Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your DNA / biometric privacy?
Here’s what they say on their website
The Michigan State Police (MSP) is committed to protecting the privacy of your potentially personally identifiable data (PPID) in a strong and meaningful manner. Our privacy policy is designed to inform both members of the public and our employees about the PPID information we collect, how we use it, how we maintain it in our systems, under what circumstances you may access or correct your own information, and what we may disclose to others.
Biometric Identification Information
MSP may collect and use your biometric Information, including (but not limited to): fingerprint images, palm print images, iris images, digital images captured during your arrest or booking, and descriptive data associated with all images, identifying marks, scars, amputations, and tattoos, for identification and investigative purposes.
It may also require submission of biometric information for employment purposes. This information is protected, retained, and used in compliance with the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Records Act, Act 289 of 1925. This act also allows for data sharing between interstate, national, and international systems for criminal identification purposes.
Biometric Information may also be submitted voluntarily for specific programs, such as for identification of individuals with special health care needs, per the Fingerprinting Residents of this State Act, MCL 28.274.
DNA identification profile information may be collected, analyzed, indexed, and retained by MSP, as specified in the DNA Identification Profiling System Act, Act 250 of 1990. This act allows DNA profiles to be used for law enforcement identification purposes or to assist in the recovery or identification of human remains or missing persons. If personal identifiers are removed, it may also be used or shared for academic, research, statistical analysis, or protocol development purposes.
The following notice will be given to all individuals who provide a DNA sample (MSP FORM BID-016):
At the time a DNA sample is taken, please be advised:
(a) That, except as otherwise provided by law, your DNA sample or DNA profile, or both, shall be destroyed or expunged, as appropriate, if the charge for which the sample was obtained has been dismissed or resulted in acquittal, or no charge was filed within the limitations period.
(b) That your DNA sample or profile, or both, will not be destroyed or expunged, as appropriate, if MSP determines you are otherwise obligated to submit a sample or if it is evidence relating to another individual that would otherwise be retained under MCL 28.176.
(c) That the burden is on the arresting law enforcement agency and the prosecution to request the destruction or expunction of a DNA sample or profile as required under MCL 28.176, not on you.
Here’s what we say
Don’t talk to the police before, during or after your Miranda rights have been read without a lawyer present. If you do limit your information because what you say locks you into what you said. Just because you are not under arrest or being detained does not mean what you say will not be used against you.
Here is some information to review.
Don’t worry, a copy of your DNA has not been sent off to the Government Mountain Storage Facility for permanant storage out of view, or has it?
Legal Counsel and Your Rights
When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.
An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.
Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.
Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.
Research us and then call us.
More Rights You Should Know
Adverse Possession in Michigan – Can Someone Claim Your Property?
Understanding Adverse Possession in MichiganMichigan recognizes adverse possession, a legal doctrine allowing someone to acquire ownership of real property they've occupied for a specific period, even without a formal title.The Statute: MCL 600.5801 The relevant...
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Other Articles
Meet MiChap
Climate and Health Adaptation ProgramYou must save yourself from yourself.Meet MICHAPOur Vision: Michigan's public health system fosters equitable health and wellbeing as it adapts to the current and future impacts of climate change. Our Mission: The Michigan Climate...
Understanding the Rule of Completeness in Michigan Courts
Understanding the Rule of Completeness in Michigan Courts: MRE 106In the pursuit of truth and ensuring fairness during legal proceedings, the Michigan Rules of Evidence (MRE) play a crucial role. One particular rule, MRE 106 (Completeness), safeguards against...
Police seize 4,000 marijuana plants, processed weed worth $6.3M
HIGHLAND PARK, MI - Feb. 24, 2024 Michigan State Police say they busted a “large-scale illicit market” marijuana grow operation in metro Detroit. After a months long investigation, the Michigan State Police Marijuana & Tobacco Investigation Section conducted a...
Meet The Office of Global Michigan
Michigan Needs You to Open Your HomeIt's a big worldThe Office of Global Michigan works to make Michigan welcoming and inclusive. In alignment with this overarching goal, our office takes the lead in advancing equity and inclusion initiatives throughout the state,...
Protest about marijuana and tobacco sales to kids
Protest about marijuana and tobacco sales to kidsWatch the report here on Channel 7 WXYZ TV Detroit (who disabled the embedding feature)Related ArticlesMore Posts
Feds discover new methods to distinguish hemp and marijuana to assist crime labs
Federally funded researchers have uncovered two methods to divide and diversify the difference between hemp and cannabis to assist to crime labs. Because Cannabis is still a crime and Hemp is not...The Controlled Substance Act of 1970 classified the plant cannabis,...
Michigan: No Evidence of Widespread Discriminatory Policing Practices
No Evidence of Widespread Discriminatory Policing PracticesNever Ending Quest January 18, 2024 In the department’s continuing work to research and address racial disparities in traffic stops, independent consulting firm CNA has determined that racial disparities...
DEA – AG Miss Deadline to Respond on Cannabis Rescheduling
The Drug Enforcement Administration persists in maintaining secrecy around their process, disregarding a congressional request for transparency.Never Ending StoryThe Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Attorney General Merrick Garland missed a Feb. 12 deadline...













