MSP Update on State’s Evidential Breath Alcohol Testing Program

MSP Update on State’s Evidential Breath Alcohol Testing Program

MSP Update on State’s Evidential Breath Alcohol Testing Program

This morning Michigan State Police (MSP) Director Col. Joe Gasper provided testimony before the state’s Judiciary and Public Safety Committee on the findings to-date of the department’s investigation into issues with the state’s Datamaster DMT evidential breath alcohol testing instruments.

As of 7 a.m., discrepancies have been identified involving eight instruments at the following locations:

Instrument Location Period of Time in Question Number of Breath Tests Possible Criminal Act
Alpena County Sheriff’s Department11/14/19 – 1/9/208Yes
Beverly Hills Police Department1/22/19 – 6/21/199Yes
Detroit Detention Center10/10/19 – 10/13/196No
Montcalm County Sheriff’s Department8/23/19 – 8/26/191No
Niles Law Enforcement Center1/15/19 – 2/18/197No
Pittsfield Township Police Department12/20/18 – 8/7/195Yes
Tecumseh Police Department2/15/19 – 6/28/1912Yes
Van Buren County Sheriff’s Department11/21/19 – 12/9/194No

As irregularities are identified, notification is made to the affected prosecutor regarding impacted breath tests.  Prosecutors will review each case on a case-by-case basis to determine what actions to take.

On Jan. 13, 2020, the MSP took all 203 Datamaster DMT evidential breath alcohol testing instruments in the state out of service until they could be inspected and verified by MSP personnel. As of 7 a.m. this morning, 37 of 203 instruments have been returned to service following verification by MSP personnel that the instruments are properly calibrated.

MSP personnel are re-certifying the most frequently used instruments and those in areas with limited access to obtaining blood samples first, with hopes of returning all instruments to service by the end of February.

A criminal investigation by MSP into potential fraud committed by contract employees of Datamaster vendor, Intoximeters, is ongoing.

The below timeline of events was also shared with the committee today.

Timeline of Events:

September 1, 2018 – Effective date of three-year maintenance contract with Intoximeters Inc.

  • Contract is $1.26 million; requires vendor’s three technicians to conduct 120-day certifications of all instruments, perform service calls and routine maintenance, and provide court testimony on the service and maintenance of the instruments.
  • The technicians whose work is in question were hired in September and November of 2018.

January 2019 – With the intent to bring the state’s evidentiary breath alcohol testing program into alignment with forensic laboratory standards and work toward national accreditation, the MSP created a new position, Breath Alcohol Technical Leader, within the Forensic Science Division.  The accreditation process was expected to take at least 18 months.

April 2019 – MSP put additional workflow requirements in place with the vendor to ensure compliance with state law and administrative rules and move toward accreditation.  It was after these additional controls were put in place that the MSP began to notice noncompliance by the vendor’s technicians.

August 9, 2019 – After identifying repeated failures by the technicians to meet contractual requirements and the inability to perform the mandated tasks of maintaining and certifying the Datamaster instruments, the MSP asked DTMB Central Procurement to issue a letter to Intoximeters outlining grounds for breach of contract and requesting a corrective action plan.

  • Examples of improper actions include:
    • Not performing timely 120-day certifications in 60 instances.
    • Incorrect recording of important elements during instrument checks; these include dry gas lot numbers and expiration dates, which can create issues in court when the lot numbers recorded by the technicians are wrong, or do not exist.
    • Sharing instrument passwords with jail staff.

August 21, 2019 – MSP received a corrective action plan from Intoximeters that outlined their action plan to correct the contractual failures.

August 23, 2019 – An Intoximeters technician committed a serious error that resulted in the dismissal of an OWI case in Montcalm County.

  • On August 23, 2019, the technician went to the Montcalm County Jail and signed the Datamaster Maintenance Log. The technician did not notify the MSP nor Intoximeters of this visit and did not submit any paperwork regarding the reason for his visit. Later that day, an MSP sergeant arrested an individual for OWI and utilized that instrument for evidential testing. MSP was first made aware of this technician’s August 23rd visit by the Montcalm County Prosecutor’s Office on November 15, 2019. The technician and Intoximeters were both unable to explain this visit, casting doubt on the reliability of any tests conducted on August 23, 2019 through August 26, 2019 when an accuracy check was performed by the technician. This lack of documentation resulted in the dismissal of this OWI case.

