI -- A Michigan Court of Claims judge on Jan. 2 dismissed two lawsuits linked to Michigan’s...
Another city approves to deprioritize enforcement of psychedelics
Another city in Michigan has recently agreed to prioritize local enforcement of laws pertaining to psychedelic substances. Additionally, they have shown their...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: Rule 501 – Privilege in General
Rule 501. Privilege; General Rule. Privilege is governed by the common law, except as modified by statute or courtrule.Have your rights been violated?Have your driving...
Decision holding mandatory life without parole unconstitutional
COA 352569 PEOPLE OF MI V JOHN ANTONIO POOLE Opinion People v Poole (Docket No. 352569) decided January 18, 2024 The State Appellate Defender Office celebrates today’s...
Evidence in Michigan Courts: A Guide to Rules 401-411
Understanding the Foundation: A Summary of Michigan Rules of Evidence 401-411 The Michigan Rules of Evidence (MRE), specifically Rules 401-411, lay the groundwork for...
Legal Consequences of Rescheduling Marijuana – 2024
Legal Consequences of Rescheduling Marijuana Jan 2024 a report from the Congressional Research Service.