The case People of Michigan v. Freddie Wilkins III (No. 367209) revolves around a legal challenge regarding the search of a vehicle without a warrant.
Police conducted a warrantless search under the “automobile exception.”
The case People of Michigan v. Freddie Wilkins III (No. 367209) revolves around a legal challenge regarding the search of a vehicle without a warrant.
Wilkins appealed a conviction stemming from the discovery of unregistered firearms in his car after police conducted a warrantless search under the “automobile exception.”
This legal principle allows law enforcement to search a vehicle without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime.
In the Wilkins’ case, the search was triggered by the odor of marijuana, which raised questions under Michigan’s marijuana laws.
While the odor of marijuana previously constituted probable cause, recent changes under Michigan’s recreational marijuana law, the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), complicate this.
The court debated whether the smell of marijuana alone still justifies a search, especially since possession of small amounts is now legal for adults.
The appellate court highlighted that for the search to be lawful, additional suspicious factors would need to accompany the marijuana smell to support probable cause for finding contraband.
Use You Right To Remain Silent
If you have been accused or charged with a crime.
Say nothing to anyone. Talk to us first.
Our firm is experienced in both State and Federal courts defending clients.
CALL NOW
The case draws comparisons to similar rulings like People v. Armstrong, where Michigan courts have reconsidered the application of the automobile exception in light of the state’s evolving marijuana laws.
The central question in both instances revolves around whether the smell of cannabis, in conjunction with additional elements such as the driver’s deceptive behavior, provides sufficient grounds for conducting a search without a warrant.
The appeal in People of Michigan v. Freddie Wilkins III (No. 367209) was denied because the Michigan Court of Appeals found that there was no immediate need for further appellate review.
Wilkins had argued that the search of his vehicle was unconstitutional under the “automobile exception” because the smell of marijuana alone, without additional suspicious circumstances, did not provide probable cause to search the car.
However, the court determined that existing case law supported the legality of the search, particularly when other factors (such as the behavior of the suspect) combined with the odor of marijuana.
The appeal in People of Michigan v. Freddie Wilkins III (No. 367209) was denied because the Michigan Court of Appeals found that there was no immediate need for further appellate review.
Wilkins had argued that the search of his vehicle was unconstitutional under the “automobile exception” because the smell of marijuana alone, without additional suspicious circumstances, did not provide probable cause to search the car.
However, the court determined that existing case law supported the legality of the search, particularly when other factors (such as the behavior of the suspect) combined with the odor of marijuana.
Similar Cases
A number of legal cases have scrutinized the legitimacy of performing warrantless vehicle searches based on the scent of marijuana, especially in light of the evolving status of marijuana laws:
People v. Armstrong (2023): In this instance, the courts in Michigan reassessed the applicability of the automobile exception, taking into consideration the provisions outlined in the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA).
The court ruled that while the smell of marijuana could still contribute to probable cause, it must be accompanied by other suspicious factors to justify a search. This case closely mirrors Wilkins, where the search was based on marijuana odor but also raised questions about unregistered firearms found during the search.
People v. Kazmierczak (2000): Previously, Michigan courts held that the smell of marijuana alone was sufficient to establish probable cause for a vehicle search.
However, this decision was later overruled in part due to changes in marijuana laws.
This case laid the groundwork for discussions like those in Wilkins, where courts must determine if the presence of marijuana (legal in small amounts) is enough to justify a search.
People v. Moorman (2020): During a traffic stop, a police officer detected the scent of marijuana, and when the defendant denied possessing any, this denial, along with the odor, provided the officer with probable cause to conduct a search of the vehicle.
The court found that the defendant’s behavior, along with the odor, justified the search, similar to the arguments presented in Wilkins. The ruling was based on the idea that such behavior suggests illegal possession beyond the legal limits
Note: This article provides a general overview and does not substitute for legal advice. Anyone charged with a CSC offense should consult an attorney for specific legal guidance.
More Articles
Criminal Law FAQs – Traffic Offenses
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Traffic OffensesAccording to Michigan State Law (Michigan Compiled Laws - MCL), Traffic Offenses encompass a wide range of violations related to the operation of motor vehicles on public roads and highways. These offenses are primarily...
Criminal Law FAQs – Drunk and Disorderly
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Drunk and DisorderlyAccording to Michigan State Law (Michigan Compiled Laws - MCL), there isn't a specific statute that solely defines "Public Drunkenness" as a statewide criminal offense in the same way some other states might have a...
Criminal Law FAQs – Drinking Alcohol or Smoking Marijuana and Driving
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Operating a Motor Vehicle Under The InfluenceWalking is cool... For fun and excercise. Not because you lost your license. Don't do the crime if you can't pay the price. But if you do get charged with a crime. Better Call Komorn to fight for...
Criminal Law FAQs – Probation Violations
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Theft CrimesAccording to Michigan State Law (Michigan Compiled Laws - MCL), a Probation Violation occurs when a person who has been sentenced to probation fails to comply with the terms and conditions of their probation order. These terms...
Criminal Law FAQs – Theft Crimes
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Theft CrimesAccording to Michigan State Law (Michigan Compiled Laws - MCL), Theft Crimes generally involve the unlawful taking of someone else's property with the intent to deprive them of it, either permanently or for a significant period....
Criminal Law FAQs – Domestic Violence
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Domestic ViolenceAccording to Michigan State Law, Domestic Violence is not a standalone criminal offense but rather a designation applied to certain crimes when the victim is a "spouse or former spouse, an individual with whom the person...
Criminal Law FAQs – Assault and Battery
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Assault and BatteryAccording to Michigan State Law, Assault and Battery are distinct but often related offenses. There isn't one single statute that explicitly defines both terms together. Instead, their definitions have evolved through...
Other Bodily Fluid House Hearing – HB-4391- Update 5-22-25
Michigan House HearingHB-4391 Saliva Test Update 5-22-25Watch the hearing or read the summary.Click here or image below to see videoFYI: Marijuana although voted to be legalized is still classified as a controlled substance in the State of Michigan and Federally. More...
Criminal Law FAQs – Marijuana Offenses
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Marijuana OffensesFAQ 1: Is recreational marijuana legal in Michigan? Answer: Yes, recreational marijuana is legal for adults 21 and over in Michigan. However, there are restrictions on possession, use in public places, and driving under...
Criminal Law FAQs – Operating While Intoxicated (DUI – OWI)
Michigan Criminal Laws FAQs Drunk Driving (Operating While Intoxicated - OWI)FAQ 1: What is the legal blood alcohol content (BAC) limit in Michigan? Answer: In Michigan, the legal BAC limit for operating a vehicle is 0.08% for individuals 21 years of age or older. For...