October 10, 2019 – Another serious error occurred that resulted in the dismissal of evidence in six cases in Wayne County.

  • On this date, a technician arrived at the Detroit Detention Center to perform a 120-day certification. The instrument failed testing, but the technician did not notice the failure. Consequently, he left the instrument in service until October 13, 2019.  During this 3-day period, the instrument was used for six OWI evidential breath tests. Because the instrument was not properly serviced and was left in service, these six cases did not have reliable breath evidence. The MSP sent a notice to the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office, which decided to dismiss the evidence in these cases.
  • Following discovery of this error, MSP requested removal of the technician responsible, with removal and replacement to occur no later than January 15, 2020. This never occurred due to the MSP actions taken on January 7 to issue the stop work order.

December 2019 – MSP began the process of establishing a unit within the Forensic Science Division to oversee the state’s breath alcohol testing program. The unit will be comprised of three equipment technician positions to maintain and certify the state’s breath alcohol testing equipment.

January 2, 2020 – During a routine audit of documents submitted by the vendor for the prior two-week period, an irregularity is noticed on an instrument at the Alpena County Sheriff’s Department.  The MSP immediately requested the original documents from the technician.

January 6, 2020 – MSP confirmed the irregularity was the result of the technician fabricating the paperwork for a required test that was not performed on the instrument.

  • A criminal investigation is opened by the MSP into possible forgery of a public document.  This investigation is ongoing.

January 7, 2020 – With potential criminal acts committed by an Intoximeters technician, the MSP issues a stop work order with the vendor and secures all equipment and paperwork from the three technicians.

January 10, 2020 – MSP finalizes an emergency plan to immediately bring all maintenance responsibilities for the state’s 203 instruments in-house, and notification is made to police and prosecutors of the stop work order and MSP’s new responsibilities.

January 13, 2020-  MSP personnel continued through the weekend to review records from the technicians yielding additional discrepancies involving a second technician and three more impacted instruments (Beverly Hills PD, Pittsfield Township PD, and Tecumseh PD), in which it is suspected that instrument calibration tests were again fabricated.

  • With this new information, MSP removes all 203 Datamaster DMT evidential breath alcohol testing instruments from service until they can be inspected and verified by MSP personnel to ensure they are properly calibrated.
  • MSP recommends to police agencies that they utilize blood draws rather than

Contact: Shanon Banner 517-284-3222
Jan. 16, 2020

Michigan State Police to expand roadside drug testing pilot

Michigan State Police to expand roadside drug testing pilot

Last November the Michigan State Police wrapped up a year long pilot program in five Michigan counties to test the accuracy of a roadside drug test.

In December lawmakers agreed to fund an expansion of the program based on its success.

A fatal crash in the Upper Peninsula city of Gladstone in 2013 was the catalyst behind the drug testing pilot. A semi-truck driver was convicted on six-felony charges in connection with the crash, including two counts of operating a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance causing death.

According to MSP the number of drug-impaired fatal crashes has increased over the ten year period between 2007 and 2017 by 151%, up from 98 to 246.

When his parents were killed in 2016, the couple’s son contacted his legislator who got the ball rolling on legislation to curb drugged driving.

Senator Thomas Casperson introduced a pair of bills to combat the problem and come up with a solution to roadside testing. Public Act 242 and 243 of 2016 became known as the Barbara J. and Thomas J. Swift Law, and police started looking at test instruments.

Members of MSP, prosecuting attorneys, toxicologists and forensic experts got together, forming the Oral Fluid Roadside Analysis Pilot Program Committee.

Their report was recently released along with the recommendation to expand the pilot state-wide for at least a year.

The oral fluid roadside test is the Alere DDS2, which detects six different drugs, including a component of cannabis known as Delta 9 THC. It also tests for the presence of amphetamine, cocaine, methamphetamine, opiates and benzodiazepines.

Program director, F/Lt. Jim Flegel said an independent laboratory as well as the MSP Forensic Lab tested the results, and across the board they proved accurate.

