Supreme Court 8-1 Gun Possession Decision Changes Second Amendment Landscape Forever!
Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), the federal statute that prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if he has been convicted of “a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year,” complies with the Second Amendment.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Aug 16 2023 | Application (23A140) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 4, 2023 to October 5, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito. |
| Aug 25 2023 | Application (23A140) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 5, 2023. |
| Oct 05 2023 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 9, 2023) |
| Oct 18 2023 | Brief of respondent Bryan David Range in opposition filed. |
| Nov 01 2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023. |
| Nov 01 2023 | Reply of petitioners Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Jun 24 2024 | Supplemental brief for the Federal Parties filed. VIDED. |
| Jun 26 2024 | Supplemental brief of respondent Bryan David Range filed. |
| Jun 28 2024 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024. |
| Jul 02 2024 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of United States v. Rahimi, 602 U. S. ___ (2024). |
Read the SCOTUS Brief here and watch the video explanation below
Supreme Court 8-1 Gun Possession Decision Changes Second Amendment Landscape Forever!
Supreme Court 8-1 Order Shatters Immediate “Assault Weapon” & Magazine Ban Hopes!
Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.
Third Circuit Holds that a Nonviolent Offender May Not Be Stripped of Second Amendment Rights. Read the Brief Here.
Recent
Michigan Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals Ruling of State Anti-Terror Statute
Michigan Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals Ruling, Temporarily Preserves State Anti-Terror StatuteIf you are charged with a crime you're part of the State of Michigan family now. Call us - Because you don't want to be a part of that family. Komorn Law (248)...
Free Speech, Terror and Michigan Law
Michigan Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals Ruling, Temporarily Preserves State Anti-Terror StatuteIf you are charged with a crime you're part of the State of Michigan family now. Call us - Because you don't want to be a part of that family. Komorn Law (248)...
Other Articles
Supreme Court Opinion – Created federal agencies need judicial oversight
Summary of the Opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoIn Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court addressed the enduring precedent set by Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which has shaped administrative law for...
Carjacking is a Federal Offense
Carjacking is a Federal OffenseCarjacking, the act of forcibly stealing an occupied vehicle, has long been a concern for public safety. It was a local and state issue until a series of violent incidents in the early 1990s that carjacking became a federal...
SCOTUS: No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes
SCOTUS: When police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes it does not necessitate a separate preliminary hearing.The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against two women who loaned their cars to others arrested for drug crimes while using the vehicles, leading...
SCOTUS Opinion, SHEETZ v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, CALIFORNIA
The Constitution provides “no textual justification for saying that the existence or the scope of a State’s power to expropriate private property without just compensation varies according to the branch of government effecting the expropriation.”The case in question...
