Is the Michigan State Police really concerned about your DNA / biometric privacy?
Here’s what they say on their website
The Michigan State Police (MSP) is committed to protecting the privacy of your potentially personally identifiable data (PPID) in a strong and meaningful manner. Our privacy policy is designed to inform both members of the public and our employees about the PPID information we collect, how we use it, how we maintain it in our systems, under what circumstances you may access or correct your own information, and what we may disclose to others.
Biometric Identification Information
MSP may collect and use your biometric Information, including (but not limited to): fingerprint images, palm print images, iris images, digital images captured during your arrest or booking, and descriptive data associated with all images, identifying marks, scars, amputations, and tattoos, for identification and investigative purposes.
It may also require submission of biometric information for employment purposes. This information is protected, retained, and used in compliance with the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Records Act, Act 289 of 1925. This act also allows for data sharing between interstate, national, and international systems for criminal identification purposes.
Biometric Information may also be submitted voluntarily for specific programs, such as for identification of individuals with special health care needs, per the Fingerprinting Residents of this State Act, MCL 28.274.
DNA identification profile information may be collected, analyzed, indexed, and retained by MSP, as specified in the DNA Identification Profiling System Act, Act 250 of 1990. This act allows DNA profiles to be used for law enforcement identification purposes or to assist in the recovery or identification of human remains or missing persons. If personal identifiers are removed, it may also be used or shared for academic, research, statistical analysis, or protocol development purposes.
The following notice will be given to all individuals who provide a DNA sample (MSP FORM BID-016):
At the time a DNA sample is taken, please be advised:
(a) That, except as otherwise provided by law, your DNA sample or DNA profile, or both, shall be destroyed or expunged, as appropriate, if the charge for which the sample was obtained has been dismissed or resulted in acquittal, or no charge was filed within the limitations period.
(b) That your DNA sample or profile, or both, will not be destroyed or expunged, as appropriate, if MSP determines you are otherwise obligated to submit a sample or if it is evidence relating to another individual that would otherwise be retained under MCL 28.176.
(c) That the burden is on the arresting law enforcement agency and the prosecution to request the destruction or expunction of a DNA sample or profile as required under MCL 28.176, not on you.
Here’s what we say
Don’t talk to the police before, during or after your Miranda rights have been read without a lawyer present. If you do limit your information because what you say locks you into what you said. Just because you are not under arrest or being detained does not mean what you say will not be used against you.
Here is some information to review.
Don’t worry, a copy of your DNA has not been sent off to the Government Mountain Storage Facility for permanant storage out of view, or has it?
Legal Counsel and Your Rights
When facing legal challenges, particularly in criminal cases, it is advisable to seek legal counsel immediately.
An experienced attorney can provide guidance on how to navigate interactions with law enforcement while safeguarding your constitutional rights.
Since 1993 our expert legal defense in navigating criminal law matters and protecting your constitutional rights are what we eat for breakfast everyday.
Contact Komorn Law PLLC if you’re ready to fight and win.
Research us and then call us.
More Rights You Should Know
MI Court of Appeals – MRTMA defense denied dismissal
Does the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act protect you in all Marijuana scenarios?The Conflict The central issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), MCL 333.27951 et seq., prevents a...
The 6th Amendment – Do You Know What It Is?
The 6th Amendment: is it still a thing?The 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial pillar of the Bill of Rights, designed to ensure fair and just legal proceedings for individuals accused of crimes. Ratified on December 15, 1791, this amendment...
Other Articles
Understanding Superintending Control in Michigan Courts
Sometimes, a higher court needs to step in to ensure a lower court is properly administering justice. This powerful action is called "superintending control."In Michigan, our court system is designed as a "One Court of Justice," meaning that while there are different...
MI COA Upholds Constitutionality of State’s Terrorist Threat Statute
The ruling means that prosecutors can continue to use this law as a vital tool in holding individuals accountable for making threats of terrorism, provided they can demonstrate the defendant acted recklessly in communicating the threat. The statute does not require...
Elder and Vulnerable Adult Financial Exploitation in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Elder and Vulnerable Adult Financial ExploitationFinancial exploitation of elders and vulnerable adults is a growing and particularly insidious crime in Michigan, preying on individuals who, due to age, disability, or mental incapacity, are unable...
Sextortion and Sexploitation in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Sextortion and SexploitationSextortion and sexploitation are increasingly prevalent and devastating forms of digital abuse, leveraging technology to coerce, manipulate, and exploit individuals, often for sexual gratification or financial gain....
Another look at People v Soto (MRTMA Defense Denied)
Another look at People v. Soto: Application of Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act to Felony ChargesMichigan's cannabis landscape is evolving rapidly, marked by a nuanced exploration of the People v. Soto case and its implications for the Michigan Regulation and...
MSC has ruled against extensive warrantless searches of cell phones.
The Michigan Supreme Court recently issued a significant ruling on August 1, 2025, limiting the ability of law enforcement to conduct broad, warrantless searches of cell phones during criminal investigations.Summary The Michigan Supreme Court recently issued a...
Michigan State Police Bust $10 Million Marijuana Grow
Sometimes, a higher court needs to step in to ensure a lower court is properly administering justice. This powerful action is called "superintending control."Lake County, MI – In a significant enforcement action, the Michigan State Police (MSP) recently seized over...
Extortion and Racketeering in Michigan
FAQs and Laws about Extortion and RacketeeringExtortion and racketeering represent serious criminal offenses in Michigan, targeting individuals who use threats, intimidation, or participate in organized criminal enterprises to obtain money, property, or undue...