In all 92 people were tested and 89 were arrested. According to the report 83 people tested positive for substances; and over 80% of those who tested positive for cannabis.

As a result of the five-county pilot, MSP plans to continue working on the accuracy of the equipment, which it hopes will support permanent changes to the Motor Vehicle Code.

MSP is also training more officers across the state as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) who can spot impaired drivers and test them at the roadside.

A date to start the yearlong pilot program has not been set, but is expected to be sometime within 2019.

Media + Blog 

Planet Green Trees Podcast

Komorn Law In The News

Media

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) First Degree

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) First Degree

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: First DegreeCriminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) is a set of laws in Michigan that define and penalize various forms of sexual offenses. These laws are categorized into four degrees, with each degree reflecting the severity of the...

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) – Michigan

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) – Michigan

Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan: Definitions, Penalties, and Legal References.Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) is a set of laws in Michigan that define and penalize various forms of sexual offenses. These laws are categorized into four degrees, with each degree...

I’ve Been Accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan

I’ve Been Accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan

If you are innocent and falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in MichiganIf you are innocent and falsely accused of Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) in Michigan, it is crucial to act carefully and strategically to protect your rights and ensure the truth comes...

Carrying a Firearm Under the Influence of Cannabis

Carrying a Firearm Under the Influence of Cannabis

Laws and Penalties in Michigan of Carrying a Concealed Firearm or EMD Under the Influence of a Controlled Substance.Michigan controlled substance info at end of article and yes cannabis is still a controlled substance 1 at the time of this article... but it is an...

Carrying a Firearm Under the Influence of Alcohol in Michigan

Carrying a Firearm Under the Influence of Alcohol in Michigan

Laws and Penalties in Michigan of Carrying a Concealed Firearm or EMD Under the Influence of Alcohol or Controlled SubstanceAn individual shall not An individual shall not carry a concealed pistol or portable device that uses electro-muscular disruption (EMD)...

Are there exceptions that justify warrantless searches?

Are there exceptions that justify warrantless searches?

Exceptions to your 4th Amendment Rights against Search and Seizure (more to come).The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution safeguards citizens by prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures and generally mandates the necessity of a warrant for such intrusions....

Warrantless Searches in Michigan

Warrantless Searches in Michigan

I don't need a warrant for that...In Michigan, as in the rest of the United States, the Fourth Amendment of the fading Constitution provides individuals with protection against unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. Generally, this means that police...

One of Michigan’s Top DUI Attorneys

One of Michigan’s Top DUI Attorneys

We aggressively defend all aspects of traffic law, from simple civil infractions to more serious alcohol and drug-related offenses.  Don't wait till the last second to get an attorney.  That's how you lose.Why Attorney Michael Komorn is one of Michigan’s Top DUI...

Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – Second Offense

Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – Second Offense

Michigan DUI Laws and Consequences – Second Offense Operating Under the Influence (OUI) is a serious offense in Michigan. If someone is caught driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, they can face severe penalties. When it comes to a second offense, the...

2017 Data Statistics on Cell Phone Use and driving accidents

2017 Data Statistics on Cell Phone Use and driving accidents

An interesting read about a 5 year trend (2013-2017) accident and crash trends for drivers who admitted they were using cellphone. There is a link toward the bottom of the page to the PDF which has some detailed statistics with a pretty picture.  But you’ll read most of it here.

Michigan Traffic Crash Facts

Cell phone use can be a distraction for the driver, the bicyclist, and the pedestrian. Cell phone use in crashes is measured by reported use, which is recorded by the police officer at the scene of the crash.

2017 Traffic Crash Data

A total of 3,099 crashes occurred in Michigan where a motor vehicle driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist was using a cell phone. Twenty-one of those crashes involved a fatality.

A total of 3,076 motor vehicle drivers, 25 pedestrians, and nine bicyclists were reported to be using cell phones in the 3,099 crashes.
Of the 25 pedestrians using a cell phone, three pedestrians were killed, six suffered a suspected serious injury, ten suffered a suspected minor injury, and five suffered a possible injury.

Of the 3,076 motor vehicle drivers using cell phones, 618 (20.1%) were 20 years of age or younger.
There were 1,490 (48.1%) rear-end crashes where a driver was using a cell phone.


Charged with distracted driving or driving under the influence of marijuana or alcohol?  Contact Komorn Law for a free case evaluation 800-656-3557.


Of the total 3,099 crashes involving cell phone use, 609 (19.7%) also involved a lane departure.

Of the total 3,099 crashes involving cell phone use, 1,236 (39.9%) were intersection related.

There were 3,076 motor vehicle drivers using a cell phone in crashes: 2,713 passenger cars, 292 pickup trucks, 28 trucks or buses over 10,000 lbs., 11 small trucks under 10,000 lbs., ten vans or motorhomes, one motorcycle, four vehicle types coded as “other,” and 17 uncoded and errors.

*In 2016, the data field measuring cell phone use was changed to include multiple distraction elements. Increases in the number of cell phone crashes in 2016 and future years may be the result of the police report change.

 

See a Detailed Stats Report on Drivers Tested Positive for Cannabinoid Drugs

Michigan Traffic Crash Facts (Main Website)

 


About Komorn Law

Komorn Law has represented numerous clients through the legal chaos of starting up a business in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Industry.

If you or someone you know is facing charges as a result of Medical Marijuana, DUI, Drugs, Forfeiture, Criminal Enterprise, etc. Please contact our office and ensure you’re defended by an experienced lawyer in the evolving laws.

Lead attorney Michael Komorn is recognized as an expert on the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. He is the President of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Association (MMMA), a nonprofit patient advocacy group which advocates for the rights of medical marijuana patients and their caregivers.

Contact us for a free no-obligation case evaluation
800-656-3557.

Follow Komorn Law

2017 Stats for Drivers Tested Positive for Cannabinoid Drugs

2017 Stats for Drivers Tested Positive for Cannabinoid Drugs

An interesting read about a 5 year trend (2013-2017) accident and crash trends for drivers who tested positive for cannabinoid drug.  There is a link toward the bottom of the page to the PDF which has very detailed statistics.

Michigan State Police (MSP)

Drivers Tested Positive for Cannabinoid Drugs

(Delta 9, Hashish Oil, Hashish, Marijuana/Marihuana, Marinol, Tetrahydrocannabinols, THC, or Cannabinoid, type unknown)

2017 Traffic Crash Data

There were 174 drivers who tested positive for cannabinoid drug use involved in 169 motor vehicle crashes. Of those crashes, 131 were classified as fatal, resulting in 144 fatalities. An additional 156 persons were injured.

The highest number of motor vehicle crashes with drivers who tested positive for cannabinoid drug use (19) occurred in April and May, and the highest number of fatal crashes (17)and persons killed (19) occurred in May.


Charged with driving under the influence of marijuana or alcohol?
Contact Komorn Law for a free case evaluation 800-656-3557.


Michigan driver statistics indicate 6.5 percent of licensed drivers who tested positive for using cannabinoid drugs were age 16-20, and 16.7 percent of drivers who tested positive for using  cannabinoid drugs in crashes were also in that age group.

See the entire PDF report here which has very detailed breakdowns. It’s a really good breakdown except I  did not note where they said who was at fault.

Michigan Traffic Crash Facts (Main Website)

 


About Komorn Law

Komorn Law has represented numerous clients through the legal chaos of starting up a business in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Industry.

If you or someone you know is facing charges as a result of Medical Marijuana, DUI, Drugs, Forfeiture, Criminal Enterprise, etc. Please contact our office and ensure you’re defended by an experienced lawyer in the evolving laws.

Lead attorney Michael Komorn is recognized as an expert on the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. He is the President of the Michigan Medical Marijuana Association (MMMA), a nonprofit patient advocacy group which advocates for the rights of medical marijuana patients and their caregivers.

Contact us for a free no-obligation case evaluation
800-656-3557.

Follow Komorn Law

Have you been issued a summons, a citation or arrested for any of these or any crimes related to these…?

Have you been issued a summons, a citation or arrested for any of these or any crimes related to these…?

Have you been issued a summons, a citation or arrested for any of these or any crimes related to these...?

Operating while intoxicated (OWI)

Operating with any presence of a Schedule I drug or cocaine (DUID)

Operating under the influence of liquor (OUIL)

Operating while visibly impaired (OWVI)

Operating a vehicle while being under 21 with any alcohol content

Minor in possession of Drugs or Alcohol (MIP)

These are serious criminal offenses that can ruin your employment, cost you tens of thousands of dollars in fines and suspend your drivers license for months or possibly years.

If you can't drive...

You could lose your job

You could lose your children

You could lose your friends

You could lose your freedom

You should have a lawyer in your corner to mitigate your exposure of jeopardy.

Prosecutors and judges  will not be going "easy" on you if you plead guilty without a lawyer, they say that to get a plea, and then just beat you down with the maximum penalties.

The Komorn Law firm will find the mistakes, inaccuracies and omissions with the prosecutor's case against you while doing a dive deep into the specific details and circumstances to find the most favorable outcome. We will do the best to minimize your liabilities while maximizing your defenses.

We can answer any question you have about your arrest, citation or case. Or if you have already hired a lawyer, CALL US FOR A SECOND OPINION.

We have been instrumental in fixing other lawyers' complete failures, and have found that most lawyers just want to get you to pay a bunch of money to take a plea deal.


NEVER ACCEPT A PLEA DEAL until you get a second opinion from KOMORN LAW.


Details of Drunk Driving laws in Michigan.

Michigan Compiled Laws Section 257.625

MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE (EXCERPT)

Act 300 of 1949

257.625 Operating motor vehicle while intoxicated; "operating while intoxicated" defined; operating motor vehicle when visibly impaired; penalties for causing death or serious impairment of a body function; operation of motor vehicle by person less than 21 years of age; "any bodily alcohol content" defined; requirements; controlled substance; costs; enhanced sentence; guilty plea or nolo contendere; establishment of prior conviction; special verdict; public record; burden of proving religious service or ceremony; ignition interlock device; definitions; prior conviction; violations arising out of same transaction.

Sec. 625.

A person shall not operate a vehicle upon a road, including a parking lot, if the person is operating while intoxicated.

As used in this section, "operating while intoxicated" means any of the following:

The person is under the influence of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

Alcohol Limits:

The person has an alcohol content of 0.08 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

After October 1, 2021, the limits will be if the person has an alcohol content of 0.10 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

The person has an alcohol content of 0.17 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

The owner of a vehicle or a person in charge or in control of a vehicle shall not authorize or knowingly allow the vehicle to be operated by a person if any of the following apply:

The person is under the influence of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

The person has an alcohol content of 0.08 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine or, beginning October 1, 2021, the person has an alcohol content of 0.10 grams or more per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine.

The person's ability to operate the motor vehicle is visibly impaired due to the consumption of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance.

A person when, due to the consumption of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, or a combination of alcoholic liquor, a controlled substance, or other intoxicating substance, the person's ability to operate the vehicle is visibly impaired. If a person is charged with violating subsection (1), a finding of guilty under this subsection may be rendered.

A person who is less than 21 years of age shall not operate a vehicle if the person has any bodily alcohol content.

A person who violates the drunk driving laws in Michigan and is found guilty will be punished at different levels depending on drunkenness and if anyone was hurt or if there was a minor in the vehicle:

Felony imprisonment under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections for not less than 1 year or more than 5 years.

Probation with imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days or more than 1 year and community service for not less than 60 days or more than 180 days. Not less than 48 hours of this imprisonment must be served consecutively. This term of imprisonment must not be suspended.

Community service for not more than 60 days.

A fine of not more than $500.00.

Misdemeanor imprisonment for not more than 93 days.

DRUGGED DRIVING:

A person shall not operate a vehicle if the person has in his or her body any amount of a controlled substance listed in schedule 1 (heroin, marijuana) or schedule 2 (cocaine).

"Intoxicating substance" means any substance, preparation, or a combination of substances and preparations other than alcohol or a controlled substance, that is either of the following:

Recognized as a drug in any of the following publications or their supplements:

The official United States Pharmacopoeia.

The official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States.

The official National Formulary.